The Board of Directors of Spirit Airlines, Inc. is soliciting your proxy to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held virtually, via live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SAVE2022, on May 10, 2022, at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time, and any adjournment or postponement of that meeting.

In this Proxy Statement, we refer to Spirit Airlines, Inc. as the “Company,” “Spirit,” “we” or “us” and the Board of Directors as the “Board.” When we refer to Spirit’s fiscal year, we mean the twelve-month period ending December 31 of the stated year. Agreements, plans and other documents referenced to in this Proxy Statement are to be qualified in their entirety by reference to the actual full text of such agreements, plans and other documents.

Notice and Access

We have elected to use the Internet as our primary means of providing our proxy materials to stockholders. Accordingly, on or about March 30, 2022, we are making the proxy materials, including this Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K, available on the Internet and mailing a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to stockholders of record as of March 15, 2022 (the “Record Date”). Brokers and other nominees who hold shares on behalf of beneficial owners will be sending their own similar notice. All stockholders as of the Record Date will have the ability to access the proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or request to receive a printed set of the proxy materials. Instructions on how to request a printed copy by mail or electronically, including an option to request paper copies on an ongoing basis, may be found also in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and on the website referred to in the notice. We intend to mail this Proxy Statement, together with the accompanying proxy card, to those stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting who have properly requested paper copies of such materials within three business days of request.

Quorum

The only voting securities of Spirit Airlines, Inc. are shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “common stock”), of which there were 108,612,618 shares outstanding as of the Record Date (excluding any treasury shares). We need the holders of a majority in voting power of the shares of common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote, present in person or represented by proxy, to hold the Annual Meeting.

Board Voting Recommendations

Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” the election of the director nominees named in Proposal No. 1 of the Proxy Statement, “FOR” the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm as described in Proposal No. 2 of the Proxy Statement, and “FOR” the approval, on a non-binding, advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers as described in Proposal No. 3 of the Proxy Statement.

Virtual Stockholder Meeting

The online format of our Annual Meeting is intended to enhance stockholder access and participation. As stated in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our stockholders as of Record Date will be allowed to communicate with us and ask questions before and during the meeting. This will increase our ability to engage and communicate effectively with all stockholders, regardless of size, resources or physical location, and will ensure that our stockholders are afforded the same rights and opportunities to participate as they would at an in-person meeting.

Other Material

The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), is available in the “Financials & Filings” section of our website at http://ir.spirit.com. You also may obtain a copy of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, without charge, by contacting the Company’s Secretary at 2800 Executive Way, Miramar, FL 33025.

Who can vote at the Annual Meeting?

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 15, 2022 will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. At the close of business on the Record Date, there were 108,612,618 shares of common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote.

Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name

If, on March 15, 2022, your shares were registered directly in your name with the transfer agent for our common stock, Wells Fargo Shareowner Services, then you are a stockholder of record. As a stockholder of record, you may vote at the Annual Meeting or vote by proxy. Whether or not you plan to attend (via the Internet) the Annual Meeting, we urge you to fill out and return the enclosed proxy card or vote by proxy over the telephone or on the Internet as instructed below to ensure your vote is counted.

Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker, Bank or Other Agent

If, on March 15, 2022, your shares were held in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, dealer or other similar organization, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by that organization. The organization holding your account is considered the stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the Annual Meeting. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker or other agent on how to vote the shares in your account. You are also invited to attend (via the Internet) the Annual Meeting. However, since you are not the stockholder of record, you may not vote your shares at the Annual Meeting unless you request and obtain a valid proxy card from your broker or other agent.

What am I being asked to vote on?

You are being asked to vote “FOR”:

In addition, you are entitled to vote on any other matters that are properly brought before the Annual Meeting.

How do I vote?

You may vote by mail or follow any alternative voting procedure described on the proxy card or the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. To use an alternative voting procedure, follow the instructions on each proxy card that you receive or on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials.

For the election of directors, you may either vote “FOR” each of the two nominees or you may withhold your vote for any nominee you specify. For the ratification of the selection of the Company’s independent auditors, and the non-binding, advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers, and you may vote “FOR” or “AGAINST” or abstain from voting.

The procedures for voting are as follows:

Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name

If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote at the Annual Meeting. Alternatively, you may vote by proxy over the Internet or, if you properly request and receive a proxy card by mail or email, by signing, dating and returning the proxy card, over the Internet or by telephone. Whether or not you plan to attend (via the Internet) the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote by proxy to ensure your vote is counted. Even if you have submitted a proxy before the Annual Meeting, you may still attend the Annual Meeting and vote via the Internet. In such case, your previously submitted proxy will be disregarded.

Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of Broker, Bank or Other Agent

If you are a beneficial owner of shares registered in the name of your broker, bank or other agent, you should have received a voting instruction card and voting instructions with these proxy materials from that organization rather than from us. Simply complete and mail the voting instruction card to ensure that your vote is counted. To vote (via the Internet) at the Annual Meeting, you must obtain a valid proxy from your broker, bank or other agent. Follow the instructions from your broker, bank or other agent included with these proxy materials, or contact your broker, bank or other agent to request a proxy form.

Who counts the votes?

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”) has been engaged as our independent agent to tabulate stockholder votes. If you are a stockholder of record, and you choose to vote over the Internet or by telephone, Broadridge will access and tabulate your vote electronically. If you choose to sign and mail your proxy card, your executed proxy card is returned directly to Broadridge for tabulation. As noted above, if you hold your shares through a broker, your broker (or its agent for tabulating votes of shares held in street name, as applicable) returns one proxy card to Broadridge on behalf of all its clients.

How are votes counted?

With respect to Proposal No. 1, the election of directors, the two nominees receiving the highest number of votes will be elected. With respect to Proposal Nos. 2, and 3, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority in voting power of the shares of common stock which are present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on each proposal is required for approval.

Brokers who hold shares in street name for the accounts of their clients may vote such shares either as directed by their clients or, in the absence of such direction, in their own discretion if permitted by the stock exchange or other organization of which they are members. If your shares are held by a broker on your behalf, and you do not instruct the broker as to how to vote these shares on Proposal No. 2, the broker may exercise its discretion to vote for or against that proposal in the absence of your instruction. With respect to Proposal Nos. 1 and 3, the broker may not exercise discretion to vote on those proposals. This would be a “broker non-vote” and these shares will not be counted as having been voted on the applicable proposal. However, broker non-votes will be considered present and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting and will be counted towards determining whether or not a quorum is present. Please instruct your bank or broker so your vote can be counted.

If stockholders abstain from voting, these shares will be considered present and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting and will be counted towards determining whether or not a quorum is present. Abstentions will have no effect with regard to Proposal No. 1, and with regard to Proposal Nos. 2 and 3 will have the same effect as an “AGAINST” vote.

How many votes do I have?

On each matter to be voted upon, you have one vote for each share of common stock you own as of March 15, 2022.

How do I vote via Internet or telephone?

You may vote by proxy by following the instructions provided in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or on the proxy card. If you properly request and receive printed copies of the proxy materials by mail, you may vote by proxy by calling the toll-free number found on the proxy card. Please be aware that if you vote over the Internet or by telephone, you may incur costs such as telephone and Internet access charges, as applicable, for which

you will be responsible. The Internet and telephone voting facilities for eligible stockholders of record will close at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 9, 2022. The giving of such a telephonic or Internet proxy will not affect your right to vote should you decide to attend (via the Internet) the Annual Meeting.

The telephone and Internet voting procedures are designed to authenticate stockholders’ identities, to allow stockholders to give their voting instructions and to confirm that stockholders’ instructions have been recorded properly.

What if I return a proxy card but do not make specific choices?

If we receive a signed and dated proxy card and the proxy card does not specify how your shares are to be voted, your shares will be voted “FOR” the election of each of the two nominees for director, “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm, and “FOR” the approval, on a non-binding, advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers. If any other matter is properly presented at the Annual Meeting, your proxy (i.e., one of the individuals named on your proxy card) will vote your shares using his or her best judgment.

Who is paying for this proxy solicitation?

We will pay for the entire cost of soliciting proxies. In addition to these mailed proxy materials, our directors, officers and employees may also solicit proxies in person, by telephone or by other means of communication. Directors, officers and employees will not be paid any additional compensation for soliciting proxies. We may also reimburse brokerage firms, banks and other agents for the cost of forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners.

What does it mean if I receive more than one set of materials?

If you receive more than one set of materials, your shares are registered in more than one name or are registered in different accounts. In order to vote all the shares you own, you must follow the instructions for voting on each Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or the proxy card that you receive by mail or email pursuant to your request, which include instructions for voting over the Internet, by telephone or by signing, dating and returning any of such proxy cards.

Can I change my vote after submitting my proxy?

Yes. You can revoke your proxy at any time before the final vote at the Annual Meeting. If you are the record holder of your shares, you may revoke your proxy in any one of three ways:

If your shares are held by your broker, bank or other agent, you should follow the instructions provided by them.

When are stockholder proposals due for next year’s Annual Meeting?

To be considered for inclusion in the proxy materials for next year’s annual meeting, your proposal must be submitted in writing by November 30, 2022, to our Secretary at 2800 Executive Way, Miramar, Florida 33025; provided that if the date of that annual meeting is more than thirty (30) days from the first anniversary of the Annual Meeting, the deadline will be a reasonable time before we begin to print and send our proxy materials for next year’s annual meeting. If you wish to submit a proposal that is not to be included in the proxy materials for next year’s annual meeting pursuant to the SEC’s shareholder proposal procedures or to nominate a director, you must do so between January 10, 2023 and February 9, 2023; provided that if the date of that annual meeting is earlier than April 23, 2023 or later than July 9, 2023 you must give notice not earlier than the 120^th day prior to the annual meeting date and not later than the 90^th day prior to the annual meeting date or, if later, the 10^th day following the day on which public disclosure of the annual meeting date is first made. You are also advised to review our Amended and Restated Bylaws, which contain additional requirements about advance notice of stockholder proposals and director nominations.

