(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | (Commission File Number) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: | ||||||||||||||
Title of Each Class | Trading Symbol | Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered | ||||||||||||
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None. |
Proposal 1(a)-1(i) – Election of Directors | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Elect each of the following director nominees for a term expiring at the Company’s 2022 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders or until his or her earlier death, retirement, resignation, or removal pursuant to the Company’s articles of association: The voting results were as follows: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
a. Election of director: Douglas J. Pferdehirt | |||||||||||||||||||||||
FOR (Number of votes) | PERCENT FOR (%) | AGAINST (Number of votes) | PERCENT AGAINST (%) | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST AS A PERCENTAGE OF SHARES IN ISSUE (%) | ABSTENTIONS (Number of votes) | BROKER NON-VOTES (Number of votes) | ||||||||||||||||
283,981,098 | 95.3% | 14,127,973 | 4.7% | 298,109,071 | 66.1% | 2,557,449 | 25,310,065 | ||||||||||||||||
b. Election of director: Eleazar de Carvalho Filho | |||||||||||||||||||||||
FOR (Number of votes) | PERCENT FOR (%) | AGAINST (Number of votes) | PERCENT AGAINST (%) | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST AS A PERCENTAGE OF SHARES IN ISSUE (%) | ABSTENTIONS (Number of votes) | BROKER NON-VOTES (Number of votes) | ||||||||||||||||
226,355,090 | 75.4% | 73,853,967 | 24.6% | 300,209,057 | 66.6% | 457,463 | 25,310,065 | ||||||||||||||||
c. Election of director: Claire S. Farley | |||||||||||||||||||||||
FOR (Number of votes) | PERCENT FOR (%) | AGAINST (Number of votes) | PERCENT AGAINST (%) | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST AS A PERCENTAGE OF SHARES IN ISSUE (%) | ABSTENTIONS (Number of votes) | BROKER NON-VOTES (Number of votes) | ||||||||||||||||
296,145,922 | 98.6% | 4,053,902 | 1.4% | 300,199,824 | 66.6% | 466,696 | 25,310,065 | ||||||||||||||||
d. Election of director: Peter Mellbye | |||||||||||||||||||||||
FOR (Number of votes) | PERCENT FOR (%) | AGAINST (Number of votes) | PERCENT AGAINST (%) | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST AS A PERCENTAGE OF SHARES IN ISSUE (%) | ABSTENTIONS (Number of votes) | BROKER NON-VOTES (Number of votes) | ||||||||||||||||
292,360,563 | 97.4% | 7,813,771 | 2.6% | 300,174,334 | 66.6% | 492,186 | 25,310,065 | ||||||||||||||||
e. Election of director: John O’Leary | |||||||||||||||||||||||
FOR (Number of votes) | PERCENT FOR (%) | AGAINST (Number of votes) | PERCENT AGAINST (%) | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST AS A PERCENTAGE OF SHARES IN ISSUE (%) | ABSTENTIONS (Number of votes) | BROKER NON-VOTES (Number of votes) | ||||||||||||||||
295,687,832 | 98.5% | 4,500,946 | 1.5% | 300,188,778 | 66.6% | 477,742 | 25,310,065 | ||||||||||||||||
f. Election of director: Margareth Øvrum | |||||||||||||||||||||||
FOR (Number of votes) | PERCENT FOR (%) | AGAINST (Number of votes) | PERCENT AGAINST (%) | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST AS A PERCENTAGE OF SHARES IN ISSUE (%) | ABSTENTIONS (Number of votes) | BROKER NON-VOTES (Number of votes) | ||||||||||||||||
295,599,217 | 98.5% | 4,617,141 | 1.5% | 300,216,358 | 66.6% | 450,162 | 25,310,065 | ||||||||||||||||
g. Election of director: Kay G. Priestly | |||||||||||||||||||||||
FOR (Number of votes) | PERCENT FOR (%) | AGAINST (Number of votes) | PERCENT AGAINST (%) | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST AS A PERCENTAGE OF SHARES IN ISSUE (%) | ABSTENTIONS (Number of votes) | BROKER NON-VOTES (Number of votes) | ||||||||||||||||
297,310,497 | 99.0% | 2,906,409 | 1.0% | 300,216,906 | 66.6% | 449,614 | 25,310,065 | ||||||||||||||||
h. Election of director: John Yearwood | |||||||||||||||||||||||
