Try our mobile app
-FN6 - VIE's
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form
(Mark One)
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number
Commission file number
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
||
|
||
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) |
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
|
||
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class |
|
Trading Symbol(s) |
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered |
|
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None (Apartment Investment and Management Company)
Partnership Common Units (Aimco OP L.P.)
(title of each class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined by Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Apartment Investment and Management Company: |
Aimco OP L.P.: |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Apartment Investment and Management Company: Yes ☐ |
Aimco OP L.P.: Yes ☐ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Apartment Investment and Management Company: |
Aimco OP L.P.: |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
Apartment Investment and Management Company: Yes ☒ No ☐ |
Aimco OP L.P.: Yes ☒ No ☐ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Apartment Investment and Management Company:
☒ |
|
Accelerated filer |
☐ |
|
Non-accelerated filer |
☐ |
|
Smaller reporting company |
|
|
|
|
Emerging growth company |
Aimco OP L.P.:
Large accelerated filer |
☐ |
|
Accelerated filer |
☐ |
Non-accelerated filer |
☐ |
|
Smaller reporting company |
|
|
|
|
Emerging growth company |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Apartment Investment and Management Company: |
Aimco OP L.P.: |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.
Apartment Investment and Management Company: Yes ☒ No ☐ |
Aimco OP L.P.: Yes ☒ No ☐ |
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Apartment Investment and Management Company: Yes |
Aimco OP L.P.: Yes |
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock of Apartment Investment and Management Company held by non-affiliates of Apartment Investment and Management Company was approximately $
As of February 24, 2023, there were
Documents Incorporated by Reference
EXPLANATORY NOTE
Apartment Investment and Management Company ("Aimco" or "the Company"), a Maryland corporation, is a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT. On December 15, 2020, Aimco completed the separation of its business into two, separate and distinct, publicly traded companies, Aimco and Apartment Income REIT Corp. (“AIR”). The separation was effected by way of a pro rata distribution, in which stockholders of Aimco received one share of Class A common stock of AIR for every one share of Class A common stock of Aimco held as of the close of business on December 5, 2020. Apartment Income REIT, L.P. (“AIR Operating Partnership”), formerly known as “Aimco Properties, L.P.” until July 7, 2021, also completed a pro rata distribution of all of the outstanding common limited partnership units of Aimco OP L.P. ("Aimco Operating Partnership" and such units, "OP Units") to holders of AIR Operating Partnership common limited partnership units and AIR Operating Partnership Class I High Performance partnership units as of the close of business on December 5, 2020. The transactions described in this paragraph are collectively referred to as the “Separation” and are governed by the terms of the Separation and Distribution Agreement (the “Separation Agreement”).
Notwithstanding the legal form of the Separation, for accounting and financial reporting purposes, Aimco is presented as being spun-off from AIR. This presentation is in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States and is due primarily to the relative significance of Aimco’s business, as measured in terms of revenue, net income, assets, and other relevant indicators, as compared to those indicators for AIR before the Separation. Therefore, Aimco is considered “spun” for accounting purposes and AIR is considered the divesting entity and treated as the accounting spinner, or accounting predecessor. A separate capital structure did not exist since the assets, liabilities and operations of Aimco prior to the Separation (Aimco and AIR together, as they existed prior to the Separation, “Aimco Predecessor”) were spread across multiple legal entities. Events noted in this filing as occurring before December 15, 2020, were those entered into by Aimco Predecessor. The historical financial statements of Aimco do not represent the financial position and results of operations of one legal entity, but rather a combination of entities under common control that have been “carved out” from Aimco Predecessor’s financial statements.
Aimco, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, is the general partner and directly is the special limited partner of Aimco Operating Partnership. As of December 31, 2022, Aimco owned 92.6% of the legal interest in the common partnership units of Aimco Operating Partnership and 94.9% of the economic interest in Aimco Operating Partnership. The remaining 7.4% legal interest is owned by limited partners. As the sole general partner of Aimco Operating Partnership, Aimco has exclusive control of Aimco Operating Partnership’s day-to-day management.
Aimco Operating Partnership holds all of Aimco's assets and manages the daily operations of Aimco's business. Pursuant to the Aimco Operating Partnership agreement, Aimco is required to contribute to Aimco Operating Partnership all proceeds from the offerings of its securities. In exchange for the contribution of such proceeds, Aimco receives additional interests in Aimco Operating Partnership with similar terms (e.g., if Aimco contributes proceeds of a stock offering, Aimco receives partnership units with terms substantially similar to the stock issued by Aimco).
This filing combines the Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, of Aimco and Aimco Operating Partnership. Where it is important to distinguish between the two entities, we refer to them specifically. As used herein and except as the context otherwise requires, “we,” “our,” and “us” refer to Aimco, Aimco Operating Partnership and their consolidated subsidiaries, collectively.
We believe combining the periodic reports of Aimco and Aimco Operating Partnership into this single report provides the following benefits:
We operate Aimco and Aimco Operating Partnership as one enterprise, the management of Aimco directs the management and operations of Aimco Operating Partnership, and Aimco OP GP, LLC, Aimco Operating Partnership’s general partner, is member managed by Aimco.
We believe it is important to understand the few differences between Aimco and Aimco Operating Partnership in the context of how Aimco and Aimco Operating Partnership operate as a consolidated company. Aimco has no assets or liabilities other than its investment in Aimco Operating Partnership. Also, Aimco is a corporation that issues publicly traded equity from time to time, whereas Aimco Operating Partnership is a partnership that has no publicly traded equity. Except for the net proceeds from stock offerings by Aimco, which are contributed to Aimco Operating Partnership in exchange for additional limited partnership interests (of a similar type and in an amount equal to the shares of stock sold in the offering), Aimco Operating Partnership generates all
remaining capital required by its business. These sources include Aimco Operating Partnership’s working capital, net cash provided by operating activities, borrowings under its revolving credit facility, the issuance of debt and equity securities, including additional partnership units, and proceeds received from the sale of real estate.
Equity, partners’ capital, and noncontrolling interests are the main areas of difference between the consolidated financial statements of Aimco and those of Aimco Operating Partnership. Interests in Aimco Operating Partnership held by entities other than Aimco, are classified within partners’ capital in Aimco Operating Partnership’s consolidated financial statements and as noncontrolling interests in Aimco’s consolidated financial statements.
To help investors understand the differences between Aimco and Aimco Operating Partnership, this report provides separate consolidated financial statements for Aimco and Aimco Operating Partnership; a single set of consolidated notes to such financial statements that includes separate discussions of each entity’s stockholders’ equity or partners’ capital, and earnings per share or earnings per unit, as applicable; and a combined Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section that includes discrete information related to each entity.
This report also includes separate Part II, Item 9A. Controls and Procedures sections and separate Exhibits 31 and 32 certifications for Aimco and Aimco Operating Partnership in order to establish that the requisite certifications have been made and that Aimco and Aimco Operating Partnership are both compliant with Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and 18 U.S.C. §1350.
APARTMENT INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY
AIMCO OP, L.P.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2022
Item |
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
2 |
|
|
|
|
1A. |
5 |
|
|
|
|
1B. |
20 |
|
|
|
|
2. |
20 |
|
|
|
|
3. |
20 |
|
|
|
|
4. |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. |
21 |
|
|
|
|
6. |
[Reserved] |
|
|
|
|
7. |
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
24 |
|
|
|
7A. |
34 |
|
|
|
|
8. |
34 |
|
|
|
|
9. |
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
35 |
|
|
|
9A. |
35 |
|
|
|
|
9B. |
39 |
|
|
|
|
9C. |
Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions That Prevent Inspections |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. |
40 |
|
|
|
|
11. |
58 |
|
|
|
|
12. |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
85 |
|
|
|
13. |
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence |
86 |
|
|
|
14. |
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15. |
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16. |
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a “safe harbor” for forward-looking statements in certain circumstances. Certain information included in this Annual Report contains or may contain information that is forward-looking, within the meaning of the federal securities laws, including, without limitation, statements regarding: the ongoing relationship between Aimco and AIR (the "Separate Entities") following the Separation; adverse economic and geopolitical conditions, including as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, which negatively impact our operations, including on our ability to maintain current or meet projected occupancy, rental rate and property operating results; the effect of acquisitions, dispositions, developments, and redevelopments; including our ability to meet budgeted costs and timelines, and achieve budgeted rental rates related to our development and redevelopment investments; expectations regarding sales of our apartment communities and the use of proceeds thereof; the availability and cost of corporate debt; and our ability to comply with debt covenants, including financial coverage ratios.
These forward-looking statements are based on management’s judgment as of this date, which is subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations, including, but not limited to: the effects and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic, geopolitical events which may adversely affect the markets in which our securities trade, and other macro-economic conditions , including, among other things, supply chain challenges, rising interest rates and inflation, all of which heightens the impact of the other risks and factors described herein, and the impact on entities in which we hold a partial interest, including its indirect interest in the partnership that owns Parkmerced Apartments; real estate and operating risks, including fluctuations in real estate values and the general economic climate in the markets in which we operate and competition for residents in such markets; national and local economic conditions, including the pace of job growth and the level of unemployment; the amount, location and quality of competitive new housing supply; the timing and effects of acquisitions, dispositions, developments and redevelopments; expectations regarding sales of apartment communities and the use of proceeds thereof; insurance risks, including the cost of insurance, and natural disasters and severe weather such as hurricanes; supply chain disruptions, particularly with respect to raw materials such as lumber, steel, and concrete; financing risks, including the availability and cost of financing; the risk that cash flows from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest; the risk that earnings may not be sufficient to maintain compliance with debt covenants, including financial coverage ratios; legal and regulatory risks, including costs associated with prosecuting or defending claims and any adverse outcomes; the terms of laws and governmental regulations that affect us and interpretations of those laws and regulations; possible environmental liabilities, including costs, fines or penalties that may be incurred due to necessary remediation of contamination of apartment communities presently owned by us; the relationship between the Separate Entities after the Separation; the ability and willingness of the Separate Entities and their subsidiaries to meet and/or perform their obligations under any contractual arrangements that were entered into among the parties in connection with the Separation and any of their obligations to indemnify, defend and hold the other party harmless from and against various claims, litigation and liabilities; and the ability to achieve some or all the benefits that we expect to achieve from the Separation; and such other risks and uncertainties described from time to time in filings by the Separate Entities with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
In addition, our current and continuing qualification as a real estate investment trust involves the application of highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and depends on our ability to meet the various requirements imposed by the Code, through actual operating results, distribution levels and diversity of stock ownership.
Readers should carefully review our financial statements and the notes thereto, as well as the section entitled “Risk Factors” described in Item 1A of this Annual Report and subsequent documents we file from time to time with the SEC.
Certain financial and operating measures found herein and used by management are not defined under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). These measures are defined and reconciled to the most comparable GAAP measures under the Non-GAAP Measures heading.
1
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
The Company
Aimco, a Maryland corporation incorporated on January 10, 1994, is a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”). Aimco is, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, the general and special limited partner of Aimco Operating Partnership, a Delaware Limited Partnership. Aimco conducts all of its business and owns all of its assets through Aimco Operating Partnership.
On December 15, 2020, we completed the Separation, creating two separate and distinct, publicly traded companies, Aimco and AIR. Additional information regarding the Separation is contained in the Explanatory Note.
Please refer to Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for discussion regarding our business segments.
Executive Overview
Our mission is to make real estate investments, primarily focused on the multifamily sector within targeted U.S. markets, where outcomes are enhanced through our human capital and substantial value is created for investors, teammates, and the communities in which we operate.
Our value proposition includes our:
Our primary goal is outsized risk-adjusted returns and accelerating growth for our shareholders. We are focused on providing superior total-return performance to shareholders, primarily through capital appreciation driven by accretive investment and active portfolio management over multi-year periods. We plan to reinvest earnings to facilitate growth and, therefore, do not presently intend to pay a regular quarterly cash dividend.
Our financial objectives are to create value and produce superior, project-level, risk-adjusted returns on equity as measured by the investment period Internal Rate of Return (“IRR”) and the project-level Multiple on Invested Capital (“MOIC”). We measure broader performance based on Net Asset value (“NAV”) growth over time.
Our capital allocation strategy was designed to leverage our investment platform and optimize risk-adjusted returns for our shareholders.
Aimco targets a balanced allocation which includes investments in “Value Add” and “Opportunistic” multifamily real estate, primarily located in South Florida, the Washington DC Metro Area and Colorado’s Front Range, plus investment in a geographically diversified portfolio of “Core” and “Core-Plus” apartment communities.
In addition, we currently hold select alternative assets, consisting primarily of indirect, real estate related, debt and equity investments. We plan to significantly reduce our allocation to these investments over time.
We have policies in place that support our stated strategy, guide our investment allocations, and manage risk, including to hold at all times a sizeable portion of our net equity in stabilized cash-flowing assets and to require cash or committed credit necessary for completion of development and redevelopment projects prior to their commencement.
Given our stated strategy, it is expected that at any point in time the value-creation process will be ongoing at numerous of our investments. Over time, we expect our enterprise to produce superior returns on equity on a risk-adjusted basis and it is our plan to do so by:
We have corporate headquarters in Denver, Colorado and Washington, D.C. Our investment platform is managed by experienced professionals based in three regions, where we will focus our new investment activity: Southeast Florida and the Washington D.C. Metro Area and Colorado's Front Range. By regionalizing this platform, we are able to leverage
2
the in-depth local market knowledge of each regional leader, creating a comparative advantage when sourcing, evaluating, and executing investment opportunities.
Our dedicated team will source and execute development and redevelopment projects, and various other direct investment strategies. Our development and redevelopment portfolio currently includes $0.8 billion of projects in construction and lease-up. In addition, our team has secured significant, high-quality, future development opportunities, including total potential of approximately 14 million square feet, located in high-growth markets. Generally, we seek direct investment opportunities in locations where barriers to entry are high, target customers can be clearly defined and where we have a comparative advantage over others in the market.
Our entire portfolio of operating properties includes 26 apartment communities (22 consolidated properties and four unconsolidated properties) with average rents in line with local market averages (generally defined as B class). We also own one commercial office building that is part of an assemblage with an adjacent apartment building. The target composition of our stabilized portfolio will continue to include primarily B multifamily assets, spread across a geographically diversified portfolio and with a bias toward long established residential neighborhoods that rank highly in regard to schools, employment fundamentals and state and regional governance. Core-Plus opportunities offer the opportunity for incremental capital investment while maintaining stabilized cashflow to accelerate income growth and improve asset values.
We currently hold select alternative investments the majority of which originated with Aimco Predecessor and, over time, plan to significantly reduce capital allocated to these investments. Our current allocation to alternative investments includes: our indirect interest mezzanine loan to the Parkmerced partnership which owns 3,165 apartment homes and future development rights in San Francisco, California, and our passive equity investments in IQHQ, Inc. (“IQHQ”), a privately-held life sciences real estate development company, and in property technology funds consisting of entities that develop technology related to the real estate industry.
At all times, we will guard our liquidity by maintaining sufficient cash and committed credit.
From time-to-time, we will allocate capital to financial assets designed to mitigate risks elsewhere in our enterprise. Existing examples include our option to acquire an interest rate swap designed to protect against repricing risk on our maturing liabilities and the use of rate caps to provide protection against increases in interest rates on in-place loans.
We expect to capitalize our activities through a combination of non-recourse property debt, construction loans, third-party equity, and the recycling of our equity, including retained earnings. We plan to limit the use of recourse leverage, with a strong preference towards non-recourse property-level debt in order to limit risk to our enterprise. When warranted, we plan to seek equity capital from joint venture partners to improve our cost of capital, further leverage our equity, reduce exposure to a single investment and, in certain cases, for strategic benefits.
Competition
There are many developers, managers, and owners of apartment real estate and underdeveloped land, as well as REITs, private real estate companies, and investors, that compete with us in acquiring, developing, obtaining financing for, and disposing of apartment communities. This competition affects our ability to realize our real estate development and transactional objectives.
In addition, our apartment communities compete for residents with other housing alternatives, including other rental apartments and condominiums, and single-family homes that are available for rent, as well as new and existing condominiums and single-family homes for sale. Competitive residential housing, as well as household formation and job creation in a particular area, could adversely affect our ability to lease apartment homes and to increase or maintain rental rates.
Taxation
Aimco
Aimco has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), commencing with its initial taxable year, and intends to continue to operate in such a manner. The Code imposes various requirements related to organizational structure, distribution levels, diversity of stock ownership, and certain restrictions with regard to owned assets
3
and categories of income that must be met in order to continue to qualify as a REIT. If Aimco continues to qualify for taxation as a REIT, it will generally not be subject to United States federal corporate income tax on its taxable income that is currently distributed to stockholders. This treatment substantially eliminates the “double taxation” (at the corporate and stockholder levels) that generally results from an investment in a corporation.
Certain of our operations, or a portion thereof, are conducted through taxable REIT subsidiaries, each of which we refer to as a “TRS”. A TRS is a corporate subsidiary that has elected to be a TRS instead of a REIT and, as such, is subject to United States federal corporate income tax.
Aimco Operating Partnership
Aimco Operating Partnership is treated as a “pass-through” entity for United States federal income tax purposes and is not subject to United States federal income taxation. Partners in Aimco Operating Partnership, however, are subject to tax on their allocable share of partnership income, gains, losses, deductions, and credits, regardless of whether the partners receive any actual distributions of cash or other property from Aimco Operating Partnership during the taxable year. Generally, the characterization of any particular item is determined by Aimco Operating Partnership rather than at the partner level, and the amount of a partner’s allocable share of such item is governed by the terms of Aimco Operating Partnership’s Partnership Agreement. Aimco Operating Partnership is subject to tax in certain states.
Regulation
General
Apartment development is subject to various laws, ordinances, and regulations, including those concerning entitlement, building, health and safety, site and building design, environment, zoning, and sales, and similar matters apply to or affect the real estate development industry.
Apartment communities and their owners are subject to various laws, ordinances, and regulations, including those related to real estate broker licensing and regulations relating to recreational facilities such as swimming pools, activity centers, and other common areas.
Changes in laws increasing the potential liability for environmental conditions existing on communities or increasing the restrictions on discharges or other conditions, as well as changes in laws affecting development, construction, and safety requirements, may result in significant unanticipated expenditures, which could adversely affect our net income and cash flows from operating activities.
In addition, existing rent control laws, as well as future enactment of rent control or rent stabilization laws, or other laws and ordinances regulating multifamily housing, may reduce rental revenue or increase operating costs in particular markets.
Environmental
Various federal, state, and local laws subject real estate owners or operators to liability for management, and the costs of removal or remediation, of certain potentially hazardous materials that may be present. These materials may include lead-based paint, asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls, and petroleum-based fuels. Such laws often impose liability without regard to fault or whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release or presence of such materials. In connection with the ownership of real estate, we could potentially be liable for environmental liabilities or costs associated with our real estate, whether currently owned, acquired in the future, or owned in the past. These and other risks related to environmental matters are described in more detail in Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Corporate Responsibility
Corporate responsibility is an important part of our business. As with all other aspects of our business, our corporate responsibility program focuses on continuous improvement, to the benefit of our stockholders, our residents, our teammates, our communities, and the environment. We actively discuss these matters with our stockholders and solicit their feedback on our program.
Environmental, Social, Governance Policies
We updated our Environmental, Social, Governance ("ESG ") policies and published a Corporate Responsibility Report reflecting our ESG priorities and performance.
4
We remain committed to providing best-in-class living environments that mitigate risk while reducing environmental impacts and creating value. Our ESG policies are in place to guide this commitment and are applicable to all new construction, existing assets, and corporate operations. These policies are also taken into consideration when hiring suppliers and procuring materials.
Human Capital and Culture
We believe our most valuable asset is our human capital, and are committed to fostering, cultivating, and preserving a welcoming and inclusive culture for all teammates. Our success is reliant on the collective sum of individual talents.
We continuously invest in our teammates and company culture to ensure employee satisfaction, health, and well-being.
We hire and promote employees based upon their unique experiences, abilities, talents, and drive. This naturally leads to a workforce rich with diverse backgrounds and perspectives, leading to improved outcomes.
We focus on succession planning and talent development to produce a strong, stable team that is the foundation of our success. We are responsible for and implement succession planning in all leadership positions, both in the short term and the long term.
We offer benefits and support reinforcing our emphasis on the health and well-being of our teammates, including 16 weeks of paid time for parental leave to new mothers and fathers, a longstanding policy of workplace flexibility for our teammates to attend to personal and family matters during the workweek, office environments focused on natural light and ergonomic office furniture including adjustable height desks, access to Company-provided healthy snacks and drinks, paid time annually to volunteer in local communities, and a bonus structure at all levels of the organization.
We evaluate team engagement and retention and include those in our goals on which all teammates are compensated. Every teammate is surveyed annually via a third-party confidential survey. The teammate engagement score consists of the average of the responses to the questions that comprise the engagement index, on a scale of 1 to 5, for all teammates who complete the survey during the year. Our overall team engagement score for the 2022 Annual Lifecycle Surveys was 4.52, with a 91% overall response rate, compared to the target score of 4.20.
As of December 31, 2022, we had 62 full-time team members, approximately 60% performing development or transactional services with the balance managing corporate and area functions, including debt and capital market transactions, legal, finance, accounting, and other support functions. None of our employees are represented by labor unions.
In 2022, Aimco was recognized with Healthiest Employers Awards in South Florida, Washington, D.C., and Denver, ranking #1 in its category for South Florida, #2 in its category for Washington, D.C., and a top scorer in Denver's medium sized employer category. The Healthiest Employers Awards honor companies with policies and initiatives promoting the health and well-being of their employees. Healthiest Employers takes a holistic view of worksite health, evaluating the extent of leadership team buy-in, including how well they understand the needs of the employee population and how they proactively support well-being.
Available Information
Our combined Annual Report on Form 10-K, our combined Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K filed by us or Aimco Operating Partnership, and any amendments to any of those reports that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission are available free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable through our website at www.aimco.com. The information contained on our website is not incorporated into this Annual Report.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The risk factors noted in this section, and other factors noted throughout this Annual Report, describe certain risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement.
RISKS RELATED TO BUSINESS
Adverse economic and geopolitical conditions, health crises and dislocations in the financial and credit markets could affect our ability to collect rents and late fees from tenants, and our ability to evict tenants, in addition to having other negative effects on our business, which in turn could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Adverse economic and geopolitical conditions, local, regional, national, or international health crises and dislocations in the credit markets could negatively impact our tenants and our operations. The occurrence of regional epidemics or a global pandemic, such as COVID-19 may adversely affect our operations, financial condition, and results of operations. These conditions also may add uncertainty to operations and may cause supply chain disruptions.
5
The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic or another health crisis, adverse economic or geopolitical events or dislocation in the financial and credit markets have negatively impacted or would negatively impact our operations or those of entities in which we hold a partial interest, including:
Given the nature of the effects of the COVID-19, it remains challenging to predict the ultimate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the global economy, our residents and commercial tenants, our communities, and the operations of entities in which we hold an interest (including our economic interest in the partnership owning the “Parkmerced Apartments”), or if disruptions are likely to continue. The extent of such impact will depend on developments, such as the emergence of new COVID-19 variants. Such developments, depending on their nature, duration, and intensity, could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition. The COVID-19 pandemic also may have the effect of heightening many of the other risks described below.
We do not have control over the partnership owning the Parkmerced Apartments, the operation of which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Our indirect interest in the partnership owning the Parkmerced Apartments is subject to certain risks, including, but not limited to, exposure to the skill and capital of the controlling party and those resulting from fluctuations in San Francisco occupancy rates, the operating disruption due to effects of COVID-19, and the current economic situation which may result in all, or a portion of the loan not being repaid. In the future, we may have situations like the Parkmerced Apartments impairment that may affect us. Such risks could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Development, redevelopment, and construction risks could affect our profitability.
Development and redevelopment are subject to numerous risks, including the following:
6
Some of these development risks may be heightened given current uncertain and potentially volatile market conditions. If market volatility causes economic conditions to remain unpredictable or to trend downwards, we may not achieve our expected returns on properties under development and we could lose some or all of our investments in those properties. In addition, the lead time required to develop, construct, and lease-up a development property may increase, which could adversely impact our projected returns or result in a termination of the development project.
In addition, we may serve as either the construction manager or the general contractor for our development projects. The construction of real estate projects entails unique risks, including risks that the project will fail to conform to building plans, specifications, and timetables. These failures could be caused by labor strikes, weather, government regulations, and other conditions beyond our control. In addition, we may become liable for injuries and accidents occurring during the construction process that are underinsured.
Failure to generate sufficient net operating income may adversely affect our liquidity, limit our ability to fund necessary capital expenditures, or adversely affect our ability to pay dividends or distributions.
Our ability to fund necessary capital expenditures on our communities and make payments to our investors depends on, among other things, our ability to generate net operating income in excess of required debt payments and our ability to collect on interest and principal payments due to us. If we are unable to fund capital expenditures on our communities, we may not be able to preserve the competitiveness of our communities, which could adversely affect their net operating income and long-term value.
Our net operating income and liquidity may be adversely affected by events or conditions beyond our control, including:
7
Our business and financial results could be adversely affected by significant inflation, higher interest rates or deflation.
Inflation can adversely affect us by increasing costs of land, materials and labor. In addition, significant inflation is often accompanied by higher interest rates, which have a negative impact on housing affordability. Rising interest rates increase the borrowing costs on new debt and could affect fair value of our investments. In an inflationary environment, our cost of capital, labor and materials can increase and the purchasing power of our cash resources can decline, which can have an adverse impact on our business or financial results.
Alternatively, a significant period of deflation could cause a decrease in overall spending and borrowing levels. This could lead to deterioration in economic conditions, including an increase in the rate of unemployment. Deflation could also cause the value of our real estate to decline. These, or other factors related to deflation, could have a negative impact on our business or financial results.
Our ability to continue to grow or maintain our pipeline of development and redevelopment opportunities may be constrained.
We source development and redevelopment opportunities through various means, including from our operating portfolio and property acquisitions. We may be unable to identify and complete acquisitions of properties compatible with our investment strategy. We may be unable to locate properties that will produce returns with a sufficient spread to our cost of capital. The inability to source opportunities could impede our growth and could have a material adverse effect on us.
Our properties are geographically concentrated in Florida, Chicago, and in the Northeast region of the United States, which makes us more susceptible to regional and local adverse economic and other conditions than if we owned a more geographically diversified portfolio.
The majority of our properties are located in Florida, Chicago, and in the Northeast region of the United States. As a result, we are particularly susceptible to adverse economic or other conditions in these markets (such as periods of economic slowdown or recession, business layoffs or downsizing, industry slowdowns, relocations of businesses, increases in real estate and other taxes, and the cost of complying with governmental regulations or increased regulation), as well as to natural disasters (including earthquakes, storms, and hurricanes), potentially adverse effects of “global warming,” and other disruptions that occur in these markets (such as terrorist activity or threats of terrorist activity and other events), any of which may have a greater impact on the value of our assets or on our operating results than if we owned a more geographically diversified portfolio.
We cannot assure you that these markets will grow or that underlying real estate fundamentals will be favorable to owners, operators, and developers of multifamily, retail, or office assets, or future development assets. Our operations may also be affected if competing assets are built in these markets. Moreover, submarkets within our core markets may be dependent upon a limited number of industries. Any adverse economic or other conditions, or any decrease in demand for office, multifamily, or retail assets could adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations.
Our development projects may subject us to certain liabilities, and we are subject to risks associated with developing properties in partnership with others.
We may hire and supervise third-party contractors to provide construction, engineering, and various other services for development projects. Certain of these contracts may be structured such that we are the principal rather than the agent. As a result, we may assume liabilities in the course of the project and be subjected to, or become liable for, claims for construction defects, negligent performance of work or other similar actions by third parties we have engaged.
Adverse outcomes of disputes or litigation could negatively impact our business, results of operations, and financial condition, particularly if we have not limited the extent of the damages for which we may be liable, or if our liabilities exceed the amounts of the insurance that we carry. Moreover, our tenants may seek to hold us accountable for the actions of contractors because of our role even if we have technically disclaimed liability as a legal matter, in which case we may determine it necessary to participate in a financial settlement for purposes of preserving the tenant or customer relationship or to protect our corporate brand. To the extent our tenants are obligated to reimburse us, acting as a principal may also mean that we pay a contractor before we have been reimbursed by our tenants. This exposes us to additional risks of collection in the event of a bankruptcy, insolvency, or a condominium purchaser default. The reverse can occur as well, where a contractor we have paid files for bankruptcy protection or commits fraud with the funds before completing a project that we have funded in part or in full.
8
Additionally, we use partnerships and limited liability companies to develop some of our real estate investments. Acting through our wholly-owned subsidiaries, we typically will be the general partner or managing member in these partnerships or limited liability companies. There are, however, instances in which we may not control or even participate in management or day-to-day operations of these properties. The use of partnerships and limited liability companies involve special risks associated with the possibility that:
In the event any of our partners or members file for bankruptcy, we could be precluded from taking certain actions affecting our project without bankruptcy court approval, which could diminish our control over the project even if we were the general partner or managing member. In addition, if the bankruptcy court were to discharge the obligations of our partner or member, it could result in our ultimate liability for the project being greater than originally anticipated.
Further, disputes between us and a partner may result in litigation or arbitration that may increase our expenses and prevent our management from focusing their time and attention on our business.
To the extent we are a general partner, we may be exposed to unlimited liability, which may exceed our investment or equity in the partnership. If one of our subsidiaries is a general partner of a particular partnership, it may be exposed to the same kind of unlimited liability.
Development of properties may entail a lengthy, uncertain, and costly entitlement process.
Approval to develop real property sometimes requires political support and generally entails an extensive entitlement process involving multiple and overlapping regulatory jurisdictions and often requires discretionary action by local governments. Real estate projects must generally comply with local land development regulations and may need to comply with state and federal regulations. We may incur substantial costs to comply with legal and regulatory requirements. An increase in legal and regulatory requirements may cause us to incur substantial additional costs, or in some cases cause us to determine that the property is not feasible for development. In addition, our competitors and local residents may challenge our efforts to obtain entitlements and permits for the development of properties. The process to comply with these regulations is usually lengthy and costly, may not result in the approvals we seek, and can be expected to materially affect our development activities.
Government regulations and legal challenges may delay the start or completion of the development of our communities, increase our expenses or limit our building of apartments or other activities.
Various local, state, and federal statutes, ordinances, rules, and regulations concerning building, health and safety, site and building design, environment, zoning, sales, and similar matters apply to or affect the real estate development industry. In addition, our ability to obtain or renew permits or approvals and the continued effectiveness of permits already granted or approvals already obtained depends on factors beyond our control, such as changes in federal, state, and local policies, rules and regulations, and their interpretations and application.
Municipalities may restrict or place moratoriums on the availability of utilities, such as water and sewer taps. If municipalities in which we operate take such actions, it could have an adverse effect on our business by causing delays, increasing our costs, or limiting our ability to operate in those municipalities. These measures may reduce our ability to develop apartment communities and to build and sell other real estate development projects in the affected markets, including with respect to land we may already own, and create additional costs and administration requirements, which in turn may harm our future sales, margins, and earnings.
In addition, there is a variety of legislation being enacted, or considered for enactment, at the federal, state, and local level relating to energy and climate change. This legislation relates to items such as carbon dioxide emissions control and building codes that impose energy efficiency standards. New building code requirements that impose stricter energy efficiency standards could significantly increase our cost to construct buildings. Such environmental laws may affect, for example, how we manage storm water runoff, wastewater discharges, and dust; how we develop or operate properties on or affecting resources such as wetlands, endangered species, cultural resources, or areas subject to preservation laws; and how we address contamination. As climate change concerns continue to grow, legislation and regulations of this nature are expected to continue and become more costly to comply with. In addition, it is possible that some form of expanded energy efficiency legislation may be passed by the
9
U.S. Congress or federal agencies and certain state legislatures, which may, despite being phased in over time, significantly increase our costs of building apartment communities and the sale price to our buyers and adversely affect our sales volumes. We may be required to apply for additional approvals or modify our existing approvals because of changes in local circumstances or applicable law.
Energy-related initiatives affect a wide variety of companies throughout the United States and the world and, because our operations are heavily dependent on significant amounts of raw materials, such as lumber, steel, and concrete, they could have an indirect adverse impact on our operations and profitability to the extent the manufacturers and suppliers of our materials are burdened with expensive cap and trade and similar energy-related taxes and regulations. Our noncompliance with environmental laws could result in fines and penalties, obligations to remediate, permit revocations, other sanctions and reputational harm.
Governmental regulation affects not only construction activities but also sales activities, mortgage lending activities, and other dealings with consumers. Further, government agencies routinely initiate audits, reviews, or investigations of our business practices to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations, which can cause us to incur costs or create other disruptions in our business that can be significant. Further, we may experience delays and increased expenses as a result of legal challenges to our proposed communities, whether brought by governmental authorities or private parties.
Competition could limit our ability to lease apartment homes, increase or maintain rents or execute our development strategy.
Our apartment communities compete for residents with other housing alternatives, including other rental apartments and condominiums, and, to a lesser degree, single-family homes that are available for rent, as well as new and existing condominiums and single-family homes for sale. Competitive residential housing, as well as the lack of household formation and job creation in a particular area, could adversely affect our ability to lease apartment homes and to increase or maintain rental rates.
In addition, there are many developers, managers, and owners of apartment real estate and underdeveloped land, as well as REITs, private real estate companies, and investors, that compete with us, some of whom have greater financial resources and market share than us. If our competitors prevent us from realizing our real estate development objectives, our performance may fall short of our expectations and adversely affect our business.
Because real estate investments are relatively illiquid, we may not be able to sell apartment communities or other assets when appropriate.
Real estate investments are relatively illiquid and generally cannot be sold quickly. REIT tax rules also restrict our ability to sell apartment communities. Thus, we may not be able to change our portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or other market conditions. Our ability to dispose of apartment communities in the future will depend on prevailing economic and market conditions, including the cost and availability of financing. This could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
Climate change may adversely affect our business.
To the extent that significant changes in the climate occur in areas where our properties are located, we may experience extreme weather and changes in precipitation and temperature, all of which may result in physical damage to or a decrease in demand for properties located in these areas or affected by these conditions. Should the impact of climate change be material in nature, including significant property damage to or destruction of our properties, or occur for lengthy periods of time, our financial condition or results of operations may be adversely affected. In addition, changes in federal, state and local legislation and regulations based on concerns about climate change could result in increased capital expenditures on our properties (for example, to improve their energy efficiency and/or resistance to inclement weather) without a corresponding increase in revenue, resulting in adverse impacts to our net income.
Potential liability or other expenditures associated with potential environmental contamination may be costly.
Various federal, state, and local laws subject real estate owners or operators to liability for management, and the costs of removal or remediation of certain potentially hazardous materials that may be present in the land or buildings. Potentially hazardous materials may include polychlorinated biphenyls, petroleum-based fuels, lead-based paint, or asbestos, among other materials. Such laws often impose liability without regard to fault or whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such materials. The presence of, or the failure to manage or remediate properly, these materials may adversely affect occupancy at such real estate as well as the ability to sell or finance such real estate. In addition, governmental agencies may bring claims for costs associated with investigation and remediation actions, damages to natural resources, and for potential fines or penalties in connection with such damage or with respect to the improper management of hazardous materials. Moreover, private plaintiffs may potentially make claims for investigation and remediation costs they incur, or personal injury, disease, disability, or other infirmities related to the alleged presence of hazardous materials at an apartment community. In addition to
10
potential environmental liabilities or costs associated with our current real estate, we may also be responsible for such liabilities or costs associated with communities we acquire or manage in the future, or real estate we no longer own or operate.
Rent control laws and other regulations that limit our ability to increase rental rates may negatively impact our rental income and profitability.
State and local governmental agencies may introduce rent control laws or other regulations that limit our ability to increase rental rates, which may affect our rental income. Especially in times of recession and economic slowdown, rent control initiatives can acquire significant political support. If rent controls unexpectedly became applicable to certain of our properties, our revenue from and the value of such properties could be adversely affected.
Laws benefiting disabled persons may result in our incurrence of unanticipated expenses.
Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), all places intended to be used by the public are required to meet certain federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. The Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 (“FHAA”) requires apartment communities first occupied after March 13, 1991, to comply with design and construction requirements for disabled access. For those apartment communities receiving federal funds, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 also has requirements regarding disabled access. These and federal, state, and local laws may require structural modifications to our apartment communities or changes in policy/practice or affect renovations of the communities. Noncompliance with these laws could result in the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants and also could result in an order to correct any non-complying feature, which could result in substantial capital expenditures. Although we believe that our apartment communities are substantially in compliance with present requirements, we may incur unanticipated expenses to comply with the ADA, the FHAA, and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 in connection with the ongoing operation or redevelopment of our apartment communities.
Moisture infiltration and resulting mold remediation may be costly.