What is the quorum requirement?

A quorum of stockholders is necessary to hold a valid meeting. A quorum will be present if the holders of a majority in voting power of the shares of common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote are present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting. On the Record Date, there were 108,612,618 shares outstanding and entitled to vote. Accordingly, not less than 54,306,310 shares must be represented by stockholders present at the Annual Meeting or by proxy to have a quorum.

Your shares will be counted towards the quorum only if you submit a valid proxy vote or vote at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted towards the quorum requirement. If there is no quorum, either the chairperson of the Annual Meeting or a majority in voting power of the stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, present via the Internet or represented by proxy, may adjourn the Annual Meeting to another time or place.

How can I find out the results of the voting at the Annual Meeting?

Voting results will be announced by the filing of a Current Report on Form 8-K within four business days after the Annual Meeting. If final voting results are unavailable at that time, we will file an amended Current Report on Form 8-K within four business days of the day the final results are available.

The Board is currently comprised of nine members. In accordance with our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, the Board is divided into three classes with staggered three-year terms. At each annual general meeting of stockholders, the successors to directors whose terms then expire will be elected to serve from the time of election and qualification until the third annual meeting following election.

Our directors are divided among the three classes as follows:

Any additional directorships resulting from an increase in the number of directors would be distributed among the three classes so that, as nearly as possible, each class would consist of one-third of the directors.

The division of the Board into three classes with staggered three-year terms may delay or prevent a change of our management or a change in control.

Carlton D. Donaway, a Class II director, has informed the Company that he does not intend to stand for re-election, and accordingly his term will end at the conclusion of the Annual Meeting. The Board has resolved to reduce the size of the Board from nine to eight members, effective as of the conclusion of the Annual Meeting. H. McIntyre Gardner and Myrna M. Soto have been nominated, and have consented to being named in this Proxy Statement and to serve as Class II directors upon their election at the Annual Meeting. Each director to be elected will hold office until the third subsequent annual meeting of stockholders or until his or her successor is elected and has been qualified, or until such director’s earlier death, resignation or removal.

Shares represented by executed proxies will be voted, if authority to do so is not withheld, for the election of the two nominees named above. In the event that any nominee should be unavailable for election as a result of an unexpected occurrence, such shares will be voted for the election of such substitute nominee as the Board may propose. Each person nominated for election has agreed to serve if elected, and management has no reason to believe that any nominee will be unable to serve.

Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the meeting. Pursuant to the Company’s corporate governance guidelines, any director nominee who receives a greater number of votes withheld from his or her election than votes for such election must submit his or her resignation for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Board will then act after considering the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation.

H. McIntyre Gardner has been a member of the Board since July 2010 and Chairman of the Board since August 2013. Mr. Gardner retired in 2008 from Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. as the Head of Americas Region and Global Bank Group, Global Private Client. Prior to joining Merrill Lynch in July 2000, Mr. Gardner was the President and Chief Operating Officer of Helen of Troy Limited, a personal care products manufacturer. From February 2017 to September 2019, he served on the board of Blucora, Inc., a publicly traded technology-enabled financial solutions company. The Board has concluded that Mr. Gardner should continue to serve on the Board as Chairman, based on his financial and business expertise and extensive corporate finance experience.

Myrna M. Soto has been a member of the Board since March 2016. Since June 2021, Ms. Soto serves as Founder & CEO of Apogee Executive Advisors, a boutique advisory firm focused on technology risk, cybersecurity, technology integrations and capital investments. She is also a Senior Investment Advisor to several Private Equity firms. She formerly served as Chief Strategy and Trust Officer of Forcepoint, a subsidiary of Raytheon Technologies which provided cybersecurity technology services. From March 2019 to May 2020, she served as Chief Operating Officer of Digital Hands, a managed security services provider. Since April 2018,

Ms. Soto was a partner at ForgePoint Capital, a venture capital firm concentrating on cyber security-related companies, and since March 2019, an investment advisor at the same firm. Prior to that, from August 2015 to March 2018, Ms. Soto served as Senior Vice President, Global, and Chief Information Security Officer of Comcast Corporation (“Comcast”), a worldwide media and technology company. From September 2009 to August 2015, she served as Comcast’s Senior Vice President and Chief Infrastructure and Information Security Officer. Prior to these roles, from 2005 until 2009, Ms. Soto served as Vice President of Information Technology Governance and Chief Information Security Officer of MGM Resorts International, a global hospitality company. She has been a director of CMS Energy Corporation, a publicly traded energy company, and its principal subsidiary, Consumers Energy Corporation, since January 2015, a director of Popular, Inc., a financial services conglomerate, since July 2018 and a director of Trinet a PEO organization since May of 2021. The Board has concluded that Ms. Soto should continue to serve on the Board and on the Compensation and the Safety, Security and Operations Committees based on her experience in information technology and security matters, leadership expertise and general business experience.

Edward M. Christie, III has been a member of the Board since January 2018 and has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since January 2019. Prior to that, Mr. Christie served as our President from October 2018 to December 2018, and as our President and Chief Financial Officer from January 2018 to October 2018. From January 2017 to December 2017, he served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. From April 2012 to December 2016, Mr. Christie served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to joining Spirit, Mr. Christie served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Pinnacle Airlines Corp. from July 2011 to March 2012. Prior to that, Mr. Christie was a partner in the management consulting firm of Vista Strategic Group LLC from May 1010 to July 2011. Mr. Christie served in various positions from 2002 to 2010 at Frontier Airlines, including as Chief Financial Officer from June 2008 to January 2010, as Senior Vice President, Finance from February 2008 to June 2008, as Vice President, Finance from May 2007 to February 2008, and before that in several positions, including Corporate Financial Administrator, Director of Corporate Financial Planning, and Senior Director of Corporate Financial Planning and Treasury. In April 2012, Pinnacle Airlines filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. The Board has concluded that Mr. Christie should continue to serve on the Board based on his business skills, leadership experience in the airline industry, financial expertise, general business knowledge and due to his position as President and CEO.

Christine P. Richards has been a member of the Board since September 2019. Ms. Richards served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of FedEx from 2005 until her retirement in September 2017. Prior to that, as part of a 33-year career at FedEx, she had responsibility in diverse areas including

strategic transactions, fleet and supply chain, customer support and government and regulatory matters. Before joining FedEx, Ms. Richards was in private law practice. She serves on several non-profit boards including the Tennessee State Collaborative on Reforming Education. She is a Commissioner on the Tennessee Public Charter School Commission and serves on the Shelby County Tennessee Retirement Board. The Board has concluded that Ms. Richards should continue to serve on the Board and on the Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees based on her experience in the aviation industry, her legal and governance expertise and her general business knowledge.

Mark B. Dunkerley has been a member of the Board since September 2019. From 2002 to February 2018, Mr. Dunkerley served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Hawaiian Holdings, Inc., the parent company of Hawaiian Airlines. Prior to Hawaiian, he was Chief Operating Officer at Sabena Airlines Group and Executive Vice President at the Washington-based aviation consultancy, Roberts Roach & Associates. Prior to that, Mr. Dunkerley was President and Chief Operating Officer of Worldwide Flight Services, a leading multinational ground handling business and held various senior positions over 10 years at British Airways PLC. Since April 16, 2020, Mr. Dunkerley serves on the board of directors of Airbus SE. He also serves on the board of directors of Volotea Airlines, a low-cost carrier operating in Europe. The Board has concluded that Mr. Dunkerley should continue to serve on the Board and on the Audit and Safety, Security and Operations Committees based on his leadership expertise, knowledge of the aviation industry, experience in operational matters, and general business experience.

Robert D. Johnson has been a member of the Board since July 2010. Mr. Johnson retired in 2008 as Chief Executive Officer of Dubai Aerospace Enterprise (DAE), a global aerospace engineering and services company. In 2005, prior to DAE, Mr. Johnson was Chairman of Honeywell Aerospace, a leading global supplier of aircraft engines, equipment, systems and services, where he also served prior to 2005 as President and Chief Executive Officer. Prior to Honeywell Aerospace, Mr. Johnson held management positions at various aviation and aerospace companies. He served on the board of directors of Ariba, Inc., a publicly traded software company, from 2005 to 2012, and currently serves on the board of directors of Spirit Aerosystems, a publicly traded aerospace components company that is not affiliated with Spirit Airlines, Roper Industries, Inc., a publicly traded diversified industrial company, and Elbit Systems of America, LLC, a U.S.-based wholly owned subsidiary, with no registered securities, of Elbit Systems Ltd., a leading global source of innovative, technology based systems for diverse defense and commercial applications. The Board has concluded that Mr. Johnson should continue to serve on the Board and on the Audit and Safety, Security and Operations Committees because of his experience in the aviation and aerospace industries, his financial expertise and his general business knowledge.

Barclay G. Jones III has been a member of the Board since 2006. Since March 2022, Mr. Jones has been a Managing Director at the Carlyle Group Inc., a multinational private equity, alternative asset management and financial services corporation. Prior to the Carlyle Group, from March 2000 to March 2022, Mr. Jones served as the Executive Vice President of Investments for iStar Financial Inc., a publicly traded finance company focused on the commercial real estate industry. Prior to iStar, Mr. Jones was at W.P. Carey & Co., an investment management company, where he served in a variety of capacities, including Vice Chairman and Chief Acquisitions Officer. The Board has concluded that Mr. Jones should continue to serve on the Board and on the Compensation and Nominating and

Corporate Governance Committees based on his financial expertise and his general business experience.