FOR (Number of votes) | PERCENT FOR (%) | AGAINST (Number of votes) | PERCENT AGAINST (%) | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST AS A PERCENTAGE OF SHARES IN ISSUE (%) | ABSTENTIONS (Number of votes) | BROKER NON-VOTES (Number of votes) | ||||||||||||||||
286,436,401 | 95.4% | 13,744,821 | 4.6% | 300,181,222 | 66.6% | 485,298 | 25,310,065 | ||||||||||||||||
i. Election of director: Sophie Zurquiyah | |||||||||||||||||||||||
FOR (Number of votes) | PERCENT FOR (%) | AGAINST (Number of votes) | PERCENT AGAINST (%) | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST AS A PERCENTAGE OF SHARES IN ISSUE (%) | ABSTENTIONS (Number of votes) | BROKER NON-VOTES (Number of votes) | ||||||||||||||||
204,343,735 | 68.1% | 95,895,955 | 31.9% | 300,239,690 | 66.6% | 426,830 | 25,310,065 | ||||||||||||||||
Proposal 2 – 2020 U.S. Say-on-Pay for Named Executive Officers | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Approve, on an advisory basis, the Company’s named executive officer compensation for the year ended December 31, 2020. The voting results were as follows: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
FOR (Number of votes) | PERCENT FOR (%) | AGAINST (Number of votes) | PERCENT AGAINST (%) | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST AS A PERCENTAGE OF SHARES IN ISSUE (%) | ABSTENTIONS (Number of votes) | BROKER NON-VOTES (Number of votes) | ||||||||||||||||
254,224,952 | 84.6% | 46,104,904 | 15.4% | 300,329,856 | 66.6% | 336,664 | 25,310,065 | ||||||||||||||||
Proposal 3 – 2020 Directors’ Remuneration Report | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Approve, on an advisory basis, the Company’s directors’ remuneration report for the year ended December 31, 2020. The voting results were as follows: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
FOR (Number of votes) | PERCENT FOR (%) | AGAINST (Number of votes) | PERCENT AGAINST (%) | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST AS A PERCENTAGE OF SHARES IN ISSUE (%) | ABSTENTIONS (Number of votes) | BROKER NON-VOTES (Number of votes) | ||||||||||||||||
257,019,146 | 85.6% | 43,292,002 | 14.4% | 300,311,148 | 66.6% | 355,372 | 25,310,065 | ||||||||||||||||
Proposal 4 – Prospective Directors’ Remuneration Policy | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Approve the Company’s prospective directors’ remuneration policy for the three years ending December 2024. The voting results were as follows: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
FOR (Number of votes) | PERCENT FOR (%) | AGAINST (Number of votes) | PERCENT AGAINST (%) | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST AS A PERCENTAGE OF SHARES IN ISSUE (%) | ABSTENTIONS (Number of votes) | BROKER NON-VOTES (Number of votes) | ||||||||||||||||
209,610,314 | 69.8% | 90,631,167 | 30.2% | 300,241,481 | 66.6% | 425,039 | 25,310,065 | ||||||||||||||||
Proposal 5 – Receipt of U.K. Annual Report and Accounts | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Receipt of the Company’s audited U.K. accounts for the year ended December 31, 2020, including the reports of the directors and the auditor thereon. The voting results were as follows: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
FOR (Number of votes) | PERCENT FOR (%) | AGAINST (Number of votes) | PERCENT AGAINST (%) | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST AS A PERCENTAGE OF SHARES IN ISSUE (%) | ABSTENTIONS (Number of votes) | BROKER NON-VOTES (Number of votes) | ||||||||||||||||
324,598,985 | 99.9% | 436,391 | 0.1% | 325,035,376 | 72.1% | 941,209 | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
Proposal 6 – Ratification of U.S. Auditor | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as the Company’s U.S. independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2021. The voting results were as follows: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
FOR (Number of votes) | PERCENT FOR (%) | AGAINST (Number of votes) | PERCENT AGAINST (%) | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST AS A PERCENTAGE OF SHARES IN ISSUE (%) | ABSTENTIONS (Number of votes) | BROKER NON-VOTES (Number of votes) | ||||||||||||||||