Although we are proactively engaged in managing moisture intrusion and preventing the presence of mold at our apartment communities, it is not unusual for periodic moisture intrusion to cause mold in isolated locations within an apartment community. We have implemented policies, procedures, and training, and include a detailed moisture intrusion and mold assessment during acquisition due diligence. We believe these measures will manage mold exposure at our apartment communities and will minimize the effects that mold may have on our residents. To date, we have not incurred any material costs or liabilities relating to claims of mold exposure or to abate mold conditions. We have only limited insurance coverage for property damage claims arising from the presence of mold and for personal injury claims related to mold exposure.
Although we are insured for certain risks, the cost of insurance, increased claims activity, or losses resulting from casualty events may affect our financial condition and results of operations.
We are insured for a portion of our real estate assets’ exposure to casualty losses resulting from fire, earthquake, hurricane, tornado, flood, and other perils, which insurance is subject to deductibles and self-insurance retention. We recognize casualty losses or gains based on the net book value of the affected asset and the amount of any related insurance proceeds. In many instances, the actual cost to repair or replace the apartment community may exceed its net book value and any insurance proceeds. We recognize the uninsured portion of losses as casualty losses in the periods in which they are incurred. In addition, we are self-insured for a portion of our exposure to third-party claims related to our workers’ compensation coverage and general liability exposure. With respect to our exposure to claims of third parties, we establish reserves at levels that reflect our known and estimated losses. The ultimate cost of losses and the impact of unforeseen events may vary materially from recorded reserves, and variances may adversely affect our operating results and financial condition. We purchase insurance to reduce our exposure to losses and limit our financial losses on large individual risks. The availability and cost of insurance are determined by market conditions outside our control. No assurance can be made that we will be able to obtain and maintain insurance at the same levels and on the same terms as we do today. If we are not able to obtain or maintain insurance in amounts we consider appropriate for our business, or if the cost of obtaining such insurance increases materially, we may have to retain a larger portion of the potential loss associated with our exposures to risks.
Natural disasters and severe weather may affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Natural disasters such as earthquakes and severe weather such as hurricanes may result in significant damage to our real estate assets. The extent of our casualty losses and loss in operating income in connection with such events is a function of the severity of the event and the total amount of exposure in the affected area. When we have geographic concentration of exposures, a single catastrophe (such as an earthquake) or destructive weather event (such as a hurricane) affecting a region may have a significant adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. We cannot accurately predict natural disasters or severe weather, or the number and type of such events that will affect us. As a result, our operating and financial results may vary significantly from one period to the next. Although we anticipate and plan for losses, there can be no assurance that our financial
11
results will not be adversely affected by our exposure to losses arising from natural disasters or severe weather in the future that exceed our previous experience and assumptions.
We depend on our senior management.
Our success and our ability to implement and manage anticipated future growth depend, in large part, upon the efforts of our senior management team, who have extensive market knowledge and relationships, and exercise substantial influence over our operational, financing, acquisition, and disposition activity. Members of our senior management team have national or regional industry reputations that attract business and investment opportunities and assist us in negotiations with lenders, existing and potential tenants, and other industry participants. The loss of services of one or more members of our senior management team, or our inability to attract and retain similarly qualified personnel, could adversely affect our business, diminish our investment opportunities, and weaken our relationships with lenders, business partners, existing and prospective tenants, and industry participants, which could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow.
We rely on our property managers to manage our properties. If our property managers fail to efficiently manage our properties, tenants may not renew their leases, or we may become subject to unforeseen liabilities.
A majority of our properties are managed by AIR. We do not supervise AIR or its managers and employees on a day-to-day basis and we cannot assure you that they will manage such properties in a manner that is consistent with their obligations under our agreements, that they will not be negligent in their performance or engage in any criminal or fraudulent activity, or that they will not otherwise default on their management obligations to us. If any of the foregoing occurs, the relationships with our tenants at such properties could be damaged, which may cause the tenants not to renew their leases, and we could incur liabilities resulting from loss or injury to the properties or to persons at the properties. If we are unable to lease the properties or we become subject to significant liabilities as a result of AIR’s management performance, our financial condition and results of operations could be substantially harmed.
Our business and operations would suffer in the event of significant disruptions or cyberattacks of our information technology systems or our failure to comply with laws, rules and regulations related to privacy and data protection.
Information technology, communication networks, and related systems are essential to the operation of our business. We use these systems to manage our vendor relationships, internal communications, accounting and record-keeping systems, and many other key aspects of our business. Our operations rely on the secure processing, storage, and transmission of confidential and other information in our computer systems and networks, which also depend on the strength of our procedures and the effectiveness of our internal controls. Information security risks have generally increased in recent years due to the rise in new technologies and the increased sophistication and activities of perpetrators of cyberattacks.
Despite system redundancy, risk transfer, insurance, indemnification, the implementation of security measures, required employee awareness training, and the existence of a disaster recovery plan for our internal information technology systems, our systems, and systems maintained by third-party vendors with which we do business are vulnerable to damage from any number of sources. We face risks associated with energy blackouts, natural disasters, terrorism, war, telecommunication failures, and cyberattacks and intrusions, such as computer viruses, malware, attachments to emails, intrusion, and unauthorized access, including from persons inside our organization or from persons outside our organization with access to our systems. We may also incur additional costs to remedy damages caused by such disruptions. Although we make efforts to maintain the security and integrity of our systems and have implemented various measures to manage the risk of a security breach or disruption, there can be no assurance that our security efforts and measures will be effective or that attempted security breaches or disruptions would not be successful or damaging. Any compromise of our security could also result in a violation of applicable privacy and other laws, significant legal and financial exposure, damage to our reputation, loss, or misuse of the information (which may be confidential, proprietary, or commercially sensitive in nature), and a loss of confidence in our security measures, which could harm our business.
We also are subject to laws, rules, and regulations in the United States, such as the California Consumer Protection Act (the “CCPA” (which became effective on January 1, 2020)), relating to the collection, use, and security of employee and other data. Evolving compliance and operational requirements under the CCPA and the privacy and data security laws of other jurisdictions
12
in which we operate impose significant costs that are likely to increase over time. Our failure to comply with laws, rules, and regulations related to privacy and data protection could harm our business or reputation.
Third Party Purchase or Offer Rights, such as in our Master Leasing Agreement, may discourage third parties from negotiating with us with respect to the sale of our real property.
During the term of the Master Leasing Agreement (as amended), AIR will have a right of first offer on development and redevelopment assets that we choose to bring to market within one year following stabilization, with certain exceptions as further set forth in the Master Leasing Agreement. In addition, AIR has an additional right of first offer with respect to stabilized properties that we are under contract to purchase, with certain exceptions as further set forth in the Master Leasing Agreement. The rights of first offer held by AIR may discourage third parties from negotiating with us with respect to the sale of our real property and may limit the number of interested buyers, and further may prevent us from receiving the maximum price that we may otherwise have obtained for such properties.
There may be, or there may be the appearance of, conflicts of interest in our relationship with AIR.
There may be, or there may be the appearance of, conflicts of interest in our relationship with AIR. The Separation was designed to minimize conflicts of interest between us and AIR, and the volume of transactions with AIR has significantly decreased since the Separation. Additionally, Mr. Considine no longer serves as a director on the Aimco Board. However, there can be no assurance that such conflicts don’t exist.
Actual, potential, or perceived conflicts could give rise to investor dissatisfaction, settlements with stockholders, litigation or regulatory inquiries or enforcement actions. Appropriately dealing with conflicts of interest is complex and difficult, and our reputation could be damaged if we fail, or appear to fail, to deal appropriately with one or more potential, actual, or perceived conflicts of interest. Regulatory scrutiny of, or litigation in connection with, conflicts of interest could have a material adverse impact on our reputation, which could materially adversely affect our business in a number of ways, including causing a reluctance of counterparties to do business with us, a decrease in the prices of our equity securities, and a resulting increased risk of litigation and regulatory enforcement actions.
Our business could be negatively affected as a result of the actions of activist stockholders.
Publicly traded companies have increasingly become subject to campaigns by investors advocating corporate actions such as financial restructuring, increased borrowing, special dividends, stock repurchases, or even sales of assets or the entire company. Given our stockholder composition and other factors, it is possible our stockholders or future activist stockholders may attempt to effect such changes. Responding to proxy contests and other actions by such activist stockholders or others would be costly and time-consuming, disrupt our operations and divert the attention of our Board and senior management team from the pursuit of business strategies, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Additionally, perceived uncertainties as to our future direction as a result of stockholder activism or changes to the composition of our board of directors (the "Board") may lead to the perception of a change in the direction of the business, instability, or lack of continuity, which may be exploited by our competitors, cause concern to our current or potential lenders, partners, or others with whom we do business, and make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified personnel.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR INDEBTEDNESS AND FINANCING
Our debt financing could result in foreclosure of our apartment communities, prevent us from making distributions on our equity, or otherwise adversely affect our liquidity.
A significant number of our assets, including apartment communities, land, and construction projects serve as collateral for our credit facility, property debt and construction loans. Our secured credit facility matures in December 2023, subject to extension options. Certain of our subsidiaries have existing secured property-level debt equal to approximately $938.5 million and construction loans of approximately $126.3 million as of December 31, 2022. Over time, we are likely to become party to additional financing arrangements, including credit facilities or other bank debt, bonds, and mortgage financing. Our organizational documents do not limit the amount of debt that we may incur, and we have significant amounts of debt outstanding. Payments of principal and interest may leave us with insufficient cash resources to operate our communities or pay distributions required to maintain our qualification as a REIT.
In connection with such financing activities, we are subject to the risk that our cash flow from operations will be insufficient to make required payments of principal and interest, and the risk that our indebtedness may not be refinanced or that the terms of any refinancing will not be as favorable as the terms of then-existing indebtedness. If we fail to make required payments of principal and interest on our non-recourse property debt, our lenders could foreclose on the apartment communities and other collateral securing such debt, which would result in the loss to us of income and asset value.
13
Disruptions in the financial markets could affect our ability to obtain financing and the cost of available financing and could adversely affect our liquidity.
Our ability to obtain financing and the cost of such financing depends on the overall condition of the United States credit markets. During periods of economic uncertainty, the United States credit markets may experience significant liquidity disruptions, which may cause the spreads on debt financings to widen considerably and make obtaining financing, including, but not limited to non-recourse property debt secured by stabilized properties, construction loans, and corporate borrowings such as those under our credit facilities, more difficult. In particular, apartment borrowers have benefited from the historic willingness of the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”), and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”), to make substantial amounts of loans secured by multifamily properties, even in times of economic distress. These two lenders are federally chartered and subject to federal regulation, which is subject to change, making uncertain their prospects and ability to provide liquidity in a future downturn.
If our ability to obtain financing is adversely affected, we may be unable to satisfy scheduled maturities on existing financings through other sources of liquidity, which could result in a lender foreclosure on the apartment communities securing such debt and loss of income and asset value, both of which would adversely affect our liquidity.
Increases in interest rates would increase our interest expense and reduce our profitability, and the phasing out of LIBOR could adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition.
Our revolving secured credit facility contains a variable interest rate which may be based, in part, on LIBOR. We also have certain non-recourse property debt and construction loans that are based on variable interest rate indexes. An increase or decrease in these variable interest rate indexes would likely increase or decrease our interest expense. An increase in interest expense may affect our profitability. We have taken steps to mitigate risk associated with an increase in variable interest rate indexes with approximately 98% of our non-recourse property debt and construction loans being either fixed or hedged as of December 31, 2022.
In March 2021, the Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates LIBOR, formally announced that the publication of LIBOR was ending and confirmed that USD LIBOR-indexed rates would cease to be published after June 30, 2023. In 2018, the Alternative Reference Rates Committee identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) as the recommended alternative to LIBOR. The adoption of SOFR is growing, and SOFR is now a widely used index on new transactions. However, until the transition from LIBOR is complete, there are risks and uncertainty in the markets as to the adoption and implementation of alternative reference rates. At this time, it is not possible to predict the effect of this on-going transition. Certain of our debt agreements, including our revolving secured credit facility, bear interest at rates that are calculated based, in part, on LIBOR. If LIBOR ceases to exist during the term of our agreements, the documents associated with our agreements contain language to address a transition to another benchmark rate. Accordingly, the phase-out of LIBOR and any other related changes or reforms, could have a material adverse effect on our financing costs, and as a result, our financial condition, operating results, and cash flows.
Covenant restrictions may limit our operations and impact our ability to make payments to our investors.
Some of our existing and/or future debt and other securities may contain covenants that restrict our activities. These may include covenants that limit our operations or impact our ability to make distributions or other payments unless certain financial tests or other criteria are satisfied, as well as certain other customary affirmative and negative covenants.
We may increase leverage in executing our development plan, which could further exacerbate the risks associated with our substantial indebtedness.
We may decide to increase our leverage to execute our development plan. We will consider a number of factors when evaluating our level of indebtedness and when making decisions regarding the incurrence of new indebtedness, including the estimated market value of our assets and the ability of particular assets, and our company as a whole, to generate cash flow to cover the expected debt service. Although our credit facility may limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness, our governing documents do not limit the amount of debt we may incur, and we may change our target debt levels at any time without the approval of our stockholders. We may incur additional indebtedness from time to time in the future to finance working capital,
14
capital expenditures, investments or acquisitions, or for other purposes. If we do so, the risks related to our indebtedness could intensify.
RISKS RELATED TO TAX LAWS AND REGULATIONS
Aimco may fail to qualify as a REIT.
If Aimco fails to qualify as a REIT, Aimco will not be allowed a deduction for dividends paid to its stockholders in computing its taxable income and will be subject to United States federal income tax at regular corporate rates. This would substantially reduce our funds available for general corporate usage or for distribution to our investors. Unless entitled to relief under certain provisions of the Code, Aimco also would be disqualified from taxation as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which it ceased to qualify as a REIT. In addition, Aimco's failure to qualify as a REIT may place us in default under our credit facilities.
We believe Aimco operates, and has since its taxable year ended December 31, 1994, operated, in a manner that enables it to meet the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT. However, qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex Code provisions for which only limited judicial and administrative authorities exist. Moreover, even a technical or inadvertent mistake could jeopardize our REIT status. Aimco's continued qualification as a REIT will depend on its satisfaction of certain asset, income, investment, organizational, distribution, stockholder ownership, and other requirements on a continuing basis. Aimco's ability to satisfy the asset tests depends upon our analysis of the fair market values of our assets, some of which are not susceptible to a precise determination, and for which we do not obtain independent appraisals. Aimco's compliance with the REIT annual income and quarterly asset requirements also depends upon our ability to successfully manage the composition of our income and assets on an ongoing basis. Moreover, the proper classification of an instrument as debt or equity for United States federal income tax purposes may be uncertain in some circumstances, which could affect the application of the REIT qualification requirements. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”), will not contend that our interests in subsidiaries or other issuers constitutes a violation of the REIT requirements. Moreover, future economic, market, legal, tax, or other considerations may cause Aimco to fail to qualify as a REIT, or the Board may determine to revoke its REIT status.
REIT distribution requirements limit our available cash.
As a REIT, Aimco is subject to annual distribution requirements. Aimco pays distributions, including taxable stock dividends, intended to enable Aimco to satisfy its distribution requirements. This limits the amount of cash available for other business purposes, including amounts to fund our growth. Aimco generally must distribute annually at least 90% of our “real estate investment trust taxable income,” which is generally equivalent to net taxable ordinary income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gain, in order for our distributed earnings not to be subject to United States federal corporate income tax. We intend to make distributions to Aimco's stockholders to comply with the requirements applicable to REITs under the Code (which may be all cash or combination of cash and stock satisfying the requirements of applicable law). However, differences in timing between the recognition of taxable income and the actual receipt of cash could require us to sell apartment communities or borrow funds on a short-term or long-term basis to meet the 90% distribution requirement of the Code.
Aimco may be subject to federal, state, and local income taxes in certain circumstances.
Even as a REIT, Aimco may be subject to United States federal income and excise taxes in various situations, such as on its undistributed income. We could also be required to pay a 100% tax on any net income on non-arm’s-length transactions between us and a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”) and on any net income from sales of apartment communities that were held for sale primarily in the ordinary course. State and local tax laws may not conform to the United States federal income tax treatment, and Aimco may be subject to state or local taxation in various state or local jurisdictions in which Aimco transacts business. Any taxes imposed on Aimco would reduce our operating cash flow and net income and could negatively impact our ability to pay dividends and distributions.
Dividends payable by REITs generally do not qualify for the reduced tax rates available for some dividends.
REITs are entitled to a United States federal income tax deduction for dividends paid to their stockholders. As compared to other taxable corporations, this ability to reduce or eliminate the REIT’s taxable income by paying dividends to stockholders is a principal benefit of maintaining REIT status, generally resulting in a lower combined tax liability of the REIT and its stockholders
15
as compared to that of the combined tax liability of other taxable corporations and their stockholders. Notwithstanding this combined benefit, dividends payable by REITs may result in marginally higher taxes to the stockholder.
C-corporations are generally required to pay United States federal income tax on earnings. After-tax earnings are then available for stockholder dividends. The maximum United States federal tax rate applicable to income from “qualified dividends” payable to United States stockholders that are individuals, trusts, and estates is currently 20%, plus the 3.8% investment tax surcharge. While dividends payable by REITs are generally not eligible for the qualified dividend reduced rates, stockholders that are individuals, trusts, or estates, and meet certain requirements, may generally deduct 20% of the aggregate amount of ordinary dividends from REITs. This deduction is available for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, and before January 1, 2026, and will generally cause the maximum tax rate for ordinary dividends from REITs to be 29.6%, plus the 3.8% investment tax surcharge. The more favorable tax rates applicable to regular corporate qualified dividends could cause investors who are individuals, trusts, and estates to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the shares of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which could adversely affect the value of the shares of REITs, including Aimco Common Stock.
Complying with the REIT requirements may cause Aimco to forgo otherwise attractive business opportunities.
To qualify as a REIT, Aimco must continually satisfy tests concerning, among other things, the sources of its income, the nature and diversification of its assets, the amounts distributed to its stockholders, and the ownership of our stock. As a result of these tests, Aimco may be required to make distributions to stockholders at disadvantageous times or when Aimco does not have funds readily available for distribution, forgo otherwise attractive investment opportunities, liquidate assets in adverse market conditions, or contribute assets to a TRS that is subject to regular corporate federal income tax.
Changes to United States federal income tax laws could materially and adversely affect Aimco and Aimco’s stockholders.
The present United States federal income tax treatment of REITs may be modified, possibly with retroactive effect, by legislative, judicial, or administrative action at any time, which could affect the United States federal income tax treatment of an investment in Aimco's Common Stock. The United States federal income tax rules dealing with REITs are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process, the IRS, and the United States Treasury Department, which results in statutory changes as well as frequent revisions to regulations and interpretations. We cannot predict how changes in the tax laws might affect Aimco or its stockholders. Revisions in federal tax laws and interpretations thereof could significantly and negatively affect our ability to qualify as a REIT and the tax considerations relevant to an investment in Aimco's Common Stock or could cause us to change our investments and commitments.
RISKS RELATED TO AIMCO OPERATING PARTNERSHIP UNITS
There are restrictions on the ability to transfer and redeem Aimco Operating Partnership Units, there is no public market for Aimco Operating Partnership Units and holders of Aimco Operating Partnership Units are subject to dilution.
The Aimco Operating Partnership agreement restricts the transferability of OP Units. Until the expiration of a one-year holding period, subject to certain exceptions, investors may not transfer OP Units without the consent of Aimco Operating Partnership’s general partner. Thereafter, investors may transfer such OP Units subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including the general partner’s right of first refusal. In addition, after the expiration of the one-year holding period, investors have the right, subject to the terms of Aimco Operating Partnership’s agreement, to require Aimco Operating Partnership to redeem all or a portion of such investor’s OP Units (in exchange for shares of our Common Stock or cash, at the Aimco Operating Partnership’s discretion) once per quarter on an exchange date set by Aimco Operating Partnership, provided such investor provides notice at least 45 days prior to the quarterly exchange date. See “Description of Aimco Operating Partnership Units and Summary of Aimco Operating Partnership Agreement—Redemption Rights of Qualifying Parties”. There is no public market for the OP Units. Aimco Operating Partnership has no plans to list any OP Units on a securities exchange. It is unlikely that any person will make a market in the OP Units, or that an active market for the OP Units will develop. If a market for the OP Units develops and the OP Units are considered “readily tradable” on a “secondary market (or the substantial equivalent thereof),” Aimco Operating Partnership would be classified as a publicly traded partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, which could have a material adverse effect on Aimco Operating Partnership and its unitholders.
In addition, Aimco Operating Partnership may issue an unlimited number of additional OP Units or other securities for such consideration and on such terms as it may establish, without the approval of the holders of OP Units. Such securities could have priority over the OP Units as to cash flow, distributions, and liquidation proceeds. The effect of any such issuance may be to dilute the interests of holders of OP Units.
16
Cash distributions by Aimco Operating Partnership are not guaranteed and may fluctuate with partnership performance.
Aimco Operating Partnership does not intend to make regular distributions to holders of OP Units (other than what is required for Aimco to maintain its REIT status). There can be no assurance regarding the amounts of available cash that Aimco Operating Partnership will generate or the portion that its general partner will choose to distribute. The actual amounts of available cash will depend upon numerous factors, including profitability of operations, required principal and interest payments on its debt, the cost of acquisitions (including related debt service payments), its issuance of debt and equity securities, fluctuations in working capital, capital expenditures, adjustments in reserves, prevailing economic conditions, and financial, business, and other factors, some of which may be beyond Aimco Operating Partnership’s control. Cash distributions depend primarily on cash flow, including from reserves, and not on profitability, which is affected by non-cash items. Therefore, cash distributions may be made during periods when our operating partnership records losses and may not be made during periods when it records profits. The Aimco Operating Partnership agreement gives the general partner discretion in establishing reserves for the proper conduct of the partnership’s business that will affect the amount of available cash. Aimco Operating Partnership may be required to make reserves for the future payment of principal and interest under its credit facilities and other indebtedness. In addition, Aimco Operating Partnership’s credit facilities may limit its ability to distribute cash to holders of OP Units. As a result of these and other factors, there can be no assurance regarding actual levels of cash distributions on OP Units, and Aimco Operating Partnership’s ability to distribute cash may be limited during the existence of any events of default under any of its debt instruments.
Holders of OP Units have limited voting rights and are limited in their ability to effect a change of control.
Aimco Operating Partnership is managed and operated by its general partner, Aimco. Unlike the holders of common stock in a corporation, holders of OP Units have only limited voting rights on matters affecting Aimco Operating Partnership’s business. Such matters relate to certain amendments of the partnership agreement and certain transactions such as the institution of bankruptcy proceedings, an assignment for the benefit of creditors and certain transfers by the general partner of its interest in Aimco Operating Partnership or the admission of a successor general partner. Holders of OP Units have no right to elect the general partner on an annual or other continuing basis, or to remove the general partner. As a result, holders of OP Units have limited influence on matters affecting the operation of Aimco Operating Partnership, and third parties may find it difficult to attempt to gain control over, or influence the activities of, Aimco Operating Partnership.
The limited partners of Aimco Operating Partnership are unable to remove the general partner or to vote in the election of our directors unless they own shares of Aimco. In order to comply with specific REIT tax requirements, Aimco's charter has restrictions on the ownership of its equity securities. As a result, Aimco Operating Partnership limited partners and Aimco's stockholders are limited in their ability to effect a change of control of Aimco Operating Partnership and Aimco, respectively.
Holders of OP Units may not have limited liability in specific circumstances.
The limitations on the liability of limited partners for the obligations of a limited partnership have not been clearly established in some states. If it were determined that Aimco Operating Partnership had been conducting business in any state without compliance with the applicable limited partnership statute, or that the right or the exercise of the right by the holders of OP Units as a group to make specific amendments to the agreement of limited partnership or to take other action under the agreement of limited partnership constituted participation in the “control” of Aimco Operating Partnership’s business, then a holder of OP Units could be held liable under specific circumstances for our operating partnership’s obligations to the same extent as the general partner.
Aimco may have conflicts of interest with holders of OP Units.
Conflicts of interest could arise in the future as a result of the relationships between the general partner of Aimco Operating Partnership and its affiliates (including us), on the one hand, and Aimco Operating Partnership or any partner thereof, on the other. The directors and officers of the general partner have fiduciary duties to manage the general partner in a manner beneficial to us, as the sole stockholder of the general partner. At the same time, as the general partner of our operating partnership, we have fiduciary duties to manage Aimco Operating Partnership in a manner beneficial to Aimco Operating Partnership and its limited partners. The duties of the general partner of Aimco Operating Partnership to Aimco Operating Partnership and its partners may therefore come into conflict with the duties of the directors and officers of the general partner to its sole stockholder, Aimco. Such conflicts of interest might arise in the following situations, among others:
17
Provisions in the Aimco Operating Partnership agreement may limit the ability of a holder of OP Units to challenge actions taken by the general partner.
Delaware law provides that, except as provided in a partnership agreement, a general partner owes the fiduciary duties of loyalty and care to the partnership and its limited partners. The Aimco Operating Partnership agreement expressly authorizes the general partner to enter into, on behalf of Aimco Operating Partnership, a right of first opportunity arrangement and other conflict avoidance agreements with various affiliates of Aimco Operating Partnership and the general partner, on such terms as the general partner, in its sole and absolute discretion, believes are advisable. The latitude given in the Aimco Operating Partnership agreement to the general partner in resolving conflicts of interest may significantly limit the ability of a holder of OP Units to challenge what might otherwise be a breach of fiduciary duty. The general partner believes, however, that such latitude is necessary and appropriate to enable it to serve as the general partner of Aimco Operating Partnership without undue risk of liability.
The Aimco Operating Partnership agreement limits the liability of the general partner for actions taken in good faith. Aimco Operating Partnership’s partnership agreement expressly limits the liability of the general partner by providing that the general partner, and its officers and directors, will not be liable or accountable in damages to Aimco Operating Partnership, the limited partners, or assignees for errors in judgment or mistakes of fact or law or of any act or omission if the general partner or such director or officer acted in good faith. In addition, Aimco Operating Partnership is required to indemnify the general partner, its affiliates, and their respective officers, directors, employees, and agents to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, against any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities, joint or several, expenses, judgments, fines, and other actions incurred by the general partner or such other persons, provided that Aimco Operating Partnership will not indemnify for (i) willful misconduct or a knowing violation of the law or (ii) for any transaction for which such person received an improper personal benefit in violation or breach of any provision of the partnership agreement. The provisions of Delaware law that allow the common law fiduciary duties of a general partner to be modified by a partnership agreement have not been resolved in a court of law, and the general partner has not obtained an opinion of counsel covering the provisions set forth in the Aimco Operating Partnership agreement that purport to waive or restrict the fiduciary duties of the general partner that would be in effect under common law were it not for the partnership agreement.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
Aimco Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries may be prohibited from making distributions and other payments.
All of Aimco Operating Partnership’s real estate assets are owned by subsidiaries of our operating partnership. As a result, Aimco Operating Partnership depends on distributions and payments from its subsidiaries in order to satisfy our financial obligations and make payments to our equity holders, as applicable. The ability of Aimco Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries to make such distributions and other payments depends on their earnings and cash flows and may be subject to statutory or contractual limitations, including covenants in some of our existing and/or future debt agreements. As an equity investor in the REIT subsidiaries and our subsidiaries, our right to receive assets upon their liquidation or reorganization are effectively subordinated to the claims of their creditors and any holders of preferred equity senior to our equity investments. To
18
the extent that we are recognized as a creditor of such subsidiaries, our claims may still be subordinate to any security interest in or other lien on their assets and to any of their debt or other obligations that are senior to our claims.
Limits on ownership of shares specified in Aimco’s charter may result in the loss of economic and voting rights by purchasers that violate those limits.
Our charter limits ownership of Common Stock by any single stockholder (applying certain “beneficial ownership” rules under the federal securities laws) to 8.7% (or up to 12.0% upon a waiver from Aimco’s Board of Directors) of outstanding shares of Common Stock, or 15% in the case of certain pension trusts, registered investment companies and Mr. Considine (or up to 20.0% for such pension trusts or registered investment companies upon a waiver from Aimco’s Board of Directors). Aimco's charter also limits ownership of Aimco's Common Stock and preferred stock by any single stockholder to 8.7% of the value of the outstanding Common Stock and preferred stock, or 15% in the case of certain pension trusts, registered investment companies, and Mr. Considine. The charter also prohibits anyone from buying shares of Aimco's capital stock if the purchase would result in Aimco losing its REIT status. This could happen if a transaction results in fewer than 100 persons owning all of Aimco's shares of capital stock or results in five or fewer persons (applying certain attribution rules of the Code) owning 50% or more of the value of all of Aimco's shares of capital stock. If anyone acquires shares in excess of the ownership limit or in violation of the ownership requirements of the Code for REITs:
Aimco may purchase the shares of capital stock held in trust at a price equal to the lesser of the price paid by the transferee of the shares or the then current market price. If the trust transfers any of the shares of capital stock, the affected person will receive the lesser of the price paid for the shares or the then current market price. An individual who acquires shares of capital stock that violate the above rules bears the risk that the individual:
Aimco’s charter may limit the ability of a third-party to acquire control of Aimco.
The 8.7% and other ownership limits discussed above may have the effect of delaying or precluding acquisition by a third-party of control of Aimco without the consent of our Board of Directors. Aimco's charter authorizes our Board of Directors to issue up to 510,587,500 shares of capital stock. As of December 31, 2022, 500,787,260 shares were classified as Common Stock and 9,800,240 shares were classified as preferred stock. Under Aimco's charter, Aimco's Board of Directors has the authority to classify and reclassify any of our unissued shares of capital stock into shares of capital stock with such preferences, conversion or other rights, voting power restrictions, limitations as to dividends, qualifications, or terms or conditions of redemptions as the Board of Directors may determine. The authorization and issuance of a new class of capital stock could have the effect of delaying or preventing someone from taking control of Aimco, where there is a difference of opinion between Aimco's Board of Directors and others as to what is in Aimco's stockholders’ best interests.
The Maryland General Corporation Law may limit the ability of a third-party to acquire control of Aimco.
As a Maryland corporation, Aimco is subject to various Maryland laws that may have the effect of discouraging offers to acquire us and increasing the difficulty of consummating any such offers, where there is a difference of opinion between our Board of Directors and others as to what is in our stockholders’ best interests. The Maryland General Corporation Law, specifically the Maryland Business Combination Act, restricts mergers and other business combination transactions between us and any person who acquires, directly or indirectly, beneficial ownership of shares of our stock representing 10% or more of the
19
voting power without our Board of Directors’ prior approval. Any such business combination transaction could not be completed until five years after the person acquired such voting power, and generally only with the approval of stockholders representing 80% of all votes entitled to be cast and 66-2/3% of the votes entitled to be cast, excluding the interested stockholder, or upon payment of a fair price. The Maryland General Corporation Law, specifically the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act, provides generally that a person who acquires shares of our capital stock representing 10% or more of the voting power in electing directors will have no voting rights unless approved by a vote of two-thirds of the shares eligible to vote. Additionally, the Maryland General Corporation Law provides, among other things, that the Board of Directors has broad discretion in adopting stockholders’ rights plans and has the sole power to fix the record date, time, and place for special meetings of the stockholders. To date, we have not adopted a stockholders’ rights plan. In addition, the Maryland General Corporation Law provides that a corporation that:
In connection with the 2020 spin-off of AIR, the pre-spin Board elected for Aimco to be subject to all of the provisions of MUTA until the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders. In 2022, the Board publicly announced its commitment to, effective as of the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders, (i) making us no longer be subject to any of the provisions of MUTA, and (ii) prohibit us from electing to be subject to MUTA without the approval of our stockholders.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
We own a geographically diversified portfolio of operating properties that produce stable cash flow and serves to balance the risk and highly variable cash flows associated with our portfolio of development and redevelopments and value-add investments. Our entire portfolio of operating properties includes 26 apartment communities (22 consolidated properties and four unconsolidated properties) located in eight major U.S. markets and with average rents in line with local market averages (generally defined as B class). We also own one commercial office building that is part of a land assemblage with an adjacent apartment building. Our current development and redevelopment portfolio consists of 12 properties, including developable land, located primarily in Southeast Florida, the Washington D.C. Metro Area and Colorado's Front Range.
Additional information about our consolidated real estate, including property debt, is contained in “Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time, we may be a party to certain legal proceedings, incidental to the normal course of business. While the outcome of the legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, we believe there are no legal proceedings pending that would have a material effect upon on our financial condition or results of operations.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
20
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Aimco
Our Common Stock is listed and traded on the NYSE under the symbol “AIV.”
On February 24, 2023, there were 149,925,165 shares of Common Stock outstanding, held by 825 stockholders of record. The number of holders does not include individuals or entities who beneficially own shares but whose shares are held of record by a broker or clearing agency but does include each such broker or clearing agency as one record holder.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
From time to time, we may issue shares of our Common Stock in exchange for OP Units, defined under the Aimco Operating Partnership heading below. Such shares are issued based on an exchange ratio of one share for each OP Unit. We may also issue shares of our Common Stock in exchange for limited partnership interests in consolidated real estate partnerships. Please refer to Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for further discussion of such exchanges.
During the year ended December 31, 2022, we issued approximately 108,000 shares of Common Stock in exchange for OP Units in these transactions. Such shares were issued in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Repurchases of Equity Securities
Our Board has, from time to time, authorized us to repurchase shares of our outstanding Common Stock. On July 27, 2022, our Board replaced all prior share repurchase authorizations with a new authorization to repurchase up to 15.0 million shares of our outstanding Common Stock, subject to customary limitations, which may be made from time to time in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. This authorization has no expiration date. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2022, we repurchased approximately 3.5 million shares at a weighted-average price of $7.21 per share. As of December 31, 2022, up to 12.3 million shares remained available for repurchase under the share repurchase authorization.
Aimco Operating Partnership
There is no public market for OP Units, and we have no intention of listing OP Units on any securities exchange. In addition, Aimco Operating Partnership’s Partnership Agreement restricts the transferability of OP Units.
On February 24, 2023, there were 162,014,847 OP Units and equivalents outstanding (of which 149,925,165 were held by us), that were held by 2,117 unitholders of record.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
Aimco Operating Partnership did not issue any unregistered OP Units during the twelve months ended December 31, 2022.
Repurchases of Equity Securities
Aimco Operating Partnership’s Partnership Agreement generally provides that after holding OP Units for one-year, limited partners other than us have the right to redeem their OP Units for cash or, at our election, shares of our Common Stock on a one-for-one basis (subject to customary antidilution adjustments). During the year ended December 31, 2022, approximately 108,000 OP Units were redeemed in exchange for shares of Common Stock, and approximately 33,000 OP Units were redeemed in exchange for cash at an aggregate weighted average price per unit of $7.07.
Dividend and Distribution Payments
As a REIT, Aimco is required to distribute annually to holders of its Common Stock at least 90.0% of its “real estate investment trust taxable income,” which, as defined by the Code and United States Department of Treasury regulations, is generally equivalent to net taxable ordinary income. Aimco's Board determines and declares Aimco's dividends. In making a dividend determination, Aimco's Board considers a variety of factors, including REIT distribution requirements; current market conditions; liquidity needs; and other uses of cash, such as deleveraging and accretive investment activities.
Stockholders receiving any dividend, whether payable in cash or cash and shares of Aimco Common Stock, will be required to include the full amount of such dividend as income to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, as
21
determined for United States federal income tax purposes for the year of such dividend and may be required to pay income taxes with respect to such dividend in excess of the cash dividend received. With respect to certain non-United States stockholders, Aimco may be required to withhold United States tax with respect to such dividend, including in respect of all or a portion of such dividend that is payable in Common Stock.
The Board of Aimco Operating Partnership’s general partner determines and declares distributions on OP Units. Aimco, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, is the sole general partner of Aimco Operating Partnership. As of December 31, 2022, Aimco owned 92.6% of the legal interest in the common partnership units of Aimco Operating Partnership and 94.9% of the economic interest of Aimco Operating Partnership. Aimco Operating Partnership holds all of our assets and manages the daily operations of our business. The distributions paid by Aimco Operating Partnership to Aimco are used to fund the dividends paid to Aimco's stockholders. Accordingly, the per share dividends Aimco pays to its stockholders generally equal the per unit distributions paid by Aimco Operating Partnership to holders of its common partnership units.
Our revolving credit agreement includes customary covenants, including a restriction on dividends and other restricted payments, but permits dividends and distributions as may be necessary to maintain Aimco's REIT status.
Performance Graph
The following graph compares cumulative total returns for our Common Stock, the FTSE Nareit Equity Apartments Index, and the Russell 2000. The FTSE Nareit Equity Apartments Index is published by The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“Nareit”), a representative of multifamily real estate investment trusts and publicly traded real estate companies with interests in United States real estate and capital markets. The FTSE Nareit Equity Apartments Index serves as our sector comparison and the Russell 2000 serves as our broad-based market index.