Dawn M. Zier has been a member of the Board since June 2015. Since February 2020, Ms. Zier has been the principal of Aurora Business Consulting, LLC, and advises public and private companies on business transformation, digital/marketing acceleration, and high-performance teams. Ms. Zier was formerly the President and CEO and a director of Nutrisystem, an innovative provider of weight loss programs and digital tools, from November 2012 until its March 2019 acquisition by Tivity Health, Inc. Ms. Zier then joined Tivity Health, a leading provider of nutrition, fitness, and social engagement solutions, serving as President and Chief Operating Officer and a member of its Board of Directors, to help with the integration efforts through December 2019. Prior to that she served in a variety of executive positions at Reader’s Digest Association, a global media and data marketing company, including President of International from 2011-2012, President of Europe from 2009-2011, and President of Global Consumer Marketing from 2008-2009. In February 2013, RDA Holding Co., the holding company and parent of Reader’s Digest Association, filed a voluntary petition for reorganization relief pursuant to Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Ms. Zier also serves on the Board of The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. where she chairs the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee as well as on the boards of Prestige Consumer Healthcare and Purple Innovation. Over the years, she has served on boards for multiple marketing and media entities, including the Data and Marketing Association’s (DMA) board from 2008 to 2015, where she was a voting director and on the executive committee. Ms. Zier earned her MBA and Master of Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The Board has concluded that Ms. Zier should continue to serve on the Board and on the Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees based on her leadership expertise, consumer marketing experience and general business knowledge.

Scott M. Haralson has served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since October 2018. He served as our Vice President, Financial Planning and Analysis and Corporate Real Estate from August 2017 to October 2018 and, prior to that, as our Vice President, Financial Planning and Analysis since August

2012. From January 2010 to August 2012, Mr. Haralson served as the Director of Finance for Dish Network and from January 2009 to January 2010, as the Director of Financial Planning and Analysis for Frontier Airlines. He also served as Chief Financial Officer at Guardian Gaming from March 2008 to January 2009 and at Swift

Aviation from July 2006 to March 2008. From August 2000 to July 2006, Mr. Haralson served in various financial management positions at America West and US Airways.

John Bendoraitis has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since December 2017. From October 2013 to December 2017, he served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. Prior to joining Spirit, Mr. Bendoraitis served as Chief Operating Officer of Frontier Airlines from March 2012 to October 2013. Previously, from 2008 to 2012, he served as President of Comair Airlines. From 2006 to 2008, he served as President of Compass Airlines, where he was responsible for the certification and launch of the airline. Mr. Bendoraitis began his aviation career in 1984 at Northwest Airlines, where over a 22-year span he worked his way up from aircraft technician to vice president of base maintenance operations.

Matthew H. Klein has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer since December 2019. From August 2016 to December 2019, he served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer. Prior to that, Mr. Klein served as the Chief Commercial Officer at lastminute.com from December 2013 to December 2015 and as Vice President, Global Airline Relations at Travelocity from October 2012 to November 2013. From September 2011 to September 2012 and from January 2016 to July 2016, he worked in various consulting capacities in the travel industry. Mr. Klein also served in various pricing, revenue management, forecasting and distribution planning positions at AirTran Airways from September 1999 to September 2011, and in various other roles in domestic pricing at US Airways from 1995 to 1999. Mr. Klein served on the board of the Airlines Reporting Corporation, an air travel intelligence and commerce company, from September 2010 to September 2011.

Thomas C. Canfield has served as our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since October 2007. From September 2006 to October 2007, Mr. Canfield served as General Counsel & Secretary of Point Blank Solutions, Inc., a manufacturer of antiballistic body armor. Prior to Point Blank, from 2004 to 2007, he served as CEO and Plan Administrator of AT&T Latin America Corp., a public company formerly known as FirstCom Corporation, which developed high-speed fiber networks in 17 Latin American cities. Mr. Canfield also served as General Counsel & Secretary at AT&T Latin America Corp from 1999 to 2004. Previously, Mr. Canfield was Counsel in the New York office of Debevoise & Plimpton LLP. Mr. Canfield serves on the board and on the audit and nominating and corporate governance committees of Iridium Communications Inc., a satellite communications company.

Melinda C. Grindle has served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer since January 2022. Ms. Grindle joined Spirit after 17 years of service with UnitedHealth Group, where she held various roles of progressive responsibility in Human Capital, with the last three years serving as the Chief Talent Officer of Optum, a health services and innovation company that is part of UnitedHealth Group.

Rocky B. Wiggins has served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer since September 2016. Prior to joining Spirit, from June 2014 to September 2016, Mr. Wiggins served as Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer at WestJet Airlines. From September 2011 to May 2014, he served as Chief Information Officer at Sun Country Airlines and from September 2000 to July 2011 as Chief Information Officer of AirTran Airways. Prior to that, he served in various information technology leadership positions at US Airways for almost 20 years.

Brian J. McMenamy has served as our Vice President and Controller since November 2017. Mr. McMenamy served in various positions from 1984 to 2017 at American Airlines, including as Vice President of Finance from April 2014 to October 2017 and as Vice President, FP&A and Controller from April 2006 to March 2014. He also served as Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of TWA Airlines, a then subsidiary of AMR Corporation (parent company of American Airlines), from March 2001 to September 2001 and as Vice President of Financial Planning and Analysis of Canadian Airlines, a then affiliate of AMR Corporation, from March 1998 to March 2000. Mr. McMenamy has previously served in private-industry Board positions with ARC Corporation and Texas Aero Engine Services from 2006 to 2013 and 2007 to 2011, respectively.

K. Blake Vanier has served as our Vice President, Financial Planning and Analysis since March 2020. Mr. Vanier served in various positions from June 2012 to March 2020 at Domino’s, including as Vice President of Global Financial Planning and Analysis from December 2018 to March 2020 and as Director of Global Financial Planning and Analysis from September 2016 to December 2018. From 2010 to 2012, he served as a Finance Manager at GTB, a global advertising agency. Prior to that, Mr. Vanier held various roles of increasing responsibility in Corporate Finance, Financial Planning and Analysis, as well as Investor Relations, at U.S Airways (now American Airlines) and JetBlue Airways.

Independence of the Board of Directors

As required under the NYSE Listed Company Manual, a majority of the members of a listed company’s board of directors must qualify as “independent,” as affirmatively determined by the Board. The Board consults with the Company’s counsel to ensure that the Board’s determinations are consistent with all relevant securities and other laws and regulations regarding the definition of “independent,” including those set forth in pertinent listing standards of the NYSE, as in effect from time to time.

Consistent with these considerations, after review of all relevant transactions or relationships between each director, or any of his or her family members, and the Company, its senior management and its independent registered public accounting firm, the Board has affirmatively determined that, with the exception of Mr. Christie, all the members of the Board are independent directors, in each case within the meaning of the applicable NYSE listing standards. Mr. Christie currently serves as the Company’s CEO.

As required under the NYSE rules, our independent directors meet regularly in executive sessions at which only independent directors are present. Mr. Gardner, Chairman of the Board, presides at all of these executive sessions.

There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

Board Responsibilities; Risk Oversight

Under our bylaws and corporate governance guidelines, the Board is responsible for, among other things, overseeing the conduct of our business; reviewing and, where appropriate, approving our major financial objectives, plans and actions; and reviewing the performance of our CEO and other members of management based on, among other things, reports from the Compensation Committee. Following the end of each year, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees the Board’s annual self-evaluation, which includes a review of any areas in which the Board or management believes the Board can make a better contribution to our corporate governance, as well as a review of Board composition, the structure and membership of Board committees, and an assessment of the Board’s compliance with corporate governance principles. In fulfilling the Board’s responsibilities, directors have full access to our management and independent advisors.

With respect to the Board’s role in our risk oversight, our Audit Committee discusses with management our policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management and our significant financial risk exposures and the actions management has taken to limit, monitor or control such exposures, while our Safety, Security and Operations Committee reviews our activities, programs and procedures on safety, security and airline operations matters and routinely assesses related risk. Moreover, the Audit and Safety, Security, and Operations Committees receive regular updates from management regarding cybersecurity matters, including the description of risks, protections and procedures. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews the Company’s environmental and social strategy and practices, in coordination with the Audit Committee’s oversight of related risks. Our Audit, Nominating and Corporate Governance, and Safety, Security, and Operations Committees report to the full Board with respect to the foregoing matters, among others. Lastly, our Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing the management of risks relating to the Company’s executive compensation plans and periodically reports to the entire Board about such risks.

The Company’s management is responsible for the day-to-day management of the risks facing the Company, including macroeconomic, financial, strategic, operational, public reporting, legal, regulatory, environmental, social, political, cybersecurity, compliance and reputational risks. Management carries out this risk management responsibility through a coordinated effort among the various risk management functions within the Company.

Leadership Structure

We have historically separated the roles of CEO and Chairman of the Board in recognition of the differences between the two roles. The CEO is responsible for setting our strategic direction and our day-to-day leadership and performance, while the Chairman of the Board provides general guidance to the CEO and sets the agenda for Board meetings and presides over meetings of the full Board. Mr. Gardner currently serves as our Chairman of the Board and Mr. Christie currently serves as our CEO. Our bylaws provide that the independent directors may appoint a lead director from among them to perform such duties as may be assigned by the Board. In his capacity as Chairman of the Board, Mr. Gardner generally performs the functions of a lead director.