323,714,163 | 99.4% | 1,870,373 | 0.6% | 325,584,536 | 72.2% | 392,049 | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
Proposal 7 – Re-appointment of U.K. Statutory Auditor | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Reappoint PwC as the Company’s U.K. statutory auditor under the U.K. Companies Act 2006, to hold office until the next Annual General Meeting of Shareholders at which accounts are laid. The voting results were as follows: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
FOR (Number of votes) | PERCENT FOR (%) | AGAINST (Number of votes) | PERCENT AGAINST (%) | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST AS A PERCENTAGE OF SHARES IN ISSUE (%) | ABSTENTIONS (Number of votes) | BROKER NON-VOTES (Number of votes) | ||||||||||||||||
323,661,766 | 99.4% | 1,905,402 | 0.6% | 325,567,168 | 72.2% | 409,417 | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
Proposal 8 – Approval of U.K. Statutory Auditor Fees | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Authorize the Board of Directors and/or the Audit Committee to determine the remuneration of PwC, in its capacity as the Company’s U.K. statutory auditor for the year ending December 31, 2021. The voting results were as follows: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
FOR (Number of votes) | PERCENT FOR (%) | AGAINST (Number of votes) | PERCENT AGAINST (%) | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST AS A PERCENTAGE OF SHARES IN ISSUE (%) | ABSTENTIONS (Number of votes) | BROKER NON-VOTES (Number of votes) | ||||||||||||||||
322,592,812 | 99.1% | 2,968,403 | 0.9% | 325,561,215 | 72.2% | 415,370 | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
Proposal 9 – Approval of Share Repurchase Contracts and Counterparties | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Approve the forms of share repurchase contracts and repurchase counterparties in accordance with specific procedures for “off-market purchases” of ordinary shares through the NYSE or Euronext Paris. The voting results were as follows: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
FOR (Number of votes) | PERCENT FOR (%) | AGAINST (Number of votes) | PERCENT AGAINST (%) | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST AS A PERCENTAGE OF SHARES IN ISSUE (%) | ABSTENTIONS (Number of votes) | BROKER NON-VOTES (Number of votes) | ||||||||||||||||
318,029,478 | 98.2% | 5,789,362 | 1.8% | 323,818,840 | 71.9% | 2,157,745 | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
Proposal 10 – Authority to Allot Equity Securities | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Authorize the Board to allot equity securities in the Company. The voting results were as follows: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
FOR (Number of votes) | PERCENT FOR (%) | AGAINST (Number of votes) | PERCENT AGAINST (%) | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST AS A PERCENTAGE OF SHARES IN ISSUE (%) | ABSTENTIONS (Number of votes) | BROKER NON-VOTES (Number of votes) | ||||||||||||||||
247,902,244 | 82.5% | 52,436,708 | 17.5% | 300,338,952 | 66.6% | 327,568 | 25,310,065 | ||||||||||||||||
Proposal 11 – Authority to Allot Equity Securities without Pre-emptive Rights | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Pursuant to the authority contemplated by the resolution in Proposal 10, authorize the Board to allot equity securities without pre-emptive rights. The voting results were as follows: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
FOR (Number of votes) | PERCENT FOR (%) | AGAINST (Number of votes) | PERCENT AGAINST (%) | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST | TOTAL VOTES VALIDLY CAST AS A PERCENTAGE OF SHARES IN ISSUE (%) | ABSTENTIONS (Number of votes) | BROKER NON-VOTES (Number of votes) | ||||||||||||||||
296,174,405 | 98.6% | 4,155,166 | 1.4% | 300,329,571 | 66.6% | 336,949 | 25,310,065 |
TechnipFMC plc | ||||||||
By: /s/ Victoria Lazar | ||||||||
Dated: | May 20, 2021 | Name: Victoria Lazar | ||||||
Title: Executive Vice President | ||||||||
Chief Legal Officer and Secretary |