The indices are weighted for all companies that fit the definitional criteria of the particular index and are calculated to exclude companies as they are acquired and to add companies to the index calculation as they become publicly traded companies. All companies that fit the definitional criteria and existed at the point in time presented are included in the index calculations. The graph assumes the investment of $100 in our Common Stock and in each index on December 31, 2017, and that all dividends paid have been reinvested. The historical information set forth on the following page is not necessarily indicative of future performance.
|
|
For the years ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Index |
|
2017 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2019 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2022 |
|
||||||
Apartment Investment and Management Company |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
104.13 |
|
|
|
126.55 |
|
|
|
111.27 |
|
|
|
162.68 |
|
|
|
150.35 |
|
FTSE Nareit Equity Apartment Index |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
103.70 |
|
|
|
130.99 |
|
|
|
110.89 |
|
|
|
181.44 |
|
|
|
123.46 |
|
Russell 2000 |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
88.99 |
|
|
|
111.70 |
|
|
|
134.00 |
|
|
|
153.85 |
|
|
|
122.41 |
|
Source: Zacks Investment Research, Inc.
22
The Performance Graph will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing by us under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate the same by reference.
23
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to 2021, should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8. For discussion of the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to 2020, please refer to Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 on our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Executive Overview
Our mission is to make real estate investments, primarily focused on the multifamily sector within targeted U.S. markets, where outcomes are enhanced through our human capital and substantial value is created for investors, teammates, and the communities in which we operate.
Please refer to “Item 1. Business” for additional discussion of our business organization and strategy and “Item 2. Properties” and “Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation” for details regarding the size, location, and key characteristics of our various properties.
The Separation
On December 15, 2020, we completed the separation of AIR from Aimco, creating two distinct, independent businesses. Prior to the Separation, the consolidated financial statements were prepared on a carve-out basis and reflect significant assumptions and allocations. The consolidated financial statements reflect our historical financial position, results of operations, and cash flows in conformity with U.S. GAAP. Our financial statements are presented for all historical periods described and at the carrying value of such assets and liabilities reflected in Aimco Predecessor’s books and records.
Results for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2022
The results from the execution of our business plan during the twelve months ended December 31, 2022, are described below.
Financial Results and 2022 Highlights
Value Add, Opportunistic and Alternative Investments
Development and Redevelopment
We generally seek development and redevelopment opportunities where barriers to entry are high, target customers can be clearly defined, and where we have a comparative advantage over others in the market. We will focus our new investment activity in Southeast Florida, the Washington D.C. Metro Area and Colorado's Front Range. Our Value Add and Opportunistic investments may also target portfolio acquisitions, operational turnarounds, and re-entitlements.
24
We currently have five active development and redevelopment projects, located across four U.S. markets, in varying phases of construction and lease-up. These projects remain on track, as measured by budget, lease-up metrics, and current market valuations. During the year ended December 31, 2022, we invested $294.4 million in development and redevelopment activities. Updates include:
Alternative Investments
Our current alternative investments are primarily those investments originated by Aimco Predecessor and include a mezzanine loan secured by a stabilized multifamily property with an option to participate in future multifamily development, as well as three passive equity investments. Over time, we plan to significantly reduce capital allocated to these investments.
Updates for our alternative investments include:
Investment Activity
We are focused on development and redevelopment, primarily funded through construction loans and joint venture equity. Updates include:
25
Operating Property Results
We own a diversified portfolio of stabilized apartment communities located in eight major U.S. markets with average rents in line with local market averages. We also own a commercial office building that is part of an assemblage with an adjacent apartment building.
Highlights for the year ended December 31, 2022 include:
Balance Sheet and Financing Activities
We are highly focused on maintaining a strong balance sheet, including having at all times ample liquidity. As of December 31, 2022, we had access to $379.8 million in liquidity, including $206.5 million of cash on hand, $23.3 million of restricted cash, and the capacity to borrow up to $150.0 million on our revolving credit facility. Refer to the Liquidity and Capital Resources section for additional information regarding our leverage.
Financial Results of Operations
We have three segments: (i) Development and Redevelopment; (ii) Operating; and (iii) Other.
Our Development and Redevelopment segment includes properties that are under construction or have not achieved stabilization, as well as land assemblages that are being held for future development. Our Operating segment includes 21 residential apartment communities that have achieved stabilized levels of operations as of January 1, 2021, and maintained it throughout the current year and comparable period. Our Other segment consists of properties that are not included in our Development and Redevelopment or Operating segments.
The following discussion and analysis of the results of our operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statement in Item 8.
26
Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2022, Compared to the same period in 2021
Net income increased by $97.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 compared to the same period in 2021, due primarily to the recognition of lease modification income and gains recognized on disposition of real estate partially offset by the non-cash impairment of the Mezzanine Investment.
Property Results
As of December 31, 2022, our Development and Redevelopment segment included five properties that were under construction. Our Operating segment included 21 communities with 5,582 apartment homes, and our Other segment included our Eldridge Townhomes acquisition, and one office building.
We use proportionate property net operating income to assess the operating performance of our segments. Proportionate property net operating income is defined as our share of rental and other property revenues, less direct property operating expenses, but:
Please refer to Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for further discussion regarding our segments, including a reconciliation of these proportionate amounts to consolidated rental and other property revenues and property operating expenses.
Proportionate Property Net Operating Income
The results of our segments for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, as presented below, are based on segment classifications as of December 31, 2022.
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
(in thousands) |
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
||||
Rental and other property revenues, before utility reimbursements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Development and Redevelopment |
$ |
919 |
|
|
$ |
2,036 |
|
|
$ |
(1,117 |
) |
|
|
(54.9 |
%) |
Operating |
|
135,224 |
|
|
|
122,303 |
|
|
|
12,921 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
% |
Other |
|
18,030 |
|
|
|
14,559 |
|
|
|
3,471 |
|
|
|
23.8 |
% |
Total |
|
154,173 |
|
|
|
138,898 |
|
|
|
15,275 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
% |
Property operating expenses, net of utility reimbursements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Development and Redevelopment |
|
2,198 |
|
|
|
1,446 |
|
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
52.0 |
% |
Operating |
|
40,841 |
|
|
|
39,625 |
|
|
|
1,216 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
Other |
|
5,560 |
|
|
|
4,405 |
|
|
|
1,155 |
|
|
|
26.2 |
% |
Total |
|
48,599 |
|
|
|
45,476 |
|
|
|
3,123 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
% |
Proportionate property net operating income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Development and Redevelopment |
|
(1,279 |
) |
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
(1,869 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
%) |
Operating |
|
94,383 |
|
|
|
82,678 |
|
|
|
11,705 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
% |
Other |
|
12,470 |
|
|
|
10,154 |
|
|
|
2,316 |
|
|
|
22.8 |
% |
Total |
$ |
105,574 |
|
|
$ |
93,422 |
|
|
$ |
12,152 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
% |
For the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to the same period in 2021:
27
The results of our segments for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, as presented below, are based on segment classifications as of December 31, 2022.
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
(in thousands) |
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
||||
Rental and other property revenues, before utility reimbursements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Development and Redevelopment |
$ |
2,036 |
|
|
$ |
1,515 |
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
34.4 |
% |
Operating |
|
122,303 |
|
|
|
116,888 |
|
|
|
5,415 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
Other |
|
14,559 |
|
|
|
13,079 |
|
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
% |
Total |
|
138,898 |
|
|
|
131,482 |
|
|
|
7,416 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
% |
Property operating expenses, net of utility reimbursements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Development and Redevelopment |
|
1,446 |
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
47.4 |
% |
Operating |
|
39,625 |
|
|
|
37,917 |
|
|
|
1,708 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
Other |
|
4,405 |
|
|
|
4,117 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
% |
Total |
|
45,476 |
|
|
|
43,015 |
|
|
|
2,461 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
% |
Proportionate property net operating income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Development and Redevelopment |
|
590 |
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
% |
Operating |
|
82,678 |
|
|
|
78,971 |
|
|
|
3,707 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
Other |
|
10,154 |
|
|
|
8,962 |
|
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
% |
Total |
$ |
93,422 |
|
|
$ |
88,467 |
|
|
$ |
4,955 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
% |
For the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to 2020, our Development and redevelopment proportionate net operating income increased by $0.1 million.
Operating proportionate property net operating income increased by $3.7 million, or 4.7% for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to 2020. The increase was attributable to a $5.4 million, or 4.6% increase in rental and other property revenues due to higher average revenues of $47 per apartment home, and a 160-basis point increase in occupancy, offset partially by a $1.7 million, or 4.5% increase in property operating expenses due primarily to higher real estate taxes and insurance.
Other proportionate property net operating income increased by $1.2 million, or 13.3% for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to 2020, due primarily to the acquisition of Eldridge Townhomes in the third quarter of 2021.
Non-Segment Real Estate Operations
Operating income amounts not attributed to our segments include property management costs, casualty losses, and, if applicable, the results of apartment communities sold or held for sale, reported in consolidated amounts, which we do not allocate to our segments for purposes of evaluating segment performance.
Depreciation and Amortization
For the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to the same period in 2021, Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $74.3 million, or 87.7%, due primarily to $85.7 million of accelerated depreciation recognized relating to the 2022 lease termination as described in Note 4.
General and Administrative Expenses
For the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to the same period in 2021, General and administrative expenses increased by $6.5 million, or 19.7%. General and administrative expenses incurred for the year ended December 31, 2021 were prior to the full build out of our platform. General and administrative expenses incurred during the year ended December 31, 2022 included $6.5 million of expenses for consulting services with respect to strategic growth, direction and advice per the Separation Agreement with AIR. This agreement concluded at December 31, 2022.
Interest Expense
For the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to the same period in 2021, interest expense increased by $20.9 million, or 39.6% due primarily due to $27.9 million of spread maintenance costs related to prepayment of the Notes Payable to AIR and other debt, the refinancing of certain property debt, and the payoff of a construction loan, partially offset by reduced interest expense on the Notes Payable to AIR due to the early payoff.
28
Mezzanine Investment Income (Loss), Net
In November 2019, Aimco Predecessor made a five-year, $275.0 million mezzanine loan to the partnership owning the "Parkmerced Apartments" located in southwest San Francisco (the "Mezzanine Investment"). The loan bears interest at a 10% annual rate, accruing if not paid from property operations. As discussed in Note 2, ownership of the subsidiaries that originated and hold the mezzanine loan was retained by AIR following the Separation. The Separation Agreement provides for AIR to transfer ownership of the subsidiaries that originated and hold the mezzanine loan, once required third-party consents to transfer are received. Until legal title of the subsidiaries is transferred, AIR is obligated to pass payments on the mezzanine loan to us.
During the year ended December 31, 2022, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge to reduce the carrying value of the Mezzanine Investment to $158.6 million. The non-cash impairment is reflected in Mezzanine investment income (loss), net, in our Consolidated Statements of Operations, and as a reduction in Mezzanine investment in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, we recognized $30.4 million of income in connection with the mezzanine loan.
Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Interest Rate Options
We are required to adjust our interest rate options to fair value on a quarterly basis. As a result of the mark-to-market adjustments, we recorded unrealized gains of $36.9 million and $6.5 million during the years ended December 31, 2022, and 2021, respectively. In addition, we realized gains of $11.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2022.
Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Equity Investments
In June 2022, 22% of our original investment in IQHQ was redeemed for $16.5 million and we recognized a realized gain of $5.7 million. Our remaining investment in IQHQ with a cost basis of $39.2 million was valued at an estimated fair market value of $59.7 million, and we recognized a $20.5 million unrealized gain at the same per share value as the cash redemption. We measure our investments in property technology funds at NAV as a practical expedient. As a result of changes in NAV, we recorded unrealized losses of $5.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to unrealized gains of $6.6 million for the same period in 2021.
Gain on Dispositions of Real Estate
During the year ended December 31, 2022, we sold three stabilized multifamily properties and one land parcel for gross proceeds of $267.3 million and recognized $175.9 million of gain on dispositions of real estate.
Lease Modification Income
In June 2022, we as lessee and AIR as lessor, entered into a lease termination agreement pursuant to which AIR paid us a termination payment on September 1, 2022. Upon receipt of this payment, the leases with respect to four properties were terminated, and we relinquished control of the associated leasehold improvements and underlying land of these four properties. The total lease modification income recognized for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $207.0 million.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net, includes costs associated with our risk management activities, partnership administration expenses, fee income, and certain non-recurring items. For the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to the same period in 2021, Other income (expense), net decreased by $16.6 million due primarily to one-time fee revenue earned in 2021 as well as advisory expenses related to a strategic business review and the annual shareholder meeting in 2022.
Income Tax Benefit (Expense)
Certain aspects of our operations, including our development and redevelopment activities, are conducted through taxable REIT subsidiaries, or TRS entities. Additionally, our TRS entities hold investments in one of our apartment communities and 1001 Brickell Bay Drive.
Our income tax benefit calculated in accordance with GAAP includes income taxes associated with the income or loss of our TRS entities. Income taxes, as well as changes in valuation allowance and incremental deferred tax items in conjunction with intercompany asset transfers and internal restructurings (if applicable), are included in Income tax benefit (expense) in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
29
Consolidated GAAP income or loss subject to tax consists of pretax income or loss of our taxable entities and gains retained by the REIT. For the year ended December 31, 2022, we had net income subject to tax of $88.8 million, compared to net losses subject to tax of $31.4 million for the same period in 2021.
For the year ended December 31, 2022, we recognized income tax expense of $17.3 million, compared to income tax benefit of $13.6 million for the same period in 2021. The year-to-year change is due primarily to GAAP income taxes associated with the net lease modification income recognized in 2022.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity
Liquidity is the ability to meet present and future financial obligations. Our primary sources of liquidity are cash flows from operations and borrowing capacity under our loan agreements.
As of December 31, 2022, our available liquidity was $379.8 million, which consisted of:
We have commitments for approximately $155.8 million and remaining planned spend of $278.7 million on development and redevelopment projects, with $304.6 million undrawn on our construction loans as of December 31, 2022. The initial allocation to our Edgewater joint venture and Strathmore joint ventures have remaining unfunded commitments of $10.3 million. We also have unfunded commitments in the amount of $2.4 million related to four investments in entities that develop technology related to the real estate industry. Our principal uses for liquidity include normal operating activities, payments of principal and interest on outstanding debt, capital expenditures, and future investments. Additionally, our third-party property managers may enter into commitments on our behalf to purchase goods or services in connection with the operation of our apartment communities and our office building. Those commitments generally have terms of one year or less and reflect expenditure levels comparable to historical levels.
We believe, based on the information available at this time, that we have sufficient cash on hand and access to additional sources of liquidity to meet our operational needs for the next twelve months.
In the event that our cash and cash equivalents, revolving secured credit facility, and cash provided by operating activities are not sufficient to cover our liquidity needs, we have the means to generate additional liquidity, such as from additional property financing activity and proceeds from apartment community sales. We expect to meet our long-term liquidity requirements, including debt maturities, development and redevelopment spending, and future investment activity, primarily through property financing activity, cash generated from operations, and the recycling of our equity. Our revolving secured credit facility matures in December 2023, prior to consideration of its two one-year extension options.
Leverage and Capital Resources
The availability and cost of credit and its related effect on the overall economy may affect our liquidity and future financing activities, both through changes in interest rates and access to financing. Any adverse changes in the lending environment could negatively affect our liquidity. We have taken steps to mitigate a portion of our short-term refunding risk. However, if property or development financing options become unavailable, we may consider alternative sources of liquidity, such as reductions in capital spending or apartment community dispositions.
As of December 31, 2022, approximately 83% of our outstanding non-recourse property debt had a fixed interest rate and approximately 17% had a variable interest rate. In addition, the weighted-average rate on our non-recourse property debt was 5.2%, and the average remaining term to maturity was 7.1 years. At December 31, 2022, substantially all of our outstanding non-recourse property debt was either fixed or hedged. Our use of interest rate caps may vary from quarter to quarter depending on lender requirements, recycling of interest rate caps between projects, and our view on forecasted interest rates.
While our primary source of leverage is property-level debt, we also have a secured $150.0 million credit facility with a syndicate of financial institutions, and construction loans. As of December 31, 2022, we had no outstanding borrowings under our revolving secured credit facility. Under our revolving secured credit facility, we have agreed to maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.25x, minimum tangible net worth of $625.0 million, and maximum leverage of 60% as defined in the credit
30
agreement. We are currently in compliance and expect to remain in compliance with these covenants during the next twelve months.
Changes in Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash
The following discussion relates to changes in consolidated cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash due to operating, investing, and financing activities, which are presented in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in Item 8 of this report.
Operating Activities
For the year ended December 31, 2022, net cash provided by operating activities was $204.2 million. Our operating cash flow is primarily affected by rental rates, occupancy levels and operating expenses related to our portfolio of apartment communities, and general and administrative costs. Cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2022, increased by $191.6 million compared to the same period in 2021, due primarily to cash received from development property lease terminations in 2022.
Cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2021, decreased by $35.3 million compared to 2020, due to higher operating and general and administrative expenses.
Investing Activities
For the year ended December 31, 2022, cash used in investing activities of $120.8 million consisted primarily of capital expenditures of $237.5 million and $129.2 million of cash used to acquire undeveloped land parcels, offset by $260.0 million of proceeds received from the disposition of real estate. Cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2022, decreased by $150.7 million compared to the same period in 2021, due primarily to proceeds received from the disposition of real estate offset by increased capital expenditures and acquisitions.
Capital additions totaled $237.5 million and $177.8 million during the years ended December 31, 2022. and 2021, respectively, and were primarily used for construction costs on our development and redevelopment properties.
We exclude the amounts of capital spending related to commercial spaces and to apartment communities sold or classified as held for sale at the end of the period from the foregoing measures. We have also excluded from these measures indirect capitalized costs, which are not yet allocated to communities with capital additions, and their related capital spending categories.
Cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2021, increased by $142.1 million compared to 2020, due primarily to capital expenditures and cash used in the purchase of The Benson Hotel, the Eldridge Townhomes, and construction costs on our development properties.
Financing Activities
For the year ended December 31, 2022, cash used in financing activities of $98.3 million consisted primarily of the $534.1 million payoff of the Notes Payable to AIR, $302.4 million to retire property debt and the $138.4 million paydown of construction loans, offset by $756.2 million in cash raised from the issuance of new property debt, $93.2 million in cash draws received from construction loans, and a $102.0 million redeemable noncontrolling interest preferred equity contribution from an institutional partner. For the year ended December 31, 2021, cash provided by financing activities of $204.7 million consisted primarily of $165.2 million of proceeds received from construction loans undertaken and $59.8 million of proceeds received from non-recourse property debt issuances.
Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2021, decreased by $165.4 million compared to 2020, due primarily to the non-recurring $420.9 million investment received from Aimco Predecessor in connection with the Separation.
Non-GAAP Measures
We use EBITDAre and Adjusted EBITDAre in managing our business and in evaluating our financial condition and operating performance. These key financial indicators are non-GAAP measures and are defined and described below. We provide reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial measures to the most comparable financial measure computed in accordance with GAAP.
31
Earnings Before Interest Expense, Income Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization for Real Estate (“EBITDAre”)
EBITDAre and Adjusted EBITDAre are non-GAAP measures, which we believe are useful to investors, creditors, and rating agencies as a supplemental measure of our ability to incur and service debt because they are recognized measures of performance by the real estate industry and allow for comparison of our credit strength to different companies. EBITDAre and Adjusted EBITDAre should not be considered alternatives to net income (loss) as determined in accordance with GAAP as indicators of liquidity. There can be no assurance that our method of calculating EBITDAre and Adjusted EBITDAre is comparable with that of other real estate investment trusts. Nareit defines EBITDAre as net income computed in accordance with GAAP, before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation, and amortization expense, further adjusted for:
EBITDAre is defined by Nareit and provides for an additional performance measure independent of capital structure for greater comparability between real estate investment trusts. We define Adjusted EBITDAre as EBITDAre adjusted to exclude the effect of net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated real estate partnerships and EBITDAre adjustments attributable to noncontrolling interests, and unrealized gain on interest rate options, which we believe allow investors to compare a measure of our earnings before the effects of our capital structure and indebtedness with that of other companies in the real estate industry. Additionally, we exclude interest income recognized on our Mezzanine Investment that was accrued but not paid.
The reconciliation of net (loss) income to EBITDAre and Adjusted EBITDAre for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
92,158 |
|
|
$ |
(4,980 |
) |
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest expense |
|
|
73,842 |
|
|
|
52,902 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
17,264 |
|
|
|
(13,570 |
) |
Gains on dispositions of real estate |
|
|
(175,863 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Lease modification income |
|
|
(206,963 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
158,967 |
|
|
|
84,712 |
|
Impairment |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Adjustment related to EBITDAre of unconsolidated partnerships |
|
|
1,004 |
|
|
|
836 |
|
EBITDAre |
|
$ |
(39,591 |
) |
|
$ |
119,900 |
|
Net (income) loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling |
|
|
(8,829 |
) |
|
|
(91 |
) |
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(3,672 |
) |
|
|
(1,136 |
) |
EBITDAre adjustments attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(491 |
) |
|
|
(320 |
) |
Mezzanine investment (income) loss, net |
|
|
179,239 |
|
|
|
(30,436 |
) |
Realized and unrealized (gains) losses on interest rate options |
|
|
(48,205 |
) |
|
|
(6,509 |
) |
Unrealized (gains) losses on IQHQ investment |
|
|
(20,501 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Adjusted EBITDAre |
|
$ |
57,950 |
|
|
$ |
81,408 |
|
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP, which requires us to make estimates and assumptions. We believe that the following critical accounting policies involve our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Capitalized Costs
We capitalize costs, including certain indirect costs, incurred in connection with our capital additions activities, including developments, redevelopments, other tangible apartment community improvements, and replacements of existing community
32
components. Included in these capitalized costs are payroll costs associated with time spent by employees in connection with the planning, execution, and control of all capital addition activities at our communities. We characterize as “indirect costs” an allocation of certain department costs, including payroll, at the area operations and corporate levels that clearly relate to capital addition activities. We also capitalize interest, property taxes, and insurance during periods in which redevelopments are in progress. We commence capitalization of costs, including certain indirect costs, incurred in connection with our capital addition activities, at the point in time when activities necessary to get communities, apartment homes, or leased spaces ready for their intended use begin. These activities include when communities, apartment homes, or leased spaces are undergoing physical construction, as well as when homes or leased spaces are held vacant in advance of planned construction, provided that other activities such as permitting, planning, and design are in progress. We cease the capitalization of costs when the communities or components thereof are substantially complete and ready for their intended use, which is typically when construction has been completed and homes or leased spaces are available for occupancy. We charge costs including ordinary repairs, maintenance, and resident turnover costs to property operating expense, as incurred.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Real estate and other long-lived assets to be held and used are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization, unless the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable. If events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable, we assess its recoverability by comparing the carrying amount to our estimate of the undiscounted future cash flows, excluding interest charges, of the asset. If the carrying amount exceeds the estimated aggregate undiscounted future cash flows, we recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.
In connection with the Separation, we entered into a sublease of office space within our corporate offices to AIR at then-current market rents. Based on an analysis of the estimated undiscounted cash flows per the terms of the sublease arrangement, we evaluated the recoverability of the assets associated with the subleased space, including, the right-of-use asset, tenant improvements and furniture, fixtures and equipment and concluded the subleased assets were impaired as of December 31, 2020. We recorded an impairment charge of $11.0 million in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2020. There were no such impairments for the years ended December 31, 2022, and 2021.
In connection with the Separation, we entered into a software license agreement with AIR to provide for the use of certain internally developed software at then-current market rates. Based on an analysis of the estimated undiscounted cash flows relative to the carrying value of the internally developed software, we concluded the assets were impaired. Additionally, following an evaluation of the future service potential of certain other internal software that was under development, we ceased development and impaired the associated carrying value. We recorded an aggregate impairment charge of $4.9 million in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2020. There were no such impairments for the years ended December 31, 2022, and 2021.
Acquisitions
Upon the acquisition of real estate, we determine whether the purchase qualifies as an asset acquisition or, less frequently, meets the definition of an acquisition of a business. We generally recognize the acquisition of apartment communities or interests in partnerships that own communities at our cost, including the related transaction costs, as asset acquisitions.
We allocate the cost of apartment communities acquired based on the relative fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The fair value of these assets and liabilities is determined using valuation techniques that rely on Level 2 and Level 3 inputs within the fair value framework. We determine the fair value of tangible assets, such as land, buildings, furniture, fixtures and equipment using valuation techniques that consider comparable market transactions, replacement costs and other available information. We determine the fair value of identified intangible assets or liabilities, which typically relate to in-place leases, using valuation techniques that consider the terms of the in-place leases, current market data for comparable leases and our experience in leasing similar communities.
The intangible assets or liabilities related to in-place leases are comprised of: (a) the value of the above- and below-market leases in-place, measured over the period, including probable lease renewals for below-market leases, that the leases are expected to remain in effect; (b) the estimated unamortized portion of avoided leasing commissions and other costs that ordinarily would be incurred to originate the in-place leases; and (c) the value associated with leased apartment homes during an estimated absorption period, which estimates rental revenue that would not have been earned had leased apartment homes been vacant at the time of acquisition, assuming lease-up periods based on market demand and stabilized occupancy levels. The above- and below-market lease intangibles are amortized to rental revenue over the expected remaining terms of the associated leases, which
33
include reasonably assured renewal periods. Other intangible assets related to in-place leases are amortized to depreciation and amortization over the expected remaining terms of the associated leases.
Mezzanine Investment
Pre-Separation, the Mezzanine Investment in the partnership owning Parkmerced Apartments and related swaption were accounted for under the equity method of accounting, and a derivative, respectively. Post-Separation, the legal title to the loan investment and swaption remained with AIR, while we obtained the right to all of the economics.
On a periodic basis, we evaluate our Mezzanine Investment for impairment. We assess whether there are any indicators that imply the value of our investment may be impaired. These include assessments of both the underlying property performance and general market conditions in place. An investment is considered impaired if we determine that its fair value is less than the net carrying value of the investment on an other-than-temporary basis. Cash flow projections for the investment consider property level factors such as expected future operating income, trends and prospects, as well as the effects of demand, competition and other factors, such as changes in the macroeconomic environment that can lead to increases in capitalization rates and discount rates. We consider various qualitative factors to determine if a decrease in the value of our investment is other-than-temporary. These factors include the loan’s maturity date, our intent and ability to retain our investment in the entity, and the financial condition and long-term prospects of the entity.
As a result of our analysis, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge to reduce the carrying value of the Mezzanine Investment to $158.6 million at December 31, 2022. The impairment loss is reflected in Mezzanine investment income (loss), net, in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2022, and as a reduction in Mezzanine investment in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2022. No impairment losses were recognized for the mezzanine investment during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Prior to recording the non-cash impairment charge, we recognized as income the net amounts earned on the mezzanine loan by AIR on its equity investment that are due to be paid to us when collected to the extent the income was supported by the change in AIR’s claim to the net assets of the underlying borrower. The income recognized primarily represents the interest accrued under the terms of the underlying mezzanine loan.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our chief market risks are refunding risk, that is the availability of property debt or other cash sources to refund maturing property debt, and repricing risk, that is the possibility of increases in base interest rates and credit risk spreads. We use long-dated, fixed-rate, non-recourse property debt on stabilized properties.
In order to avoid the refunding and repricing risks of short-term borrowings. We use working capital primarily to fund short-term uses. We make limited use of derivative financial instruments and we do not use them for trading or other speculative purposes.
Market Risk
As of December 31, 2022, on a consolidated basis, we had $164.2 million of variable-rate property-level debt outstanding and $113.4 million of variable rate construction loans. The impact of rising interest rates is mitigated by our use of interest rate caps, which as of December 31, 2022, provided protection for our variable interest rate debt. Our use of interest rate caps may vary from quarter to quarter depending on lender requirements, recycling of interest rate caps between projects, and our view on forecasted interest rates. We estimate that an increase in our variable rate indices of 100 basis points with constant credit risk spreads, would increase interest expense by $0.5 million on an annual basis. We estimate that a decrease in our variable rate indices of 100 basis points with constant credit risk spreads, would reduce interest expense by $1.0 million on an annual basis.
As of December 31, 2022, we held interest rate swaps and caps with $2.0 billion notional value. These instruments were acquired for $17.7 million and at year end were valued at $62.3 million.
As of December 31, 2022, we had $229.8 million in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, a portion of which bears interest at variable rates.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The independent registered public accounting firm’s reports, consolidated financial statements and schedule listed in the “Index to Financial Statements” on page F-1 of this Annual Report are filed as part of this report and incorporated herein by this reference.
34
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Aimco
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by our Board, management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013 Framework).
Based on their assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2022, our internal control over financial reporting is effective.
Our independent registered public accounting firm has issued an attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the fiscal period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the internal control over financial reporting of Aimco.
35
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of
Apartment Investment and Management Company
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited Apartment Investment and Management Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Apartment Investment and Management Company (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022 and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 15(a) and our report dated February 27, 2023 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Denver, Colorado
February 27, 2023
36
Aimco Operating Partnership
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Aimco Operating Partnership’s management, with the participation of Aimco Operating Partnership’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, Aimco Operating Partnership’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, Aimco Operating Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Aimco Operating Partnership’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by our Board, management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of Aimco Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013 Framework).
Based on their assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2022, Aimco Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting is effective.
Aimco Operating Partnership’s independent registered public accounting firm has issued an attestation report on Aimco Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the fiscal period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the internal control over financial reporting of Aimco.
37
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Partners and the Board of Directors of
Aimco OP L.P.
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited Aimco OP L.P.’s internal control over financial reporting as of year ended December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Aimco OP L.P. (the Partnership) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of year ended December 31, 2022, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Partnership as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, partners’ capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 15(a) and our report dated February 27, 2023 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Partnership’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Partnership in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Denver, Colorado
February 27, 2023
38
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS
Not applicable.
39
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The Board is composed of nine highly qualified directors who bring strong skills, industry experience and track records of driving value. Seven of eight independent directors have joined the Board within the past approximately two years, demonstrating a commitment to refreshment and providing fresh perspectives through their varied backgrounds.
The directors of the Company, their ages, dates they began serving on the Board, and their positions on the Board are set forth below.
Name |
|
Age |
|
Director Since |
|
Position |
Wes Powell |
|
43 |
|
December 2020 |
|
Director (Class III), President and Chief Executive Officer |
Quincy L. Allen |
|
53 |
|
December 2020 |
|
Director (Class I), Chairman of the Nominating, Environmental, Social, and Governance Committee |
Patricia L. Gibson |
|
60 |
|
December 2020 |
|
Director (Class I), Chairman of the Investment Committee |
Jay Paul Leupp |
|
59 |
|
December 2020 |
|
Director (Class II), Chairman of the Audit Committee |
Robert A. Miller |
|
77 |
|
April 2007 |
|
Director (Class III) |
Deborah Smith |
|
50 |
|
January 2021 |
|
Director (Class III) |
R. Dary Stone |
|
69 |
|
December 2020 |
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors (Class II) |
James P. Sullivan |
|
61 |
|
December 2022 |
|
Director (Class II) |
Kirk A. Sykes |
|
64 |
|
December 2020 |
|
Director (Class I), Chairman of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee |
40
The following is a biographical summary of the current directors of the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
WES POWELL
President and Chief Executive Officer, Aimco
Age: 43 |
|
Experience
• President and Chief Executive Officer, (2020 – present) Executive Vice President, Redevelopment and Acquisitions (2018 – 2020), Senior Vice President, Redevelopment with responsibility for the eastern region (2013 to 2018), held various positions, including Asset Manager, Director, and Vice President of Redevelopment, (2004 – 2013), Aimco
• Staff Architect, Ai Architecture (now Perkins & Will)
Qualifications
• Real Estate, Property / Asset Management and Operations, Capital Markets, Development and Construction, Investment and Finance gained through his experience overseeing Aimco’s redevelopment and development activities nationally, leading acquisitions in the eastern U.S., and prior responsibilities as an Asset Manager for the company
• Mr. Powell also brings expertise in Business Operations, Financial Expertise and Literacy, Talent Development and Management
Education
• B.EnvD, University of Colorado School of Architecture and Urban Planning
• MBA, Northwestern’s Kellogg School of Management |
|
Other Boards / Organizations
• Urban Land Institute, Member
• National Multi Housing Council, Member
Committees
• None |
41
|
|
|
|
|
QUINCY L. ALLEN
Co-Founder and Managing Partner, Arc Capital Partners
Age: 53 |
|
Experience
• Co-Founder and Managing Partner, Arc Capital Partners, a Los Angeles real estate investment firm that specializes in urban mixed-use properties (2013 to present)
• Managing Director and investment committee member of the Canyon-Johnson Urban Funds (partnership between Canyon Partners and Earvin “Magic” Johnson), Canyon Partners (2003 – 2013)
• Executive focused on workouts and portfolio management, Lazard Frères (2000 – 2002)
• Vice President, Archstone Communities. a leading national multifamily REIT focused on apartments in urban locations (1997-2000)
• Began real estate investment career at Security Capital Group focused on the multifamily and industrial (Prologis) platforms (1996 – 1997)
Qualifications
• Real Estate, Development, Investment, Finance and Business Operations gained through his experience at Arc Capital, where Mr. Allen is responsible for overall firm strategy, investments, asset management, financing and dispositions, and during his time at Canyon Partners, Lazard and Archstone Communities
• Mr. Allen also brings Financial Expertise and Literacy and Talent Development and Management experience
Education
• BS, Finance, Summa Cum Laude, Wayne State University
• MBA, Harvard Business School |
|
Other Boards / Organizations
• Mike Ilitch School of Business at Wayne State University, Board member
• Wayne State University Foundation, Investment Committee Member
• Think Together, Board member
• Urban Land Institute, Pension Real Estate Association, Member
• National Multi Housing Council, Member
Committees
• Audit
• Compensation and Human Resources
• Nominating, Environmental, Social, and Governance, Chair
• Investment |
42
|
|
|
|
|
PATRICIA L. GIBSON
Founding Principal and CEO, Banner Oak Capital Partners
Age: 60 since 2020 |
|
Experience
• Founding Principal and CEO, Banner Oak Capital Partners, a fully integrated, independent investment management platform and Registered Investment Advisor with $5 billion in assets under management (2016 – present)
• President, Hunt Realty Investments, where she led the commercial real estate investment management activities for the Hunt family of companies (2010 – 2016); Senior Vice President (1997 – 2010)
• Senior positions, Goldman Sachs’ real estate subsidiary, (1994 – 1997)
• Began real estate investment career at The Travelers Realty Investment Company on the debt and equity side of the business (1985 – 1994)
Qualifications
• Real Estate, Investment and Finance, Capital Markets, Asset Management and Financial Expertise and Literacy gained through her experience at Banner Oak, where Ms. Gibson oversees all investment activity and is responsible for establishing and implementing the firm’s strategic direction, as well as her time at Hunt Realty Investment where she was responsible for the growth of an extensive and diverse portfolio of direct-owned strategic assets totaling over $3 billion, including a strategic venture with a major pension fund dedicated to investments in real estate operating platforms, and her time at Goldman Sachs overseeing portfolio management and the capital market efforts for over $4 billion in commercial real estate assets
• Ms. Gibson also brings expertise in Business Operations and Talent Development and Management
Education
• BS, Finance, Fairfield University
• MBA, University of Connecticut
• Chartered Financial Analyst |
|
Other Boards / Organizations
• RLJ Lodging Trust (since 2017)
• Pacolet Milliken Enterprises, a private investment company focused on energy and real estate
• Urban Land Institute, Member
• Industrial and Office Parks Red Council, formerly Vice Chair
• Executive Council of the University of Texas Real Estate Finance Council, Member
• National Association of Real Estate Investment Managers, Member & previous Chairman
Committees
• Audit
• Compensation and Human Resources
• Nominating, Environmental, Social, Governance
• Investment, Chair |
43
|
|
|
|
|
JAY PAUL LEUPP
Co-Founder, Managing Partner, and Senior Portfolio Manager, Terra Firma Asset Management
Age: 59 since 2020 |
|
Experience
• Co-Founder, Managing Partner, and Senior Portfolio Manager, Real Estate Securities, Terra Firma Asset Management (2020 – present)
• Managing Director and Portfolio Manager/Analyst, Global Real Estate Securities, Lazard Asset Management (2011 – 2020).
• Founder, President and Chief Executive Officer, also served as the Senior Portfolio Manager for real estate securities mutual funds, Grubb & Ellis Alesco Global Advisors (2007 – 2011 when sold to Lazard)
• Managing Director, Real Estate Equity Research, RBC Capital Markets, an investment banking group of the Royal Bank of Canada (2002 – 2006)
• Managing Director, Real Estate Equity Research, Robertson Stephens & Co. Inc., an investment banking firm (1994 – 2002).
• Vice President, Staubach Company (1991 – 1994)
• Development Manager, Trammell Crow Residential, one of the nation’s largest developers of multifamily housing (1989 – 1991)
• Senior Accountant (CPA), KPMG Peat Marwick 1985-1987.