Board Committees

The Board has the following standing committees: an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and a Safety, Security and Operations Committee. The composition and responsibilities of each committee are described below. Members serve on these

committees until their resignation or until otherwise determined by the Board. The Board also has provided for an ad hoc Finance Committee, which may be constituted from time to time by the Board. A copy of the Finance Committee charter is available on the Company’s website at http://ir.spirit.com. Below is the committee membership as of March 30, 2022:

Audit Committee

Our Audit Committee oversees our corporate accounting and financial reporting process. Among other matters, the Audit Committee evaluates the independent auditors’ qualifications, independence and performance; determines the engagement of the independent auditors; reviews and approves the scope of the annual audit and the audit fee; discusses with management and the independent auditors the results of the annual audit and the review of our quarterly financial statements; approves the retention of the independent auditors to perform any proposed permissible non-audit services; monitors the rotation of partners of the independent auditors on the Company’s engagement team as required by law; reviews our critical accounting policies and estimates; oversees our internal audit function and annually reviews the Audit Committee charter and the committee’s performance. The Audit Committee performs other functions as set forth in the Audit Committee charter, which satisfies the applicable standards of the SEC and the NYSE. A copy of the Audit Committee charter is available on the Company’s website at http://ir.spirit.com.

The current members of our Audit Committee are Messrs. Donaway, Dunkerley, and Johnson, with Mr. Donaway serving as the chair of the committee. All members of our Audit Committee meet the requirements for financial literacy under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the NYSE. The Board has determined that all members of the Audit Committee are financial experts as defined under the applicable rules of the SEC and thereby have the accounting and financial management expertise required under the applicable rules and regulations of the NYSE. All three members of the Audit Committee are independent directors as defined under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the NYSE.

Compensation Committee

Our Compensation Committee reviews and approves, and in some instances makes recommendations with respect to, the Company’s policies, practices and plans relating to compensation and benefits of our officers and other management level employees. The Compensation Committee (i) reviews and approves performance goals and objectives relevant to compensation of our CEO and other executive officers; (ii) evaluates the performance of our CEO in light of those goals and objectives and other factors and determines and approves our CEO’s compensation based on such evaluation; (iii) with input from our CEO, evaluates the performance of other officers, and sets their compensation based on such evaluations after taking into account the recommendations of our CEO; (iv) determines the base salaries of our officers, and also administers the issuance of restricted stock units, performance share units and other equity-based awards under our compensation plan documents as well as the awarding of annual cash bonus opportunities under our short-term incentive plans; (v) reviews and discusses pay equity on an annual basis; (vi) reviews, and makes recommendations to the Board with respect to, the form and amount of compensation of non-employee directors of the Company; (vii) reviews and evaluates, at least annually, the performance of the Compensation Committee and its members, including compliance of the Compensation Committee with its charter and corporate governance principles; (viii) approves the peer group companies used to benchmark Company performance and executive officer compensation; and (ix) periodically reviews, in consultation with its independent compensation consultant, the Company’s executive compensation philosophy and target competitive positioning for reasonableness and appropriateness. The Compensation Committee monitors compliance with the Company’s stock

ownership guidelines and also oversees risk assessment with respect to the Company’s executive compensation policies and practices. It also periodically reviews, and when appropriate makes recommendations with respect to, the severance and change in control benefits afforded to our executive officers and other members of management. The Compensation Committee performs other functions as set forth in the Compensation Committee charter. A copy of the Compensation Committee charter is available on the Company’s website at http://ir.spirit.com.

The Compensation Committee engaged Willis Towers Watson as the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation advisor for the first quarter of 2021, and engaged and appointed Korn Ferry as the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation advisor (each of such firms, for the relevant periods, the “Compensation Consultant”) for the remainder of the year. The Committee also retained independent external legal counsel during 2021. Each year, the Compensation Committee evaluates the qualifications, performance and independence of its independent compensation consultant and legal counsel. In March 2022, the Compensation Committee reviewed information regarding the independence and potential conflicts of interest of the Compensation Consultant and external legal counsel during 2021. The Compensation Committee members took into account, among other things, the factors enumerated by the SEC and the NYSE for evaluating compensation advisor and legal counsel independence and concluded that its compensation consultant and legal counsel are both independent and that no conflict of interest exists with respect to the work performed by either firm. Representatives of Compensation Consultant and external legal counsel have direct access to Compensation Committee members without management involvement. The Compensation Committee has sole authority to replace its compensation consultant and/or legal counsel from time to time and to hire additional consultants and legal counsel at any time. Representatives of Compensation Consultant participated in all meetings of the Compensation Committee meetings in 2021.

The current members of our Compensation Committee are Mr. Jones and Mses. Richards, Soto and Zier, with Mr. Jones serving as the chair of the committee. The Board has affirmatively determined that each of Mr. Jones and Mses. Richards, Soto and Zier meets the definition of “independent director” for purposes of the NYSE listing rules.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for making recommendations regarding candidates for directorships, the size and composition of the Board and committee memberships. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing and making recommendations to the Board concerning our corporate governance guidelines and other corporate governance matters. The Committee is also responsible for reviewing environmental, social, and governance matters (ESG), and human capital management (HCM), including diversity review, employee engagement and succession planning with respect to our leadership team.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews candidates for directors in the context of the current composition, skills and expertise of the Board, the operating requirements of the Company and the interests of stockholders. It also takes into consideration applicable laws and regulations (including the NYSE listing standards), diversity, skills, experience, integrity, ability to make independent analytical inquiries, understanding of the Company’s business and business environment, willingness and availability to devote adequate time and effort to Board responsibilities and other relevant factors. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may also engage, if it deems appropriate, a professional search firm to identify candidates that possess the desired characteristics and skills. During each search, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (i) assesses the Board’s needs and functions; (ii) develops search specifications which are reported to, and concurred by, the full Board; (iii) convenes a search sub-committee (which generally includes all members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Chairman of the Board and the CEO) to conduct recruitment efforts and interviews with the director candidates; (iv) performs appropriate and necessary screenings and inquiries into the backgrounds and qualifications of possible director candidates; and lastly (v) may recommend a nominee(s) to the Board, which subsequently votes to elect the nominee(s).

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by stockholders in accordance with, and pursuant to, the advance notice procedures for nominations of directors as set forth in the Company’s amended and restated bylaws. The Board believes that the procedures set forth in the Company’s amended and restated bylaws are currently sufficient and that the establishment of a formal policy is not necessary.

Stockholders who wish to recommend individuals for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to become nominees for election to the Board may do so by delivering, along with any updates or supplements required by the Company’s amended and restated bylaws, a written recommendation, c/o the Company’s Secretary, to the following address: Spirit Airlines, Inc., 2800 Executive Way, Miramar, Florida 33025 not earlier than the 120^th day prior to and not later than the 90^th day prior to the first anniversary of the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders for the preceding year; provided, however, that in the event that the date of the annual meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after such anniversary date, such recommendation shall be delivered not earlier than the 120^th day prior to the Company’s annual meeting and not later than the 90^th day prior to such annual meeting, or, if later, the 10^th day following the day on which public disclosure of the date of such annual meeting was first made. Submissions must include the required information and follow the specified procedures set forth in the Company’s amended and restated bylaws. Any such submission must be accompanied by the written consent of the proposed nominee to be named as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will evaluate any director candidates that are properly recommended by stockholders in the same manner as it evaluates all other director candidates, as described above.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is currently comprised of Mr. Jones and Mses. Richards and Zier, with Ms. Zier serving as the chair of the committee. The Board has affirmatively

determined that each of Mr. Jones and Mses. Richards and Zier meets the definition of “independent director” for purposes of the NYSE listing rules. A copy of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter is available on the Company’s website at http://ir.spirit.com.

Safety, Security and Operations Committee

Our Safety, Security and Operations Committee oversees the Company’s activities, programs and procedures with respect to safety, security and airline operations. Among other matters, the

Safety, Security and Operations Committee reviews the Company’s safety programs, policies and procedures; reviews the Company’s policies, procedures and investments, and monitors the Company activities, with respect to physical and information security; and reviews other aspects of airline operations such as reliability, organization and staffing. The current members of our Safety, Security and Operations Committee are Messrs. Donaway, Dunkerley, and Johnson and Ms. Soto, with Mr. Johnson serving as the chair of the committee. Non-committee members of the Board regularly attend meetings of the Safety, Security and Operations Committee. The Safety, Security and Operations Committee operates under a written charter, a copy of which is available on the Company’s website at http://ir.spirit.com.

Meetings of the Board of Directors, Board and Committee Member Attendance and Annual Meeting Attendance

Our Board has regularly scheduled meetings and an annual meeting of stockholders each year, in addition to special meetings scheduled as appropriate. The Board met seven times during 2021, a particularly challenging year due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Each of the five regularly scheduled Board meetings held during 2021 included an executive session, consisting of only independent directors. Mr. Gardner, Chairman of the Board, presided at all of these executive sessions. The Audit Committee of the Board met six times, the Compensation Committee of the Board met eight times, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met four times, and the Safety, Security and Operations Committee of the Board met four times during 2021. Each Board member attended 75% or more of the aggregate of the meetings of the Board and of the committees on which they served, during 2021. Committee meetings are open to all members of the Board. Meetings of the Safety, Security and Operations Committee are regularly attended by all directors. We encourage all of our directors and nominees for director to attend our annual meeting of stockholders; however, attendance is not mandatory. All of our then-serving directors attended our annual meeting of stockholders in 2021.

Stockholder and Other Interested Parties Communications with the Board of Directors

Should stockholders or other interested parties wish to communicate with the Board or any specified independent directors, such correspondence should be sent to the attention of the Secretary, at 2800 Executive Way, Miramar, Florida 33025. The Secretary will forward the communication to the Board or to the individual director(s), as appropriate.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of the current members of our Compensation Committee is or has at any time during the past year been an officer or employee of ours. None of our executive officers currently serves or in the past year has served as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our Board or Compensation Committee.

Executive Pay-for-Performance

We seek to ensure a pay-for-performance culture with well-balanced and transparent compensation policies and practices that are designed to drive shareholder returns as well as attract, motivate and retain superior executives, as more fully described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement.