Qualifications
• Capital Markets, Investment and Finance, Real Estate, and Development gained through his over 28 years of experience as a Portfolio Manager and Managing Director focused on investments in real estate securities and leasing, acquisition and financing of commercial real estate; Mr. Leupp also brings Corporate Governance experience gained through his public and private board service
• Mr. Leupp brings additional expertise in Accounting and Auditing for Large Business Organizations, Business Operations, Financial Expertise and Literacy, Property / Asset Management and Operations, and Talent Development and Management. Mr. Leupp is a Certified Public Accountant (Inactive Status)
Education
• BS, Business Administration, Santa Clara University
• MBA, Harvard Business School |
|
Other Boards / Organizations
• Health Care Realty (since 2020)
• Marathon Digital Holdings (since 2021)
• G.W. Williams Company (private)
• The Policy Board of the Fisher Center for Real Estate at the University of California, Berkeley, Member
• Santa Clara University’s Trustee Finance Committee, Member
• AICPA, Member
Committees
• Audit, Chair
• Compensation and Human Resources
• Nominating, Environmental, Social, and Governance
• Investment |
44
|
|
|
|
|
ROBERT A. MILLER
President, RAMCO Advisors LLC
Age: 77 since 2007 |
|
Experience
• President of RAMCO Advisors LLC, an investment advisory and business consulting firm (2012 – present)
• Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, International, Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation (2011 – 2012)
• President, Marriott Leisure (1997 – 2011)
• President (1988 – 1997), Executive Vice President & General Manager (1984 to 1988), Marriott Vacation Club International
• Co-Founder, President and Chief Operating Officer, American Resorts, Inc. (1978 – 1984 when sold to Marriott)
• Served for five years as an accountant, Arthur Young & Company
Qualifications
• Business Operations, Property / Asset Management and Operations, Marketing and Branding, Sales, Development, Finance and Investment, and Accounting and Auditing for Large Business Organizations through his 44 years as a successful real estate entrepreneur, corporate executive and consultant
• Mr. Miller also provides expertise related to Financial Expertise and Literacy and Talent Development and Management
Education
• BSBA, University of Florida |
|
Other Boards / Organizations
• AIR (2020 – 2021)
• Welk Hospitality Group (2016 – 2021)
• American Resort Development Association, Director and past Chairman
• Urban Land Institute, Member
Committees
• Audit
• Compensation and Human Resources
• Nominating, Environmental, Social, and Governance
• Investment |
45
|
|
|
|
|
DEBORAH SMITH
Co-Founder and CEO, The CenterCap Group
Age: 50 since 2021 |
|
Experience
• Co-Founder and CEO, The CenterCap Group, a boutique investment bank providing strategic M&A advisory, capital-raising and consulting related services to private and public sector companies and fund managers across the real assets industry (2009 – present); also serves as Chief Executive Officer of the firm’s two wholly owned subsidiaries, CC Securities (since 2011) and CenterCap Advisors (since 2019)
• Co-Head of Mergers and Acquisitions and Senior Managing Director, CB Richard Ellis Investors, where she also served on the Global Leadership Team, which oversaw execution of strategies and best practices (2007 – 2009)
• Served as an investment banker with Lehman Brothers, Wachovia Securities, and Morgan Stanley
• Ms. Smith is a frequent speaker at industry conferences and author of numerous industry articles for real estate focused publications.
Qualifications
• Investment and Finance, Capital Markets, Corporate Transactions, Business Strategy & Operations, Real Estate, and Marketing gained through her experience as a Co-Founder and CEO at The CenterCap Group where Ms. Smith heads the firm’s Strategic Capital, Mergers & Acquisitions and Execution efforts, as well as her role as an investment banker at various firms; Ms. Smith has been involved in more than $100 billion of mergers, acquisitions and restructuring transactions and over $500 million of private capital raising assignments to support GP and LP positions for middle-market restructuring, acquisition and development projects across the retail, multifamily, office, hotel and industrial sectors
• Ms. Smith also brings expertise in Financial Expertise and Literacy, Legal, and Talent Development and Management
Education
• Bachelor of Economics, with honors, University of Sydney
• Bachelor of Law, with honors, University of Sydney |
|
Other Boards / Organizations
• None
Committees
• Audit
• Compensation and Human Resources
• Nominating, Environmental, Social, and Governance
• Investment |
46
|
|
|
|
|
R. DARY STONE
Chairman of the Board
President and CEO, R. D. Stone Interests
Age: 69 Independent Director since 2020 |
|
Experience
• President and Chief Executive Officer, R. D. Stone Interests (1990 – present)
• Served as President of multiple real estate companies (1988 – present), including President and COO of Cousins Properties, an NYSE listed REIT
Qualifications
• Investment and Finance, Real Estate, Development, Property / Asset Management and Operations, Capital Markets gained through his over 30-year career investing and developing a variety of projects and joint ventures including the operation and management of one of the country’s largest master planned developments and other large commercial real estate projects and success in getting zoning changes that allowed for multifamily and other non-office uses where prior zoning was commercial
• Mr. Stone also brings expertise in Business Operations, Corporate Governance, Financial Expertise and Literacy, and Talent Development and Management
Education
• Tulane University and Baylor University
• JD, Baylor University Law School |
|
Other Boards / Organizations
• Cousins Properties (2011 – 2016 and currently since 2018)
• Tolleson Wealth
• Former Regent, Baylor University; Chairman (2009 - 2011)
• Hunt Companies, Inc (2015 – 2016)
• Parkway, Inc (2016 – 2017)
• Lone Star Bank (former)
• Former Chairman, Banking Commission of Texas (previously known as the Texas State Finance Commission)
Committees
• Audit
• Compensation and Human Resources
• Nominating, Environmental, Social, and Governance
• Investment |
47
|
|
|
|
|
JAMES P. SULLIVAN
Age: 61 since 2022 |
|
Experience
• Senior Advisor – Research, Green Street Advisors (2020)
• President, Green Street Advisory Group (2014-2019)
• Head of North American REIT Research, Green Street Advisors (2010-2014)
• Managing Director/Senior REIT Analyst, Green Street Advisors (1994-2009)
• Prior to Green Street, served as a real estate investment banker and construction lender at Bank of America and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company
Qualifications
• Real Estate, Capital Markets, Investment and Finance, gained through his 26-year career at Green Street Advisors, the preeminent independent research and advisory firm concentrating on the commercial real estate industry. During his first 20 years at Green Street, Mr. Sullivan was a REIT analyst, and he managed the firm's REIT research team for five years. He then served for five years as President of Green Street's Advisory Group, providing strategic advice to commercial real estate owners and investors around the world. In his final year at Green Street, Mr. Sullivan was a Senior Advisor to Green Street's research team, helping to foster best practices across the firm's public and private market research groups.
• Mr. Sullivan brings additional expertise in Accounting and Auditing for Large Business Organizations, Business Operations, Corporate Governance, Financial Expertise and Literacy, and Operations, and Talent Development and Management
Education
• BA, Economics, Duke University
• MBA, Finance and Real Estate, Columbia University |
|
Other Boards / Organizations
• The James Campbell Company (2022 - present; member of Compensation and Audit Committees)
• Bixby Land Company (2016-present; Compensation Committee Chairman, Audit Committee member)
Committees
• Audit
• Compensation and Human Resources
• Nominating, Environmental, Social, and Governance
• Investment |
48
|
|
|
|
|
KIRK A. SYKES
Co-Managing Partner, Accordia Partners
Age: 64 since 2020 |
|
Experience
• Co-Managing Partner, Accordia Partners, LLC, a real estate development company (2014 – present)
• President, Primary Corporation, a real estate company that owns commercial real estate (1993 – present)
• President and Managing Director, Urban Strategy America Fund, LLP, a New Boston real estate investment fund (2005 – 2014)
Qualifications
• Real Estate, Investment and Finance, Development, Capital Markets, Marketing and Branding, Property / Asset Management and Operations, Financial Expertise and Literacy, gained through his experience at real estate development and commercial real estate companies, as well as his time at a real estate focused investment fund, and perspective gained during his tenure as Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston and other roles including service on Fleet Bank and BankBoston’s Community Bank Advisory Boards
• Mr. Sykes also brings expertise in Corporate Governance and Talent and Development
Education
• B. Arch., Cornell University
• Graduate, The Harvard Business School Owner and President Management Program |
|
Other Boards / Organizations
• Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (2017-2019)
• Natixis Loomis Sayles Funds, Board of Trustees. Trustee, Audit & Governance Committee Member (2019 – Present)
• Federal Reserve Bank of Boston External Diversity Advisory Board, Member (2010 – Present)
• Real Estate Executive Council Emeritus Board, (Former-Chairman)
• NAIOP Massachusetts Board Management Committee, Member
• The Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Former Member (2008 – 2014) and Chairman (2012 – 2014)
Committees
• Audit
• Compensation and Human Resources, Chair
• Nominating, Environmental, Social, and Governance
• Investment |
49
Summary of Director Qualifications and Expertise
Below is a summary of the qualifications and expertise of the directors, including expertise relevant to Aimco’s business.
Summary of Director |
Mr. |
Mr. |
Ms. |
Mr. |
Mr. |
Ms. |
Mr. |
Mr. Sullivan |
Mr. |
Accounting and Auditing |
|
|
|
● |
● |
|
|
● |
|
Business Operations |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
Capital Markets |
● |
● |
● |
● |
|
● |
● |
● |
● |
Corporate Governance |
● |
● |
|
● |
|
|
● |
● |
● |
Development |
● |
● |
|
● |
● |
|
● |
|
● |
Executive |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
|
● |
Financial Expertise and Literacy |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
Information Technology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment and Finance |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
Legal |
|
|
|
|
|
● |
|
|
|
Marketing and Branding |
|
|
|
|
● |
● |
|
|
● |
Property / Asset Management and Operations |
● |
|
● |
● |
● |
|
● |
|
● |
Real Estate |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
Talent Development and Management |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
Demographics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Race/Ethnicity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
African American |
|
● |
|
|
|
|
|
|
● |
Asian/Pacific Islander |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
White/Caucasian |
● |
|
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
|
Hispanic/Latino |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Native American |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gender |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Male |
● |
● |
|
● |
● |
|
● |
● |
● |
Female |
|
|
● |
|
|
● |
|
|
|
Meetings and Committees
The Board held nine meetings during the year ended December 31, 2022. During 2022, there were the following five committees: Audit; Compensation and Human Resources; Nominating, Environmental, Social, and Governance; Investment; and Aimco-AIR Transactions. During 2022, no director attended fewer than 75% of the aggregate total number of meetings of the Board and each committee on which such director served.
The Corporate Governance Guidelines, as described below, provide that the Company generally expects that the Chairman of the Board will attend all annual and special meetings of the stockholders. Other members of the Board are not required to attend such meetings. All of the then-members of the Board attended the Company’s 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, including the Chairman of the Board, and the Company anticipates that the full Board will attend the annual meeting this year.
Below is a table illustrating the current standing committee memberships and chairmen. Additional detail on each committee follows the table.
Director |
|
Audit |
|
Compensation |
|
Nominating, Environmental, Social, and Governance |
|
Investment |
|
Quincy L. Allen |
|
● |
|
● |
|
† |
|
● |
|
Patricia L. Gibson |
|
● |
|
● |
|
● |
|
† |
|
Jay Paul Leupp |
|
† |
|
● |
|
● |
|
● |
|
Robert A. Miller |
|
● |
|
● |
|
● |
|
● |
|
Wes Powell |
|
̶ |
|
̶ |
|
̶ |
|
̶ |
|
Deborah Smith |
|
● |
|
● |
|
● |
|
● |
|
R. Dary Stone* |
|
● |
|
● |
|
● |
|
● |
|
James P. Sullivan |
|
● |
|
● |
|
● |
|
● |
|
Kirk A. Sykes |
|
● |
|
† |
|
● |
|
● |
|
__________
● indicates a member of the committee
† indicates the committee chairman
* indicates the Chairman of the Board
50
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee currently consists of the eight independent directors (Messrs. Allen, Leupp, Miller, Stone, Sullivan, and Sykes and Mses. Gibson and Smith) (the "Independent Directors"). Mr. Leupp serves as the chairman of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee has a written charter that is reviewed annually and was last amended in September 2022. In addition to the work of the Audit Committee, the chairman has regular and recurring conversations with Ms. Stanfield, Aimco’s Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), Ms. Johnson, Aimco’s Chief Administrative Officer (“CAO”), the head of Aimco’s internal audit function, and representatives of Ernst & Young LLP. The Audit Committee’s charter is posted on Aimco’s website (www.aimco.com) and is also available in print to stockholders, upon written request to Aimco’s Corporate Secretary.
The Audit Committee’s responsibilities are set forth in the following chart.
|
|
|
Audit Committee Responsibilities |
|
Accomplished |
|
|
|
Oversees Aimco’s accounting and financial reporting processes and audits of Aimco’s financial statements. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, and oversight of the independent auditors and the lead engagement partner and makes its appointment based on a variety of factors. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Reviews the scope, and overall plans for and results of the annual audit and internal audit activities. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Oversees management’s negotiation with Ernst & Young LLP concerning fees, and exercises final approval over all Ernst & Young LLP fees. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Consults with management and Ernst & Young LLP with respect to Aimco’s processes for risk assessment and enterprise risk management. Areas involving risk that are reported on by management and considered by the Audit Committee, the other Board committees, or the Board, include: operations, liquidity, leverage, finance, financial statements, the financial reporting process, accounting, legal matters, regulatory compliance, information technology and data protection, sustainability, climate risk, ESG, compensation, succession planning, and human resources and human capital. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Consults with management and Ernst & Young LLP regarding, and provides oversight for, Aimco’s financial reporting process, internal control over financial reporting, and the Company’s internal audit function. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Reviews and approves the Company’s policy about the hiring of former employees of independent auditors. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Reviews and approves the Company’s policy for the pre-approval of audit and permitted non-audit services by the independent auditor, and reviews and approves any such services provided pursuant to such policy. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Receives reports pursuant to Aimco’s policy for the submission and confidential treatment of communications from teammates and others concerning accounting, internal control and auditing matters. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Reviews and discusses with management and Ernst & Young LLP quarterly earnings releases prior to their issuance and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and annual reports on Form 10-K prior to their filing. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Reviews the responsibilities and performance of the Company’s internal audit function, approves the hiring, promotion, demotion or termination of the lead internal auditor, and oversees the lead internal auditor’s periodic performance review and changes to his or her compensation. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Reviews with management the scope and effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, including for purposes of evaluating the accuracy and fair presentation of the Company’s financial statements in connection with the certifications made by the CEO and CFO. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Meets regularly with members of Aimco management and with Ernst & Young LLP, including periodic meetings in executive session. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Performs an annual review of the Company’s independent auditor, including an assessment of the firm’s experience, expertise, communication, cost, value, and efficiency, and including external data relating to audit quality and performance, including recent Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) reports on Ernst & Young LLP and its peer firms. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Performs an annual review of the lead engagement partner of the Company’s independent auditor and the potential successors for that role. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Periodically evaluates independent audit service providers. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Reviews and discusses periodic reports from management pertaining to information technology security and controls. |
|
✓ |
51
The Audit Committee held eight meetings during the year ended December 31, 2022. As set forth in the Audit Committee’s charter, no director may serve as a member of the Audit Committee if such director serves on the audit committee of more than two other public companies, unless the Board determines that such simultaneous service would not impair the ability of such director to effectively serve on the Audit Committee. No member of the Audit Committee serves on the audit committee of more than two other public companies.
Audit Committee Financial Expert
The Board has designated Mr. Leupp as an “audit committee financial expert.” In addition, all of the members of the Audit Committee qualify as audit committee financial experts. Each member of the Audit Committee is independent, as that term is defined by Section 303A of the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange relating to audit committees.
Compensation and Human Resources Committee
The Compensation and Human Resources Committee currently consists of the eight Independent Directors. Mr. Sykes serves as the chairman of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee. The chairman meets regularly with Ms. Johnson, Aimco’s CAO. The Chairman also has regular conversations with the Compensation and Human Resources Committee’s independent compensation consultant, Willis Towers Watson, and outside counsel with expertise in executive compensation and compensation governance related matters. The Compensation and Human Resources Committee has a written charter that is reviewed annually and was last amended in April 2022. The Compensation and Human Resources Committee’s charter is posted on Aimco’s website (www.aimco.com) and is also available in print to stockholders, upon written request to Aimco’s Corporate Secretary.
The Compensation and Human Resources Committee’s responsibilities are set forth in the following charts.
|
|
|
Compensation and Human Resources Committee Responsibilities |
|
Accomplished |
|
|
|
Responsible for succession planning in all leadership positions, both in the short term and the long term, with particular focus on CEO and key person succession. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Oversees the Company’s management of the talent pipeline process. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Oversees the goals and objectives of the Company’s executive compensation plans. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Annually evaluates the performance of the CEO. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Determines the CEO’s compensation. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Negotiates and provides for the documentation of any employment agreement (or amendment thereto) with the CEO, as applicable. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Reviews and approves the decisions made by the CEO as to the compensation of the other executive officers. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Approves and grants equity compensation. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Reviews and discusses the Compensation Discussion & Analysis with management. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Oversees the Company’s submission to a stockholder vote of matters relating to compensation, including advisory votes on executive compensation and the frequency of such votes, incentive and other compensation plans, and amendments to such plans. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Considers the results of stockholder advisory votes on executive compensation and takes such results into consideration in connection with the review and approval of executive officer compensation. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Reviews stockholder proposals and advisory stockholder votes relating to executive compensation matters and recommends to the Board the Company’s response to such proposals and votes. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Reviews compensation arrangements to evaluate whether incentive and other forms of pay encourage unnecessary or excessive risk taking. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Reviews and approves the terms of any compensation “claw back” or similar policy or agreement between the Company and the Company’s executive officers. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Reviews periodically the goals and objectives of the Company’s executive compensation plans and recommends that the Board amend these goals and objectives if appropriate. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
In coordination with the Nominating, Environmental. Social, and Governance Committee, oversees the Company’s policies and strategies related to human capital. |
|
✓ |
52
|
|
|
Compensation and Human Resources Committee Responsibilities |
|
Accomplished |
|
|
|
Oversees the Company’s culture, with a particular focus on collegiality, collaboration, and team-building. |
|
✓ |
One of the most important responsibilities of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee is to ensure a succession plan is in place for key members of the Company’s executive management team, including the CEO. Based on the work of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee, the Board has a succession plan for the CEO position, is prepared to act in the event of a CEO vacancy in the short term, and has identified candidates for succession over the long term. The Board will select the successor taking into consideration the needs of the organization, the business environment, and each candidate’s skills, experience, expertise, leadership, and fit. The Company maintains a robust succession planning process, as highlighted in the following chart.
|
Management Succession
|
|
The Company maintains an executive talent pipeline for every executive officer position, including the CEO position, and every other senior officer position within the organization. |
|
The executive talent pipeline includes “interim,” “ready now,” and “under development” candidates for each position. The Company has an intentional focus on those formally under development for executive roles. Management is also focused on attracting, developing, and retaining strong talent across the organization. |
|
The executive talent pipeline is formally updated annually and is the main topic of at least one of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee’s meetings each year. The Compensation and Human Resources Committee also reviews the pipeline in connection with year-end performance and compensation reviews for every executive officer position. The pipeline is discussed regularly at the management level, as well. |
|
Talent development and succession planning is a coordinated effort among the CEO, the Compensation and Human Resources Committee, and the CAO, as well as each succession candidate. |
|
The Board is provided exposure to succession candidates for executive officer positions. |
|
All executive succession candidates have development plans. |
|
The Company maintains a forward-looking approach to succession. Positions are filled considering the business strategy and needs at the time of a vacancy and the candidate’s skills, experience, expertise, leadership and fit. |
|
The Company has a proven track record on the development of talented leaders and succession, most recently with the CEO transition in December 2020. |
The Compensation and Human Resources Committee held five meetings during the year ended December 31, 2022.
53
Nominating, Environmental, Social, and Governance Committee
The Nominating, Environmental, Social, and Governance Committee currently consists of the eight Independent Directors. Mr. Allen serves as the chairman of the Nominating, Environmental, Social, and Governance Committee. The Nominating, Environmental, Social, and Governance Committee has a written charter that is reviewed annually and was last amended in September 2022. The Committee’s charter is posted on Aimco’s website (www.aimco.com) and is also available in print to stockholders, upon written request to Aimco’s Corporate Secretary.
The Nominating, Environmental, Social, and Governance Committee’s responsibilities are set forth in the following chart.
|
|
|
Nominating, Environmental, Social, and Governance Committee Responsibilities |
|
Accomplished |
|
|
|
Focuses on Board candidates and nominees, and specifically:
• Plans for Board refreshment and succession planning for directors; • Identifies and recommends to the Board individuals qualified to serve on the Board; • Identifies, recruits, and, if appropriate, interviews candidates to fill positions on the Board, including persons suggested by stockholders or others; and • Reviews each Board member’s suitability for continued service as a director when his or her term expires and when he or she has a change in professional status and recommends whether or not the director should be re-nominated. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Focuses on Board composition and procedures as a whole and recommends, if necessary, measures to be taken so that the Board reflects the appropriate balance of knowledge, experience, skills, expertise, and diversity of perspective and background required for the Board as a whole. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Develops and recommends to the Board a set of corporate governance principles applicable to Aimco and its management. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Maintains a related party transaction policy and oversees any potential related party transactions. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Oversees a systematic and detailed annual evaluation of the Board, committees, and individual directors in an effort to continuously improve the function of the Board. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Considers corporate governance matters that may arise and develops appropriate recommendations, including providing the forum for the Board to consider important matters of public policy and vet stockholder input on a variety of matters. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Reviews corporate governance trends, best practices, and regulations applicable to the corporate governance of the Company and develops appropriate recommendations for the Board. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Oversees the Company’s policies and strategies related to environmental, social, and corporate responsibility matters, including climate-related risks and opportunities and human rights, in coordination with the other standing committees of the Board. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Evaluates relevant, current, and emerging environmental, social, and corporate responsibility risks, opportunities, and trends that may materially impact or be of significance to the business, operations, or performance of the Company, reviews and assesses with management third-party rating reports and scores of the Company on environmental, social, and corporate responsibility matters, reviews with management the Company’s communications strategy on such matters, and develops appropriate recommendations for the Board. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Receives updates from the Company’s management regarding material environmental, social, and corporate responsibility activities, practices, policies, and procedures. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Oversees the Company’s disclosure on environmental, social, and governance matters. |
|
✓ |
|
|
|
Reviews annually the Company’s public policy advocacy efforts and political and charitable contributions. |
|
✓ |
The Nominating, Environmental, Social, and Governance Committee held four meetings during the year ended December 31, 2022.
54
Investment Committee
The Investment Committee currently consists of the Independent Directors and non-management directors. Ms. Gibson serves as the chairman of the Investment Committee. The Investment Committee’s purpose is to provide oversight and guidance to the Company’s management regarding investment decisions. The Investment Committee held five meetings during the year ended December 31, 2022.
Aimco-AIR Transactions Committee
The Aimco-AIR Transactions Committee consisted of Ms. Gibson, Mr. Leupp, and Ms. Smith. Ms. Gibson served as the chairman of the Aimco-AIR Transactions Committee until it was disbanded on February 1, 2023. The purposes of the Aimco-AIR Transactions Committee were to ensure transactions between Aimco and AIR are on an arms-length basis and on commercially reasonable terms. The Aimco-AIR Transactions Committee met regularly with members of Aimco’s senior leadership. Due to reduced transaction activity with AIR, the responsibilities of the Aimco-AIR Transactions Committee were moved to the Investment Committee effective February 1, 2023, and the Aimco-AIR Transactions Committee was disbanded accordingly.
The following table sets forth the number of meetings held by the Board and each committee during the year ended December 31, 2022.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Board |
|
Non-Management Directors |
|
Audit Committee |
|
Compensation and Human |
|
Nominating and Corporate |
|
Investment |
|
Aimco-AIR Transactions Committee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Number of Meetings |
|
9 |
|
5* |
|
8 |
|
5 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
|
5** |
* Included one meeting of only the Independent Directors.
** Due to reduced transaction activity with AIR, the responsibilities of the Aimco-AIR Transactions Committee were moved to the Investment Committee effective February 1, 2023.
THE GOVERNANCE OF OUr BOARD
This chart provides a summary overview of Aimco’s governance practices, each of which is described in more detail in the information that follows.
|
|
What Aimco Does |
|
Supermajority Independent Board. Eight of the nine directors, or 89% of the directors, are independent. |
|
Independent Standing Committees. Only independent directors serve on the Audit, Compensation and Human Resources, and Nominating, Environmental, Social, and Governance Committees. |
|
Independent Chairman of the Board. The Company’s Chairman of the Board is an independent director. |
|
Separation of Chairman and CEO. The Company has separated the roles of Chairman of the Board and CEO. |
|
Board Refreshment. The Nominating, Environmental, Social, and Governance Committee has structured the Board such that there are directors of varying tenures and perspectives, with new directors joining the Board every few years, while retaining the institutional memory of longer-tenured directors. In connection with the Separation, six directors left the Board and the Company added seven new directors. |
|
Regular Access to and Involvement with Management. In addition to regular access to management during Board and committee meetings, the independent directors have ongoing, direct access to members of management and to the Aimco business. This includes the Audit Committee chairman’s active and regular engagement with accounting staff and the Aimco auditors, the Compensation and Human Resources Committee chairman’s continuing involvement with compensation and personnel matters, the Nominating, Environmental, Social, and Governance Committee chairman’s participation in director recruitment and other governance matters, and Mr. Stone’s frequent involvement with Mr. Powell with respect to strategy, agenda setting, board materials, and policy matters. |
|
Engaged Board. In addition to regular access to management, the non-management directors meet at least quarterly and receive written updates from the CEO regularly. |
|
Stockholder Engagement. Under the direction of the Board and including participation by Board members when requested by stockholders, Aimco systematically and at least annually canvasses its largest stockholders, those holding approximately two-thirds of outstanding Aimco shares, concerning compensation, governance, and other ESG matters. |
|
Director Stock Ownership. By the completion of five years of service from the time of the Separation or from joining the Board, a non-management director is expected to own equity having a value of at least five times the annual cash retainer for independent directors. |
55
|
What Aimco Does |
|
Risk Assessment. The Board conducts an annual risk assessment. Areas involving risk that are reported on by management and considered by the Board, include: operations, liquidity, leverage, finance, financial statements, the financial reporting process, accounting, legal matters, regulatory compliance, information technology and data protection, sustainability, environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”), compensation, and human resources and human capital. The Compensation and Human Resources Committee is responsible for succession planning in all leadership positions, both in the short term and the long term, with particular focus on CEO succession in the short term and the long term. |
|
Majority Voting with a Resignation Policy. In an uncontested election, Aimco requires its directors to be elected by a majority of the votes cast. Directors failing to get a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election are expected to tender their resignation. |
|
Proxy Access. A stockholder or a group of up to 20 stockholders, owning at least 3% of our shares for three years, may submit nominees for up to 20% of the Board, or two nominees, whichever is greater, for inclusion in our proxy materials, subject to complying with the requirements contained in our bylaws. |
|
|
What Aimco Does Not Do |
|
Unapproved Related Party Transactions. The Nominating, Environmental, Social, and Governance Committee oversees a related party transactions policy requiring review and approval of such transactions to help ensure that Aimco’s decisions are based on considerations only in the best interests of Aimco and its stockholders. |
|
Pledging or hedging shares held to satisfy stock ownership requirements. The Company’s insider trading policy places restrictions on the Company’s directors, executive officers, and all other employees entering into hedging transactions with respect to the Company’s securities (such as, but not limited to, zero-cost collars, equity swaps, and forward sale contracts) and from holding the Company’s securities in margin accounts or otherwise pledging such securities as collateral for loans. Pledging or hedging transactions are permitted only in very limited circumstances, and only with respect to shares held in excess of stock ownership requirements. Hedging transactions may not be entered into with regard to Aimco securities that are subject to a risk of forfeiture (e.g., restricted stock awards) and Aimco directors, executive officers, other officers, and certain other employees must receive preclearance from Aimco’s legal department before engaging in any hedging transactions. No directors or executive officers have in place any hedging or pledging transactions. |
|
Interlocking Directorships. No member of Aimco management serves on a board or a compensation committee of a company at which an Aimco director is also an employee. |
|
Director Overboarding. Aimco’s corporate governance guidelines and committee charters limit the number of other boards and the number of other audit committees on which an Aimco director may serve. Typically, an Aimco director is limited to service on four or fewer boards (including the Company’s) and is limited to service on three or fewer audit committees, including the Company’s. |
|
Retirement Age or Term Limits. Rather than impose arbitrary limits on service, the Company regularly (and at least annually) reviews each director’s continued role on the Board and considers the need for periodic board refreshment. |
CODE OF ETHICS
The Board has adopted a code of ethics entitled “Code of Business Conduct and Ethics” that applies to the members of the Board, all of Aimco’s executive officers and all teammates of Aimco or its subsidiaries, including Aimco’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is posted on Aimco’s website (www.aimco.com) and is also available in print to stockholders, upon written request to Aimco’s Corporate Secretary. If, in the future, Aimco amends, modifies, or waives a provision in the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, rather than filing a Current Report on Form 8-K, Aimco intends to satisfy any applicable disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K by posting such information on Aimco’s website (www.aimco.com), as necessary.
56
Our Executive Officers
The executive officers of the Company, their ages, dates they were first elected as an executive and their positions are set forth below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Name |
|
Age |
|
|
First Elected |
|
Position |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Wes Powell |
|
|
43 |
|
|
January 2018 |
|
Director (Class III), President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|||||
H. Lynn C. Stanfield |
|
|
48 |
|
|
October 2018 |
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|||||
Jennifer Johnson |
|
|
50 |
|
|
December 2020 |
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and General Counsel |
For more information about Wes Powell, please see the Board of Directors section. Biographical summaries of our other executive officers are set forth below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Lynn C. Stanfield. Ms. Stanfield was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in December 2020. From October 2018 to December 2020, Ms. Stanfield served as Aimco’s Executive Vice President, Financial Planning & Analysis and Capital Allocation, with responsibility for various finance functions and corporate and income tax strategy, and serving as a member of Aimco’s Investment Committee. Since joining Aimco in March 1999, Ms. Stanfield has held various positions with responsibility for affordable asset management, income tax, and investor relations. Prior to joining Aimco, Ms. Stanfield was engaged in public accounting at Ernst and Young with a focus on partnership and real estate clients and served as Assistant Professor of Accounting at Erskine College. Ms. Stanfield holds a Master of Professional Accountancy from Clemson University and is a licensed CPA. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jennifer Johnson. Ms. Johnson was appointed Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and General Counsel in December 2020. From August 2009 to December 2020, Ms. Johnson served as Senior Vice President, Human Resources. From July 2006 to August 2009, Ms. Johnson served as Vice President and Assistant General Counsel. She joined the Company as Senior Counsel in August 2004. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Johnson was in private practice with the law firm of Faegre & Benson LLP with a focus on labor and employment law and commercial litigation. Ms. Johnson earned her law degree from the University of Colorado Law School. |
57
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS (CD&A)
This CD&A addresses the following:
Stockholder Engagement
The Compensation and Human Resources Committee (the “Committee”) and Aimco management remain committed to extensive engagement with stockholders as part of ongoing efforts to formulate and implement an executive compensation program designed to align the long-term interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders. In 2021 and 2022, we engaged with stockholders representing more than 80% of our outstanding shares on a broad range of topics, including executive compensation. The Company continued to receive broad support from stockholders on its executive compensation program, including the program's structure, the program's alignment with pay and performance, the quantum of compensation delivered under the program, and the level of disclosure.
OVERview of Aimco’s Pay-for-Performance Philosophy
Aimco is a pay-for-performance organization. Aimco starts by setting target total compensation near the median of target total compensation for Aimco’s peers as identified below, both as a measure of fairness and also to provide an economic incentive to remain with Aimco. Actual compensation varies from target compensation based on Aimco’s results. Each officer’s annual cash incentive compensation, “short term incentive” or STI, is based in part on Aimco’s performance against corporate, rather than personal, goals. The more senior the officer, the greater the percentage of his or her STI that is based on Aimco’s performance against its corporate goals. Aimco’s longer term compensation, “long term incentive” or LTI, follows a similar tiered structure. Each officer’s LTI is based in part on relative “total stockholder return” or TSR, with NEOs having a greater share of their LTI based on relative TSR. In the case of Mr. Powell, his entire LTI award is “at risk” based on Aimco’s relative TSR. LTI is measured and vests over time, so that officers bear longer term exposure to the decisions they make.
58
To reinforce alignment of stockholder and management interests, Aimco also has stock ownership guidelines that require substantial equity holdings by executive officers, as described further below.
OVERview of Aimco’s POST-SEPARATION and 2022 Performance Results
Aimco has achieved significant accomplishments and produced superior returns since the Separation as summarized below.
|
Secured significant future development opportunities in key target markets of Southeast Florida, Washington, D.C. Metro Area, and Colorado's Front Range, more than tripling Aimco's controlled pipeline to 14 million square feet |
|
|
Sourced third party capital and entered into strategic partnership with Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation to provide Limited Partner equity capital for up to $1 billion of Aimco-led multifamily development projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Created $100 million of value from the monetization of successfully executed development and redevelopment projects totaling 865 residential units |
|
|
Repurchased approximately 3.5 million shares in 2022 and increased the Company’s share repurchase authorization from 10 million to 15 million shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refinanced or retired more than $1 billion of near-term liabilities and eliminated substantially all floating rate exposure. Today, Aimco's property debt is primarily fixed-rate loans on stabilized properties with an average term to maturity of 8.2 years. Aimco's construction loans are primarily floating rate with in-place hedges that protect against rising interest rates. |
|
|
Sold three stabilized multifamily assets, a development land parcel, and a partial interest in life science developer IQHQ, unlocking $284 million of asset value which exceeded the values used in Aimco's internal NAV estimate |
|
|
Total stockholder returns of 30% since the separation from AIR Communities in December 2020 through December 31, 2022, outperforming peers2 and the FTSE Apartment Equity Index, the MSCI U.S. REIT Index, the Russell 2000, and the S&P 500 |
1 Returns measured from December 14, 2020, the date of when-issued trading for Aimco post-separation from AIR.
2 Peer group consists of: Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc.; Centerspace (formerly known as Investors Real Estate Trust); Clipper Realty, Inc.; Elme Communities (formerly known as Washington Real Estate Investment Trust); Five Point Holdings, LLC; Forestar Group, Inc.; Howard Hughes Corp.; Independence Realty Trust, Inc.; JBG SMITH Properties; Stratus Properties, Inc.; The St. Joe Company; Tejon Ranch Co.; and Veris Residential (formerly known as Mack-Cali Realty Corp). Total shareholder return for this group was determined using the simple average total shareholder return for these companies.
59
Summary of Executive Compensation Program and Governance Practices
Below we summarize certain executive compensation program and governance practices, including practices we have implemented to drive performance and practices we avoid because we believe they would not serve our stockholders’ long-term interests.
|
|
What Aimco Does |
|
Pays for performance. A significant portion of executive pay is not guaranteed, but rather is at risk and tied to key financial and value creation metrics that are set in advance and disclosed to stockholders. All of the incentive compensation (both STI and LTI) for Mr. Powell is subject to the achievement of various performance objectives. For the other NEOs, all STI compensation, and two-thirds of target LTI compensation is subject to the achievement of various performance objectives. |
|
Balances short-term and long-term incentives. The incentive programs provide a balance of annual and longer-term incentives, with LTI compensation vesting over multiple years comprising a substantial percentage of target total compensation. |
|
Uses multiple performance metrics. These mitigate the risk of the undue influence of a single metric by utilizing multiple performance measures. Such measures differ for STI and LTI. |
|
Caps award payouts. Amounts or shares that can be earned under the STI plan and LTI plan are capped. |
|
Uses market-based approach for determining NEO target pay. Target total compensation for NEOs is generally set near the median for peer comparators. The Committee reviews the peer comparator group annually. |
|
Maintains stock ownership guidelines and holding periods after vesting until ownership guidelines are met. Aimco has the following minimum equity ownership requirements: CEO – five times base salary; and other executive officers – three times base salary. |
|
Includes double-trigger change in control provisions. Equity awards include “double trigger” provisions requiring both a change in control and a subsequent termination of employment (other than for cause) for accelerated vesting to occur. |
|
Uses an independent compensation consulting firm. The Committee engages an independent compensation consulting firm that specializes in the real estate industry. |
|
Maintains a claw back policy. In the event of a financial restatement resulting from misconduct by an executive, the claw back policy allows the Company to recoup incentive compensation paid to the executive based on the misstated financial information. The policy covers all forms of bonus, incentive, and equity compensation. |
|
Conducts a risk assessment. The Committee annually conducts a compensation risk assessment to determine whether the compensation policies and practices, or components thereof, create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. |
|
Acts through an independent Compensation Committee. The Committee consists entirely of independent directors. |
|
|
What Aimco Does Not Do |
|
Guarantee salary increases, bonuses or equity grants. The Company does not guarantee annual salary increases or bonuses. The Company makes no guaranteed commitments to grant equity-based awards. |
|
Provide excise tax gross-up payments. The Company does not have, and will not enter into, any contractual arrangements that include excise tax gross-up payments. |
|
Reprice options. The Company has never repriced the per-share exercise price of any outstanding stock options. Repricing of stock options is not permitted under the Company’s Second Amended and Restated 2015 Stock Award and Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”) without first obtaining approval from the stockholders of the Company. |
|
Pay dividends or dividend equivalents on unearned performance shares. Performance share award agreements provide for the payment of dividends only if and after the shares are earned. Dividends, if any, accrue during the performance period and are paid once shares are earned. |
|
Provide more than minimal personal benefits. The Company does not provide executives with more than minimal perquisites, such as reserved parking spaces. |
60
What We Pay and Why: Components of Executive Compensation
Total compensation for Aimco’s NEOs is comprised of the following components:
|
|
|
||
Compensation Component |
|
Form |
|
Purpose |
|
|
|
||
Base Salary |
|
Cash |
|
Provide a salary that is competitive with market. |
|
|
|
||
STI |
|
Cash |
|
Reward executive for achieving short-term business objectives. |
|
|
|
||
LTI |
|
Restricted stock, stock options, and/or long-term incentive units in our operating partnership (“LTIP Units”), subject to performance and/or time vesting, typically over three to four years. |
|
Align executive’s compensation with stockholder objectives, and provide an incentive to take a longer-term view of Aimco’s performance. |
LTI compensation directly ties the interests of executives to the interests of our stockholders, and comprises a substantial proportion of compensation for Aimco NEOs, as follows:
|
|
|
CEO 2022 Target Pay Mix |
|
OTHER NEOs 2022 TARGET PAY MIX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
CEO Pay Overview
The Committee determines the compensation for the CEO. In setting Mr. Powell’s target total compensation for 2022, the Committee considered, among other things, the peer group compensation data as discussed below and Mr. Powell’s relevant expertise and experience. Because Mr. Powell was relatively new to his position, having been promoted to CEO in December 2020, the Committee set his target total compensation at approximately 72% of the median for the peer group. The Committee devised a compensation plan for Mr. Powell that resulted in approximately 24% base salary, 29% based on Aimco’s performance against its 2022 corporate goals, and 47% based on relative TSR. Mr. Powell’s target compensation mix is illustrated as follows:
In addition to reviewing the performance of, and determining the compensation for, the CEO, the Committee also reviews and approves the decisions made by the CEO as to the compensation of Aimco’s other executive officers. Base salary, target STI, and target LTI are generally set near the median base salary, target STI, and target LTI for peer comparators.
How peer comparators are identified
The Committee, with the advice of its independent executive compensation consultant, developed a peer group for purposes of benchmarking NEO compensation based on industry and business strategy. The peer group ranged from 0.5x to 2.5x Aimco's total capitalization, with Aimco at the 41st percentile, and with Aimco at the 51st and 60th percentile based on total and gross depreciable assets, respectively. Based on this analysis, Aimco included as “peers” for 2022 target compensation the following 12 real estate companies:
|
|
|
|
||
Peer Group |
||
|
|
|
Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. |
|
Independence Realty Trust, Inc. |
|
|
|
Bluerock Residential Growth REIT, Inc. |
|
JBG SMITH Properties |
|
|
|
Centerspace |
|
Mack-Cali Realty Corp. (now Veris Residential, Inc.) |
|
|
|
Clipper Realty, Inc. |
|
Seritage Growth Properties |
|
|
|
Five Point Holdings, LLC |
|
The St. Joe Co. |
|
|
|
Forestar Group Inc. |
|
Washington REIT (now Elme Communities) |
|
|
|
Risk analysis of Aimco’s compensation programs
The Committee considers risk-related matters when making decisions with respect to executive compensation and has determined that neither Aimco’s executive compensation program nor any of its non-executive compensation programs create risk-taking incentives that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the organization. Aimco’s compensation programs align management incentives with the long-term interests of the Company.
62
|
|
Aimco’s Compensation Program Discourages Excessive Risk-Taking |
|
Limits on STI. The compensation of executive officers and other teammates is not overly weighted toward STI. Moreover, STI is capped. |
|
Use of LTI. LTI is included in target total compensation and typically vests over a period of three to four years. The vesting period encourages officers to focus on sustaining Aimco’s long-term performance. Executive officers with more responsibility for strategic and operating decisions have a greater percentage of their target total compensation allocated to LTI. LTI is capped at two times target, or 200%, for the CEO, and 1.67 times target, or 167%, for the other NEOs. |
Stock ownership guidelines and required holding periods after vesting. Aimco’s stock ownership guidelines require all executive officers to hold a specified amount of Aimco equity. Any executive officer who has not yet satisfied the stock ownership requirements for his or her position must retain LTI after its vesting until stock ownership requirements are met. These policies ensure each executive officer has a substantial amount of personal wealth tied to long-term holdings in Aimco stock. |
Shared performance metrics across the organization. A portion of STI for the NEOs is based upon Aimco’s performance against its corporate goals, which are reviewed and approved by the Committee. One hundred percent of Mr. Powell’s STI, and 50% of the STI for the other NEOs, is based upon Aimco’s performance against its corporate goals. In addition, having shared performance metrics across the organization reinforces Aimco’s focus on a collegial and collaborative team environment. |
LTI based on TSR. One hundred percent of the Mr. Powell’s LTI, and 67% of the LTI for the other NEOs, is based on relative TSR. |
Multiple performance metrics. Aimco had five corporate goals for 2022. In addition, through Aimco’s performance management program, Managing Aimco Performance, or MAP, which sets and monitors performance objectives for every team member, each team member had several different individual performance goals that are set at the beginning of the year and approved by management. Mses. Stanfield and Johnson had an average of six individual goals for 2022. Having multiple performance metrics inherently reduces excessive or unnecessary risk-taking, as incentive compensation is spread among a number of metrics rather than concentrated in a few. |
Total Compensation for 2022
For 2022, total compensation is the sum of base compensation earned in 2022, STI earned in 2022, and LTI awards granted in 2022.
Base Compensation for 2022
For 2022, Mr. Powell’s base compensation was $550,000, approximately 76% of the median for CEOs in Aimco’s peer group. For 2022, Ms. Stanfield’s base compensation was $450,000 and base compensation for Ms. Johnson was set at $395,000.
Short-Term Incentive Compensation for 2022
The Committee determined Mr. Powell’s STI by the extent to which Aimco met five designated corporate goals, which are described below and are referred to as Aimco’s Key Performance Indicators, or KPIs.
For the other NEOs, calculation of STI was determined by two components: Aimco’s performance against the KPI; and each officer’s achievement of her individual MAP goals. For example, if an executive’s target STI was $400,000 and weighted 50% on KPIs, then 50% of that amount, or $200,000, varied based on KPI results and 50% of that amount, or $200,000, varied based on MAP results. As actual KPI results were 162.00% of target in 2022, then the executive would receive 162.00% of $200,000 ($324,000) for the KPI portion of her STI, and if MAP results were 100%, such hypothetical executive would receive 100% of the $200,000, for a total STI payment of $524,000.
63
Aimco’s 2022 KPIs reflected Aimco’s publicly communicated areas of strategic focus, as set forth below. Specifically, Aimco’s KPIs consisted of the following six corporate goals that were reviewed with, and approved by, the Committee, each weighted as described.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CORPORATE GOALS |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Management (10% of KPI) |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on 2022 NOI performance of stabilized portfolio, dispositions and monetization of investments, and alternative investment performance |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development and Redevelopment (30% of KPI) |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on development and redevelopment execution as compared to the 2022 budget and plan |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Deployment and Allocation (30% of KPI) |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on the deployment and allocation of capital into the existing pipeline of previously identified and/or controlled investment opportunities and into newly identified value-add opportunities |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet (20% of KPI) |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on execution of the debt and third-party equity financing plan for 2022, maintaining abundant liquidity, and other balance sheet activities that strengthen Aimco's balance sheet and add financial flexibility |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Human Capital and Environmental. Social, and Governance (ESG) (10% of KPI) |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on team retention and team engagement scores and 2022 progress against ESG objectives |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These goals aligned executive officers with the publicly communicated, long-term goals of the Company without encouraging them to take unnecessary and excessive risks. Threshold performance paid out at 50%; target performance paid out at 100%; and maximum performance paid out at 200%.
For some goals, where performance was between threshold and target or between target and maximum, the amount of the payout was interpolated.
64
The following is a tabular presentation of the performance criteria and results for 2022, explained in detail in the paragraphs that follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Performance Measures |
|
Goal |
|
Threshold |
|
Target 100% |
|
Maximum |
|
Actual |
|
Payout |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Portfolio Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
2022 NOI performance of stabilized portfolio as compared to 2022 Budget, dispositions and monetization of investments, and alternative investment performance. |
|
10% |
|
For stabilized portfolio, threshold performance equated to 5% less than budgeted NOI |
|
For stabilized portfolio, target performance equated to budgeted NOI. For dispositions and monetization of investments, target performance equated to cancellation of Aimco's leasehold interest in Prism in Cambridge, MA, and 707 Leahy in Redwood City, CA. |
|
For stabilized portfolio, maximum performance equated to more than 5% above budgeted NOI |
|
Stabilized property NOI, was more than 5% above budgeted NOI. Following the successful development and lease-up of 707 Leahy in Redwood City, CA, Prism in Cambridge, MA, Flamingo Point North Tower in Miami Beach, FL, and The Fremont on the Anschutz Medical Campus in Aurora, CO, Aimco and AIR canceled Aimco’s leasehold interest in each property on September 1, 2022. In return for the termination of the leases, Aimco received proceeds of $200M, resulting in value creation, net of costs, of approximately $100M, which was realized approximately 18 months earlier than anticipated. Exited the Seattle market, closing on the sales of two apartment communities for a total of $122M, and sold Pathfinder Village in Fremont, CA, for $127M. Aimco's joint venture in Fort Lauderdale, FL (described below) monetized a portion of its investment by closing on the sale of one of three parcels it acquired in 1Q 2022 for development along Broward Avenue. The 0.8 acre parcel was sold for $18.3M, approximately double the original purchase price per acre. Redeemed 22% of our passive equity investment in IQHQ, receiving proceeds of $16.5M from the sale, resulting in a greater than 50% IRR over the hold period for this portion of our investment. |
|
20.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Development and Redevelopment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Achieve budgeted/forecasted expectations on timing and costs for development/redevelopment projects and rents compared to underwriting. |
|
30% |
|
— |
|
Based on completion of projects on time and on budget, and achievement of year-end occupancy and rental rates consistent with the 2022 budget and plan. |
|
— |
|
Aimco's eight development and redevelopment projects were on track as measured by budget and lease-up metrics. Completed construction and/or lease up of 707 Leahy in Redwood City, CA, Prism in Cambridge, MA, Flamingo Point North Tower in Miami Beach, FL, and The Fremont on the Anschutz Medical and Life Sciences Campus in Aurora, CO. Aimco and its joint venture partner began construction on 220-apartment home development at Strathmore Square in Bethesda, MD. |
|
34.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Capital Deployment and Allocation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Deployment and allocation of capital into the existing pipeline of previously identified and/or controlled investment opportunities and into newly identified value-add opportunities. |
|
30% |
|
— |
|
Based on the deployment and allocation of capital consistent with the 2022 Budget into the existing pipeline of previously identified and/or controlled investment opportunities and into newly identified value-add opportunities. |
|
— |
|
Invested $279.4M in development and redevelopment projects. Formed a joint venture for the construction of approximately 1M square feet of mixed-use development in the Edgewater neighborhood of Miami, FL. Aimco has a 20% share of the joint venture, which includes the initial contribution of an eighth of an acre of land that Aimco purchased for $1.7M in January 2022. Executed a joint venture agreement to act as a co-GP on the development of a phased multifamily community at Strathmore Square in Bethesda, MD. Closed on the purchase of three development parcels for $100M in the Flagler Village neighborhood of Fort Lauderdale, FL. The nine-acre assemblage allows for approximately 3M square feet of phased, mixed-use development. Closed on a $1.8M purchase of a land option Aimco controlled for multifamily development on the Anschutz Medical Campus in Aurora, CO. |
|
50.00% |
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Financing activities, maintaining abundant liquidity, and other activities that strengthen Aimco’s balance sheet and add financial flexibility. |
|
20% |
|
— |
|
Based on execution of the debt and third-party equity financing plan for 2022, maintaining abundant liquidity, and other balance sheet activities that strengthen Aimco's balance sheet and add financial flexibility. |
|
— |
|
Retired or refinanced more than $1B of near-term liabilities, improving our balance sheet, which is now comprised of primarily fixed-rate loans on stabilized properties with an average term to maturity of 8.2 years. Aimco's construction loans are primarily floating rate with in-place hedges that protect against rising interest rates. In July 2022, completed the early repayment of $534M of notes due to AIR, originally scheduled to mature in January 2024. Entered into a strategic partnership with Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation to provide Limited Partner equity capital for up to $1B of Aimco-led multifamily development projects. At December 31, 2022, Aimco had access to $379.8M, including $206.5M of cash on hand, $23.3M of restricted cash, and the capacity to borrow up to $150M on its revolving credit facility. As of December 31, 2022, 98% of Aimco's total debt was either fixed rate or hedged with interest rate cap protection. Aimco's interest hedging instruments, purchased to provide protection against increases in interest rates, were valued at $62.3M versus a cost basis of $18M. |
|
40.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Human Capital & Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Progress Against Human Capital and ESG Objectives |
|
10% |
|
— |
|
Based on team retention and team engagement scores and achievement of 2022 ESG plan. |
|
— |
|
Retained 100% of officer team and reduced overall voluntary turnover by more than half year-over-year (from 31% voluntary turnover in 2021 to 14% in 2022). Team engagement was 4.52 (up from 4.21 in 2021), a new Aimco record, based on a response rate of 91%. Recognized as a “Healthiest Employer” by Denver Business Journal, South Florida Business Journal, and Healthiest Employers of Greater Washington, D.C., and certified as a “Great Place to Work.” Refreshed ESG policies, adopted a new human rights policy, performed first-time climate risk assessments, and began reporting to the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures, or TCFD. |
|
18.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162.00% |
An explanation of the objective of each goal and performance levels and payouts for each goal is set forth below.
Portfolio Management (10% of KPI). The primary objective of this goal was to fulfill the Company’s strategic objective to achieve rent growth for its stabilized portfolio based on high levels of resident retention, through superior customer selection and satisfaction, coupled with disciplined innovation resulting in sustained cost control, to maximize NOI margins, and to monetize investments when the time is right, maximizing proceeds and Aimco's internal rate of return ("IRR") on investments. For 2022, the range for the stabilized portfolio NOI portion of the goal was as follows: “Threshold” equated to achievement of five percent unfavorable to 2022 budgeted NOI; “Target” equated to achievement of 2022 budgeted NOI; and “Maximum” equated to five percent favorable to 2022 budgeted NOI. For the dispositions and monetization of investments portion of the goal, target performance equated to cancellation of Aimco's leasehold interest in Prism in Cambridge, MA, and 707 Leahy in Redwood City, CA. Stabilized property NOI, which was up 14.2% from 2021, was more than 5% above budgeted NOI, achieving the maximum level of performance for this portion of the goal. Following the successful development and lease-up of 707 Leahy in Redwood City, CA, Prism in Cambridge, MA, Flamingo Point North Tower in Miami Beach, FL, and The Fremont on the Anschutz Medical Campus in Aurora, CO, Aimco and AIR canceled Aimco’s leasehold interest in each property on September 1, 2022. In return for the termination of the leases, Aimco received proceeds of $200M, resulting in value creation, net of costs, of approximately $100M, which was realized approximately 18 months earlier than anticipated. Aimco also exited the Seattle market, closing on the sales of two apartment communities for a total of $122M, and sold Pathfinder Village in Fremont, CA, for $127M. Aimco's joint venture in Fort Lauderdale, FL (described below in "Capital Deployment and Allocation") monetized a portion of its investment by closing on the sale of one of three parcels it acquired in early 2022 for development along Broward Avenue. The 0.8 acre parcel was sold for $18.3M, approximately double the
66
original purchase price per acre. With regard to Aimco's alternative investments, Aimco redeemed 22% of its passive equity investment in IQHQ, receiving proceeds of $16.5M from the sale, a greater than 50% IRR over the hold period for this portion of our investment. This resulted in a payout on the Portfolio Management goal of 20.00% for each of the NEOs.
Development and Redevelopment Execution (30% of KPI). The primary objective of this goal was to fulfill Company’s strategic objective of executing active development, redevelopment, and lease-up projects pursuant to the Company’s 2022 budget and plan. Large and/or complex projects provided increased weighting toward the total goal weighting of 30%, with smaller scale projects provided lower weighting toward the total goal weighting. Achievement for each project was determined with reference to the 2022 budgeted investment and plan for the project, and was based on the extent to which the project work was completed on time and within budget, as well as, where applicable, the extent to which year-end occupancy and rental rates were consistent with the 2022 budget and plan. In 2022, Aimco's development and redevelopment projects were on track as measured by budget and lease-up metrics. Aimco completed construction and/or lease up of 707 Leahy in Redwood City, CA, Prism in Cambridge, MA, Flamingo Point North Tower in Miami Beach, FL, and The Fremont on the Anschutz Medical Campus in Aurora, CO. Aimco and its joint venture partner began construction on a 220-apartment home development at Strathmore Square in Bethesda, MD, discussed further below. This resulted in a payout on this goal of 34.00% for each of the NEOs.
Capital Deployment and Allocation (30% of KPI). The primary objective of this goal was to fulfill the Company’s strategic objective of effectively deploying capital into its existing pipeline of previously identified and/or controlled investment opportunities and into newly identified value-add opportunities. In 2022, Aimco invested $279.4M in its active development and redevelopment projects. Additionally, Aimco deployed capital into several newly identified value-add opportunities, significantly expanding Aimco's potential development pipeline. Aimco formed a joint venture for the construction of approximately 1M square feet of mixed-use development in the Edgewater neighborhood of Miami, FL. Aimco has a 20% share of the joint venture, which includes the initial contribution of an eighth of an acre of land that Aimco purchased for $1.7M in January 2022. The development site is situated as the gateway to Aimco’s Edgewater land assemblage and its redevelopment of The Hamilton. Aimco will serve as the development manager for the venture and expects to begin construction in 2023. Aimco executed a joint venture agreement to act as a co-GP on the development of a phased multifamily community at Strathmore Square in Bethesda, MD. The project is fully entitled and includes approvals for over 2,200 units in six phases. Aimco will participate in the first two multifamily phases totaling 574 units. Aimco has rights to increase our investment and to choose to participate in future phases of development. Aimco and its joint venture partner began construction on the first phase of development in late 2022. Aimco closed on the purchase of three development parcels for $100M in the rapidly growing Flagler Village neighborhood of Fort Lauderdale, FL. The nine-acre assemblage allows for approximately 3M square feet of phased, mixed-use development, which could contain up to 1,500 residential units, more than 300 hotel keys, and more than 100,000 square of retail space at full build-out. As set forth above, the joint venture monetized a portion of its investment by closing on the sale of the 0.8 acre parcel for approximately double the original purchase price per acre. Aimco closed on a $1.8M purchase of a land option it controlled for multifamily development on the Anschutz Medical Campus in Aurora, CO. Aimco has begun planning for the next multifamily development on the site, which slated to include approximately 275 apartment homes. This resulted in a payout on this goal of 50.00% for each of the NEOs.
Balance Sheet (20% of KPI). The primary objective of this goal was to fulfill the Company’s strategic objectives of executing its debt and equity financing plans and maintaining abundant liquidity. In 2022, Aimco retired or refinanced more than $1B of near-term liabilities, improving our balance sheet, which is now comprised of primarily fixed-rate loans on stabilized properties with an average term to maturity of 8.2 years. Aimco's construction loans are primarily floating rate with in-place hedges that protect against rising interest rates. In July 2022, Aimco completed the early repayment of $534M of notes due to AIR, originally scheduled to mature in January 2024. Aimco entered into a strategic partnership with Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation to provide Limited Partner equity capital for up to $1B of Aimco-led multifamily development projects. At December 31, 2022, Aimco had access to $379.8M, including $206.5M of cash on hand, $23.3M of restricted cash, and the capacity to borrow up to $150M on its revolving credit facility. As of December 31, 2022, 98% of Aimco's total debt was either fixed rate or hedged with interest rate cap protection. Aimco's interest hedging instruments, purchased to provide protection against increases in interest rates, were valued at $62.3M versus a cost basis of $18M. This resulted in a payout on the balance sheet goal of 40.00% for each of the NEOs.
Human Capital & Environmental, Social, and Governance (10% of KPI). The primary objective of this goal was to fulfill Aimco’s strategic objective of fostering a healthy environment of respect and innovation, empowering our human capital to create value, and furthering our broader commitment to corporate responsibility. In 2022, Aimco retained 100% of its officer team and reduced overall voluntary turnover by more than half year-over-year (from 31% voluntary turnover in 2021 to 14% in 2022). Every teammate is surveyed via a third-party, confidential survey performed on an annual basis. The team engagement score consists of the average of the responses to the questions that comprise the engagement index, on a scale of 1 to 5, for all teammates who complete the survey during the year. Team engagement for 2022 was 4.52 (up from 4.21 in 2021), a new
67
Aimco record, based on a response rate of 91%. Aimco was recognized as a “Healthiest Employer” by the Denver Business Journal, the South Florida Business Journal, and Healthiest Employers of Greater Washington, D.C., and certified as a “Great Place to Work.” In 2022 Aimco refreshed its ESG policies, adopted a new human rights policy, performed first-time climate risk assessments for its portfolio, and began reporting to the TCFD. This resulted in a payout on the ESG goal of 18.00% for each of the NEOs.
Due to Aimco’s overall achievement on each of its 2022 goals, Aimco’s overall KPI performance was 162%. Accordingly, each NEO was awarded 162% of the portion of his or her target STI attributable to KPI.
Various of the key financial indicators we use in managing our business and in evaluating our financial condition and operating performance are non-GAAP measures. Key non-GAAP measures we use are defined, described and, where appropriate, reconciled to the most comparable financial measures computed in accordance with GAAP under the Non-GAAP Measures heading within Part II, Item 7 of this filing.
Long-Term Incentive Compensation Awards for 2022
Under the 2022 LTI program for executive officers, four forms of LTI awards were granted to NEOs on February 2, 2022, as follows: (1) performance-based restricted stock, which was granted to Mr. Powell and Mses. Stanfield and Johnson, representing 50% of the 2022 LTI awards for Mr. Powell and approximately 54% of the respective 2022 LTI awards for Mses. Stanfield and Johnson; (2) performance-based stock options, which were granted to both Mr. Powell, representing 50% of his 2022 LTI awards, and to Ms. Johnson, representing approximately 13% of her 2022 LTI awards; (3) performance-based LTIP Units, which were granted to Ms. Stanfield, representing approximately 13% of her 2022 LTI awards; and (4) time-based restricted stock, which was granted to Mses. Stanfield and Johnson, representing one-third of their respective 2022 LTI awards, with one-third of the awards vesting on each anniversary of the grant date. Aimco refers to the performance-based restricted stock, performance-based stock options, and performance-based LTIP Units as “performance-based LTI awards” because the amount of restricted stock, stock options, and LTIP Units that vest, if any, is determined based on Aimco’s relative TSR performance during a forward looking, three-year performance period, as described in detail below.
The Committee typically sets grant dates for LTI awards at the time of its final compensation determination, generally in late January or early February.
|
|
|
2022 CEO LTI Equity Mix
|
|
2022 OTHER NEOs LTI EQUITY MIX
|
68
The amount of performance-based LTI awards granted in 2022 that may vest are determined in accordance with the following TSR performance metrics:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metric and Performance Level(1) (relative performance stated as basis points above or below index performance or percentile rank)(2) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Threshold 50% |
|
Target 100% |
|
Maximum 200% |
|
|
|
|
|||
Relative to Russell 2000 Value Index (1/3 Weighting) |
|
-350 bps |
|
+50 bps |
|
+500 bps |
|
|
|
|
|||
Relative to FTSE NAREIT Equity Apartments Index (1/3 Weighting) |
|
-350 bps |
|
+50 bps |
|
+500 bps |
|
|
|
|
|||
Relative to Identified Peer Group (1/3 Weighting)(3) |
|
30th Percentile |
|
55th Percentile |
|
80th Percentile |
(1) The relative metrics above reflect the metrics used for the awards made in 2022 for the three-year forward looking performance period ending on December 31, 2024.
(2) If absolute TSR for the three-year forward looking performance period is negative, any portion of the LTI award achieved above target will not vest until absolute TSR is once again positive.
(3) The identified peer group, developed by the Committee with the assistance of its independent executive compensation consultant, consisted of the following 13 real estate companies: Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc.; Centerspace (formerly known as Investors Real Estate Trust); Clipper Realty, Inc.; Elme Communities (formerly known as Washington Real Estate Investment Trust); Five Point Holdings, LLC; Forestar Group, Inc.; Howard Hughes Corp.; Independence Realty Trust, Inc.; JBG SMITH Properties; Stratus Properties, Inc.; The St. Joe Company; Tejon Ranch Co.; and Veris Residential (formerly known as Mack-Cali Realty Corp).
Such metrics apply to the performance-based restricted stock granted to Mr. Powell and Mses. Stanfield and Johnson, the performance-based stock options granted to Mr. Powell and Ms. Johnson, and the performance-based LTIP Units granted to Ms. Stanfield. The Committee set threshold performance to pay out at 50%; target performance to pay out at 100%; and maximum performance to pay out at 200%. Performance below threshold will result in no payout. If performance is between threshold and target or between target and maximum, the amount of the payout will be interpolated. Performance-based LTI awards vest 100% following the end of the three-year performance period (based on attainment of TSR targets), for a three-year plan from start to finish, illustrated below, subject to the grantee’s continued service to Aimco, and subject to a delay if absolute TSR for the three-year forward looking performance period is negative.
For the purpose of calculating the number of shares of performance-based restricted stock to be granted to Mr. Powell and Mses. Stanfield and Johnson, the dollar amount allocated to restricted stock was divided by $7.32 per share, which price was calculated by a third party financial firm with particular expertise in the valuation of performance-based restricted stock. The share award agreements to which the performance-based restricted shares were granted do not provide for the payment of dividends, if any, until the shares are earned. Dividends, if any, accrue during the performance period.
For the purpose of calculating the number of shares subject to the performance-based stock options to be granted to Mr. Powell and Ms. Johnson, the dollar amount allocated to stock options was divided by $2.82, which price was calculated by a third party financial firm with particular expertise in the valuation of performance-based stock options. The stock options as granted had an exercise price of $6.96, which was the closing price of Aimco's stock on the grant date and equal to the fair market value of Aimco's Common Stock on the grant date.
69
Ms. Stanfield's performance-based LTIP Units are intended to constitute profits interests within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code, with Ms. Stanfield being granted the ability to participate in the appreciation of value of Aimco that took place after these LTIP Units were granted, subject to their vesting. For the purpose of calculating the number of shares subject to these LTIP Units, the dollar amount allocated to LTIP Units was divided by $2.84, which price was calculated by a third party financial firm with particular expertise in the valuation of such LTIP Units. The performance-based LTIP Units as granted had a conversion price of $6.96, which was the closing price of Aimco's stock on the grant date and equal to the fair market value of Aimco's Common Stock on the grant date.
For the purpose of calculating the number of shares of time-based restricted stock to be granted to Mses. Stanfield and Johnson, the dollar amount allocated to restricted stock was divided by $6.84, which the average closing trading price of Aimco's Common Stock for the five-day trading period up to and including the date of the grant.
NEO Compensation for 2022
CEO Compensation. The Committee determined Mr. Powell’s STI for 2022 would be based entirely on Aimco’s performance against corporate goals, described above. The Committee calculated Mr. Powell’s STI by multiplying his STI target of $688,000 by 162.00%, which was the Committee’s payout determination having reviewed Aimco’s overall performance against corporate goals, as described in detail above. The Committee granted Mr. Powell’s LTI in the form of restricted stock and stock options on February 2, 2022, for the three-year performance period from January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2024; the LTI grant is entirely at risk, based on relative returns over the performance period. Mr. Powell’s 2022 target compensation and incentive compensation is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
Target Total |
|
|
2022 Incentive Compensation |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
STI |
|
LTI |
||||||
Target Total |
|
Paid |
|
STI ($) |
|
LTI ($) |
|
|
($) (1) |
|
Time-Based |
|
Performance-Based |
|
Performance-Based |
2,338,000 |
|
550,000 |
|
688,000 |
|
1,100,000 |
|
|
1,114,560 |
|
— |
|
550,000 |
|
550,000 |
__________
(1) Amount shown reflects the amount of 2022 STI paid to Mr. Powell.
(2) Amount shown reflects a 100% payout that would result from achieving “target” performance. Actual payout may range from 0% to 200% of this amount depending on performance results over the forward looking, three-year performance period ending December 31, 2024. The number of shares or options that are earned, if any, will vest 100% following the end of the three-year performance period, for a three-year vesting period.
Other NEO Compensation. For Mses. Stanfield and Johnson, an allocation of the target STI was made as follows: 50% of the target STI was calculated based on Aimco’s performance against KPI and 50% of the target STI was calculated based on each executive’s achievement of her individual MAP goals. As described above, Aimco’s KPI performance was 162.00%. Accordingly, each was awarded 162.00% of the portion of her STI attributable to KPI.
In determining the MAP achievement component of 2022 STI, Mr. Powell determined that: Ms. Stanfield’s MAP achievement would be paid at 200% of target for her contributions to Aimco’s balance sheet and to finance, capital allocation, and tax; and Ms. Johnson’s MAP achievement would be paid at 200% of target for her leadership over legal matters, human capital, and ESG efforts. The Committee reviewed and approved Mr. Powell’s determinations with respect to Mses. Stanfield and Johnson. As described above, LTI for Mses. Stanfield and Johnson was granted on February 2, 2022, in the form of restricted stock. Target compensation and incentive compensation for 2022 for Mses. Stanfield and Johnson is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
Target Total |
|
|
2022 Incentive Compensation ($) |
|||||
|
|
|
Incentive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
STI |
|
|
LTI |
|
|
|
Target Total |
Paid Base |
STI |
LTI |
|
|
($) (1) |
Time-Based |
Performance- Based |
Performance- Based |
Performance- Based |
Ms. Stanfield |
1,358,000 |
450,000 |
383,000 |
525,000 |
|
|
693,230 |
175,000 |
280,000 |
70,000 |
— |
Ms. Johnson |
1,066,000 |
395,000 |
296,000 |
375,000 |
|
|
535,760 |
125,000 |
200,000 |
— |
50,000 |
__________
70
Determination Regarding 2020 Performance Share Awards. As part of the 2020 LTI program, the Company granted performance-share awards that might be earned based on relative TSR as compared to the FTSE NAREIT Equity Apartments Index (60% weighting) and the MSCI US REIT Index (40% weighting) over a three-year performance period ending on December 31, 2022, with awards vesting 50% following the end of the three-year performance period (based on attainment of TSR targets) and 50% one year later, for a four-year plan from start to finish. On February 1, 2023, the Committee determined that Aimco’s three-year TSR (combined with AIR’s TSR for the period from December 15, 2020, through December 31, 2022, as described in the chart below) was 180 basis points higher than the FTSE NAREIT Equity Apartments Index and 490 basis points lower than the MSCI US REIT Index for the three-year performance period ending on December 31, 2022, resulting in the number of shares being earned at approximately 82% of target for Mr. Powell and Ms. Stanfield. Factoring in the portion of 2020 LTI that was for the purpose of retention, the realized LTI compensation for Mr. Powell and Ms. Stanfield was 88% of target.
The chart below summarizes the results for the 2020 performance share awards, and provides performance as of December 31, 2022, for the “in progress” 2022 and 2021 and performance share awards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Long Term Incentive Plan Award Status |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Three-Year Performance Period |
|
2020 |
|
2021 |
|
|
2022 |
|
2023 |
|
2024 |
|
|
Status |
|
CEO % |
|
Other |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
2022 – 2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33% Completed |
|
|
Tracking Between Target and Maximum |
|
200%(3) |
|
167%(3) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
2021 – 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
67% Completed |
|
|
|
|
|
Tracking Between Target and Maximum |
|
200%(3) |
|
167%(3) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
2020 – 2022 |
|
|
100% Completed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payout Achieved Between Threshold and Target |
|
88%(4) |
|
88%(4) |
||||||
(1) Beginning in 2021, coinciding with his promotion to CEO, 100% of the LTI award for Mr. Powell is performance-based, or at risk, based entirely on relative TSR.
(2) Two-thirds of the LTI awards for the other NEOs (and for Mr. Powell prior to 2021) are performance-based, or at risk, based on relative TSR, and the remaining one-third of the LTI awards are for the purpose of retention, or time-based. Payouts shown include the time-based portion of the awards.
(3) Amounts reflect performance of “in progress” awards as of December 31, 2022.
(4) Post Separation, the Committee determined that the remaining performance periods of the 2019 and 2020 Aimco performance-based awards would be determined using the combined total stockholder return of Aimco and AIR.
Other Compensation
From time to time, Aimco determines to provide executive officers with additional compensation in the form of discretionary cash or equity awards. Aimco did not provide any such awards to the NEOs in 2022.
Post-Employment Compensation and Employment and Severance Arrangements
401(k) Plan
Aimco provides a 401(k) plan that is offered to all Aimco teammates. Aimco matches 100% of participant contributions to the extent of the first 3% of the participant's eligible compensation and 50% of participant contributions to the extent of the next 2% of the participant's eligible compensation. For 2022, the maximum match by Aimco was $12,200, which was the amount that Aimco matched for each of Mr. Powell and Mses. Stanfield and Johnson’s 2022 401(k) contributions.
Other than the 401(k) plan, Aimco does not provide post-employment benefits. Aimco does not maintain a defined benefit pension plan, a supplemental executive retirement plan, or any other similar arrangements.
Executive Employment Arrangements
2021 Powell Employment Agreement. On October 27, 2021, Aimco Development Company, LLC, an affiliate of the Company and the employer entity for Aimco’s employees, entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Powell (the “2021 Employment Agreement”). The Committee evaluated the terms of the 2021 Employment Agreement in comparison to those of the CEOs of Aimco’s peers. The 2021 Employment Agreement is for a term expiring on December 31, 2022. The 2021 Employment Agreement provides that on December 31, 2022, and on each subsequent one-year anniversary thereafter, the agreement shall be renewed for an additional one-year term unless either party gives written notice of intent not to renew to the
71
other party at least 60 days before the end of the then calendar year. On December 31, 2022, the 2021 Employment Agreement was renewed for an additional one-year term.
The 2021 Employment Agreement provides that the Committee shall review and set Mr. Powell’s target total compensation on an annual basis in comparison to compensation paid to the Company’s peers, taking into consideration experience, performance, and other relevant factors.
Pursuant to the 2021 Employment Agreement, upon termination of Mr. Powell’s employment by Aimco Development Company, LLC without cause, or by Mr. Powell for good reason, Mr. Powell is generally entitled to: (a) a lump sum cash payment equal to two times the sum of (i) his annual base salary for the calendar year of the date of termination, and (ii) his target annual bonus for the calendar year of the date of termination; (b) any short-term incentive bonus earned but unpaid for a prior fiscal year (the “Prior Year STI”); (c) a pro-rata portion of the short-term incentive bonus he would have earned for the year in which the termination occurs, based on the actual achievement of the applicable performance targets (the “Pro Rata STI”); and (d) an amount equal to the monthly COBRA premium for health and welfare plan coverage for Mr. Powell and his coverage dependents in effect on the date of termination (the “monthly COBRA reimbursement”) multiplied by 24 months. The vesting and exercise of any equity awards held Mr. Powell on the date of termination would be determined in accordance with the applicable incentive plan and award agreement.
In the event of termination of Mr. Powell’s employment by Aimco without cause, or by Mr. Powell for good reason, in either case, within the period commencing six months prior to and ending 24 months following a “Change in Control” (as defined in the 2021 Employment Agreement), then in lieu of the severance benefits described above, Mr. Powell will be entitled to: (a) a lump sum cash payment equal to three times the sum of (i) his annual base salary for the calendar year of the date of termination, and (ii) his target annual bonus for the calendar year of the date of termination; (b) the Prior Year STI; (c) the Pro Rata STI; (d) the monthly COBRA reimbursement multiplied by 36 months; and (e) 100% accelerated vesting of any unvested equity awards then held by Mr. Powell.
The 2021 Employment Agreement provides that if Mr. Powell’s employment is terminated by reason of his death or disability, then Mr. Powell will be eligible to receive the Prior Year STI and the Pro Rata STI. The vesting and exercise of any equity awards held by Mr. Powell at the time of his death or disability would be determined in accordance with the applicable incentive plan and award agreement.