Perquisites

Perquisites are not a significant part of our executive compensation program. As is common in the airline industry, senior executives and non-employee directors, and their respective immediate families, are entitled to certain travel privileges on our flights, which may be on a positive space basis. In addition, retired non-employee directors who meet certain criteria are eligible for lifetime post-retirement positive-space air travel on our airline, as more fully described in the “Non-Employee Director Compensation” section of this Proxy Statement.

Stock Ownership Guidelines for Non-employee Directors and Executives

We maintain stock ownership guidelines applicable to non-employee directors and executives, as more fully described in the “Non-Employee Director Compensation” and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” sections of this Proxy Statement. Non-employee directors and executives are expected to meet their ownership guidelines within five years of becoming subject to the guidelines. All of our non-employee directors and executive officers who have served at least five years are currently in compliance with the guidelines.

Anti-Hedging/Pledging Policy

We do not allow our directors and executive officers to enter into put and call options and other hedging transactions in the Company’s stock, nor to pledge the Company’s stock as collateral to secure loans. We believe that these prohibitions further align directors’ interests with those of our stockholders.

Clawback Policy

In January 2014, the Company adopted a clawback policy (the “Prior Clawback Policy”) providing for the termination and forfeiture of outstanding incentive compensation awards to officers and for the recoupment of gains actually or constructively received by officers pursuant to incentive compensation awards, in each case where the Company is required to prepare a restated financial statement and where a lower incentive payment or award would have been made to or received by the officer had they been based on the restated financial results. In March 2019, with input from the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant and independent legal counsel, the Compensation Committee approved, and the Board ratified, a new clawback policy (the “New Clawback Policy”), primarily expanding the scenarios under which forfeiture and recoupment of incentive compensation would be allowed and also expanding coverage to all executives. The New Clawback Policy applies to all incentive compensation approved, granted or awarded on or after March 19, 2019. The Prior Clawback Policy remains in effect with respect to all incentive compensation approved, granted or awarded prior to March 19, 2019. Under the New Clawback Policy, the Company is required to seek reimbursement of incentive compensation (cash

and equity-based) paid, and to terminate and cancel incentive compensation yet to be paid, to officers and other executives on the basis of reported financial results that were later the subject of a financial statement restatement, in each case to the extent that the incentive compensation actually received or earned exceeded the amount that would have been received or earned based on the restated financial results, as determined by the Compensation Committee. The New Clawback Policy also gives the Compensation Committee discretionary recoupment rights in scenarios not involving a financial restatement, including fraud, negligence or misconduct that cause reputational or financial harm to the Company and the payment of incentive compensation based on financial or operating performance results that were incorrectly calculated or reported.

In addition, the award agreements applicable to awards under the Company’s long-term incentive plans and awards of annual cash bonus opportunities under the Company’s short-term incentive plans contain clawback provisions providing for the termination and forfeiture of outstanding incentive compensation awards and for the recoupment of gains actually or constructively received pursuant to incentive compensation awards, in situations where the executive engages in any activity in competition with the Company or which is inimical, contrary, or harmful to the interests of the Company, in the determination of the Compensation Committee.

Taken together, all of the Company’s clawback rights and remedies are believed to be consistent with best corporate governance practices.

Retirement and Pension Practices

We do not provide a defined benefit pension plan or any supplemental executive retirement plan or other form of non-qualified retirement plan for our executive officers.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board has adopted corporate governance guidelines to assist it in the exercise of its responsibilities and to serve the interests of the Company and its stockholders. The guidelines address areas such as Board and committee size and composition, director qualification standards and interaction with institutional investors. A copy of our corporate governance guidelines is available to security holders on the Company’s website at http://ir.spirit.com.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

The Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all members of the Board, officers and employees, including our CEO, Chief Financial Officer and principal accounting officer. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics addresses, among other things, issues relating to conflicts of interests, including internal reporting of violations and disclosures, and compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations. The purpose of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is to deter wrongdoing, to promote honest and ethical conduct and to ensure to the greatest possible extent that our business is conducted in a legal and ethical manner. We intend to promptly disclose on our website

(1) the nature of any substantive amendment to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our directors, officers or other principal financial officers, (2) the nature of any waiver, including an implicit waiver, from a provision of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that is granted to one of these specified directors, officers or other principal financial officers, and (3) the name of each person who is granted such a waiver and the date of the waiver. A copy of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on the Company’s website at http://ir.spirit.com.

Related Party Transactions

The Board monitors and reviews any transaction, arrangement or relationship, or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships, in which the Company is to be a participant, the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and a related party had or will have a direct or indirect material interest, including purchases of goods or services by or from the related party or entities in which the related party has a material interest, indebtedness, guarantees of indebtedness and employment by us of such related party. Furthermore, the Company’s directors and executive officers complete an annual questionnaire that requires them to identify and describe, among other items, any transactions that they or their respective related parties may have with the Company.

Limitation of Liability and Indemnification Related Party Transactions

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation contains provisions that limit the liability of our directors for monetary damages to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. Consequently, our directors will not be personally liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages for any breach of fiduciary duties as directors, except liability for:

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that we may indemnify our directors and executive officers, in each case to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. Our amended and restated bylaws also provide that we are obligated to indemnify our directors and executive officers to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law and advance expenses incurred by a director or officer in advance of the final disposition of any action or proceeding, and permit us to secure insurance on behalf of any officer, director, employee or other agent for any liability arising out of his or her actions in that capacity regardless of whether we would otherwise be permitted to indemnify him or her under the provisions of Delaware law. We have entered into agreements to indemnify our directors, executive officers and other employees as determined by the Board. For more information, see “Certain

Relationships and Related Transactions – Other Transactions” elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. With specified exceptions, these agreements provide for indemnification for related expenses including, among other things, attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines and settlement amounts incurred by any of these individuals in any action or proceeding. We believe these limitations of liability provisions and indemnification agreements are necessary to attract and retain qualified persons as directors and officers. We also maintain directors’ and officers’ liability insurance.

The limitation of liability and indemnification provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, amended and restated bylaws and indemnification agreements may discourage stockholders from bringing a lawsuit against our directors and officers for breach of their fiduciary duty. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that any such lawsuit must be brought in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware. The foregoing provisions may also reduce the likelihood of derivative litigation against our directors and officers, even though an action, if successful, might benefit us and other stockholders. Further, a stockholder’s investment may be adversely affected to the extent that we pay the costs of settlement and damage awards

against directors and officers as required by these indemnification provisions. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), may be permitted to our directors, officers and controlling persons pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, we have been advised that, in the opinion of the SEC, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act, and is, therefore, unenforceable. At present, there is no pending litigation or proceeding involving any of our directors, officers or employees for which indemnification is sought, and we are not aware of any threatened litigation that is expected to result in claims for indemnification.

Limited Duration Stockholder Rights Agreement

On March 30, 2020, the Company announced that our Board had approved the adoption of a stockholder rights agreement (the “Rights Agreement”). The key features of the Rights Agreement are described in the Company’s Current Reports on Forms 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 30, 2020 and March 10, 2021. The Rights Agreement expired on March 29, 2021.

The Audit Committee of the Board has selected Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2022 and is seeking ratification of such selection by our stockholders at the Annual Meeting. Ernst & Young LLP has audited our financial statements since 1995. Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP are expected to attend our Annual Meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Neither our amended and restated bylaws nor other governing documents or law require stockholder ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. However, the Audit Committee is submitting the selection of Ernst & Young LLP to our stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If our stockholders fail to ratify the selection, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether or not to retain Ernst & Young LLP. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if they determine that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders.

To be approved, the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm must receive a “FOR” vote from the holders of a majority in voting power of the shares of common stock which are present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted towards a quorum. Abstentions will have the same effect as an “AGAINST” vote for purposes of determining whether this matter has been approved. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The following table provides information regarding the fees incurred by Ernst & Young LLP during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. All fees described below were approved by the Audit Committee.

Audit Fees

Audit fees represent fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements, including reviews of our quarterly financial statements, as well as audit services provided in connection with certain other regulatory filings including our 2021 and 2020 filings of reports on Form 8-K, consents, and comfort letters.

Audit-Related Fees

There were no audit-related fees of Ernst & Young LLP during 2021 and 2020.

Tax Fees

Tax fees represent fees billed for professional services rendered for the review and advice on U.S. and foreign tax matters.

All Other Fees

All other fees represent an annual license fee for access to Ernst & Young LLP’s web-based accounting research tool during 2021 and 2020.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and non-audit services provided by its independent registered public accounting firm. This policy is set forth in the charter of the Audit Committee and is available on the Company’s website at http://ir.spirit.com.

The Audit Committee approved all audit and other services provided by Ernst & Young LLP for 2021 and 2020 and the estimated costs of those services. Actual amounts billed, to the extent in excess of the estimated amounts, were periodically reviewed and approved by the Audit Committee.

The Audit Committee periodically considers whether the non-audit services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP are compatible with maintaining Ernst & Young LLP’s independence.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE

FOR

THE RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2022.

Pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), the Company is soliciting stockholders for a non-binding, advisory vote on compensation programs for our named executive officers (sometimes referred to as “say on pay”). In 2018, our stockholders voted on a proposal relating to the frequency of the “say-on-pay” vote. At that time, we recommended, and our stockholders approved on an advisory, non-binding basis, an annual say-on-pay vote. We agree with our stockholders and have included this advisory (non-binding) vote on the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal year 2021.

Our stockholders have the opportunity to vote for, against or abstain from voting on the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the stockholders approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the accompanying compensation tables and the related narrative disclosure in this Proxy Statement.”

To be approved, this proposal must receive a “FOR” vote from the holders of a majority in voting power of the shares of common stock which are present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted towards a quorum. Abstentions will have the same effect as an “AGAINST” vote for purposes of determining whether this matter has been approved. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal.

At our 2021 annual meeting of stockholders, approximately 98% of the shares voted were cast in favor of our management “say on pay” resolution. The Compensation Committee believes those voting results affirm our stockholders’ support of our approach to executive compensation. The Company recommends that stockholders again approve and support the decisions pertaining

to the compensation of our named executive officers and the Company’s executive compensation programs.

As described in detail under the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement, our compensation programs are designed to motivate our executives to create a successful company. Our philosophy is to make a significant percentage of an executive officer’s compensation “at-risk” by linking it to the Company’s performance. We believe that our compensation program, with its balance of short-term incentives (including annual performance-based cash bonuses) and long-term incentives (including performance-based equity and cash awards), encourages and rewards sustained performance that is aligned with long-term stockholder interests. Our compensation programs are also designed to enable the Company to attract and retain superior executives in a highly competitive and challenging marketplace. Stockholders are encouraged to read the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement, the accompanying compensation tables and the related narrative disclosure.

Among other programs applicable to executive officers, the Company (i) does not pay tax gross-ups to its executives with respect to retirement, severance or change-in-control payments; (ii) maintains stock ownership guidelines applicable to all officers (and directors); (iii) maintains a robust clawback policy applicable to all executives; and (iv) has an anti-hedging and anti-pledging policy applicable to executives (and directors).

This vote is non-binding. The Board and the Compensation Committee expect to take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation decisions to the extent they can determine the cause or causes of any significant negative voting results. Unless the Board modifies its determination on the frequency of future “say on pay” advisory votes, the next “say on pay” advisory vote will be held at the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders.

The following table sets forth, as of the Record Date (March 15, 2022), information regarding beneficial ownership of our capital stock by:

Beneficial ownership is determined according to the rules of the SEC and generally means that persons have beneficial ownership of a security if they possess sole or shared voting or investment power of that security, including options and warrants that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days and restricted stock units that vest within 60 days. Except as indicated by the footnotes below, we believe, based on the information furnished to

us, that the persons named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown that they beneficially own, subject to community property laws where applicable.

Common stock subject to stock options and warrants currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of the Record Date and restricted stock units that vest within 60 days of the Record Date are deemed to be outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of the person holding these options, warrants and restricted stock units and the percentage ownership of any group of which the holder is a member but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person.

Beneficial ownership is based on there having been 108,612,618 shares of our voting common stock outstanding as of the Record Date. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each of the individuals and entities named below is c/o Spirit Airlines, Inc., 2800 Executive Way, Miramar, Florida 33025.

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock and other equity securities of the Company. Officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

To the Company’s knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to the Company and written representations that no other reports were required, during the year ended December 31, 2021, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners were complied with, except that Mr. Wiggins filed a late Form 4 on March 5, 2021, to report a sale transaction effected on March 1, 2021.

No meeting fees have been paid under the 2020 Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy. Moreover, under the 2020 Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy, the cash compensation paid and the equity awards granted to any non-employee director during any calendar year may not exceed $400,000 (or $500,000 in the case of the Chairman of the Board) in total value (including the value of any such equity awards based on the grant date fair value). Under limited and extraordinary circumstances, the Compensation Committee can make exceptions to the foregoing annual limit, provided that the non-employee director receiving the additional compensation may not participate in the decision to award such compensation. The Compensation Committee’s discretion to waive the annual limit has not been exercised to date. The annual limit will not apply to

the calendar year 2023 or any subsequent calendar year unless the Board approves an extension of the limit to a specified date occurring after December 31, 2022. Our non-employee directors are reimbursed for travel and other expenses incurred for attending meetings. Furthermore, consistent with prevailing practice in the airline industry, our incumbent non-employee directors and their immediate family members are afforded free positive-space personal air travel benefits on our airline, in our case up to a maximum value of $5,000 per year. In addition, our retired non-employee directors who had served on the Board for a period of at least five years ended on or after June 1, 2015, are eligible for lifetime post-retirement positive-space air travel on our airline for the former non-employee director and, until the death of the former non-employee director, for his or her spouse or designated

travel companion and dependent children, up to a maximum value of $5,000 per year. Our non-employee directors are not eligible for retirement benefits nor do they receive perquisites such as life or medical insurance provided by the Company.

We maintain a deferral program under which each non-employee director may, at his or her election and prior to the grant date, defer settlement of 100% of his or her vested restricted stock units until the earliest of (a) 360, 720 or 1,080 days following the vesting of the restricted stock units (with the non-employee director affirmatively selecting the number of days); (b) a change of control; and (c) a termination of service.

Under the Company’s stock ownership guidelines, non-employee directors are required to meet a share ownership level with a minimum value equal to 5.0 times the base annual cash retainer payable to non-employee directors (one-third of which must be owned outright in the form of shares of our common stock). Non-employee directors are expected to meet their ownership levels within five years of becoming subject to the guidelines. All of our non-employee directors who have served at least five years are currently in compliance with the guidelines.

The 2020 Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy is designed to ensure alignment with long-term stockholder interests. The policy is also designed to (i) ensure that the Company can attract and retain outstanding director candidates, (ii) recognize the substantial time commitment necessary to oversee the affairs of the Company and (iii) support the independence of thought and action expected of directors.

In 2021, general and supplemental annual cash retainers were paid to our non-employee directors per the terms of our program (as set forth above). Moreover, on January 13, 2021, each of our non-employee directors received a grant of 4,769 restricted stock units with 100% of such grants vesting on January 13, 2022. Also, on January 13, 2021, Mr. Gardner received an additional grant of 1,987 restricted stock units with 100% vesting on January 13, 2022, representing 50% in value of his annual retainer as Chairman of the Board. Prior to the 2021 restricted stock unit grants, Mr. Donaway and Ms. Soto, elected to defer settlement of their restricted stock units to the earliest to occur of 1,080 days following the vesting of such units, a change of control or a termination of service as a director.

2022 Non-Employee Director Compensation

It has been the practice of the Compensation Committee to review the competitiveness of our compensation program for non-employee directors every two years rather than annually. As such, the Compensation Committee did not make any changes to the 2020 Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy described above. Accordingly, on January 13, 2022, each of our non-employee directors received a grant of 5,046 restricted stock units with 100% of such grants vesting on January 13, 2023. Also on

January 13, 2022, Mr. Gardner received an additional grant of 1,987 restricted stock units with 100% vesting on January 13, 2023, representing 50% in value of his annual retainer as Chairman of the Board. Mr. Jones and Ms. Soto elected to defer settlement of their 2022 grant of restricted stock units to the earliest to occur of 1,080 days following the vesting of such units, a change of control or a termination of service as a director. For 2022, general and supplemental annual cash retainers are expected to be paid to our non-employee directors per the terms of our program, as set forth above.

The following discussion and analysis of compensation arrangements of our named executive officers, or NEOs, should be read together with the compensation tables and related disclosures in the “Executive Compensation” section of this Proxy Statement. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that are based on our current plans, considerations, expectations and determinations regarding future compensation programs.

Our Compensation Committee is appointed by the Board and is responsible for establishing, implementing, and monitoring adherence to our compensation philosophy. We seek to ensure that the total compensation paid to our executive officers is fair, reasonable and competitive.

The Compensation Committee engaged Willis Towers Watson as the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation advisor for the first quarter of 2021, and engaged and appointed Korn Ferry as the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation advisor (each of such firms, for the relevant periods, the “Compensation Consultant”) for the remainder of the year. The Committee also retained external legal counsel during 2021. Each year, the Compensation Committee evaluates the qualifications, performance and independence of its compensation consultant and reviews the performance of its legal counsel. During 2021, the Compensation Committee reviewed information regarding the independence and potential conflicts of interest of the Compensation Consultant and external legal counsel. The Compensation Committee members took into account, among other things, the factors enumerated by the SEC and the NYSE for evaluating compensation advisor independence and concluded that the Compensation Consultant is independent and that no conflict of interest currently exists with respect to the work

performed by the firm. Representatives of the Compensation Consultant and external legal counsel have direct access to Compensation Committee members (and vice versa) without management involvement. The Compensation Committee has sole authority to replace its compensation consultant and/or legal counsel from time to time and to hire additional consultants and legal counsel at any time. Representatives of Willis Towers Watson or Korn Ferry participated in all meetings of the Compensation Committee in 2021.

With respect to executive compensation approved for the year 2021, the Compensation Committee based its decisions in part on comparative compensation market data provided by the Compensation Consultant. The Compensation Committee also considered input provided by Mr. Christie, who served as our CEO during 2021, with respect to compensation of our other NEOs. However, Mr. Christie does not provide input for the Compensation Committee’s determination of his own compensation. Decisions of our Compensation Committee pertaining to the compensation of our NEOs and the Company’s executive compensation programs are regularly reported to, and in some instances presented for approval by, the full Board. We continue to be committed to shareholder engagement, communication and transparency, and in designing our compensation policies, we endeavor to ensure that management’s interests are aligned with those of our stockholders and that such policies support long-term value creation. Our long-standing compensation philosophy to pay our executive officers for performance, measured against Company goals, remained an integral part of our overall compensation program in 2021.

Executive Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

The market for experienced management talent is highly competitive inside and outside our industry. Airline industry consolidation, as well as new airline startups, have intensified that competitiveness. Our goal is to attract, motivate and retain executives with the talent and experience necessary for us to achieve our strategic business plan and to effectively manage each of our business functions. In doing so, we draw upon a pool of talent that is highly sought after within the airline industry and elsewhere in the travel, hospitality and general industries. Within this talent pool, we seek individuals who we believe will be able to contribute to our unique ultra low-cost operating model and our vision of future success, our culture and values, and who will enhance the cohesiveness and productivity of our leadership team. We regard as fundamental that executive officer compensation be structured to provide competitive base salaries and benefits to attract and retain superior executive officers, and to provide incentive compensation to motivate executive officers to attain, and to reward executive officers for attaining, established financial, operational and other goals that are consistent with increasing stockholder value.