In the event that any payment or benefit payable to Mr. Powell under the 2021 Employment Agreement would result in the imposition of excise taxes under the “golden parachute” provisions of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code, then such payments and benefits will either be made and/or provided in full or will be reduced such that the excise tax under Section 280G is not applicable, whichever is least economically disadvantageous to Mr. Powell. The 2021 Employment Agreement does not provide for any excise tax or other tax “gross-up” payment.
All severance payments and benefits under the 2021 Employment Agreement are subject to applicable withholding obligations, Mr. Powell’s execution and non-revocation of a release of claims, and compliance with certain non-competition, non-disclosure, and non-solicitation covenants.
Neither Ms. Stanfield nor Ms. Johnson has an employment agreement.
Executive Severance Arrangements
Aimco has an executive severance policy that provides that Aimco shall seek stockholder approval or ratification of any future severance agreement for any senior executive officer that provides for benefits, such as lump-sum or future periodic cash payments or new equity awards, in an amount in excess of 2.99 times such executive officer’s base salary and bonus. Compensation and benefits earned through the termination date, the value of vesting or payment of any equity awards outstanding prior to the termination date, pro rata vesting of any other long-term awards, or benefits provided under plans, programs or arrangements that are applicable to one or more groups of employees in addition to senior executives are not subject to the policy. It has been Aimco’s longstanding practice not to provide excessive severance arrangements.
Executive Severance Policy. On February 22, 2018, the Committee adopted the Apartment Investment and Management Company Executive Severance Policy (the “Executive Severance Policy”). The Executive Severance Policy superseded and replaced any employment agreement or other plan, policy or practice involving the payment of severance benefits to participants under the Executive Severance Policy. On April 28, 2021, the Committee amended the Executive Severance Policy in accordance with recommendations provided by the Committee’s compensation consultant to bring the policy in line with
72
market. On October 27, 2021, the Committee amended the Executive Severance Policy to remove severance provisions for the Chief Executive Officer in connection with the Committee’s approval of an employment agreement for Mr. Powell that includes severance provisions that are consistent with the severance to which he may otherwise become entitled under the Executive Severance Policy. The Company’s Executive Vice Presidents, as determined on the records of the Company and any other entities through which the operations of the Company are conducted, are eligible to participate in the Executive Severance Policy. Each of Mses. Stanfield and Johnson are participants under the Executive Severance Policy.
The Executive Severance Policy provides that if the Company terminates a participant’s employment without “Cause,” or if the participant terminates his or her employment for “Good Reason” (each as defined in the Executive Severance Policy), then the participant will be eligible to receive the following benefits:
• a lump sum payment equal to the sum of (i) the annual base salary for the calendar year of the date of termination, and (ii) the target annual bonus for the calendar year of the date of termination; and
• with respect to each participant, an amount equal to their monthly COBRA premium, multiplied by 18 months.
The vesting and exercise of any equity awards held by a participant on the date of termination will be determined in accordance with the applicable incentive plan and award agreement.
Pursuant to the terms of the Executive Severance Policy, if the Company terminates a participant’s employment without Cause, or if the participant terminates his or her employment for Good Reason, in either case, within the period commencing six months prior to and ending 24 months following a “Change in Control” (as defined in the Executive Severance Policy), then in lieu of the severance benefits described above the participant will be eligible to receive the following benefits:
• a lump sum payment equal to two times the sum of (i) the annual base salary for the calendar year of the date of termination, and (ii) the target annual bonus for the calendar year of the date of termination;
• with respect to each participant, the monthly COBRA premium multiplied by 24 months; and
• 100% accelerated vesting of any unvested equity awards then-held by the participant.
The Executive Severance Policy provides that if the employment of the participant is terminated by reason of the participant’s death or disability, then the participant will be eligible to receive a pro-rated bonus for the year of termination. In addition, the vesting and exercise of any equity awards held by the participant at the time of his or her death or disability will be determined in accordance with the applicable incentive plan and award agreement.
In the event that any payment or benefit payable to a participant under the Executive Severance Policy would result in the imposition of excise taxes under the “golden parachute” provisions of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code, then such payments and benefits will either be made and/or provided in full or will be reduced such that the excise tax under Section 280G is not applicable, whichever is least economically disadvantageous to the participant. The Executive Severance Policy does not provide for any excise tax or other tax “gross-up” payment.
All severance payments and benefits under the Executive Severance Policy are subject to applicable withholding obligations, the participant’s execution and non-revocation of a release of claims, and compliance with certain non-competition, non-disclosure and non-solicitation covenants set forth in a restrictive covenant agreement that is appropriate for the participant’s position.
The Executive Severance Policy will remain in effect, subject to amendment, until terminated by the Board. The Board may terminate or amend the Executive Severance Policy at any time, so long as at least 90 days’ prior notice is provided to any participant if the termination or amendment of the Executive Severance Policy would materially or adversely affect the rights of the participant.
Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Agreements
Effective in connection with their promotions by Aimco for Mr. Powell and Mses. Stanfield and Johnson, Aimco entered into certain non-competition and non-solicitation agreements with each executive. Mr. Powell’s non-competition and non-solicitation agreement was replaced by his 2021 Employment Agreement. Pursuant to these agreements, each of these NEOs agreed that during the term of his or her employment with the Company and for a period of two years following the termination
73
of his or her employment, except in circumstances where there was a change in control of the Company, he or she would not (i) be employed by a competitor of the Company described on a schedule to the agreement, (ii) solicit other employees to leave the Company’s employment, or (iii) solicit customers of Aimco to terminate their relationship with the Company. The agreements further require that the NEOs protect Aimco’s trade secrets and confidential information. For Mr. Powell, the non-solicitation requirement survives a change in control of the Company. For Mses. Stanfield and Johnson, the agreements provide that in order to enforce the above-noted non-competition condition following the executive’s termination of employment by the Company without cause, the executive will receive, for a period not to extend beyond the earlier of 24 months following such termination or the date of acceptance of employment with a non-competitor, (i) non-compete payments in an amount, if any, to be determined by the Company in its sole discretion and (ii) a monthly payment equal to two-thirds of such executive’s monthly base salary at the time of termination. For purposes of these agreements, “cause” is defined to mean, among other things, the executive’s (i) breach of the agreement, (ii) failure to perform required employment services, (iii) misappropriation of Company funds or property, (iv) conviction, plea of guilty, or plea of no contest to a crime involving fraud or moral turpitude, or (v) negligence, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, misconduct or violation of law.
Equity Award Agreements
Double Trigger Vesting Upon Change in Control. The award agreements pursuant to which restricted stock, stock option, and/or LTIP Unit awards have been granted to Mr. Powell and Mses. Stanfield and Johnson, as applicable, provide that if (i) a change in control occurs and (ii) the executive’s employment with the Company is terminated either by the Company without cause or by the executive for good reason, in either case, within 12 months following the change in control, then (a) for time-based restricted stock and/or LTIP Unit awards, all outstanding shares of restricted stock and LTIP Units shall become immediately and fully vested, and (b) for performance-based restricted stock, stock options, and/or LTIP Unit awards, all outstanding shares of restricted stock, stock options, and/or LTIP Units shall become immediately and fully vested based on the higher of actual or target performance through the truncated performance period ending on the date of the change in control, and all vested stock options will remain exercisable for the remainder of the term of the option.
Accelerated Vesting Upon Termination of Employment Due to Death or Disability. The award agreements pursuant to which restricted stock, stock option, and/or LTIP Unit awards have been granted to Mr. Powell and Mses. Stanfield and Johnson, as applicable, provide that upon a termination of employment due to death or disability, then (a) for time-based restricted stock and/or LTIP Unit awards, all outstanding shares of restricted stock and LTIP Units shall become immediately and fully vested, and (b) for performance-based restricted stock, stock option, and/or LTIP Unit awards, all outstanding shares of restricted stock, stock options, and/or LTIP Units shall become immediately and fully vested based on the higher of actual or target performance through the truncated performance period ending on the date of termination, and all vested stock options will remain exercisable for the remainder of the term of the option.
Other Benefits; Perquisite Philosophy
Aimco’s executive officer benefit programs are substantially the same as for all other eligible officers and employees. Aimco does not provide executives with more than minimal perquisites, such as reserved parking places.
Stock Ownership Guidelines and Required Holding Periods After Vesting
Aimco believes that it is in the best interest of Aimco’s stockholders for Aimco’s executive officers to own Aimco equity. Every year, the Committee and CEO review Aimco’s stock ownership guidelines, each executive officer’s holdings in light of the stock ownership guidelines, and each executive officer’s accumulated realized and unrealized restricted stock, stock option, and LTIP Unit gains. The Committee updated the stock ownership guidelines in April 2022.
Equity ownership guidelines for all executive officers are determined as a multiple of the executive’s base salary. The Committee and management have established the following stock ownership guidelines for Aimco’s executive officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Officer Position |
|
Ownership Target |
Chief Executive Officer |
|
5x base salary |
Other Executive Vice Presidents |
|
3x base salary |
74
Any executive officer who has not satisfied the stock ownership guidelines must, until the stock ownership guidelines are satisfied, hold 50% of any restricted stock that vests, after deduction of restricted stock sold for payment of income taxes related to the vesting, and hold shares equal to 50% of (i) the value realized upon option exercises less (ii) related income taxes.
Each of Mr. Powell and Mses. Stanfield and Johnson exceeded the ownership targets established in Aimco’s stock ownership guidelines as of the date of this filing.
75
Role of Outside Consultants
The Committee has the authority under its charter to engage the services of outside advisors, experts and others to assist the Committee. In 2022, the Committee engaged Willis Towers Watson to advise the Committee regarding Aimco’s executive compensation plan. Willis Towers Watson did not provide other services to Aimco. The Committee assessed the independence of Willis Towers Watson pursuant to SEC rules and concluded that Willis Towers Watson is independent.
The Committee directed Willis Towers Watson to: (i) perform studies of competitive compensation practices; (ii) develop conclusions and recommendations regarding Aimco’s executive compensation plans for consideration by the Committee; (iii) identify an executive compensation peer group; (iv) perform a benchmarking analysis of the base salary, STI, and LTI of the NEOs relative to competitive practices; (v) advise the Committee regarding stock ownership guidelines for the NEOs; and (vi) perform an assessment of the risks contained in Aimco’s incentive compensation plans.
Base Salary, Incentive Compensation, and Equity Grant Practices
Base salary adjustments typically take effect on January 1. The Committee (for the CEO) and the CEO, in consultation with the Committee (for the other executive officers), determine incentive compensation in late January or early February. STI is typically paid in February or March. LTI is granted on a date determined by the Committee, typically in late January or early February.
Aimco grants equity in three scenarios: in connection with its annual incentive compensation program as discussed above; in connection with certain new-hire or promotion packages; and for purposes of retention.
With respect to LTI, the Committee sets the grant date for the restricted stock, stock option, and LTIP Unit grants. The Committee typically sets grant dates at the time of its final compensation determination, generally in late January or early February. The date of determination and date of award are not selected based on share price. In the case of new-hire packages that include equity awards, grants are made on the executive’s start date or on a date designated in advance based on the passage of a specific number of days after the executive’s start date. For non-executive officers, as provided for in the 2015 Plan, the Committee has delegated the authority to make equity awards, up to certain limits, to the Chief Financial Officer (Ms. Stanfield) and/or Corporate Secretary (Ms. Johnson). The Committee and Mses. Stanfield and Johnson time grants without regard to the share price or the timing of the release of material non-public information and do not time grants for the purpose of affecting the value of executive compensation.
2023 Compensation Targets
Based on comparison to compensation paid to CEOs at Aimco’s peers, the Committee set Mr. Powell’s target total compensation (base compensation, STI and LTI) for 2023 at approximately $3.9 million. Mr. Powell, in consultation with and approval from the Committee, set target total compensation (base compensation, STI and LTI) for 2023 for the other NEOs as follows: Ms. Stanfield — $1.8 million; and Ms. Johnson — $1.4 million. Aimco performance will determine the amounts paid for 2023 STI and the portion of LTI awards that vest, and such amounts may be less than, or in excess of, these target amounts. STI will be paid in cash. The LTI was granted on February 1, 2023, and was in the form of restricted stock.
Accounting Treatment and Tax Deductibility of Executive Compensation
The Committee generally considers the accounting treatment and tax implications of the compensation awarded or paid to our executives. Grants of equity compensation awards under our long-term incentive program are accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 718. Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code was amended on December 22, 2017, by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”). Under the Tax Act, Section 162(m) applies to each employee who serves as the Company’s principal executive officer or principal financial officer during the taxable year, each other employee of the Company who is among the three most highly compensated officers during such taxable year, and any other employee who was a covered employee of the Company for any preceding taxable year beginning after December 31, 2016. The Tax Act also eliminated the performance-based compensation exception with respect to tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, but includes a transition rule with respect to compensation that is provided pursuant to a written binding contract in effect on November 2, 2018, and not materially modified after that date. The Company has awarded, and will continue to award, compensation as it considers appropriate that does not qualify for deductibility under Section 162(m).
Compensation and Human Resources Committee Report to Stockholders
76
The Compensation and Human Resources Committee held five meetings during the year ended December 31, 2022. The Compensation and Human Resources Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion & Analysis with management. Based upon such review, the related discussions, and such other matters deemed relevant and appropriate by the Compensation and Human Resources Committee, the Compensation and Human Resources Committee has recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion & Analysis be included in this filing.
Date: February 20, 2023
QUINCY L. ALLEN
PATRICIA L. GIBSON
JAY PAUL LEUPP
ROBERT A. MILLER
DEBORAH SMITH
R. DARY STONE
JAMES P. SULLIVAN
KIRK A. SYKES (CHAIRMAN)
The above report will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing by Aimco under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that Aimco specifically incorporates the same by reference.
77
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The table below summarizes the compensation for the years 2022, 2021 and 2020 attributable to each of the NEOs.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name and Principal |
|
Year |
|
Salary |
|
|
Bonus |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Option |
|
|
Non-Equity |
|
|
All Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Wes Powell — |
|
2022 |
|
|
550,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
550,003 |
|
(5) |
|
550,002 |
|
(5) |
|
1,196,516 |
|
|
|
12,200 |
|
|
|
2,858,721 |
|
President and Chief |
|
2021 |
|
|
525,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,123,148 |
|
|
|
964,228 |
|
|
|
827,662 |
|
|
|
5,160 |
|
|
|
5,445,198 |
|
|
|
2020 |
|
|
450,000 |
|
|
|
175,000 |
|
|
|
501,417 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
630,437 |
|
|
|
2,850 |
|
|
|
1,759,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
H. Lynn C. Stanfield — |
|
2022 |
|
|
450,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
528,077 |
|
(6) |
|
— |
|
|
|
805,753 |
|
|
|
12,200 |
|
|
|
1,796,030 |
|
Executive Vice |
|
2021 |
|
|
425,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,354,344 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
633,332 |
|
|
|
5,160 |
|
|
|
3,417,836 |
|
|
|
2020 |
|
|
425,000 |
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
423,975 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
616,642 |
|
|
|
2,850 |
|
|
|
1,818,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Jennifer Johnson — |
|
2022 |
|
|
395,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
327,198 |
|
(7) |
|
50,001 |
|
(7) |
|
774,309 |
|
|
|
12,200 |
|
|
|
1,558,708 |
|
Executive Vice President, Chief |
|
2021 |
|
|
371,280 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,558,035 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
617,877 |
|
|
|
5,160 |
|
|
|
2,552,352 |
|
|
|
2020 |
|
|
362,440 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
482,179 |
|
|
|
2,850 |
|
|
|
1,097,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
__________
The amounts shown in this column for 2022 include the grant date fair value of the performance-based restricted stock awards or performance based LTIP Unit awards, as applicable, granted in 2022 based on the probable outcome of the performance condition to which such awards are subject, which was calculated by a third-party consultant using a Monte Carlo valuation model in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Based on the foregoing, the grant date fair value is $7.32 per share for the performance-based restricted stock awards granted to each of Mr. Powell and Mses. Stanfield and Johnson, and $2.84 per LTIP Unit granted to Ms. Stanfield, that are based on relative TSR performance. The grant date fair value of the performance-based restricted stock awards, assuming achievement at the maximum level of performance, is $1,100,006 for Mr. Powell, $560,009 for Ms. Stanfield, and $400,009 for Ms. Johnson. The grant date fair value of the performance-based LTIP Unit award, assuming achievement at the maximum level of performance, is $140,001 for Ms. Stanfield.
The amounts shown in this column for 2022 include the grant date fair value of the performance-based stock options granted in 2022 based on the probable outcome of the performance condition to which such option is subject, which was calculated by a third-party consultant using a Monte Carlo valuation model. Based on the foregoing, the grant date fair value is $2.82 per underlying share of the options. The grant date fair value of the options, assuming achievement at the maximum level of performance, is $1,100,003 for Mr. Powell and $100,003 for Ms. Johnson.
78
GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS IN 2022
The following table provides details regarding plan-based awards granted to the NEOs during the year ended December 31, 2022.
|
|
Estimated Future |
|
Estimated Future |
|
All Other |
|
All other Option |
|
Exercise |
Grant |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option |
Option |
|
|||||||||||
Name |
Grant |
Threshold |
|
Target |
|
Maximum |
|
Threshold |
|
Target |
|
Maximum |
|
Units |
|
Threshold |
|
Target |
|
Maximum |
|
Awards |
Awards |
|
|||||||||||
Wes Powell |
2/2/2022 |
|
344,000 |
|
|
688,000 |
|
|
1,376,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
2/2/2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,569 |
|
|
75,137 |
|
|
150,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
550,003 |
|
|||||||
|
2/2/2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,518 |
|
|
195,036 |
|
|
390,072 |
|
6.96 |
|
550,002 |
|
|||||||
H. Lynn Stanfield |
2/2/2022 |
|
191,500 |
|
|
383,000 |
|
|
766,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
2/2/2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178,072 |
|
|||||||||
|
2/2/2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,126 |
|
|
38,252 |
|
|
76,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
280,005 |
|
|||||||
|
2/2/2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,324 |
|
|
24,648 |
|
|
49,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
|||||||
Jennifer Johnson |
2/2/2022 |
|
148,000 |
|
|
296,000 |
|
|
592,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
2/2/2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,194 |
|
|||||||||
|
2/2/2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,662 |
|
|
27,323 |
|
|
54,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,004 |
|
|||||||
|
2/2/2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,866 |
|
|
17,731 |
|
|
35,462 |
|
6.96 |
|
50,001 |
|
|||||||
__________
The amounts shown in this column include the grant date fair value of the performance-based restricted stock awards or performance based LTIP Unit awards, as applicable, based on the probable outcome of the performance condition to which such awards are subject, which was calculated by a third-party consultant using a Monte Carlo valuation model in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Based on the foregoing, the grant date fair value is $7.32 per share for the performance-based restricted stock awards granted to each of Mr. Powell and Mses. Stanfield and Johnson, and $2.84 per LTIP Unit granted to Ms. Stanfield, that are based on relative TSR performance. The grant date fair value of the performance-based restricted stock awards, assuming achievement at the maximum level of performance, is $1,100,006 for Mr. Powell, $560,009 for Ms. Stanfield, and $400,009 for Ms. Johnson. The grant date fair value of the performance-based LTIP Unit award, assuming achievement at the maximum level of performance, is $140,001 for Ms. Stanfield.
The amounts shown in this column include the grant date fair value of the performance-based stock options based on the probable outcome of the performance condition to which such option is subject, which was calculated by a third-party consultant using a Monte Carlo valuation model. Based on the foregoing, the grant date fair value is $2.82 per underlying share of the options. The grant date fair value of the options, assuming achievement at the maximum level of performance, is $1,100,003 for Mr. Powell and $100,003 for Ms. Johnson.
79
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END 2022
The following table shows outstanding stock option awards classified as exercisable and unexercisable as of December 31, 2022, for the NEOs. The table also shows unvested and unearned stock awards assuming a market value of $7.12 per share (the closing market price of the Company’s Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on December 30, 2022).
|
Option Awards |
Stock Awards |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name |
Number of |
|
Number of |
|
Equity |
|
|
Option |
|
|
Option |
Number |
|
|
Market |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
||||||
Wes |
|
|
|
|
|
390,072 |
|
(2) |
|
6.96 |
|
|
2/2/2032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,274 |
|
(3) |
|
1,069,951 |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
634,400 |
|
(4) |
|
6.66 |
|
|
4/28/2031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179,858 |
|
(5) |
|
1,280,589 |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,125 |
|
(6) |
|
36,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
371,901 |
|
(7) |
|
2,647,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,557 |
|
(8) |
|
11,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
692 |
|
(9) |
|
4,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,329 |
|
(10) |
|
9,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
H. Lynn C. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,504 |
|
(3) |
|
544,708 |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,296 |
|
(11) |
|
7,887 |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,892 |
|
(5) |
|
967,551 |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,858 |
|
(12) |
|
6,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,267 |
|
(13) |
|
23,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,585 |
|
(14) |
|
182,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,998 |
|
(15) |
|
163,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,934 |
|
(7) |
|
1,765,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,323 |
|
(16) |
|
9,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
649 |
|
(17) |
|
4,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,245 |
|
(18) |
|
8,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Jennifer |
|
|
|
|
|
35,462 |
|
(2) |
|
6.96 |
|
|
2/2/2032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,646 |
|
(3) |
|
389,080 |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,816 |
|
(5) |
|
546,930 |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,275 |
|
(14) |
|
130,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
(15) |
|
92,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,984 |
|
(7) |
|
1,253,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
__________
80
OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED IN 2022
The following table sets forth certain information regarding options and stock awards exercised and vested, respectively, during the year ended December 31, 2022, for the persons named in the Summary Compensation Table above.
|
|
Option Awards |
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Name |
|
Number of |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Value |
|
||||
Wes Powell |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
5,317 |
|
|
|
36,488 |
|
H. Lynn Stanfield |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
14,981 |
|
|
|
106,819 |
|
Jennifer Johnson |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,334 |
|
|
|
28,474 |
|
__________
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL
The NEOs are entitled to certain severance payments and benefits upon a qualifying termination of employment or, in the case of a change in control, double trigger accelerated vesting of equity awards in the event of a qualifying termination of employment that occurs within one year following a change in control. The terms of these arrangements are described under “CD&A — Post-Employment Compensation and Employment and Severance Arrangements — Executive Employment Arrangements, Executive Severance Arrangements, and Equity Award Agreements” above.
In the table that follows, potential payments and other benefits payable upon termination of employment and change in control situations are set out as if the conditions for payments had occurred and/or the terminations took place on December 31, 2022. In setting out such payments and benefits, amounts that had already been earned as of the termination date are not shown. Also, benefits that are available to all full-time regular employees when their employment terminates are not shown. The amounts set forth below are estimates of the amounts that could be paid out to the NEOs upon their termination. The actual amounts to be paid out can only be determined at the time of such NEOs’ separation from Aimco. The following table summarizes the potential payments under various scenarios if they had occurred on December 31, 2022.
|
|
Value of Accelerated Stock and Stock Options ($)(1) |
|
Severance ($) |
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Name |
|
Change |
|
Double |
|
Death or |
|
Termination |
|
Termination |
|
Death |
|
Disability |
|
Termination |
|
Termination |
|
Termination |
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wes Powell |
|
— |
|
5,414,672 |
|
5,414,672 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
1,114,560 |
(3) |
1,114,560 |
(3) |
2,534,368 |
(4) |
2,534,368 |
(4) |
3,801,551 |
(5) |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Lynn C. Stanfield |
|
— |
|
3,684,372 |
|
3,684,372 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
693,230 |
(3) |
693,230 |
(3) |
865,625 |
(6) |
865,625 |
(6) |
1,709,500 |
(7) |
600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jennifer Johnson |
|
— |
|
2,417,367 |
|
2,417,367 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
535,760 |
(3) |
535,760 |
(3) |
742,447 |
(6) |
742,447 |
(6) |
1,450,595 |
(7) |
526,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__________
81
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION
We believe that executive pay should be internally consistent and equitable to motivate our teammates to create stockholder value. In August 2015, pursuant to a mandate of the Dodd-Frank Act, the SEC adopted a rule requiring annual disclosure of the ratio of the median employee’s annual total compensation to the annual total compensation of the principal executive officer. The disclosure is required for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2017. The annual total compensation for 2022 for Mr. Powell, our CEO, was $2,858,721, as reported under the heading “Summary Compensation Table.” Our median employee’s total compensation for 2022 was $177,320. As a result, we estimate that Mr. Powell’s 2022 total compensation was approximately 16 times that of our median employee.
Our CEO to median employee pay ratio was calculated in accordance with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K. We identified the median employee by examining 2022 total compensation, consisting of base salary, annual bonus amounts, stock-based compensation (based on the grant date fair value of awards granted during 2022) and other incentive payments for all individuals who were employed by Aimco on December 31, 2022, other than our CEO. Our measuring date of December 31 remained the same as last year. We included all active employees and annualized the compensation for any employees who were not employed by Aimco for the full 2022 calendar year. After identifying the median employee based on 2022 total compensation, we calculated annual total compensation for such employee using the same methodology we use for our NEOs as set forth in the “Total” column in the Summary Compensation Table.
82
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
In formulating its recommendation for director compensation, the Nominating, Environmental, Social, and Governance Committee reviews director compensation for independent directors of companies in the real estate industry and companies of comparable market capitalization, revenue, and assets and considers compensation trends for other NYSE-listed companies. The Nominating, Environmental, Social, and Governance Committee also considers the size of the Board as compared to other boards, the participation of each independent director on committees, and the resulting workload on the directors. In addition, the Nominating, Environmental, Social, and Governance Committee considers the overall cost of the Board to the Company and the cost per director.
2022 COMPENSATION
For 2022, based on the advice of Aimco's independent compensation consultant, Willis Towers Watson, with such advice based on a review of director compensation for Aimco's identified peer group, compensation for the Independent Directors included an annual fee of $170,000, payable up to 50% in the form of a cash retainer with the remainder in stock, stock options, and/or LTIP Units. The stock, stock options, and LTIP Units were awarded on February 4, 2022. The closing price of Aimco’s Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on February 4, 2022, was $6.79. No meeting fees were paid to independent directors for attending meetings of the Board and the committees on which they serve.
As contemplated by the Separation and by Aimco and AIR, Mr. Considine had specific responsibilities to Aimco as a non-executive consultant during 2021 and 2022 to support the establishment and growth of the Aimco business, reporting directly to the Board. These responsibilities included short and long-term strategic direction and advice, transition and executive support to Aimco officers, and advice and consultation with respect to Aimco’s strategic growth and acquisition activities. The Independent Directors set Mr. Considine’s 2022 target total compensation (including base compensation, STI, and LTI) for these responsibilities at $1.8 million. Mr. Considine’s responsibilities to Aimco as a non-executive consultant did not continue past 2022, and he will not be provided any further compensation as a non-executive consultant in 2023. Mr. Considine resigned from serving as a member of the Board on February 13, 2023.
For the year ended December 31, 2022, Aimco paid the directors serving on the Board during that year as follows:
Name |
|
Fees Earned or |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Option |
|
|
Non-Equity |
|
|
Change in Pension |
|
|
All Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|||||||
Quincy L. Allen |
|
|
85,000 |
|
|
|
83,890 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
168,890 |
|
Terry Considine (4) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,960,503 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,960,503 |
|
Patricia L. Gibson |
|
|
21,250 |
|
|
|
146,807 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
168,057 |
|
Jay Paul Leupp |
|
|
21,250 |
|
|
|
146,807 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
168,057 |
|
Robert A. Miller (5) |
|
|
21,250 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
148,751 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
170,001 |
|
Wes Powell (6) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Deborah Smith (5) |
|
|
21,250 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
148,751 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
170,001 |
|
Michael A. Stein (7) |
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
109,287 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
169,287 |
|
R. Dary Stone |
|
|
85,000 |
|
|
|
83,890 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
168,890 |
|
Kirk A. Sykes |
|
|
85,000 |
|
|
|
83,890 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
168,890 |
|
__________
83
2023 Compensation
Compensation for each of the non-management directors in 2023 includes an annual fee of $200,000, payable up to 50% in the form of a cash retainer with the remainder in stock, stock options, and/or LTIP Units. The stock, stock options, and LTIP Units were awarded on February 1, 2023. The closing price of Aimco’s Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on February 1, 2023, was $7.59. Additional retainers for Board leadership positions in 2023 are as follows: Chairman of the Board — $65,000; Audit Committee Chairman — $20,000; Compensation and Human Resources Committee Chairman — $15,000; Nominating, Environmental, Social, and Governance Committee Chairman — $14,000; and Investment Committee Chairman — $15,000. Directors will not receive meeting fees in 2023.
84
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information available to the Company, as of February 22, 2023, with respect to Aimco’s equity securities beneficially owned by (i) each director and the NEOs, and (ii) all directors and executive officers as a group. The table also sets forth certain information available to the Company, as of February 22, 2023, with respect to shares of Common Stock held by each person known to the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of such shares. This table reflects options that are exercisable within 60 days. Unless otherwise indicated, each person has sole voting and investment power with respect to the securities beneficially owned by that person. The business address of each of the following directors and NEOs is 4582 South Ulster Street, Suite 1450, Denver, Colorado 80237. None of the securities reflected in this table held by the directors or NEOs are the subject of any hedging or pledging transaction.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
|
Number of |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Percentage |
|
||||
Directors and Named Executive Officers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Wes Powell |
|
|
1,389,494 |
|
|
0.93% |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
0.88% |
|
||
H. Lynn C. Stanfield |
|
|
710,216 |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
17,858 |
|
|
* |
|
||
Jennifer Johnson |
|
|
479,225 |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
* |
|
||
Quincy L. Allen |
|
|
70,336 |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
* |
|
||
Patricia L. Gibson |
|
|
98,451 |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
* |
|
||
Jay Paul Leupp |
|
|
102,609 |
|
(5) |
* |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
* |
|
||
Robert A. Miller |
|
|
299,037 |
|
(6) |
* |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
* |
|
||
Deborah Smith |
|
|
233,855 |
|
(7) |
* |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
* |
|
||
R. Dary Stone |
|
|
89,185 |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
* |
|
||
James P. Sullivan |
|
|
18,618 |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
* |
|
||
Kirk A. Sykes |
|
|
75,887 |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
* |
|
||
All directors and executive officers as a group |
|
|
3,566,913 |
|
(8) |
|
2.37 |
% |
|
|
17,858 |
|
|
|
2.26 |
% |
5% or Greater Holders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
The Vanguard Group |
|
|
21,828,329 |
|
(9) |
|
14.56 |
% |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
13.84 |
% |
100 Vanguard Blvd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. |
|
|
17,439,376 |
|
(10) |
|
11.63 |
% |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
11.06 |
% |
100 East Pratt St. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Baltimore, Maryland 21202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
BlackRock, Inc. |
|
|
13,949,317 |
|
(11) |
|
9.30 |
% |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
8.84 |
% |
55 East 52nd Street |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
New York, New York 10055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Sessa Capital Special Opportunity Fund II, L.P. and affiliates |
|
|
9,932,043 |
|
(12) |
|
6.62 |
% |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
6.30 |
% |
888 Seventh Avenue, 30th Floor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
New York, New York 10019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Westdale Investments L.P. and affiliates |
|
|
8,807,745 |
|
(13) |
|
5.87 |
% |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
5.58 |
% |
2550 Pacific Ave., Suite 1600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Dallas, Texas 75226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Land & Buildings Investment Management, LLC and affiliates |
|
|
8,798,969 |
|
(14) |
|
5.87 |
% |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
5.58 |
% |
1 Landmark Square, 17th Floor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Stamford, Connecticut 06901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
__________
* Less than 0.5%
(1) Excludes shares of Common Stock issuable upon redemption of common OP Units or equivalents.
(2) Represents the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by each person divided by the total number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of February 22, 2023. Any shares of Common Stock that may be acquired by a person within 60 days upon the exercise of options, warrants, rights or conversion privileges or pursuant to the power to revoke, or the automatic termination of, a trust, discretionary account or similar arrangement are deemed to be beneficially owned by that person and are deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of outstanding shares of Common Stock owned by that person, but not any other person.
(3) Through wholly owned subsidiaries, Aimco acts as general partner of the Aimco Operating Partnership. As of February 22, 2023, Aimco held approximately 95.0% of the common partnership interests in the Aimco Operating Partnership. Interests in the Aimco Operating Partnership that are held by limited partners other than Aimco are referred to as “OP Units.” Generally, after a holding period of 12 months, common OP Units may be tendered
85
for redemption and, upon tender, may be acquired by Aimco for shares of Common Stock at an exchange ratio of one share of Common Stock for each common OP Unit (subject to adjustment). If Aimco acquired all common OP Units for Common Stock (without regard to the ownership limit set forth in Aimco’s Charter), these shares of Common Stock would constitute approximately 5.0% of the then outstanding shares of Common Stock. OP Units are subject to certain restrictions on transfer.
(4) Represents the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned, divided by the total number of shares of Common Stock outstanding, assuming, in both cases, that all 7,812,767 OP Units outstanding as of February 22, 2023 are redeemed in exchange for shares of Common Stock (notwithstanding any holding period requirements, and Aimco’s ownership limit). See note (3) above. Excludes partnership preferred units issued by the Aimco Operating Partnership and Aimco preferred securities.
(5) Includes 2,000 shares held directly by Mr. Leupp, 100,596 shares held by a trust for the benefit of Mr. Leupp’s children, of which Mr. Leupp and his spouse are trustees, and 13 shares held by Terra Firma Asset Management, LLC, of which Mr. Leupp is a 65% managing member.
(6) Includes 228,803 shares subject to options that are exercisable within 60 days.
(7) Includes 170,323 shares subject to options that are exercisable within 60 days.
(8) Includes 399,126 shares subject to options that are exercisable within 60 days.
(9) Beneficial ownership information is based on information contained in an Amendment No. 2 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 9, 2023, by The Vanguard Group. According to the schedule, The Vanguard Group has sole dispositive power with respect to 21,429,805 of the shares, shared voting power with respect to 237,528 of the shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 398,524 of the shares.
(10) Beneficial ownership information is based on information contained in an Amendment No. 2 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2023, by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. on behalf of itself and affiliated entities. According to the schedule, included in the securities listed above as beneficially owned by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. are 6,581,317 shares and 9,836,953 shares over which T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund, Inc., respectively, have sole voting power. According to the schedule, T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. has sole dispositive power with respect to all 17,439,376 shares.
(11) Beneficial ownership information is based on information contained in an Amendment No. 3 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 24, 2023, by BlackRock, Inc. According to the schedule, BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 13,448,597 of the shares and sole dispositive power with respect to all 13,949,317 shares.
(12) Beneficial ownership information is based on information contained in Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2023, by Sessa Capital Special Opportunity Fund II, L.P., Sessa Capital GP, LLC, Sessa Capital IM, L.P., Sessa Capital IM GP, LLC, and John Petry. According to the schedule, Sessa Capital Special Opportunity Fund II, L.P., Sessa Capital GP, LLC, Sessa Capital IM, L.P., Sessa Capital IM GP, LLC, and John Petry have shared voting power and shared dispositive power with respect to all 9,932,043 shares.
(13) Beneficial ownership information is based on information contained in an Amendment No. 1 to Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on November 18, 2022, by Westdale Investments L.P., JGB Ventures I, Ltd., JGB Holdings, Inc., Joseph G. Beard, Westdale Construction Co. Limited, Ronald Kimel, and Warren Kimel. According to the schedule, Westdale Investments L.P., JGB Ventures I, Ltd., JGB Holdings, Inc., and Joseph G. Beard have shared voting and dispositive power over the 7,857,295 shares owned directly by Westdale Investments L.P., and Westdale Construction Co. Limited, Ronald Kimel, and Warren Kimel have shared voting and dispositive power over the 950,450 shares owned directly by Westdale Construction Co. Limited.
(14) Beneficial ownership information is based on information contained in an Amendment No. 1 to Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on December 19, 2022, by Land & Buildings Investment Management, LLC, Jonathan Litt, and affiliated persons. According to the schedule, Land & Buildings Investment Management, LLC and Jonathan Litt have shared voting power and shared dispositive power with respect to 8,798,969 shares.
SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
Information on equity compensation plans as of the end of the 2022 fiscal year under which equity securities of the Company are authorized for issuance is set forth in the following table.
|
|
|||||||||||
Plan Category |
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Number of Securities |
|
|||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
|
|
7,004,196 |
|
|
$ |
6.33 |
|
|
|
21,388,667 |
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
__________
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Policies and Procedures for Review, Approval or Ratification of Related Person Transactions
Aimco recognizes that related person transactions can present potential or actual conflicts of interest and create the appearance that Aimco’s decisions are based on considerations other than the best interests of Aimco and its stockholders. Nevertheless, Aimco recognizes that there are situations where related person transactions may be in, or may not be inconsistent with, the
86
best interests of Aimco and its stockholders. The Nominating, Environmental, Social, and Governance Committee, pursuant to a written policy approved by the Board, has oversight for related person transactions. The Nominating, Environmental, Social, and Governance Committee will review transactions, arrangements or relationships in which (1) the aggregate amount involved will or may be expected to exceed $100,000 in any calendar year, (2) Aimco (or any Aimco entity) is a participant, and (3) any related party has or will have a direct or indirect interest (other than an interest arising solely as a result of being a director of another corporation or organization that is a party to the transaction or a less than ten percent beneficial owner of another entity that is a party to the transaction). The Nominating, Environmental, Social, and Governance Committee has also given its standing approval for certain types of related person transactions such as certain employment arrangements, director compensation, transactions with another entity in which a related person’s interest is only by virtue of a non-executive employment relationship or limited equity position, and transactions in which all stockholders receive pro rata benefits.
Sublease of a Portion of Aimco Office Space
On January 25, 2019, Aimco entered into a sublease agreement (the “Sublease”) with an entity in which Mr. Considine, former Director who resigned from the Board in February 2023, has sole voting and investment power. Under this agreement, Aimco has subleased to said entity approximately 2,957 square feet of office space within the same building as Aimco’s corporate headquarters in Denver, Colorado, and consisting of excess space not needed by Aimco, on exactly the same terms as Aimco leases the space. The Sublease does not provide any benefit to the entity, as other space in the building requires comparable rent. The Sublease provides some benefit to Aimco as it gives Aimco the ability to put the excess space to productive use. The entity has a lease term less favorable than Aimco’s lease with the landlord, in that Aimco has the option to terminate the Sublease at any time, for any or no reason, upon six months’ notice. The Sublease has a term that began on April 1, 2019, and ends on April 30, 2029, the same term as the Aimco lease. The annual amount of rent in the first year was $78,361, subject to annual increases. The aggregate amount of rent expected to be paid under the Sublease, assuming the entire lease term is fulfilled, is approximately $850,000. The Nominating, Environmental, Social, and Governance Committee reviewed the Sublease and determined that it is in the best interests of Aimco and its stockholders.
Related Person Transactions
In November 2019, Aimco confirmed an arrangement with Richard M. Powell, of R.M. Powell & Co., a contractor for Aimco since 1997 and father of Mr. Wes Powell, Director, President and CEO. Depending on the success of potential transactions identified by Mr. Richard Powell, he may earn fees in amounts in excess of $120,000. Pursuant to the Company’s related party transactions policy, the Nominating, Environmental, Social, and Governance Committee reviewed and approved the arrangement with Mr. Richard Powell, subject to the Committee’s subsequent review and approval of any specific transaction in which R.M. Powell & Co. provides services. In April 2022, the Nominating, Environmental, Social, and Governance Committee reviewed and approved a transaction directly sourced by R.M. Powell & Co., including a fee paid to R.M. Powell & Co. in the amount of $998,134, with such fee calculated pursuant to the fee structure previously reviewed and approved by the Nominating, Environmental, Social, and Governance Committee.
In March 2020, Elizabeth Likovich, the daughter of Mr. Considine, former Director who resigned from the Board in February 2023, became a full-time employee of the Company. Her compensation for 2022 was in line with the median for her peers, and consisted of $262,184 in base salary, $129,687 in STI, $8,403 in non-discretionary matching contributions under Aimco’s 401(k) plan, and $103,728 in equity awards vesting over three years. Prior to joining Aimco, Ms. Likovich held a similar position at a peer apartment company. Pursuant to the policy noted above, the Nominating, Environmental, Social, and Governance Committee reviewed and approved the employment of Ms. Likovich.
INDEPENDENCE OF DIRECTORS
The Board has determined that to be considered independent, a director may not have a direct or indirect material relationship with Aimco or its subsidiaries (directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company). A material relationship is one that impairs or inhibits, or has the potential to impair or inhibit, a director’s exercise of critical and disinterested judgment on behalf of Aimco and its stockholders. In determining whether a material relationship exists, the Board considers all relevant facts and circumstances, including whether the director or a family member is a current or former employee of the Company, family member relationships, compensation, business relationships and payments, and charitable contributions between Aimco and an entity with which a director is affiliated (as an executive officer, partner or substantial stockholder). The Board consults with the Company’s counsel to ensure that such determinations are consistent with all relevant securities and other laws and regulations regarding the definition of “independent director,” including but not limited to those categorical standards set forth in Section 303A.02 of the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange.
87
Consistent with these considerations, the Board has affirmatively determined that Messrs. Allen, Leupp, Miller, Stone, Sullivan, and Sykes and Mses. Gibson and Smith are independent directors.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES
Below is information on the fees billed for services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP during the years ended December 31, 2022, and 2021.
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
Aggregate fees billed for services |
|
$ 1.66 million |
|
|
$ 1.77 million |
|
Audit Fees: |
|
$ 1.62 million |
|
|
$ 1.75 million |
|
Audit-Related Fees: |
|
$ -- |
|
|
$ -- |
|
Tax Fees: |
|
$ 0.4 million |
|
|
$ 0.02 million |
|
Tax Consulting Fees (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other fees |
|
$ -- |
|
|
$ -- |
|
__________
88
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies
The Audit Committee has adopted the Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy (the “Pre-Approval Policy”). A summary of the Pre-Approval Policy is as follows:
• The Pre-Approval Policy describes the Audit, Audit-related, Tax and Other Permitted services that have the general pre-approval of the Audit Committee.
• Pre-approvals are typically subject to a dollar limit of $50,000.
• The term of any general pre-approval is generally 12 months from the date of pre-approval.
• At least annually, the Audit Committee reviews and pre-approves the services that may be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm without obtaining specific pre-approval from the Audit Committee.
• Unless a type of service has received general pre-approval and is anticipated to be within the dollar limit associated with the general pre-approval, it requires specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee if it is to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm.
• The Audit Committee will consider whether all services are consistent with the rules on independent registered public accounting firm independence.
• The Audit Committee also considers whether the independent registered public accounting firm is best positioned to provide the most effective and efficient service, for reasons such as its familiarity with Aimco’s business, people, culture, accounting systems, risk profile and other factors, and whether the service might enhance Aimco’s ability to manage or control risk or improve audit quality. Such factors are considered as a whole, and no one factor is necessarily determinative.
All of the services described in the Principal Accountant Fees section above were approved pursuant to the annual engagement letter or in accordance with the Pre-Approval Policy.
89
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)(1) The financial statements listed in the Index to Financial Statements on Page F-1 of this report are filed as part of this report and incorporated herein by reference.
(a)(2) The financial statement schedule listed in the Index to Financial Statements on Page F-1 of this report is filed as part of this report and incorporated herein by reference.
(a)(3) Exhibits.
90
INDEX TO EXHIBITS (1) (2)
EXHIBIT NO. |
DESCRIPTION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Form of 5.2% Secured Mezzanine Note, made by Aimco REIT Sub, LLC (included in Exhibit 10.32) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm - Aimco |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93
101 |
The following materials from Aimco’s and Aimco Operating Partnership’s consolidated Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, formatted in iXBRL (Inline Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) consolidated balance sheets; (ii) consolidated statements of operations; (iii) consolidated statements of comprehensive income; (iv) consolidated statements of equity and consolidated statements of partners’ capital; (v) consolidated statements of cash flows; (vi) notes to the consolidated financial statements; and (vii) financial statement schedule (3) |
|
|
104 |
Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document). |
* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None.
94
APARTMENT INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY
AIMCO OP L.P.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
Page |
|
Financial Statements: Apartment Investment and Management Company: |
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID: |
F-4 |
|
F-6 |
||
F-7 |
||
F-8 |
||
F-9 |
||
|
|
|
Aimco OP L.P. |
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID: |
F-10 |
|
F-12 |
||
F-13 |
||
F-14 |
||
F-15 |
||
|
|
|
F-16 |
||
F-16 |
||
Note 2 — Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
F-16 |
|
F-25 |
||
F-26 |
||
F-28 |
||
F-30 |
||
F-31 |
||
F-33 |
||
F-34 |
||
F-35 |
||
F-36 |
||
F-37 |
||
F-40 |
||
F-16 |
||
F-41 |
||
F-44 |
||
|
|
|
Financial Statement Schedule: |
|
|
F-45 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
APARTMENT INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY |
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Wesley W. Powell |
|
|
Wesley W. Powell |
|
|
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
Date: |
February 27, 2023 |
|
AIMCO OP L.P. |
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
Aimco OP GP, LLC, its General Partner |
|
|
/s/ Wesley W. Powell |
|
|
Wesley W. Powell Director, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
Date: |
February 27, 2023 |
F-2
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of each registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
APARTMENT INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
AIMCO OP L.P. |
|
|
|
|
By: Aimco OP GP, LLC, its General Partner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ WESLEY W. POWELL |
|
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
February 27, 2023 |
Wesley W. Powell |
|
(principal executive officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ H. LYNN C. STANFIELD |
|
Executive Vice President and |
|
February 27, 2023 |
H. Lynn C. Stanfield |
|
Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ R. DARY STONE |
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors |
|
February 27, 2023 |
R. Dary Stone |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ QUINCY L. ALLEN |
|
Director |
|
February 27, 2023 |
Quincy L. Allen |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ PATRICIA L. GIBSON |
|
Director |
|
February 27, 2023 |
Patricia L. Gibson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JAY PAUL LEUPP |
|
Director |
|
February 27, 2023 |
Jay Paul Leupp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ ROBERT A. MILLER |
|
Director |
|
February 27, 2023 |
Robert A. Miller |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ DEBORAH SMITH |
|
Director |
|
February 27, 2023 |
Deborah Smith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JAMES P. SULLIVAN |
|
Director |
|
February 27, 2023 |
James P. Sullivan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ KIRK A. SYKES |
|
Director |
|
February 27, 2023 |
Kirk A. Sykes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of
Apartment Investment and Management Company
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Apartment Investment and Management Company (the Company) as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 15(a) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework), and our report dated February 27, 2023, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
|
|
Impairment of mezzanine investment
|
Description of the Matter |
|
During 2022 the Company recorded an impairment loss on its mezzanine investment of $212.6 million to reduce the investment to its estimated fair value of $158.6 million. As more fully described in Note 2 and Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company periodically evaluates the mezzanine investment for impairment. An impairment loss is recognized to adjust the investment to its estimated fair value when the Company determines the fair value is less than the carrying value of the investment on an other-than-temporary basis.
Auditing the Company’s measurement of the impairment loss on the mezzanine investment involved a higher degree of judgment due to the subjective nature of the assumptions used in determining the fair value of the underlying real estate collateral. The significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of real estate include the capitalization rate, discount rate, market rental rates and operating expense ratio.
|
F-4
How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit
|
|
We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s process to determine the fair value of the mezzanine investment and measure the impairment loss. This included testing controls over management’s evaluation of the significant inputs and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the underlying real estate collateral.
To test the impairment loss on the mezzanine investment, our audit procedures included, among others, testing the completeness and accuracy of the information included in the valuation model and evaluating the significant assumptions mentioned above that were used to estimate fair value. With the assistance of our valuation specialists, we compared the significant assumptions to observable market data and published industry resources, including comparing management’s capitalization rate, discount rate, market rental rates, operating expense ratio to ranges for comparable properties in the same or nearby markets. |
|
|
|
/s/
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2020.
February 27, 2023
F-5
APARTMENT INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of December 31, 2022 and 2021
(In thousands)
|
|
December 31, |
|
|||||
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Buildings and improvements |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
Land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Net real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Mezzanine investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest rate options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Unconsolidated real estate partnerships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Notes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Right-of-use lease assets- finance leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Non-recourse property debt, net |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
Construction loans, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Notes payable to AIR |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
Total indebtedness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Lease liabilities - finance leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accrued liabilities and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Redeemable noncontrolling interests in consolidated real estate partnerships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Equity ( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common Stock, $ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Retained Earnings (accumulated deficit) |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
Total Aimco equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated real estate partnerships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common noncontrolling interests in Aimco Operating Partnership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
See notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-6
APARTMENT INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020
(In thousands)
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|||
REVENUES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Rental and other property revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
OPERATING EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Property operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Impairment |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Interest expense |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Mezzanine investment income (loss), net |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on interest rate options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on equity investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
||
Income from unconsolidated real estate partnerships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Gains on dispositions of real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Lease modification income |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
Income (loss) before income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
Net (income) loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net (income) loss attributable to common noncontrolling |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income (loss) attributable to Aimco |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net income (loss) attributable to Aimco per common |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Aimco per common |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding – basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding – diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
See notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-7
APARTMENT INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020
(In thousands)
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
Common |
|
|
||
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Additional |
|
Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit) |
|
Aimco Predecessor Equity |
|
Total Aimco |
|
Consolidated |
|
Aimco |
|
Total |
Balances at December 31, 2019 |
|
— |
|
$— |
|
$— |
|
$— |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
Net income (loss) |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
( |
|
|
( |
|
( |
|
( |
|
( |
|
Contributions from Aimco Predecessor, net |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|||
Issuance of equity in connection with Separation |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
( |
|
( |
|
— |
|
|
— |
||||
Contributions from noncontrolling interests |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
||
Other common stock issuances |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|||||
Balances at December 31, 2020 |
|
|
|
|
( |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net income (loss) |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
( |
|
— |
|
( |
|
|
( |
|
( |
|
Redemption of OP Units |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
( |
|
( |
||||
Share-based compensation expense |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
||||
Contributions from noncontrolling interests |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
( |
|
— |
|
( |
Other common stock issuances |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|||||
Other, net |
|
( |
|
|
|
|
( |
|
— |
|
|
( |
|
( |
|
|||
Balances at December 31, 2021 |
|
|
|
|
( |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net income (loss) |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Redemption of OP Units |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
( |
|
( |
||||
Share-based compensation expense |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
||||
Contributions from noncontrolling interests |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
( |
|
( |
|
( |
Redemption of redeemable noncontrolling interests in consolidated real estate partnerships |
|
— |
|
— |
|
( |
|
— |
|
— |
|
( |
|
— |
|
— |
|
( |
Purchase of noncontrolling interests in consolidated real estate partnerships |
|
— |
|
— |
|
( |
|
— |
|
— |
|
( |
|
— |
|
— |
|
( |
Common stock repurchased |
|
( |
|
( |
|
( |
|
— |
|
— |
|
( |
|
— |
|
— |
|
( |
Other common stock issuances |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|||||
Cash dividends |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
( |
|
— |
|
( |
|
— |
|
— |
|
( |
Other, net |
|
( |
|
|
( |
|
( |
|
— |
|
( |
|
( |
|
|
( |
||
Balances at December 31, 2022 |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$- |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
See notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-8
APARTMENT INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020
(In thousands)
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Income from unconsolidated real estate partnerships |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Realized and unrealized (gains) losses on interest rate options |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
Impairment |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Mezzanine investment, net |
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Lease modification income |
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Realized and unrealized (gains) losses on equity investments |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Gain on disposition of real estate |
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
||
Changes in operating assets and operating liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Other assets, net |
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
Net cash received from development property lease terminations |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Accrued liabilities and other |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Total adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Purchases of real estate |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Proceeds from disposition of real estate |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Investment in IQHQ |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Redemption of IQHQ investment |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Investment in unconsolidated real estate partnerships |
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Other investing activities |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Proceeds from non-recourse property debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Proceeds from construction loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
||
Payments of deferred loan costs |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Principal repayments on non-recourse property debt |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Principal repayments on construction loans |
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Principal repayments on Notes Payable to AIR |
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Purchase of interest rate options |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Proceeds from interest rate options |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Payments on finance leases |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Change in Aimco Predecessor investment, net |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
||
Payments of prepayment premiums |
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Common stock repurchased |
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Dividend paid on common stock |
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Distributions to redeemable noncontrolling interests |
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Contributions from noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Contributions from redeemable noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
||
Redemption of OP units |
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Redemption of noncontrolling interests |
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Redemption of redeemable noncontrolling interests |
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Other financing activities |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
NET DECREASE IN CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, AND RESTRICTED CASH |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, AND RESTRICTED CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH AT END OF PERIOD |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||
See notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-9
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Partners and the Board of Directors of
Aimco OP L.P.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Aimco OP L.P. (the Partnership) as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, partners’ capital, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 15(a) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Partnership at December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework), and our report dated February 27, 2023 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Partnership’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Partnership in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
|
|
Impairment of mezzanine investment
|
Description of the Matter |
|
During 2022 the Company recorded an impairment loss on its mezzanine investment of $212.6 million to reduce the investment to its estimated fair value of $158.6 million. As more fully described in Note 2 and Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company periodically evaluates the mezzanine investment for impairment. An impairment loss is recognized to adjust the investment to its estimated fair value when the Company determines the fair value is less than the carrying value of the investment on an other-than-temporary basis.
Auditing the Company’s measurement of the impairment loss on the mezzanine investment involved a higher degree of judgment due to the subjective nature of the assumptions used in determining the fair value of the underlying real estate collateral. The significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of real estate include the capitalization rate, discount rate, market rental rates and operating expense ratio.
|
F-10
How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit
|
|
We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s process to determine the fair value of the mezzanine investment and measure the impairment loss. This included testing controls over management’s evaluation of the significant inputs and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the underlying real estate collateral.
To test the impairment loss on the mezzanine investment, our audit procedures included, among others, testing the completeness and accuracy of the information included in the valuation model and evaluating the significant assumptions mentioned above that were used to estimate fair value. With the assistance of our valuation specialists, we compared the significant assumptions to observable market data and published industry resources, including comparing management’s capitalization rate, discount rate, market rental rates, operating expense ratio to ranges for comparable properties in the same or nearby markets. |
/s/
We have served as the Partnership's auditor since 2020.
February 27, 2023
F-11
AIMCO OP L.P.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of December 31, 2022 and 2021
(In thousands)
|
|
December 31, |
|
|||||
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Buildings and improvements |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
Land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Net real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Mezzanine investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest rate options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Unconsolidated real estate partnerships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Notes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Right-of-use lease assets- finance leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Non-recourse property debt, net |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
Construction loans, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Notes payable to AIR |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
Total indebtedness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Lease liabilities - finance leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accrued liabilities and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Redeemable noncontrolling interests in consolidated real estate partnerships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Partners’ capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
General Partner and Special Limited Partner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Limited Partners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Partners’ capital attributable to Aimco Operating Partnership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated real estate partnerships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total partners’ capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total liabilities and partners’ capital |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
See notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-12
AIMCO OP L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020
(In thousands)
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|||
REVENUES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Rental and other property revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
OPERATING EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Property operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Impairment |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Interest expense |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Mezzanine investment income (loss), net |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on interest rate options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on equity investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
||
Income from unconsolidated real estate partnerships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Gains on dispositions of real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Lease modification income |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
Income (loss) before income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
Net (income) loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Aimco Operating |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net income (loss) attributable to Aimco Operating |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Aimco Operating |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Weighted-average common units outstanding – basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Weighted-average common units outstanding – diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
See notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-13
AIMCO OP L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
For the Years Ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020
(In thousands)
|
|
General Partner |
|
|
Limited |
|
|
Partners’ Capital |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
Aimco Predecessor Capital |
|
|
Total |
|
||||||
Balances at December 31, 2019 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||||
Net income (loss) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
Contributions from Aimco Predecessor, net |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Issuance of partners' capital in connection with Separation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|||
Contributions from noncontrolling interests |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
||
Other issuances of OP Units |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|||
Balances at December 31, 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income (loss) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
Redemption of OP Units |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
||||
Contributions from noncontrolling interests |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Other OP Unit issuances |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|||
Other, net |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|||
Balances at December 31, 2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|||||
Redemption of OP Units |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
||||
Contributions from noncontrolling interests |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Redemption of redeemable noncontrolling interests in consolidated real estate partnerships |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Purchase of noncontrolling interests in consolidated real estate partnerships |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Repurchases of OP Units held by Aimco |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Other OP Unit issuances |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|||
Cash dividends |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
Balances at December 31, 2022 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|||||
See notes to the consolidated financial statements
F-14
AIMCO OP L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020
(In thousands)
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||||
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
2020 |
|
||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Income from unconsolidated real estate partnerships |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
Realized and unrealized (gains) losses on interest rate options |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
( |
) |
||
Impairment |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Amortization of debt issuance costs and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Mezzanine investment, net |
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
( |
) |
||
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
||
Lease modification income |
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Realized and unrealized (gains) losses on equity investments |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Gain on disposition of real estate |
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|||
Changes in operating assets and operating liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Other assets, net |
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
( |
) |
||
Net cash received from development property lease terminations |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
||
Accrued liabilities and other |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Purchases of real estate |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
Proceeds from disposition of real estate |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
||
Investment in IQHQ |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Redemption of IQHQ investment |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
||
Investment in unconsolidated real estate partnerships |
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Other investing activities |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Proceeds from non-recourse property debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|||
Proceeds from construction loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
||
Payments of deferred loan costs |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
— |
|
|
( |
) |
Principal repayments on non-recourse property debt |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
— |
|
|
( |
) |
Principal repayments on construction loans |
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Principal repayments on Notes Payable to AIR |
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Purchase of interest rate options |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
— |
|
|
( |
) |
Proceeds from interest rate options |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
Payments on finance leases |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Change in Aimco Predecessor investment, net |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
Payments of prepayment premiums |
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
( |
) |
Common stock repurchased |
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Dividend paid on common stock |
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Distributions to redeemable noncontrolling interests |
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Contributions from noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|||
Contributions from redeemable noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
||
Redemption of OP units |
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Redemption of noncontrolling interests |
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Redemption of redeemable noncontrolling interests |
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Other financing activities |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
NET DECREASE IN CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, AND RESTRICTED CASH |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
||
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, AND RESTRICTED CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH AT END OF PERIOD |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
||||
See notes to the consolidated financial statements
F-15
APARTMENT INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY
AIMCO OP L.P.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2022
Note 1 — Organization
Apartment Investment and Management Company (“Aimco”), a Maryland corporation incorporated on January 10, 1994, is a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”). Aimco, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, is the general partner and directly is the special limited partner of Aimco OP L.P. ("Aimco Operating Partnership").
Except as the context otherwise requires, “we,” “our,” and “us” refer to Aimco, Aimco Operating Partnership, and their consolidated subsidiaries, collectively.
The Separation
On December 15, 2020, we completed the separation of our businesses (the “Separation”), creating two, separate and distinct, publicly traded companies, Aimco and Apartment Income REIT Corp. (“AIR”) (Aimco and AIR together, as they existed prior to the Separation, “Aimco Predecessor”). Events noted in this filing as occurring before December 15, 2020, were those entered into by Aimco Predecessor.
Prior to the Separation, the consolidated financial statements were prepared on a carve-out basis and reflect significant assumptions and allocations. The consolidated financial statements reflect our historical consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). The historical financial statements of Aimco do not represent the financial position and results of operations of one legal entity, but rather a combination of entities under common control that have been “carved out” from Aimco Predecessor’s financial statements. All significant intercompany balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
All Separation-related transactions between Aimco and Aimco Predecessor have been considered effectively settled through partners’ capital in our consolidated financial statements, other than the Notes Payable to AIR as discussed in Note 7. The settlement of these transactions has been reflected as Contributions from Aimco Predecessor, net in our Consolidated Statements of Equity and Partners’ Capital and Change in Aimco Predecessor investment, net in financing activity in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Business
As of December 31, 2022, Aimco owned
We own or lease a portfolio of real estate investments focused primarily on the U.S. multifamily sector. These real estate investments include a portfolio of
Any reference to the number of apartment communities and homes, square footage, or occupancy percentage in these notes to our consolidated financial statements are unaudited.
Note 2 — Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Aimco, Aimco Operating Partnership, and their consolidated subsidiaries. Aimco Operating Partnership’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Aimco Operating Partnership and its consolidated subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
F-16
As used herein, and except where the context otherwise requires, “partnership” refers to a limited partnership or a limited liability company and “partner” refers to a partner in a limited partnership or a member of a limited liability company.
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts to conform to the current period financial statement presentation with no effect on the Company’s previously reported results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.
Principles of Consolidation
We consolidate a variable interest entity (“VIE”), in which we are considered the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary is the entity that has (i) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could be significant to the VIE. Refer to Note 6 for further information.
Allocations
The 2020 Consolidated Statement of Operations includes allocations of general and administrative expenses from Aimco Predecessor, as discussed in Note 5. We consider the basis on which expenses have been allocated to be a reasonable reflection of the utilization of services provided to or the benefit received by us during the periods presented. However, the allocations may not include all of the actual expenses that we would have incurred and may not reflect our consolidated results of operations, financial position, and cash flows had it been a stand-alone company during the periods presented. Actual costs that might have been incurred had we been a stand-alone company would depend on a number of factors, including the chosen organizational structure, what functions we might have performed ourselves or outsourced, and strategic decisions we might have made in areas such as information technology and infrastructure. Following the Separation, AIR, through its subsidiaries, provides us with certain property management and other services, and we perform certain functions using our own resources or purchase services from third parties.
Common Noncontrolling Interests in Aimco Operating Partnership
Individuals and entities that hold an interest in Aimco Operating Partnership other than Aimco are reflected in our accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as Common Noncontrolling Interests in Aimco Operating Partnership. Aimco Operating Partnership’s income or loss is allocated to the holders of OP Units, other than Aimco, based on the weighted-average number of OP Units (including Aimco) outstanding during the period. For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, the holders of OP Units had a weighted-average economic ownership interest in Aimco Operating Partnership of approximately
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Real Estate Partnerships
Redeemable noncontrolling interests consist of equity interests held by a limited partner in a consolidated real estate partnership that has a finite life. We generally attribute to noncontrolling interests their share of income or loss of consolidated partnerships based on their proportionate interest in the results of operations of the partnerships, including their share of losses even if such attribution results in a deficit noncontrolling interest balance within our equity accounts.
If a consolidated real estate partnership includes redemption rights that are not within our control, the noncontrolling interest is included as temporary equity. If the redemption right is not currently redeemable, but probable of being redeemable in the future, changes in redemption value are recognized each quarter with the change in value being reflected in additional paid-in-capital.
The assets of our consolidated real estate partnerships must first be used to settle the liabilities of the consolidated real estate partnerships. The consolidated real estate partnership’s creditors do not have recourse to the general credit of Aimco Operating Partnership.
In December 2022, we were admitted to Strathmore Joint Venture 1 as sole limited partner. In addition, in the same period $
F-17
In July 2022, we closed a $
In February 2022, we acquired all of the outstanding redeemable non-controlling interests in an entity reported as a consolidated VIE as of December 31, 2021. At the time of redemption, the carrying amount of the redeemable noncontrolling interests was $
Redeemable noncontrolling interests in consolidated real estate partnerships as of December 31, 2022 consist of the $
The following table shows changes in our redeemable noncontrolling interests in consolidated real estate partnerships during the years ended December 31, 2022 , and 2021 (in thousands):
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
Balance at Beginning of Period |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
Capital contributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Distributions |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Redemptions |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Balance at December 31, |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
Investments in Unconsolidated Real Estate Partnerships
We own general and limited partner interests in partnerships that either directly, or through interests in other real estate partnerships, own apartment communities. We generally account for investments in real estate partnerships that we do not consolidate under the equity method. Accordingly, we recognize our share of the earnings or losses of the entity for the periods presented, inclusive of our share of any impairments and disposition gains or losses recognized by and related to such entities, and we present such amounts within Income from unconsolidated real estate partnerships in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The excess of our cost of the acquired partnership interests over our share of the partners’ equity or deficit is generally ascribed to the fair values of land and buildings owned by the partnerships. We amortize the excess cost ascribed to the buildings over the related estimated useful lives. Such amortization is recorded as an adjustment of the amounts of earnings or losses we recognize from such unconsolidated real estate partnerships.
We assess the recoverability of our equity method investments if there are indicators of potential impairment. We did not recognize any such impairments of our equity method investments during the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020.
Mezzanine Investment
In November 2019, Aimco Predecessor made a
The Separation Agreement provides for AIR to transfer ownership of the subsidiaries that originated and hold the mezzanine loan, a related equity option to acquire a
On a periodic basis, we evaluate our Mezzanine Investment for impairment. We assess whether there are any indicators that imply the value of our investment may be impaired. These include assessments of both the underlying property performance and general market conditions in place. An investment is considered impaired if we determine that its fair value is less than the net carrying value of the investment on an other-than-temporary basis. Cash flow projections for the investments consider property
F-18
level factors such as expected future operating income, trends and prospects, as well as the effects of demand, competition and other factors. We consider various qualitative factors to determine if a decrease in the value of our investment is other-than-temporary. These factors include the loan’s maturity date, our intent and ability to retain our investment in the entity, and the financial condition and long-term prospects of the entity.
The loan is subject to certain risks, including, but not limited to, changes in the macroeconomic environment that can lead to increases in capitalization rates and discount rates, and factors that can have negative effects on occupancy and market rental rates such as lower demand for urban living in San Francisco resulting from the post pandemic virtual working environment adopted by big tech, and an increase in virtual participation as compared to pre-pandemic in class learning at local colleges. These trends have impacted the demand at the Parkmerced Apartments, resulting in a sustained decrease in rents and a negative impact on the resulting occupancy rates. Further, recent transactions in the market and a supporting appraisal, indicate that that the collateral from the note has declined in value.
This decline was deemed to be other-than-temporary and the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $
Prior to recording the impairment charge, we recognized as income the net amounts earned on the mezzanine loan by AIR on its equity investment that are due to be paid to us when collected to the extent the income was supported by the change in AIR’s claim to the net assets of the underlying borrower. The income recognized primarily represents the interest accrued under the terms of the underlying mezzanine loan.
Real Estate
Acquisitions
Upon the acquisition of real estate, we determine whether the purchase qualifies as an asset acquisition or, less frequently, meets the definition of an acquisition of a business. We generally recognize the acquisition of real estate or interests in partnerships that own real estate at our cost, including the related transaction costs, as asset acquisitions.
We allocate the cost of real estate acquired based on the relative fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The fair value of these assets and liabilities is determined using valuation techniques that rely on Level 2 and Level 3 inputs within the fair value framework. We determine the fair value of tangible assets, such as land, buildings, furniture, fixtures, and equipment using valuation techniques that consider comparable market transactions, replacement costs, and other available information. We determine the fair value of identified intangible assets or liabilities, which typically relate to in-place leases, using valuation techniques that consider the terms of the in-place leases, current market data for comparable leases, and our experience in leasing similar real estate.
The intangible assets or liabilities related to in-place leases are comprised of: (a) the value of the above- and below-market leases in-place, measured over the period, including probable lease renewals for below-market leases, for which the leases are expected to remain in effect; (b) the estimated unamortized portion of avoided leasing commissions and other costs that ordinarily would be incurred to originate the in-place leases; (c) the value associated with in-place leases during an estimated absorption period, which estimates rental revenue that would not have been earned had the leased space been vacant at the time of acquisition, assuming lease-up periods based on market demand and stabilized occupancy levels; and (d) tax abatement contract related intangibles, to the extent the property has them in place. The above and below-market lease intangibles are amortized to rental revenue over the expected remaining terms of the associated leases, which include reasonably assured renewal periods. Other intangible assets related to in-place leases are amortized to depreciation and amortization over the expected remaining terms of the associated leases.
Capital Additions
We capitalize costs, including certain indirect costs, incurred in connection with our capital additions activities, including redevelopments, other tangible apartment community improvements, and replacements of existing community components. Included in these capitalized costs are payroll costs associated with time spent by employees in connection with the planning, execution, and control of all capital addition activities at our communities. We characterize as “indirect costs” an allocation of certain department costs, including payroll, at the area operations and corporate levels that clearly relate to capital addition activities. We also capitalize interest, property taxes, and insurance during periods in which construction projects are in progress. We commence capitalization of costs, including certain indirect costs, incurred in connection with our capital addition activities,
F-19
at the point in time when activities necessary to get communities, apartment homes, or leased spaces ready for their intended use begin. These activities include when communities, apartment homes or leased spaces are undergoing physical construction, as well as when homes or leased spaces are held vacant in advance of planned construction, provided that other activities such as permitting, planning, and design are in progress. We cease the capitalization of costs when the communities or components thereof are substantially complete and ready for their intended use, which is typically when construction has been completed and homes or leased spaces are available for occupancy. We charge costs including ordinary repairs, maintenance, and resident turnover costs to property operating expense, as incurred.
For each of the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, we capitalized to buildings and improvements $
Gain or Loss on Dispositions
Gain or loss on dispositions are recognized when we no longer hold a controlling financial interest in the real estate and sufficient consideration has been received. Upon disposition, the related assets and liabilities are derecognized, and the gain or loss on disposition is recognized as the difference between the carrying amount of those assets and liabilities and the value of consideration received. Total Gains on dispositions of real estate of $
Impairment
Real estate and other long-lived assets to be held and used are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization, unless the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable. If events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable, we assess its recoverability by comparing the carrying amount to our estimate of the undiscounted future cash flows, excluding interest charges, of the community. If the carrying amount exceeds the aggregate undiscounted future cash flows, we recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value of the community.
In connection with the Separation, we entered into a sublease of office space within our corporate offices to AIR at then-current market rents. Based on an analysis of the estimated undiscounted cash flows relative to the sublease arrangement, we evaluated the recoverability of the assets associated with the subleased space, including, the right-of-use asset, tenant improvements and furniture, fixtures and equipment and concluded the subleased assets were impaired. We recorded an impairment charge of $
In connection with the Separation, we entered into a software license agreement with AIR to provide for the use of certain internally developed software at then-current market rates. Based on an analysis of the estimated undiscounted cash flows relative to the carrying value of the internally developed software, we concluded the assets were impaired. Additionally, following an evaluation of the future service potential of certain other internal software that was under development, we ceased development and impaired the associated carrying value. We recorded an aggregate impairment charge of $
Cash Equivalents
We classify highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less as cash equivalents. We maintain cash equivalents in financial institutions in excess of insured limits. We have not experienced any losses in these accounts in the past and believe that we are not exposed to significant credit risk because our accounts are deposited with major financial institutions.
F-20
Supplemental cash flow information for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020 is as follows (in thousands):
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|||
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Non-cash transactions associated with acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Mark to market adjustment on an assumed construction loan |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Right-of-use lease assets |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Accrued liabilities and other |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Lease liabilities |
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Contributions to noncontrolling interests |
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Contributions from Aimco Predecessor |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
Contribution from noncontrolling interest in consolidated real estate partnerships |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other non-cash transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Operating leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Accrued capital expenditures (at end of period) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Issuance of notes payable to AIR in connection with Separation |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
Contribution from Aimco Predecessor, net |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash consists of tenant security deposits, capital replacement reserves, insurance reserves, and cash restricted as required by our debt agreements.
Other Assets
As of December 31, 2022, and 2021, other assets were comprised of the following amounts (in thousands):
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
Other investments |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
Deferred costs, deposits, and other |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Prepaid expenses and real estate taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Corporate fixed assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $ |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Due from affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total other assets, net |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
F-21
Other investments
Other investments consist of passive equity investments in IQHQ Inc. (IQHQ), a privately held life sciences real estate development company, and property technology funds. See Note 13 for discussion of our fair value measurements for these investments.
Intangibles
Intangible assets are included in Other assets, net and intangible liabilities are included in Accrued liabilities and other in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following table details intangible assets and liabilities, net of accumulated amortization, for the years ended December 31, 2022, and 2021 (in thousands).
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
Intangible assets (1) |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
Less: accumulated amortization |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Intangible assets, net |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Below-market leases |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
Less: accumulated amortization |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Intangible liabilities, net |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
(1) Amount includes $
Based on the balance of intangible assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2022, the net aggregate amortization for the next five years and thereafter is expected to be as follows (in thousands).
|
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
Intangible liabilities |
|
||
2023 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
2027 |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Total future amortization |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
Accounts Receivable, net and Straight-line rent
We present our accounts receivable and straight-line rent receivable net of allowances for amounts that may not be collected. The allowance is determined based on an assessment of whether substantially all of the amounts due from the resident or tenant is probable of collection. This includes a specific tenant analysis and aging analysis.
F-22
Deferred Leasing Costs
In accordance with the adoption of Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) 842, we defer leasing costs incremental to a lease that we would not have incurred if the contract had not been obtained. Amortization of these costs over the lease term on the same basis as lease income, is included in Depreciation and amortization in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Revenue from Leases
We are a lessor for residential and commercial leases. Our operating leases with residents may provide that the resident reimburse us for certain costs, primarily the resident’s share of utilities expenses, incurred by the apartment community. Our operating leases with commercial tenants may provide that the tenant reimburse us for common area maintenance, real estate taxes, and other recoverable costs incurred by the commercial property. Residential and commercial reimbursements represent revenue attributable to non-lease components for which the timing and pattern of recognition is the same as the revenue for the lease components. Reimbursements and the related expenses are presented on a gross basis in our Consolidated Statements of Operations, with the reimbursements included in Rental and other property revenues in the period the recoverable costs are incurred. We recognize rental revenue attributed to lease components, net of any concessions, on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.