Since our initial public offering in 2011, and with the input and assistance of our Compensation Consultants, our Compensation

Committee has adhered to a comprehensive executive compensation program designed to provide appropriately a balanced mix of (i) fixed versus at-risk variable compensation, (ii) annual versus long-term compensation and (iii) cash versus equity-based compensation. As further described below, our executive compensation program is structured around four primary components: fixed base salary, annual cash incentive compensation (bonuses) linked to performance targets, equity-based long-term incentive compensation consisting of a combination of restricted stock units (“RSUs”), performance share units (“PSUs”) and market stock units (“MSUs”), and cash-based long-term incentive compensation linked to long-term financial performance. MSUs are a hybrid of stock options and RSUs that reward for absolute stock price appreciation. MSUs are settled at the end of 3rd year based absolute share price performance measured at the end of 1st, 2nd, and 3rd years.

Shareholder engagement, communication and transparency are important factors considered when we design our compensation policies. The Company communicates regularly with shareholders on various key matters, including executive compensation, and seeks to incorporate shareholder feedback into its executive compensation practices.

In determining the form and amount of compensation payable to our NEOs, we are guided by the following principles:

Results of 2021 Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation and Stockholder Engagement

At our annual meeting of stockholders in May 2021, our stockholders once again expressed support for our compensation programs and the compensation of our NEOs, with an approval rate of approximately 98% for our management “say on pay” resolution. The Compensation Committee carefully evaluated the results of the 2021 “say on pay” vote, and consistent with recommendations from Compensation Consultant, made no significant changes to the overall design of our compensation program during 2021.

The Company communicates regularly with shareholders on various matters, including executive compensation, and seeks to incorporate shareholder input into its executive compensation practices. The Compensation Committee will continue to take into account stockholder feedback and evolving best practices in making compensation decisions in future years and will endeavor to ensure that management’s interests are aligned with those of our stockholders and support long-term value creation.

Determination of Compensation

The Compensation Committee meets periodically to specifically review and determine adjustments, if any, to the CEO’s compensation, including his base salary, annual bonus compensation and long-term equity awards, and to review and consider recommendations of the CEO with respect to the other NEOs’ base salaries, annual bonus compensation and long-term equity awards. For 2021, as more fully described below, the Compensation Committee determined each individual component of compensation for our NEOs. The Compensation Committee annually evaluates our company-wide performance against the approved operating plan for the prior fiscal year. The Compensation Committee also meets periodically to discuss compensation-related matters as they arise during the year. For each year, our CEO evaluates each other NEO’s individual performance and contributions to the Company’s success and reports to the Compensation Committee his recommendations regarding each element of the other NEOs’ compensation. The CEO does not participate in any formal discussion with the Compensation Committee regarding decisions on his own compensation, and on request of the Compensation Committee he recuses himself from meetings when his individual performance is evaluated, and his compensation is discussed and decided.

The Compensation Consultant has worked closely with the Compensation Committee to determine an appropriate executive compensation strategy that supports our core business objectives: maintaining low costs, profitable growth, safe and reliable operations, sound cash flow and long-term value creation. In considering approaches to executive compensation, the Compensation Committee continuously reviews ways to strengthen the alignment of management’s interests with the interests of shareholders, strengthen our ability to attract, motivate and retain key executive talent and design plans that account for the relatively high volatility and cyclicality of our industry.

In order to assist the Compensation Committee in setting appropriate compensation plans, performance metrics and target amounts, the

Compensation Consultant conducts annual assessments of our executive compensation program. Due to the compensation restrictions imposed by the CARES Act and the volatile market conditions, the Compensation Committee utilized the benchmarking data from the 2020 assessment as the basis for the year 2021 compensation decisions. The Compensation Committee also conducted benchmarking assessments for specific individual positions as deemed necessary. In December 2019, the Compensation Committee approved a group of publicly traded airline companies as the appropriate talent-competitor peer group for compensation market comparison purposes for 2020 (the “Compensation Peer Group”, listed in more detail below). The selection of companies for the Compensation Peer Group focused on a mix of passenger carriers as an appropriate population for assessing the amounts and percentile rankings of compensation elements for NEOs, including base salaries, short-term incentives (bonuses) and long-term equity-based incentives. Data for Allegiant Travel Company’s CEO (who is also a large shareholder of that company) was excluded due to particularities of that executive’s pay package.

After consideration, and recommendations from the Compensation Consultant, the Compensation Committee approved to maintain the Compensation Peer Group selected in December 2019, except that WestJet Airlines was subsequently removed after being acquired and going private. For the 2020 Compensation program assessment, Willis Towers Watson primarily used the Compensation Peer Group to assess the competitiveness of our Chief Executive Officer’s, Chief Operating Officer’s and Chief Commercial Officer’s compensation, as these positions would normally be recruited from other passenger airlines. In assessing the compensation of our Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel, Willis Towers Watson used a blended approach consisting of both Compensation Peer Group proxy data and general industry survey data, adjusted for revenue size, as these positions could also generally be recruited from companies in other industries. For its analysis prepared for 2020 compensation purposes, Willis Towers Watson used data taken from the following three executive pay surveys:

The data from the two general industry executive surveys reflected companies with revenues approximating the revenues of the Company. The Compensation Committee was not aware of the individual participating companies in the surveys and reviewed the data in a summarized fashion.

For purposes of measuring our performance on (i) adjusted operating margin for the performance share units awarded to our executive officers in 2021 and, (ii) metrics as part of the 2021 STI Plan (as described in more detail below), in December 2020 the Compensation Committee approved a broader group of publicly-traded airline companies as a relevant peer group (the “Short-Term Incentive Peer Group” and “Performance Share Op Margin Peer Group,” as applicable). For 2021, the Compensation Committee removed SkyWest from the Op-Margin peer-group compared to the one used in 2020, because, as a regional contract carrier that airline operates under a very different business model than that operated by the Company.

Compensation Philosophy and Market Positioning

For 2021, the Compensation Committee opted to continue the past practice of setting the target-pay positioning at the median (50th percentile) for each element of pay. The Compensation Committee determined that this was necessary to attract and retain seasoned and industry-leading executive talent to support Spirit’s growth profile. The CARES Act compensation restrictions limit increases in the NEO’s compensation until the end of restriction period. With the CARES Act compensation restrictions, the scope for making compensation changes to NEOs were limited until the of the end of restriction period. Within this general framework and following the recommendation of Compensation Consultant, the Compensation Committee has approved the following compensation philosophy based on our objectives and unique business model:

Along with the above-described elements of compensation, the Committee seeks to align target total cash compensation (TCC, consisting of base salary and target short-term incentive) and Target total direct compensation (TDC consisting of TCC and Long-term Incentive) with market median levels.

We believe our executive compensation philosophy will enable us to maintain our competitive position for key executive talent by targeting market median for each element of compensation. The Compensation Committee reserves discretion to deviate from the above guidelines as necessary to account for changing industry characteristics, our particular business model, individual performance, economic factors outside our control, and other factors. An analysis prepared by Compensation Consultant in December 2019 indicated that our NEOs’ 2020 Compensation is aligned with the desired pay positioning, approximating the 50^th percentile of the market.

Elements of Compensation

For 2021, our compensation program for our NEOs consisted of four components:

We are continuing to build our executive compensation program around each of the above elements because each individual component is useful in achieving one or more of the objectives of the program and we believe that, collectively, they are effective in achieving our overall objectives.

1.    Base Salary. We provide our NEOs and other employees with a base salary to compensate them for services rendered during the year and to provide them with a minimum level of guaranteed pay. The base salary payable to each NEO is intended to provide a fixed component of compensation reflecting the executive’s skill set, experience, role and responsibilities. Base salary amounts are established based on consideration of, among other factors, the scope of the NEOs’ responsibilities, ability to contribute to the Company’s success, years of service and individual job performance and the Compensation Committee’s general knowledge of the competitive market, based on, among other things, experience with other companies and our industry and market data provided by the Compensation Consultant.

The Compensation Committee did not increase annual base salaries of Messrs. Christie, Bendoraitis, Klein and Canfield in 2021. Effective July 1, 2021, the annual base salary of Mr. Haralson increased to $400,000, representing an increase of 6.7%. The increase for Mr. Haralson was implemented to bring his salary closer to the 25^th percentile of the market. The NEOs’ 2021 base salaries are set forth under the “Summary Compensation Table” below and are prorated, when applicable, to reflect the changes made.

2.    Performance-Based Short-Term Incentives. Cash bonuses are intended to provide incentives to meet or exceed company-wide financial and operating performance objectives. Generally, all of our NEOs and other executive officers are eligible for annual cash bonuses, which are determined annually based on achievement of a set of pre-established financial and operational performance metrics established for the year at or shortly after the time of the Board’s approval of the annual operating plan. To improve employee motivation and the visibility of payouts during the challenging conditions of operating during a pandemic, the Compensation Committee decided to divide 2021 STI plan into four quarterly performance periods. The Compensation Committee maintains the ability to apply certain discretion to any cash bonus payouts, including making adjustments based on the Company’s safety performance and any unanticipated unusual circumstances that may arise during the performance year.

Our short-term incentive bonus program is administered by the Compensation Committee. For each quarterly measurement period, the Compensation Committee approves (i) the performance metrics; (ii) the weighting of the performance metrics; (iii) the threshold, target and stretch (maximum) performance levels for each metric and the percentage payouts for the performance levels (usually zero for less than threshold performance, 100% of target value for target performance and 200% of target value for stretch or maximum performance); and (iv) the target bonus opportunity for officer positions, expressed as a percentage of base salary. After the performance results are available (following each quarter in 2021), the specific bonus payments are calculated using the formula embodied in the short-term incentive plan, and may include discretionary adjustments as the Compensation Committee may approve based on individual performance and other factors. Incentive bonuses for executives are awarded under, and subject to the terms and conditions of, our 2015 Incentive Award Plan described below. Moreover, as described below, we maintain a robust clawback policy covering incentive compensation (both cash and equity-based) paid to our executive officers to further align management with the interests of stockholders over the long term.