Debt Issuance Costs
We defer, as debt issuance costs, lender fees and other direct costs incurred in obtaining new financing and amortize the amounts over the terms of the related loan agreements. In connection with the modification of existing financing arrangements, we defer lender fees and amortize these costs and any unamortized debt issuance costs over the term of the modified loan agreement. Debt issuance costs associated with non-recourse property debt are presented as a direct deduction from the related liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. For debt issuance costs associated with our revolving credit facilities and construction loans that have not been drawn we record the costs in Other assets, net in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and amortize the costs to Interest expense, on a straight-line basis over the term of the arrangement. Debt issuance costs associated with construction loans are reclassified as a direct deduction to the construction loan liability in proportion to any draws on the loans in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and subsequently amortized to Interest expense on a straight-line basis over the remaining term of the arrangement in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
When financing arrangements are repaid or otherwise extinguished prior to maturity, unamortized debt issuance costs are written off. Any lender fees or other costs incurred in connection with an extinguishment are recognized as expense. Amortization and write-off of debt issuance costs and other extinguishment costs are included in Interest expense in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation for all tangible assets is calculated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. Acquired buildings and improvements are depreciated over a useful life based on the age, condition, and other physical characteristics of the asset. Furniture, fixtures, and equipment are generally depreciated over
We depreciate capitalized costs using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the related improvement, which is generally
Purchased equipment is recognized at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset, which is generally
Certain homogeneous items that are purchased in bulk on a recurring basis, such as appliances, are depreciated using group methods that reflect the average estimated useful life of the items in each group. Except in the case of casualties, where the net book value of the lost asset is written off in the determination of casualty gains or losses, we generally do not recognize any loss in connection with the replacement of an existing community component because normal replacements are considered in determining the estimated useful lives used in connection with our composite and group depreciation methods.
F-23
Income Tax Benefit (Expense)
Certain aspects of our operations, including our development and redevelopment activities, are conducted through taxable REIT subsidiaries, or TRS entities. Additionally, our TRS entities hold investments in one of our apartment communities and 1001 Brickell Bay Drive.
Our income tax benefit (expense) calculated in accordance with GAAP includes income taxes associated with the income or loss of our TRS entities. Income taxes, as well as changes in valuation allowance and incremental deferred tax items in conjunction with intercompany asset transfers and internal restructurings (if applicable), are included in Income tax benefit (expense) in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Consolidated GAAP income or loss subject to tax consists of pretax income or loss of our taxable entities and gains retained by the REIT. For the year ended December 31, 2022, we had net income subject to tax of $
For the year ended December 31, 2022, we recognized income tax expense of $
Aimco has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 1994, and Aimco intends to continue to operate in such a manner. Aimco's current and continuing qualification as a REIT depends on its ability to meet the various requirements imposed by the Code, which are related to organizational structure, distribution levels, diversity of stock ownership and certain restrictions with regard to owned assets and categories of income. If Aimco qualifies for taxation as a REIT, it will generally not be subject to United States federal corporate income tax on its taxable income that is currently distributed to stockholders. This treatment substantially eliminates the “double taxation” (at the corporate and stockholder levels) that generally results from an investment in a corporation.
Even if Aimco qualifies as a REIT, Aimco may be subject to United States federal income and excise taxes in various situations, such as on undistributed income. Aimco also will be required to pay a
Earnings per Share and per Unit
Aimco and Aimco Operating Partnership calculate earnings per share and unit based on the weighted-average number of shares of Common Stock or OP Units, participating securities, common stock or common unit equivalents and dilutive convertible securities outstanding during the period. Aimco Operating Partnership considers both OP Units and equivalents, which have identical rights to distributions and undistributed earnings, to be common units for purposes of the earnings per unit computations. Please refer to Note 11 for further information regarding earnings per share and unit computations.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts included in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes thereto. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in the Current Year
During the first quarter of 2022, we adopted ASU 2021-05 establishing Topic 842, Lessors - Certain Leases with Variable Lease Payments in conjunction with our ongoing operations. ASU 2021-05 requires a lessor to classify a lease with variable payments that do not depend on an index or rate as an operating lease if either a sales-type lease or direct financing lease classification would trigger a day-one loss, which was effective for us on
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2020, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2020-04, “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting” (“ASU 2020-04”), which provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships and other transactions affected by the
F-24
discontinuation of the LIBOR or by another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform. The guidance was effective beginning March 12, 2020 and can be applied prospectively through December 31, 2024. In January 2021, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2021-01, “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Scope” (“ASU 2021-01”), which clarified the scope and application of the original guidance. In December 2022, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2022-06, "Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Deferral of the Sunset Date of Topic 848" ("ASU 2022-06"), which deferred the sunset date of Topic 848 from December 31, 2022 to December 31, 2024. The UK Financial Conduct Authority has an intended cessation date of the overnight 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month tenors of USD LIBOR of June 30, 2023. We plan to adopt ASU 2020-04, ASU 2021-01 and ASU 2022-06 when LIBOR is discontinued. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting this guidance, but do not expect it to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Note 3 — Significant Transactions
Acquisitions and Investments
At the time of acquisition,
Joint Venture Transactions
Dispositions
F-25
Lease Arrangements
Note 4 — Lease Arrangements
Aimco as Lessor
The majority of lease payments we receive from our residents and tenants are fixed. We receive variable payments from our residents and commercial tenants primarily for utility reimbursements and other services.
For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020,
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|||
Fixed lease income |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||
Variable lease income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||||
In general, our commercial leases have options to extend for a certain period of time at the tenant's option.
2023 |
|
$ |
|
|
2024 |
|
|
|
|
2025 |
|
|
|
|
2026 |
|
|
|
|
2027 |
|
|
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
Aimco as Lessee
Lease Arrangements with AIR
We as lessee, and AIR, as lessor, have entered into leases on properties currently under construction or in lease-up. These lease arrangements are governed by separate Master Lease Agreements and the Master Leasing Agreement.
As of December 31, 2022, the Master Leasing Agreement governed one finance lease for a
F-26
In June 2022, we as lessee and AIR as lessor, entered into a lease termination agreement with respect to
Because the termination agreement modified the expiration date of each lease to September 1, 2022, we accelerated depreciation on the associated leasehold improvements using lease terms that ended September 1, 2022. We recorded $
Ground Leases
In December 2022, in conjunction with consolidating the Strathmore Joint Venture 1, which was described in the Note 3, we recognized a 98-year ground lease for the land underlying the development site, a ground up project on the development of a phased multifamily community totaling
During the year ended December 31, 2020, we entered into two 99-year ground leases for the land underlying the development site at Upton Place, a mixed-use development project which will create
Other Finance Lease Arrangements
In February 2022, we, as lessee, entered into certain finance lease arrangements concurrent with a purchase agreement to acquire a development site in the Flagler Village neighborhood of Fort Lauderdale, Florida. During the third quarter of 2022, we completed the $
As of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, our finance leases had weighted-average remaining terms of
As of December 31, 2022, finance lease right-of-use totaled $
For the year ended December 31, 2022, amortization related to finance leases was $
For the year ended December 31, 2022, we capitalized $
For the year ended December 31, 2022, interest expense net of amounts capitalized related to our finance leases was $
Operating Lease Arrangements
We have operating leases primarily for corporate office space. Substantially all of the payments under our office leases are fixed. As of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, our operating leases had weighted-average remaining terms of
We record operating lease expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Total operating lease expense for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020 was $
F-27
For finance and operating leases, when the rate implicit in the lease cannot be determined, we estimate the value of our lease liabilities using discount rates equivalent to the rates we would pay on a secured borrowing with terms similar to the leases. We determine if an arrangement is or contains a lease at inception. We have lease agreements with lease and non-lease components, and have elected to not separate these components for all classes of underlying assets. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Leases with initial terms greater than 12 months are recorded as operating or financing leases in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Office Space Sublease
We have a sublease arrangement to provide space within our corporate office for fixed rents, which commenced on
Annual Future Minimum Lease Payments
Combined minimum annual lease payments under operating and finance leases, and sublease income that offsets our operating lease rent, are as follows as of December 31, 2022 (in thousands):
|
Sublease Income and Lease Modification Income |
|
|
Future Minimum Rent |
|
|
Future Minimum Payments |
|
|||
2023 |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||
2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
2027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||
Less: Discount |
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
Total lease liabilities |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||
Note 5 — Agreements and Transactions with AIR
In conjunction with the Separation, we entered into various separation and transition services agreements with AIR that have significant operational and financial impacts to us.
Master Services Agreement
Under the Master Services Agreement with AIR, AIR provides us with customary administrative and support services. We are obligated to pay AIR the fully burdened costs in performing the services. We may terminate any or all services on 60 days prior written notice, and AIR may terminate individual services, at any time after December 31, 2023. During the year ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, we incurred administrative and support fees of $
Property Management Agreements
Under the
During the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, we recognized property management and property accounting fees of $
F-28
property accounting fees of $
Master Leasing Agreement
The Master Leasing Agreement, as amended on June 14, 2022, governs the current and any future leasing arrangements between us, as lessee, and AIR, as lessor. Under the amendments to the Master Leasing Agreement, AIR's purchase option to acquire completed development and redevelopment properties was replaced with a right of first offer on development and redevelopment assets that have achieved stabilization and that we choose to bring to market within one year thereafter. Each time the parties wish to execute a new lease for a particular property, they will execute a stand-alone lease.
Notes Payable to AIR
In July 2022, we completed the early repayment of the $
Other
In June 2022, for $
Due to and from AIR
As of December 31, 2022, we have amounts due to and from AIR of $
Terry Considine Service Agreement/AIR Reimbursement
As contemplated by the Separation and by Aimco and AIR, Terry Considine, an Aimco board member and our former Chief Executive Officer, had specific responsibilities to us as a non-executive employee during 2021 and 2022 to support the establishment and growth of our business, reporting directly to the Board. These responsibilities, separate from Mr. Considine's services as a board member, which have also come to an end, included (i) short and long-term strategic direction and advice; (ii) transition and executive support to officers; and (iii) advice and consultation with respect to strategic growth and acquisition activities. Mr. Considine's transition services to Aimco have been completed. The independent directors of the Board set Mr. Considine's 2022 target total compensation (including base compensation, short-term incentive, and long-term incentive) for these responsibilities at $
Additionally, we are obligated for all base salary, short-term incentive amounts and long-term incentive amounts payable to Mr. Considine for the calendar year 2022 under the terms of his employment agreement with AIR that are in excess of $
For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, we recorded $
These arrangements concluded as of December 31, 2022. Additionally, Mr. Considine resigned from serving as a member of the Board on February 13, 2023.
Expense Allocation
In preparing our consolidated financial statements for the periods prior to the Separation, certain expenses, including property operating expenses, depreciation and amortization, and general and administrative expenses, incurred at the corporate level that are attributable to us have been allocated on a carve-out basis. Expenses allocated for the years ended December 31, 2020 was $
F-29
value of all communities held by Aimco Predecessor, which we believe to be reasonable methodologies. These allocated expenses are centralized corporate costs for management and other services, including, but not limited to, executive oversight, treasury, finance, human resources, tax, accounting, financial reporting, information technology, and investor relations.
Note 6 — Variable Interest Entities
We evaluate our investments in limited partnerships and similar entities in accordance with applicable consolidation guidance to determine whether each such entity is a VIE. The accounting standards for the consolidation of VIEs require qualitative assessments to determine whether we are the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary analysis is based on power and economics. We conclude that we are the primary beneficiary and consolidate the VIE if we have both (i) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly influence the VIE's economic performance, and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses of, or the right to receive benefits from, the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Significant judgments and assumptions related to the determinations include, but are not limited to, estimates about the current and future fair values and performance of real estate held by these VIEs and general market conditions.
We consolidate Aimco Operating Partnership, a VIE of which we are the primary beneficiary. Through Aimco Operating Partnership, we consolidate all VIEs for which we are the primary beneficiary. Substantially all of our assets and liabilities are those of Aimco Operating Partnership.
Aimco Operating Partnership is the primary beneficiary, and therefore consolidates its
The details of our consolidated and unconsolidated VIEs, excluding those of Aimco Operating Partnership, are summarized in the table below as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 (in thousands, except for VIE count).
|
|
As of December 31, 2022 |
|
|
As of December 31, 2021 |
|
||||||||||
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Unconsolidated |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Unconsolidated |
|
||||
Count of VIEs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Real estate, net |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||||
Mezzanine investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Right-of-use lease assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Unconsolidated real estate partnerships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Other assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Accrued liabilities and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Non-recourse property debt, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Construction loans, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Lease liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Consolidated Real Estate Partnerships
The changes in consolidated VIE assets and liabilities from December 31, 2021 to December 31, 2022 in the table above are primarily due to the impact of:
(i) In December 2022, we were admitted as sole limited partner to Strathmore Joint Venture 1, and we remitted $
(ii) In September 2022, we as lessee received final payment from AIR as lessor, pursuant to the lease termination agreement entered into in June 2022. The leases with respect to
F-30
addition, we derecognized right-of-use lease assets and lease liabilities of $
(iii) In February 2022, we acquired all of the outstanding redeemable non-controlling interests in an entity reported as a consolidated VIE as of December 31, 2021. Consequently, the entity became wholly owned by us and is no longer a VIE. As a result, $
Unconsolidated Real Estate Partnerships
We own an interest in
Our investment balances of $
Mezzanine Investment
As discussed in Note 2, AIR holds a mezzanine loan payable by the partnership that owns Parkmerced Apartments, of which it is not the primary beneficiary. Under the terms of the Separation Agreement, AIR is obligated to transfer ownership of the subsidiaries that hold this interest to us upon receipt of applicable third-party consents. Our investment balances as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, were $
Note 7 —Debt
Non-Recourse Property Debt
We finance apartment communities in our portfolio primarily using property-level, non-recourse, long-dated, fixed-rate debt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|||||
|
Maturity Date |
|
Contractual Interest Rate |
|
Weighted-Average Interest Rate (1) |
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
Fixed-rate property debt |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||||
Variable-rate property debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total non-recourse property debt |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Assumed debt fair value adjustment, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Debt issuance costs, net of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Total non-recourse property debt, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
(1) As of December 31, 2022, and after application of interest rate caps, the weighted average interest rate is
Principal and interest on our non-recourse property debt are generally payable monthly or in monthly interest-only payments with balloon payments due at maturity. As of December 31, 2022, our property debt was secured by
As of December 31, 2022, the scheduled principal amortization and maturity payments for the non-recourse property debt were as follows (in thousands):
F-31
|
Amortization |
|
|
Maturities |
|
|
Total |
|
|||
2023 |
$ |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
|
||
2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
2027 |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
||
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||
Construction Loans
Our construction loans, which are primarily non-recourse loans except for customary construction loan guarantees, are summarized in the following table (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|||||
|
Maturity Date |
|
Contractual Interest Rate |
|
Weighted-Average Interest Rate (1) |
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
Fixed-rate construction loans |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
||||
Variable-rate construction loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total construction loans |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Assumed debt fair value adjustment, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Debt issuance costs, net of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Total construction loans, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
(1) As of December 31, 2022, and after application of interest rate caps, the weighted average interest rate is
Interest-only payments on our construction loans are generally payable monthly with balloon payments due at maturity. As of December 31, 2022, our construction debt was secured by
As of December 31, 2022, the scheduled principal maturity payments for the construction debt were as follows (in thousands):
|
Principal Maturity Payments |
|
|
2023 |
$ |
— |
|
2024 |
|
|
|
2025 |
|
|
|
2026 |
|
— |
|
2027 |
|
— |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
Total |
$ |
|
|
Revolving Credit Facility
In December 2020, we entered into a credit agreement that provides for a $
F-32
As of December 31, 2022, we had
Notes Payable to AIR
In July 2022, we completed the prepayment of $
Note 8 — Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes reflect the net effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities of our taxable entities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes.
|
|
December 31, |
|
|||||
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Real estate and real estate partnership basis differences |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
Lease Liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Real estate and real estate partnership basis differences |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
Lease Right of Use |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net operating, capital, and other loss carryforwards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Net deferred tax liability |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
Our policy is to include any interest and penalties related to income taxes within income tax benefit (expense) in our consolidated statements of operations.
Significant components of the income tax benefit (expense) including any interest and penalties related to income taxes are as follows and are classified within Income tax benefit (expense) in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020 (in thousands):
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|||
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Federal |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||
State |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
||
Total current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Deferred: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Federal |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
State |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Total deferred |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Total income tax expense (benefit) |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
F-33
Consolidated GAAP income or loss subject to tax consists of pretax income or loss of our taxable entities and income and gains retained by the REIT. For the year ended December 31, 2022, we had consolidated net income subject to tax of $
The reconciliation of income tax attributable to operations computed at the United States statutory rate to income tax benefit recognized for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020 is shown below (in thousands):
|
|
2022 |
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
||||||
|
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
Tax (benefit) expense at United States statutory rates on consolidated income or loss subject to tax |
|
$ |
|
|
$( |
|
|
$( |
|
|||
US branch profits tax on earnings of foreign subsidiary |
|
( |
|
( |
|
( |
|
|
( |
|
||
State income tax, net of federal (benefit) expense |
|
|
|
( |
|
|
( |
|
||||
Effects of permanent differences |
|
|
|
|
( |
|
|
|||||
Uncertain tax positions |
|
( |
|
( |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
||
Valuation allowance |
|
|
|
|
( |
|
|
|||||
Other |
|
( |
|
( |
|
|
( |
|
( |
|
||
Total income tax benefit |
|
$ |
|
|
$( |
|
|
$( |
|
|||
Income taxes paid totaled approximately $
For income tax purposes, dividends paid to holders of Common Stock primarily consist of ordinary income, capital gains, qualified dividends, unrecaptured Section 1250 gains, or a combination thereof.
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
||||||
Ordinary income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
% |
|||||
Capital gains |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|||||
Qualified dividends |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
||||
Unrecaptured § 1250 gain |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
||||
Return of capital |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
||||
Balance at December 31 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
% |
|||||
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of our unrecognized tax benefits is presented below and is included in Accrued liabilities and other in our Consolidated Balance Sheets (in thousands):
Because the statute of limitations has not yet elapsed, our United States federal income tax returns for the year ended December 31, 2019, and subsequent years and certain of our state income tax returns for the year ended December 31, 2019, and subsequent years are currently subject to examination by the IRS or other taxing authorities. If recognized, the unrecognized tax benefits would affect our effective tax rate.
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Balance at January 1 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
Reductions based on tax positions in prior years |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Balance at December 31 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
In accordance with the accounting requirements for stock-based compensation, we may recognize tax benefits in connection with the exercise of stock options by employees of our TRS entities and the vesting of restricted stock awards. We recognize the tax effects related to stock-based compensation through earnings in the period the compensation is recognized.
Note 9 — Aimco Equity
Common Stock
F-34
Our Board of Directors is authorized to issue up to
2022 Stock Repurchases
Our Board has, from time to time, authorized us to repurchase shares of our outstanding Common Stock. As of December 31, 2022, we were authorized to repurchase up to
There were
2022 Cash Dividend
As a REIT, Aimco is required to distribute annually to holders of shares of its Common Stock at least
Separation from AIR
Notwithstanding the legal form of the Separation, for accounting and financial reporting purposes, we are presented as being spun-off from AIR. Therefore, we are the accounting spinee and AIR is considered the divesting entity and treated as the accounting spinnor, or accounting predecessor. Since the assets, liabilities and operations of Aimco prior to the Separation were spread across multiple legal entities, a separate capital structure did not exist.
Note 10 — Partners’ Capital
Aimco Operating Partnership Partners’ Capital
Common Partnership Units
In Aimco Operating Partnership’s Consolidated Balance Sheets, the OP Units held by us are classified within Partners’ Capital as General Partner and Special Limited Partner capital and the OP Units held by entities other than us are classified within Limited Partners’ capital. In our Consolidated Balance Sheets, the OP Units held by entities other than us are classified within permanent equity as Common noncontrolling interests in Aimco Operating Partnership.
OP Units held by us are not redeemable whereas OP Units held by interests in Aimco Operating Partnership other than Aimco are redeemable at the holders’ option, subject to certain restrictions, on the basis of one OP Unit for either one share of Common Stock or cash equal to the fair value of a share of Common Stock at the time of redemption. We have the option to deliver shares of Common Stock in exchange for all or any portion of such OP Units tendered for redemption. When a limited partner redeems an OP Unit for Common Stock, Limited Partners’ capital is reduced, and the General Partner and Special Limited Partners’ capital is increased.
Entities other than us that hold OP Units receive distributions in an amount equivalent to the dividends paid to holders of Common Stock.
During the year ended December 31, 2022, approximately
F-35
Separation from AIR
On December 15, 2020, Aimco Operating Partnership completed the Separation, which was effected, in part, through a pro rata distribution of all of the outstanding common limited partnership units of Aimco Operating Partnership to holders of AIR Operating Partnership common limited partnership units and AIR Operating Partnership Class I High Performance partnership units as of the close of business on December 5, 2020. In addition, our stockholders received
Note 11 — Earnings and Dividends per Share and per Unit
Aimco and Aimco Operating Partnership calculate basic earnings per share of common stock and basic earnings per common unit based on the weighted-average number of shares of Common Stock and common partnership units outstanding. We calculate diluted earnings per share of Common Stock and diluted earnings per unit taking into consideration dilutive shares of Common Stock and common partnership unit equivalents and dilutive convertible securities outstanding during the period.
The shares of Common Stock and common partnership units outstanding at the Separation date are reflected as outstanding for all periods prior to the Separation for purposes of determining earnings per share and per unit. Each of our executives and AIR’s executives received one unvested share of our stock and one unvested share of AIR stock at the Separation date for each unvested share they held at that date. We include AIR’s executives’ rights to receive Aimco shares upon vesting in our dilutive calculations.
Aimco's Common Stock and common partnership unit equivalents include options to purchase shares of Common Stock, which, if exercised, would result in our issuance of additional shares of Common Stock and Aimco Operating Partnership’s issuance to us of additional common partnership units equal to the number of shares of Common Stock purchased under the options. These equivalents also include unvested performance-based restricted stock awards that do not meet the definition of participating securities, which would result in an increase in the number of shares of Common Stock and common partnership units outstanding equal to the number of the shares that vest. Common partnership unit equivalents also include unvested long-term incentive partnership units. We include in the denominator securities with dilutive effect in calculating diluted earnings per share and per unit during these periods.
Aimco's time-based restricted stock awards receive non-forfeitable dividends similar to shares of common stock and common partnership units prior to vesting, and our Performance-Based LTIP I units and Performance-Based LTIP II units receive non-forfeitable distributions based on specified percentages of the distributions paid to common partnership units prior to vesting and conversion. The unvested restricted shares and units related to these awards are participating securities. We include the effect of participating securities in basic and diluted earnings per share and unit computations using the two-class method of allocating distributed and undistributed earnings when the two-class method is more dilutive than the treasury stock method. Participating securities are included in the computation of diluted earnings per share and unit for the year ended December 31, 2022, because the effect of their inclusion is dilutive. Participating securities are excluded from our computation of diluted loss per share and unit for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, because the effect of their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.
F-36
Reconciliations of the numerator and denominator in the calculations of basic and diluted earnings per share and per unit for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 are as follows (in thousands, except per share and per unit data):
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|||
Earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net income (loss) attributable to Aimco |
$ |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
Net income (loss) allocated to Aimco participating securities |
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Aimco common stockholders |
$ |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Denominator - shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Basic weighted-average common stock outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Diluted share equivalents outstanding |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Diluted weighted-average common stock outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Earnings (loss) per share - basic |
$ |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
Earnings (loss) per share - diluted |
$ |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Earnings per unit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net income (loss) attributable to Aimco Operating Partnership |
$ |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
Net income (loss) allocated to Aimco Operating Partnership participating securities |
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Aimco Operating Partnership's common unit holders |
$ |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Denominator - units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Basic weighted-average common partnership units outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Diluted partnership unit equivalents outstanding |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Diluted weighted-average common partnership units outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Earnings (loss) per unit - basic |
$ |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
Earnings (loss) per unit - diluted |
$ |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
Note 12 — Share-Based Compensation
We have a stock award and incentive program to attract and retain employees and independent directors. As of December 31, 2022, approximately
In connection with the Separation, we entered into an agreement to modify all outstanding awards granted to the holders of such awards. Each outstanding time or performance based Aimco award was converted into one share of our Common Stock and one share of AIR common stock. Generally, all such Aimco equity awards retain the same terms and vesting conditions as the original Aimco equity awards immediately before the Separation.
Following the Separation, compensation expense related to these modified awards for the employees retained by us is incurred by Aimco. The compensation expense related to these modified awards for employees of AIR is incurred by AIR.
F-37
For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, total compensation cost recognized for share-based awards was (in thousands):
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|||
Share-based compensation expense (1) |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||
Capitalized share-based compensation (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total share-based compensation (3) |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||
As of December 31, 2022, our share of total unvested compensation cost not yet recognized was
We grant stock options and restricted stock awards that are subject to time-based vesting and require continuous employment, typically over a period of to
We recognize compensation cost associated with time-based awards ratably over the requisite service periods, which are typically three to four years. We recognize compensation cost related to the TSR-based awards, over the requisite service period, commencing on the grant date. The value of the TSR-based awards takes into consideration the probability that the market condition will be achieved; therefore, previously recorded compensation cost is not adjusted in the event that the market condition is not achieved, and awards do not vest.
We had Time-Based Stock Options, Time-Based Restricted Stock, TSR Stock Options, TSR Restricted Stock, TSR LTIP I units and TSR LTIP II units outstanding as of December 31, 2022.
|
|
TSR Stock Options |
|
|
Time-Based Restricted Stock Awards |
|
|
TSR Restricted Stock Awards |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
||||||
Outstanding at beginning of year |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
||||||
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Exercised |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
||||
Vested |
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
(1) |
||||
Forfeited |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
(1) |
||
Outstanding at end of year |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
||||||
(1) Weighted-average grant date fair value is based off pre-Separation values when the awards were granted.
|
|
LTIP I Units |
|
|
TSR LTIP II Units |
|
|
Time LTIP II Units |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
||||||
Outstanding at beginning of year |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
(1) |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
||||
Granted |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Exercised |
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
||
Vested |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
(1) |
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|||||
Forfeited |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
||||||
(1) Weighted-average grant date fair value is based off pre-Separation values when the awards were granted.
F-38
The following table summarizes the unvested or outstanding shares issued to our employees and employees of AIR and are potentially dilutive to us and Aimco Operating Partnership as of December 31, 2022.
|
Unvested Shares |
|
|
|
|
||||||
Awards |
Aimco |
|
|
AIR |
|
|
Unvested Compensation Not Yet Recognized (1) |
|
|||
Time-Based Stock Options (Outstanding shares) |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
TSR Stock Options (Outstanding shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Time-Based Restricted Stock Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
TSR Restricted Stock Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
LTIP I units |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
||
TSR LTIP II units (Outstanding shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|||
Determination of Grant-Date Fair Value Awards
We estimated the fair value of TSR-based awards granted in 2022 and 2021 using a Monte Carlo simulation valuation method. Under this method, the prices of the indices and shares of our Common Stock were simulated through the end of the performance period. The correlation matrix between shares of our Common Stock and the indices, as well as the corresponding return volatilities, were developed based upon an analysis of historical data.
The following table includes the assumptions used for the valuation of TSR-based awards that were granted in 2022 and 2021.
TSR-based Award Assumptions |
|
2022 |
|
2021 |
Grant date market value of a common share |
|
$ |
|
$ |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
||
Dividend yield |
|
|
||
Expected volatility |
|
|
||
Derived vesting period of TSR Restricted Stock |
|
|
||
Weighted average expected term of TSR Stock Options and LTIP II units |
|
|
Note 13 — Fair Value Measurements
Recurring Fair Value Measurements
From time to time, we purchase interest rate swaps, caps, and other instruments to provide protection against increases in interest rates on our variable rate debt. As of December 31, 2022, we held interest rate swaps and caps with $
During the year ended December 31, 2022, we monetized an interest rate swap and an interest rate cap for $
On a recurring basis, we measure at fair value our interest rate options, which are presented in Other assets, net in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Our interest rate options are classified within Level 2 of the GAAP fair value hierarchy, and we estimate their fair value using pricing models that rely on observable market information, including contractual terms, market prices, and interest rate yield curves. The fair value adjustment is included in earnings in Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on interest rate options in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. Changes in fair value are reflected as a non-cash transaction in adjustments to arrive at cash flows from operations, and any upfront premium is reflected in Purchase of interest rate options in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, we had investments of $
F-39
value (“NAV”) as a practical expedient. See Note 14 for further information regarding unfunded commitments related to these investments.
The following table summarizes the fair value of our interest rate options and our investments in real estate technology funds as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 (in thousands):
|
|
As of December 31, 2022 |
|
As of December 31, 2021 |
||||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
Interest rate options |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
Investments in real estate technology funds (1) |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements
As of December 31, 2022, we tested the Mezzanine Investment for impairment given triggering events occurring in the fourth quarter of 2022 and we recorded a non-cash impairment charge to reduce the carrying value of the Mezzanine Investment to $
Immediately following the Separation, we tested our right of use assets, tenant improvements, furniture, fixtures and equipment and our internally developed software for impairment. We concluded that the estimated fair value of the related assets no longer exceeded their carrying values and recorded an aggregate impairment of $
Fair Value Disclosures
We believe that the carrying value of the consolidated amounts of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivables and payables approximated their fair value as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, due to their relatively short-term nature and high probability of realization. We estimate the fair value of our debt using an income and market approach, including comparison of the contractual terms to observable and unobservable inputs such as market interest rate risk spreads, contractual interest rates, remaining periods to maturity, debt service coverage ratios, and loan to value ratios. We classify the fair value of our non-recourse property debt and construction loans within Level 2 of the GAAP valuation hierarchy based on the significance of certain of the unobservable inputs used to estimate their fair value. The carrying amount of the Notes Payable to AIR, which were fully repaid in the third quarter of 2022, approximated their fair value at December 31, 2021.
The following table summarizes carrying value and fair value of our non-recourse property debt, construction loans, and Notes Payable to AIR as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 (in thousands):
|
|
As of December 31, 2022 |
|
|
As of December 31, 2021 |
|
||||||||||
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
||||
Non-recourse property debt |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||||
Construction loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Notes Payable to AIR |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||||
Note 14 — Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments
In connection with our development, redevelopment and other capital additions activities, we have entered into various construction-related contracts, and have made commitments to complete development and redevelopment of certain real estate, pursuant to financing or other arrangements. We have entered into contracts for $
F-40
We have total remaining commitments to unconsolidated joint ventures of $
As of December 31, 2022, we have remaining commitments of $
We also enter into certain commitments for future purchases of goods and services in connection with the operations of our apartment communities. Those commitments generally have terms of
Legal Matters
From time to time, we may be a party to certain legal proceedings, incidental to the normal course of business. While the outcome of the legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, we believe there are no legal proceedings pending that would have a material effect upon on our financial condition or results of operations.
Note 15 — Business Segments
We have
Our Development and Redevelopment segment consists of properties that are under construction or have not achieved stabilization, as well as land held for development. Our Operating segment includes
Our CODM uses cash flow, construction timeline to completion, and actual versus budgeted results to evaluate our properties in our Development and Redevelopment segment. Our CODM uses proportionate property net operating income to assess the operating performance of our Operating segment. Proportionate property net operating income is defined as our share of rental and other property revenues, excluding reimbursements, less direct property operating expenses, net of utility reimbursements, for consolidated communities. In our Consolidated Statements of Operations, utility reimbursements are included in Rental and other property revenues, in accordance with GAAP.
As of December 31, 2022, our Development and Redevelopment segment consists of
The following tables present the results of operations of consolidated properties, with our segments reported on a proportionate basis for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020 (in thousands): Prior period carve out amounts have been adjusted retrospectively to reconcile the difference between non-recurring carve out accounting and current results as it relates to insurance
F-41
expense, for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. This adjustment ensures comparability of post-Separation results to pre-Separation segment results. Absent the adjustment, 2021 NOI would have increased
|
Development and Redevelopment |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Proportionate |
|
|
Corporate and Amounts Not Allocated to Segments (2) |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2022: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Rental and other property revenues |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||||||
Property operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Other operating expenses not allocated |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Proportionate property net operating |
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|||
Other items included in income before |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income (loss) before income tax |
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||||
|
Development and Redevelopment |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Proportionate |
|
|
Corporate and Amounts Not Allocated to Segments (2) |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2021: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Rental and other property revenues |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||||||
Property operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Other operating expenses not allocated |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Proportionate property net operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
||||
Other items included in income before |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Income (loss) before income tax |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
||||
F-42
|
Development and Redevelopment |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Proportionate |
|
|
Corporate and Amounts Not Allocated to Segments (2) |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2020: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Rental and other property revenues |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||||||
Property operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Other operating expenses not allocated |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Proportionate property net operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
||||
Other items included in income before |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Income (loss) before income tax |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
||||
Net real estate and non-recourse property debt, net, of our segments as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 were as follows (in thousands):
|
Development and Redevelopment |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Corporate(1) |
|
|
Total |
|
|||||
As of December 31, 2022: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Buildings and improvements |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
|
||||
Land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
||||
Total real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
||||
Accumulated depreciation |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Net real estate |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Non-recourse property debt and construction loans, net |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
|
||||
|
Development and Redevelopment |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Corporate(1) |
|
|
Total |
|
|||||
As of December 31, 2021: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Buildings and improvements |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||||
Land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Accumulated depreciation |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Net real estate |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Non-recourse property debt and construction loans, net |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||||
F-43
In addition to the amounts disclosed in the tables above, as of December 31, 2022, the Development and Redevelopment segment right-of-use lease assets and lease liabilities aggregated to $
Note 16 — Subsequent Events
On February 20, 2023, we entered into an agreement to sell our Parkmerced mezzanine loan for $
F-44
APARTMENT INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY
AIMCO OP L.P.
SCHEDULE III: REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 2022
(In Thousands Except Apartment Home Data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
As of December 31, 2022 |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Cost |
|
Cost Capitalized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
|
|
|
||
Apartment Community |
|
Apartment |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Year |
|
Apartment |
|
|
|
Buildings and |
|
Subsequent to |
|
|
|
Buildings and |
|
(3) |
|
Accumulated |
|
Total Cost |
|
(5) |
Name |
|
Type |
|
Acquired |
|
Location |
|
Built |
|
Homes |
|
Land |
|
Improvements |
|
Acquisition |
|
Land |
|
Improvements |
|
Total |
|
Depreciation (AD) |
|
Net of AD |
|
Encumbrances |
Operating: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118-122 West 23rd Street |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$( |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|||||
173 E. 90th Street |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
|
|||||||||||||
237-239 Ninth Avenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
|
|||||||||||||
1045 on the Park Apartments Homes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
|
|||||||||||||
2200 Grace |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
|
|||||||||||||
Bank Lofts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
|
|||||||||||||
Bluffs at Pacifica, The |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
|
— |
||||||||||||
Elm Creek |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
|
|||||||||||||
Evanston Place |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
|
|||||||||||||
Hillmeade |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
|
|||||||||||||
Hyde Park Tower |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
|
|||||||||||||
Plantation Gardens |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
|
|||||||||||||
Royal Crest Estates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
|
— |
||||||||||||
Royal Crest Estates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
|
|||||||||||||
Royal Crest Estates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
|
|||||||||||||
St. George Villas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
|
|||||||||||||
Waterford Village |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
|
— |
||||||||||||
Wexford Village |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
|
— |
||||||||||||
Willow Bend |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
|
|||||||||||||
Yacht Club at Brickell |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
|
|||||||||||||
Yorktown Apartments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development and redevelopment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benson Hotel & faculty Club, The |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|||||||||
One Edgewater |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
||||||||||
Hamilton House |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
||||||||
Flying Horse |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
||||||||
Hamilton, The |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
|
|||||||||||||
Oak Shore |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
||||||||
Upton Place |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
||||||||
Mondo Market |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
||||||
Strathmore Phase 1 Con |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|||||||
300 W. Broward Blvd. |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|||||||||
200 W. Broward Blvd. |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|||||||||
Fitzsimons Phase Four |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
||||||||
Sears Parcel 1 |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|||||||||
Sears Parcel 2 |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|||||||||
Sears Parcel 3 |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|||||||||
Total Development and redevelopment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1001 Brickell Bay Drive |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
|
— |
|||||||||||
Eldridge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$( |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
F-45
APARTMENT INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY
AIMCO OP L.P.
SCHEDULE III: REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
For the Years Ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020
(In Thousands)
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|||
Total real estate balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||
Additions during the year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Capital additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Dispositions |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Write-offs of fully depreciated assets and other |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total real estate balance at end of year |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Accumulated depreciation balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||
Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Dispositions |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Write-offs of fully depreciated assets and other |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Accumulated depreciation balance at end of year |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||
F-46