2022 Executive Compensation Decisions

Given the significant continued negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s business and operations and continuing unpredictability of the near-term business outlook, the Company took a number of strategic actions to promote long-term success and sustainability of the business. The pandemic caused significantly greater disruption to our business and the airline industry as a whole than any other crisis in recent history and, in light of the dramatic reduction in incentive payouts to our NEOs in 2020, the Compensation Committee made a priority of retaining the recognized talent the Company had assembled in its senior leadership. The Compensation Committee was also mindful of the heightened rate of turnover and attrition occurring after other major industry shocks, for example in the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attack, and agreed that retention of key personnel would be an important factor in the Company’s success in emerging from the pandemic. In this respect, with recommendations from the Compensation Consultant, the Compensation Committee approved the following modifications to the Company’s executive compensation programs for fiscal year 2022:

Base Salary: No salary increases or other adjustments have been provided to Messrs. Christie, Bendoraitis, Klein, Canfield and Haralson for 2022.

Short-term incentives (STI): to address continued uncertainty in the business environment and tightened labor market conditions, align the STI plan with the Company’s near-term business focus to solidify recovery gains and posture the Company toward a post-COVID transition by improving management’s line of sight and to provide flexibility to shift focus during the course of the year as appropriate, the Compensation Committee decided to (i) divide 2022 STI plan into two semi-annual performance periods (1^st half 2022 and 2^nd half 2022), (ii) set performance targets, metrics and weights for each performance period prior to such performance period, and (iii) make a single annual payout after the 2nd measurement period once measurement is complete in 1^st quarter of 2023 (subject to continued employment by participants through such payment date). For the 2022 1^st semi-annual performance period, the Compensation Committee approved relative adjusted EBITDA margin, A:14 % performance achievement and three strategic goals as the performance metrics.

Long-term incentives (LTI): to enhance the motivation of our executive officers to drive a successful recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic, to address the retention concerns under the

extraordinary circumstances caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and to align the Company’s strategic priorities, the Compensation Committee decided to (i) again grant a cash-based performance long-term incentive along with the equity-based LTI, (ii) modify the equity-based LTI plan to provide for PSUs based on a three-year cumulative earnings hurdle along with RSUs and with PSUs based on relative adjusted operating margin.

In accordance with the foregoing, our NEOs were granted a cash-based long-term performance incentive as described in the table below. 50% of the award vests after 2^nd year based 2-year relative cumulative Adjusted Op-Margin and the remaining 50% vests after 3^rd year, based on the 3-year relative cumulative Adjusted Op-Margin. Maximum payout is capped at 125% of the grant date value. The cash-based long-term performance incentive is based on adjusted operating margin, or profitability, provides better line of sight to management’s ability to drive Company performance in relation to industry peers and improves retention by reducing the volatility of the overall LTI plan payout.

The grant of PSUs based on an earnings hurdle enhances the retention value of our equity-based grants while keeping the focus on the key metrics of share price appreciation and profitability as we seek to successfully emerge from the significant effects of the pandemic. The Compensation Committee also believes the goal is set at a reasonable, yet robust level, given the cumulative net losses due to impact of COVID-19. The PSUs based on an earnings hurdle: (i) set threshold, target and stretch performance payout levels based on 3-year cumulative adjusted EBITDA with threshold set at zero or negative 3-year cumulative adjusted EBITDA, (ii) have three-year cliff vesting, and (iii) have a positive payout multiplier of 125% of the number of units granted if the Company’s share price appreciation is 25% or greater over the measurement period, a negative multiplier of 75% of the number of units granted if share price depreciation is greater than 25% over the measurement period and no multiplier applied if the share price performance over the measurement period falls between the above two points.

The timing and amounts of payouts under the cash-based and equity-based long-term incentives are subject to, and may be affected by, applicable compensation restrictions under the CARES Act.

Benefits: During 2021, the Compensation Committee decided to add executive physical examinations as part of benefits offered to officers and, in early 2022, to adopt a formal officer retiree travel benefits plan.

Additional Compensation Information

1.    Severance and Change in Control-Based Compensation. All of our NEOs are covered by the Company’s 2017 executive severance plan (the “2017 Executive Severance Plan”), which was adopted in March 2017 by the Board of Directors on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee. Pursuant to the 2017 Executive Severance Plan and subject to an exception applicable only to Mr. Christie as noted below, as of December 31, 2020, each executive who holds a senior vice president or higher position is entitled to receive:

As for severance and other benefits under the 2017 Executive Severance Plan that (i) constitute “parachute payments” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code (“280G Payments”), and (ii) would otherwise be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code (the “Excise Tax”), then the 280G Payments will be either: (i) delivered in full, or (ii) delivered as to such lesser extent which would result in no portion of such benefits being subject to the Excise Tax, whichever of the foregoing amounts, taking into account the applicable federal, state and

local income taxes and the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, results in the receipt by the executive officer on an after-tax basis, of the greatest amount of benefits, notwithstanding that all or some portion of such benefits may be taxable under Section 4999 of the Code. The Company is not required to provide “gross-ups” for any excise taxes.

The 2017 Executive Severance Plan provides, with respect to participants whose employment with the Company commenced on or after September 1, 2014, that (i) the Board is permitted to terminate an officer for poor performance without triggering severance benefits; and (ii) unpaid severance benefits would be offset by compensation earned by a former employee from a new employer during the applicable severance period.

The benefits provided under the 2017 Executive Severance Plan are in lieu of any other benefits provided under any other Company policy, plan or arrangement, including any benefits provided under any employment agreement. As a condition to receiving benefits under the 2017 Executive Severance Plan, participants must execute a general release.

Restricted stock units granted to executive officers under our 2015 Plan are subject to accelerated vesting in the event the executive officer dies or becomes permanently disabled while still employed by the Company or in the event of a termination of the executive officer by the Company without cause or a voluntary resignation by the executive officer for good reason, in either case after the Company has entered into a definitive change in control agreement. Performance share units granted to our executive officers prior to 2022 under our 2015 Plan will automatically terminate in the event the executive officer’s employment terminates for any reason prior to the end of the applicable performance period except that the Company would be subject to a prorated settlement obligation in the event of a change in control or the executive officer’s death or permanent disability during the applicable measurement period.

On February 5, 2022, the Compensation Committee approved modifications to the terms of the cash-based long-term incentive awards granted to executive officers, and the performance share units granted to executive officers in 2022, in each case, under our 2015 Plan to provide for accelerated vesting, subject to the conditions, and on the specified vesting dates, as set forth in the applicable awards agreements, in the event of (i) a termination of an executive officer by the Company without cause or a voluntary

resignation by an executive officer for good reason, in either case, following a change in control or (ii) a successor corporation failing to assume or substitute such long-term incentive awards following a change in control.

The Company and Mr. Christie entered into a letter agreement, dated March 15, 2018 (the “Christie Letter Agreement”) setting forth the terms and conditions under which he would serve as President and CFO and starting on January 1, 2019, as CEO and President. Under the Christie Letter Agreement, Mr. Christie is eligible for participation in the 2017 Executive Severance Plan; provided, however, that in the event of a non-change in control termination without cause, Mr. Christie shall be entitled to receive a cash severance amount equal to 150% of base salary rather than 100% of base salary and the other terms of the 2017 Executive Severance Plan shall continue to apply. In the event Mr. Christie ceases to be employed by the Company for any reason other than death or a termination by the Company for cause (as defined in the 2017 Executive Severance Plan), subject to his execution of a release of claims in favor of the Company and compliance with a certain non-competition restriction, the Company shall provide him (and his spouse and dependent children) a lifetime travel pass for the Company’s flights enabling them to travel for free in any class of service that is available at the time of reservation. The Christie Letter Agreement also includes restrictive covenants, including a 12-month post termination restriction on competition and solicitation.

2.    Limited Perquisites. Perquisites are not a significant part of our executive compensation program. As is common in the airline industry, senior executives and their immediate families are entitled to certain travel privileges on our flights, which may be on a positive space basis. Similar travel benefits (which generally are

on a space available basis) are afforded to all of our director-level employees and above. The value of such flight benefits for the executives is reported as taxable income. We believe that providing these benefits is a relatively inexpensive way to enhance the competitiveness of the executive’s compensation package. We do not provide any other significant perquisites or personal benefits to our NEOs. In addition, in circumstances where the Company is recruiting an executive candidate who would have to relocate to accept our job offer, we provide such executive with relocation assistance, which includes travel, shipping household goods and temporary housing. Relocation benefits are an important tool for us to recruit and retain key management talent.

3.    Stock Ownership Guidelines for Executives. We maintain stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers. Under the guidelines, our NEOs are required to meet a share ownership level (consisting of shares of common stock and restricted stock units but excluding performance share units) with a minimum value equal to 2 times base salary (5 times salary for the CEO) of which at least one-third must be owned outright in the form of shares of our common stock. Also under the guidelines, our other executive officers (non-NEOs) are required to meet a share ownership level (consisting of shares of common stock and restricted stock units but excluding performance share units) with a minimum level equal to 1.5 times base salary of which one-third must be owned outright in the form of shares of our common stock. The Company’s officers are expected to meet their ownership levels within five years of becoming subject to the guidelines. All of our executive officers, including our NEOs, who have served at least five years are currently in compliance with the guidelines. The following table sets forth, as of March 15, 2022 information regarding the equity ownership of our NEOs: