|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | Responsibility for Financial Statements |
| | | |
| | | The Company’s management is responsible for the integrity and fairness of presentation of these consolidated financial |
| | | statements. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared by management, in accordance with |
| | | International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, for review by |
| | | the Audit Committee and approval by the Board of Directors. The preparation of financial statements requires the selection of appropriate accounting policies in accordance with |
| | | International Financial Reporting Standards and the use of estimates and judgements by management to present fairly |
| | | and consistently the consolidated financial position of the Company. Estimates are necessary when transactions |
| | | affecting the current period cannot be finalized with certainty until future information becomes available. In making |
| | | certain material estimates, the Company’s management has relied on the judgement of independent specialists. |
| | | |
| | | The Company’s management has developed and maintains a system of internal accounting controls to ensure, on a |
| | | reasonable and cost-effective basis, that the financial information is timely reported and is accurate and reliable in all |
| | | material respects and that the Company’s assets are appropriately accounted for and adequately safeguarded. |
| | | |
| | | The consolidated financial statements have been audited by KPMG LLP, our independent auditor. Its report outlines |
| | | the scope of its examination and expresses its opinions on the consolidated financial statements and internal control |
| | | over financial reporting. |
| | | |
| | | /s/ “David D.Cates” | | | | | | | | | /s/ “Gabriel (Mac) McDonald” |
| | | |
| | | David D. Cates | | | | | | | | | Gabriel (Mac) McDonald |
| | | President and Chief Executive Officer | | | | | | | | | Vice-President Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
| | | |
| | | March 4, 2021 |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting |
| | | |
| | | The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control |
| | | over financial reporting. Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial |
| | | reporting based on the Internal Control – Integrated Framework, 2013 issued by the Commit ee of Sponsoring |
| | | Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the Company’s |
| | | internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2020. |
| | | |
| | | The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as at December 31, 2020 has been audited |
| | | by KPMG LLP, our independent auditor, as stated in its report which appears herein. |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | Changes to Internal Control over Financial Reporting |
| | | |
| | | There has not been any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during 2020 |
| | | that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial |
| | | reporting. |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | | |
| | 2 |
| | | |
|
| KPMG LLP | |
| Bay Adelaide Centre |
| 333 Bay Street, Suite 4600 |
| Toronto, ON M5H 2S5 |
| Canada |
| Tel 416-777-8500 |
| Fax 416-777-8818 |
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Denison Mines Corp.: |
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying consolidated statement of financial position of Denison |
Mines Corp. (the Company) as of December 31, 2020, the related consolidated statements of |
income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity, and cash flows for the year |
then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our |
opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the |
financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2020 and its financial performance and its |
cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with International Financial Reporting |
Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting |
Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial |
reporting as of December 31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated |
Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway |
Commission, and our report dated March 4, 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion on the |
effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. |
Basis for Opinion These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. |
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on |
our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be |
independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws |
and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the |
PCAOB. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards |
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the |
consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or |
fraud. Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of |
the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures |
that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence |
regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audit also |
included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by |
management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial |
statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. |
| | | |
| | | | KPMG LLP is a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent |
| | | | member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. |
| | | | KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP. |
| | | | | |
| | | |
|
|
Denison Mines Corp |
March 4, 2021 |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| Critical Audit Matter The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of |
| the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated |
| to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the |
| consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or |
| complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our |
| opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by |
| communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit |
| matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates. Evaluation of indicators of impairment for mineral properties As discussed in note 2H. to the consolidated financial statements, a mineral property is |
| assessed at the end of each reporting period to determine if there is any indication that mineral |
| property may be impaired. A mineral property is tested for impairment using the impairment |
| indicators under IFRS 6 - Exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources up until the |
| commercial and technical feasibility for the property is established. As discussed in Note 10 to |
| the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s mineral properties balance as of |
| December 31, 2020 was $179,743 thousand. We identified the evaluation of indicators of impairment for mineral properties as a critical audit |
| matter. Assessing the Company’s determination of whether various internal and external |
| factors, individually or in the aggregate, result in an impairment indicator involves the application |
| of a higher degree of auditor judgment. Specifically, judgment is required to evaluate the facts |
| and circumstances related to the Company’s mineral properties, including assessing the |
| Company’s future plans for each property and exploration results. The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We |
| evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls over the |
| Company’s impairment indicator assessment process, including controls related to the |
| Company’s impairment indicator review for each property. We assessed the Company’s future |
| plans by comparing them to the most recent exploration program and budget approved by the |
| Board of Directors and evaluating the time period remaining for the Company’s right to explore |
| them by inspecting governmental filings. We evaluated the Company’s exploration results by |
| comparing them to relevant technical reports. /s/ KPMG LLP Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2020. Toronto, Canada |
| March 4, 2021 |
| | | 2 | |
| |
|
| KPMG LLP | |
| Bay Adelaide Centre |
| 333 Bay Street, Suite 4600 |
| Toronto, ON M5H 2S5 |
| Canada |
| Tel 416-777-8500 |
| Fax 416-777-8818 |
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors Denison Mines Corp.: |
Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting We have audited Denison Mines Corp.’s (the Company) internal control over financial reporting |
as of December 31, 2020, based on the criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated |
Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway |
Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal |
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, based on the criteria established in |
Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring |
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting |
Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated statement of financial position of |
the Company as of December 31, 2020, the related consolidated statements of income (loss) |
and comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, |
and the related notes (col ectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated |
March 4, 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. |
Basis for Opinion The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over |
financial reporting and for its assessment of the ef ectiveness of internal control over financial |
reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over |
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal |
control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered |
with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in |
accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the |
Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards |
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether |
effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our |
audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal |
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing |
and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed |
risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in |
the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. |
| |
| | | |
| | | | KPMG LLP is a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent |
| | | | member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. |
| | | | KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP. |
| | | | | |
| | | |
|
|
Denison Mines Corp |
March 4, 2021 |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide |
| reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of |
| financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting |
| principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and |
| procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately |
| and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide |
| reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of |
| financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that |
| receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with |
| authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable |
| assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or |
| disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial |
| statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or |
| detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of ef ectiveness to future periods are |
| subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or |
| that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. /s/ KPMG LLP Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants Toronto, Canada |
| March 4, 2021 |
| |
| |
| |
| | | 2 | |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
| To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Denison Mines Corp. |
|
|
| Opinion on the Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of Denison Mines Corp. |
| and its subsidiaries (together, the Company) as of December 31, 2019, and the related consolidated |
| statement of income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity and cash flow for the year |
| then ended, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the consolidated financial statements). |
|
| In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material |
| respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019, and its financial performance and |
| its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as |
| issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. |
|
| Substantial Doubt About the Company’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will |
| continue as a going concern. As discussed in note 2 (not presented herein) to the consolidated financial |
| statements, appearing in Exhibit 99.3 of Company’s annual report on Form 40-F for the year ended |
| December 31, 2019, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and negative cash |
| outflows from operating activities that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going |
| concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described. The consolidated financial |
| statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. |
|
| Basis for Opinion The Company’s management is responsible for the consolidated financial statements. Our responsibility is |
| to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We are a |
| public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) |
| (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. |
| federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange |
| Commission and the PCAOB. |
|
| We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we |
| plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial |
| statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. |
|
| Our audit of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of |
| material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and |
| performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, |
| evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audit also |
| included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as |
| well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit also |
| |
| PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
| PwC Tower, 18 York Street, Suite 2600, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5J 0B2 |
| T: +1 416 863 1133, F: +1 416 365 8215 |
|
| “PwC” refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an Ontario limited liability partnership. |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION |
| | | | |
| | | (Expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars (“CAD”) except for share amounts) |
| | | | | | | | | | At December 31 |
| | | | At December 31 | | |
| | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | ASSETS | | | | |
| | | Current | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Cash and cash equivalents (note 4) | | | $ | 24,992 $ | | 8,190 |
| | | Trade and other receivables (note 5) | | | | | 3,374 | | 4,023 |
| | | Inventories (note 6) | | | | | 3,015 | | 3,352 |
| | | Investments (note 7) | | | | | 16,657 | - |
| | | Prepaid expenses and other | | | | | 1,373 | | 978 |
| | | | | | | | 49,411 | | 16,543 |
| | | Non-Current | | | | | | | | |
| | | Inventories-ore in stockpiles (note 6) | | | | | 2,098 | | 2,098 |
| | | Investments (note 7) | | | | | 293 | | 12,104 |
| | | Restricted cash and investments (note 9) | | | 12,018 | | 11,994 |
| | | Property, plant and equipment (note 10) | | | | | 256,870 | | 257,259 |
| | | Total assets | | | $ | 320,690 $ | | 299,998 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | |
| | | Current | | | | | | | | |
| | | Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | | $ | 7,178 $ | | 7,930 |
| | | Current portion of long-term liabilities: | | | | | | |
| | | Deferred revenue (note 11) | | | | | 3,478 | | 4,580 |
| | | Post-employment benefits (note 12) | | | | | 120 | | 150 |
| | | Reclamation obligations (note 13) | | | | | 802 | | 914 |
| | | Other liabilities (note 14) | | | | | 262 | | 1,372 |
| | | | | | | | 11,840 | | 14,946 |
| | | Non-Current | | | | | | | |
| | | Deferred revenue (note 11) | | | | | 33,139 | | 31,741 |
| | | Post-employment benefits (note 12) | | | | | 1,241 | | 2,108 |
| | | Reclamation obligations (note 13) | | | | | 37,618 | | 31,598 |
| | | Other liabilities (note 14) | | | | | 375 | | 532 |
| | | Deferred income tax liability (note 15) | | | | | 9,192 | | 8,924 |
| | | Total liabilities | | | | | 93,405 | | 89,849 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | EQUITY | | | | | | | | |
| | | Share capital (note 16) | | | | | 1,366,710 | | 1,335,467 |
| | | Share purchase warrants (note 17) | | | | | | - | 435 |
| | | Contributed surplus | | | | | 67,387 | | 65,417 |
| | | Deficit | | | | | (1,208,587) | | | (1,192,304) |
| | | Accumulated other comprehensive income (note 19) | | | | | 1,775 | | 1,134 |
| | | Total equity | | | | | 227,285 | | 210,149 |
| | | Total liabilities and equity | | | $ | 320,690 $ | | 299,998 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Issued and outstanding common shares (note 16) | | 678,981,882 | | 597,192,153 |
| | | Commitments and contingencies (note 24) | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Subsequent events (note 26) | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements |
| | | |
| | | On behalf of the Board of Directors: |
| | | |
| | | /s/ ‘Catherine J.G. Stefan | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | /s/ ‘Brian D. Edgar’ |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Catherine J.G. Stefan | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Brian D. Edgar |
| | | Director | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Director | |
| | 3 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) and |
| | | Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | Year Ended December 31 |
| | | (Expressed in thousands of CAD dollars except for share and per share amounts) | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | REVENUES (note 21) | | | | | $ | 14,423 $ | | 15,549 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | EXPENSES | | | | | | | | |
| | | Operating expenses (note 20, 21) | | | | | | (10,594) | | | (14,436) |
| | | Exploration and evaluation (note 21) | | | | | | (9,032) | | (15,238) |
| | | General and administrative (note 21) | | | | | | (7,609) | | (7,811) |
| | | Other income (expense) (note 20) | | | | | | (95) | | 2,970 |
| | | | | | | | | (27,330) | | | (34,515) |
| | | Loss before net finance expense, equity accounting | | | | | (12,907) | | | (18,966) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Finance expense, net (note 20) | | | | | | (4,236) | | (4,125) |
| | | Equity share of loss of associate (note 8) | | | | | | | - | (426) |
| | | Loss before taxes | | | | | | | | | | | | (17,143) | | | (23,517) |
| | | Income tax recovery (note 15): | | | | | | | | |
| | | Deferred | | | | | | 860 | | 5,376 |
| | | Net loss for the period | | | | | $ | (16,283) $ | | | (18,141) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Other comprehensive income (loss) (note 19): | | | | | | | |
| | | Items that may be reclassified to loss: | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Unamortized experience gain – post employment liability | | | | | 638 | - |
| | | | | | | | | Foreign currency translation change | | | | | | | 3 | 7 |
| | | Comprehensive loss for the period | | | | | $ | (15,642) $ | | | (18,134) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Basic and diluted net loss per share | | | | | $ | (0.03) $ | | (0.03) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Weighted-average number of shares outstanding (in thousands): | | | | | | | |
| | | Basic and diluted | | | | | | 628,441 | | | 590,343 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements |
| | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | 4 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | Year Ended December 31 |
| | | (Expressed in thousands of CAD dol ars) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Share capital (note 16) | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Balance-beginning of period | | | | | $ 1,335,467 $ 1,331,214 |
| | | Shares issued for cash, net of issue costs | | | | | | | | 30,825 | | 4,292 |
| | | Flow-through share premium | | | | | | | | (22) | | (902) |
| | | Shares issued on acquisition of additional mineral property interests (note 10) | | | | | - | 19 |
| | | Share options exercised-cash | | | | | | | | 148 | | 405 |
| | | Share options exercised-fair value adjustment | | | | | | | | 50 | | 140 |
| | | Share units exercised-fair value adjustment | | | | | | | | 242 | | 299 |
| | | Balance-end of period | | | | | 1,366,710 1,335,467 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Share purchase warrants (note 17) | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Balance-beginning of period | | | | | | | | 435 | | 435 |
| | | Share purchase warrants expired | | | | | | | | (435) | - |
| | | Balance-end of period | | | | | | | | | - | 435 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Contributed surplus | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Balance-beginning of period | | | | | | | | 65,417 | | 63,634 |
| | | Share-based compensation expense (note 18) | | | | | | | | 1,827 | | 2,222 |
| | | Share options exercised-fair value adjustment | | | | | | | | (50) | | (140) |
| | | Share units exercised-fair value adjustment | | | | | | | | (242) | | (299) |
| | | Share warrants expired | | | | | | | | 435 | - |
| | | Balance-end of period | | | | | | | | 67,387 | | 65,417 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Deficit | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Balance-beginning of period | | | | | (1,192,304) (1,174,163) |
| | | Net loss | | | | | | (16,283) | | | | | (18,141) |
| | | Balance-end of period | | | | | (1,208,587) (1,192,304) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Accumulated other comprehensive income (note 19) | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Balance-beginning of period | | | | | | | | 1,134 | | 1,127 |
| | | Unamortized experience gain – post employment liability | | | | | | | 638 | - |
| | | Foreign currency translation | | | | | | | | | 3 | 7 |
| | | Balance-end of period | | | | | | | | 1,775 | | 1,134 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Total Equity | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Balance-beginning of period | | | | | $ 210,149 $ | | | | | 222,247 |
| | | Balance-end of period | | | | | $ 227,285 $ | | | | | 210,149 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements |
| | | |
| | | | | |
| | 5 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | Year Ended December 31 |
| | | (Expressed in thousands of CAD dol ars) | | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN): | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Net loss for the period | | | | $ | (16,283) $ | | | (18,141) |
| | | Items not affecting cash and cash equivalents: | | | | | | | | |
| | | Depletion, depreciation, amortization and accretion | | | | | | 7,145 | | 8,711 |
| | | Share-based compensation (note 18) | | | | | | 1,827 | | 2,222 |
| | | Recognition of deferred revenue (note 11) | | | | | | (2,762) | | (4,609) |
| | | Losses on reclamation obligation revisions (note 13) | | | | | | 3,595 | | 845 |
| | | Gains on debt obligation revisions (note 14) | | | | | | (2) | | (26) |
| | | Losses (gains) on property, plant and equipment disposals (note 20) | | | (405) | | 37 |
| | | Losses (gains) on investments (note 20) | | | | | | (5,046) | | 1,085 |
| | | Equity loss of associate (note 8) | | | | | | | - | 678 |
| | | Dilution gain of associate (note 8) | | | | | | | - | (252) |
| | | Gain on deconsolidation of associate | | | | | | | - | (5,267) |
| | | Foreign exchange losses (gains) (note 20) | | | | | | 529 | (2) |
| | | Deferred income tax recovery (note 15) | | | | | | (860) | | (5,376) |
| | | Post-employment benefits (note 12) | | | | | | (90) | | (107) |
| | | Reclamation obligations (note 13) | | | | | | (826) | | (855) |
| | | Change in non-cash working capital items (note 20) | | | | | | (307) | | 2,256 |
| | | Net cash used in operating activities | | | | | (13,485) | | | (18,801) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | |
| | | Decrease in loans receivable (note 23) | | | | | | | - | 250 |
| | | Sale of investments (note 7) | | | | | | 477 | - |
| | | Purchase of investments (note 7) | | | | | | (7) | | (511) |
| | | Expenditures on property, plant and equipment (note 10) | | | | | | (278) | | (929) |
| | | Proceeds on sale of property, plant and equipment | | | 137 | 8 |
| | | Decrease (increase) in restricted cash and investments | | | (24) | | 261 |
| | | Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | | | | | | 305 | | (921) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | |
| | | Issuance of debt obligations (note 14) | | | | | | | - | 670 |
| | | Repayment of debt obligations (note 14) | | | | | | (467) | | (662) |
| | | Issuance of common shares for: | | | | | | | | |
| | | New share issues-net of issue costs (note 16) | | | | | | 30,825 | | 4,292 |
| | | Share options exercise proceeds (note 16) | | | | | | 148 | | 405 |
| | | Net cash provided by financing activities | | | | | | 30,506 | | 4,705 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | | | | | 17,326 | (15,017) |
| | | Foreign exchange effect on cash and cash equivalents | | | | | | (524) | - |
| | | Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | | | | | | 8,190 | | 23,207 |
| | | Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | | | | $ | | 24,992 $ | | 8,190 |
| | | Supplemental cash flow disclosure (note 20) |
| |
| | | | | | | | | The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | 6 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | Notes to the consolidated financial statements for the years ended |
| | | December 31, 2020 and 2019 |
| | | |
| | | (Expressed in CAD dollars except for shares and per share amounts) | |
| | | |
| | | 1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS |
| | | |
| | | Denison Mines Corp. (“DMC”) and its subsidiary companies and joint operations (collectively, “Denison” or the |
| | | “Company”) are engaged in uranium mining related activities, which can include acquisition, exploration and |
| | | development of uranium properties, as well as the extraction, processing and sel ing of uranium. |
| | | |
| | | The Company has a 90.0% interest in the Wheeler River Joint Venture (“WRJV”), a 66.90% interest in the |
| | | Waterbury Lake Uranium Limited Partnership (“WLULP”), a 22.5% interest in the McClean Lake Joint Venture |
| | | (“MLJV”) (which includes the McClean Lake mil ) and a 25.17% interest in the Midwest Joint Venture (“MWJV”), |
| | | each of which are located in the eastern portion of the Athabasca Basin region in northern Saskatchewan, Canada. |
| | | The McClean Lake mil is contracted to provide toll milling services to the Cigar Lake Joint Venture (“CLJV”) under |
| | | the terms of a toll mil ing agreement between the parties (see note 11). In addition, the Company has varying |
| | | ownership interests in a number of other development and exploration projects located in Canada. |
| | | |
| | | The Company provides mine decommissioning and other services (collectively “environmental services”) to third |
| | | parties through its Denison Closed Mines Group (formerly Denison Environmental Services) and is also the |
| | | manager of Uranium Participation Corporation (“UPC”), a publicly-listed company formed to invest substantially all |
| | | of its assets in uranium oxide concentrates (“U3O8“) and uranium hexafluoride (“UF6”). The Company has no |
| | | ownership interest in UPC but receives fees for management services and commissions from the purchase and |
| | | sale of U3O8 and UF6 by UPC. |
| | | |
| | | DMC is incorporated under the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) and domiciled in Canada. The address of its |
| | | registered head office is 40 University Avenue, Suite 1100, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5J 1T1. |
| | | |
| | | References to “2020” and “2019” refer to the year ended December 31, 2020 and the year ended December 31, |
| | | 2019 respectively. |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | 2. STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
| | | |
| | | Statement of Compliance |
| | | |
| | | These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting |
| | | Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”). |
| | | |
| | | These financial statements were approved by the board of directors for issue on March 4, 2021. |
| | | |
| | | Significant accounting policies |
| | | |
| | | These consolidated financial statements are presented in Canadian dol ars (“CAD”) and all financial information is |
| | | presented in CAD, unless otherwise noted. |
| | | |
| | | The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires management to make |
| | | judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amount |
| | | of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. Actual results may vary from these estimates. |
| | | |
| | | Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are |
| | | recognized in the period in which the estimates are revised and in any future periods affected. The areas involving |
| | | a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the |
| | | consolidated financial statements are disclosed in note 3. |
| | | |
| | | The significant accounting policies used in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements are described |
| | | below: |
| | | |
| | | A. Consolidation principles |
| | | |
| | | The financial statements of the Company include the accounts of DMC, its subsidiaries, its joint operations and its |
| | | investments in associates. |
| | 7 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | Subsidiaries |
| | | |
| | | Subsidiaries are all entities (including structured entities) over which the DMC group of entities has control. The |
| | | group controls an entity where the group is exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns from its involvement with |
| | | the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power to direct the activities of the entity. Subsidiaries |
| | | are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the group and are deconsolidated from the |
| | | date that control ceases. Intercompany transactions, balances and unrealized gains and losses from intercompany |
| | | transactions are eliminated. |
| | | |
| | | Joint Operations |
| | | |
| | | Joint operations are contractual arrangements which involve joint control between the parties. In the mining |
| | | industry, these arrangements govern the formation, ownership and ongoing operation and management of various |
| | | mineral property interests contributed to the joint operation. A joint operation may or may not be structured through |
| | | a separate financial vehicle. The consolidated financial statements of the Company include its share of the assets |
| | | in such joint operations, together with its share of the liabilities, revenues and expenses arising jointly or otherwise |
| | | from those operations. Al such amounts are measured in accordance with the terms of each arrangement. |
| | | |
| | | Investments in associates |
| | | |
| | | An associate is an entity over which the Company has significant influence and is neither a subsidiary, nor an |
| | | interest in a joint operation. Significant influence is the ability to participate in the financial and operating policy |
| | | decisions of the entity without having control or joint control over those policies. |
| | | | |
| | | Associates are accounted for using the equity method. Under this method, the investment in associates is initially |
| | | recorded at cost and adjusted thereafter to record the Company’s share of post-acquisition earnings or loss of the |
| | | associate as if the associate had been consolidated. The carrying value of the investment is also increased or |
| | | decreased to reflect the Company’s share of capital transactions, including amounts recognized in other |
| | | comprehensive income, and for accounting changes that relate to periods subsequent to the date of acquisition. |
| | | Dilution gains or losses arising from changes in the interest in investments in associates are recognized in the |
| | | statement of income or loss. |
| | | | |
| | | The Company assesses at each period-end whether there is any objective evidence that an investment in an |
| | | associate is impaired. If impaired, the carrying value of the Company's share of the underlying assets of the |
| | | associate is written down to its estimated recoverable amount, being the higher of fair value less costs of disposal |
| | | or value in use, and charged to the statement of income or loss. |
| | | |
| | | B. Foreign currency translation |
| | | |
| | | Functional and presentation currency |
| | | |
| | | Items included in the financial statements of each entity in the DMC group are measured using the currency of the |
| | | primary economic environment in which the entity operates (“the functional currency”). Primary and secondary |
| | | indicators are used to determine the functional currency. Primary indicators include the currency that mainly |
| | | influences sales prices, labour, material and other costs. Secondary indicators include the currency in which funds |
| | | from financing activities are generated and in which receipts from operating activities are usually retained. |
| | | Typical y, the local currency has been determined to be the functional currency of Denison’s entities. |
| | | |
| | | The financial statements of entities that have a functional currency different from the presentation currency of DMC |
| | | (“foreign operations”) are translated into Canadian dollars as follows: assets and liabilities-at the closing rate at the |
| | | date of the statement of financial position, and income and expenses-at the average rate of the period (as this is |
| | | considered a reasonable approximation to actual rates). Al resulting changes are recognized in other |
| | | comprehensive income or loss as cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments. |
| | | | |
| | | When the Company disposes of its entire interest in a foreign operation, or loses control, joint control, or significant |
| | | influence over a foreign operation, the foreign currency gains or losses accumulated in other comprehensive |
| | | income or loss related to the foreign operation are recognized in the statement of income or loss as translational |
| | | foreign exchange gains or losses. |
| | | |
| | | Transactions and balances |
| | | |
| | | Foreign currency transactions are translated into an entity’s functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing |
| | | at the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of foreign |
| | 8 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | currency transactions and from the translation at year-end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities |
| | | denominated in currencies other than an operation’s functional currency are recognized in the statement of income |
| | | or loss as transactional foreign exchange gains or losses. |
| | | |
| | | C. Cash and cash equivalents |
| | | |
| | | Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, deposits held with banks, and other short-term highly liquid |
| | | investments with original maturities of three months or less which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in |
| | | value. |
| | | | |
| | | D. Financial instruments |
| | | |
| | | Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognized when the Company becomes a party to the contractual |
| | | provisions of a financial instrument. Financial assets are derecognized when the rights to receive cash flows from |
| | | the assets have expired or have been transferred and the Company has transferred substantial y all risks and |
| | | rewards of ownership. Financial liabilities are derecognized when the obligations specified in the contract are |
| | | discharged, cancel ed or expire. |
| | | | |
| | | At initial recognition, the Company classifies its financial instruments in the fol owing categories: |
| | | |
| | | Financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss (“FVTPL”) |
| | | |
| | | A financial asset is classified in this category if it is a derivative instrument, an equity instrument for which the |
| | | Company has not made the irrevocable election to classify as fair value through other comprehensive income |
| | | (“FVTOCI”), or a debt instrument that is not held within a business model whose objective includes holding the |
| | | financial assets in order to collect contractual cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest. |
| | | Derivative financial liabilities and contingent consideration liabilities related to business combinations are also |
| | | classified in this category. Financial instruments in this category are recognized initially and subsequently at fair |
| | | value. Transaction costs are expensed in the statement of income or loss. Gains and losses arising from changes |
| | | in fair value are presented in the statement of income or loss – within other income (expense) - in the period in |
| | | which they arise. |
| | | |
| | | Financial assets at amortized cost |
| | | |
| | | A financial asset is classified in this category if it is a debt instrument and / or other similar asset that is held within |
| | | a business model whose objective is to hold the asset in order to col ect the contractual cash flows (i.e. principal |
| | | and interest). Financial assets in this category are initially recognized at fair value plus transaction costs and |
| | | subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method less a provision for impairment. |
| | | Interest income is recorded in the statement of income or loss through finance income. |
| | | |
| | | Financial liabilities at amortized cost |
| | | |
| | | Al financial liabilities that are not recorded as FVTPL are classified in this category and are initial y recognized less |
| | | a discount (when material) to reduce the financial liabilities to fair value and less any directly attributable transaction |
| | | costs. Subsequently, financial liabilities are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. Interest |
| | | expense is recorded in the statement of income or loss through finance expense. |
| | | |
| | | Refer to the “Fair Value of Financial Instruments” section of note 23 for the Company’s classification of its financial |
| | | assets and liabilities within the fair value hierarchy. |
| | | | |
| | | E. Impairment of financial assets | | |
| | | |
| | | At each reporting date, the Company assesses the expected credit losses associated with its financial assets that |
| | | are not carried at FVTPL. Expected credit losses are calculated based on the dif erence between the contractual |
| | | cash flows and the cash flows that the Company expects to receive, discounted, where applicable, based on the |
| | | asset’s original effective interest rate. |
| | | | |
| | | For “Trade and other receivables”, the Company calculates expected credit losses based on historical credit loss |
| | | experience, adjusted for forward-looking factors specific to debtors and the economic environment. In recording |
| | | an impairment loss, the carrying amount of the asset is reduced by this computed amount either directly or indirectly |
| | | through the use of an allowance account. |
| | 9 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | F. Inventories |
| | | |
| | | Expenditures, including depreciation, depletion and amortization of production assets, incurred in the mining and |
| | | processing activities that wil result in future concentrate production are deferred and accumulated as ore in |
| | | stockpiles, in-process inventories and concentrate inventories. These amounts are carried at the lower of weighted |
| | | average cost or net realizable value (“NRV”). NRV is calculated as the estimated future concentrate price (net of |
| | | sel ing costs) less the estimated costs to complete production into a saleable form. |
| | | |
| | | Stockpiles are comprised of coarse ore that has been extracted from the mine and is available for further |
| | | processing. Mining production costs are added to the stockpile as incurred and removed from the stockpile based |
| | | upon the weighted average cost per tonne of ore produced from mines considered to be in commercial production. |
| | | The current portion of ore in stockpiles represents the amount expected to be processed in the next twelve months. |
| | | |
| | | In-process and concentrate inventories include the cost of the ore removed from the stockpile, a pro-rata share of |
| | | the amortization of the associated mineral property, as well as production costs incurred to process the ore into a |
| | | saleable product. Processing costs typically include labor, chemical reagents and directly attributable mil overhead |
| | | expenditures. Items are valued at weighted average cost. |
| | | |
| | | Materials and other supplies held for use in the production of inventories are carried at weighted average cost and |
| | | are not written down below that cost if the finished products in which they wil be incorporated are expected to be |
| | | sold at or above cost. However, when a decline in the price of concentrates indicates that the cost of the finished |
| | | products exceeds NRV, the materials are written down to NRV. In such circumstances, the replacement cost of |
| | | the materials may be the best available measure of their net realizable value. |
| | | | |
| | | G. Property, plant and equipment |
| | | |
| | | Plant and equipment |
| | | |
| | | Plant and equipment are recorded at acquisition or production cost and carried net of depreciation and |
| | | impairments. Cost includes expenditures incurred by the Company that are directly attributable to the acquisition |
| | | of the asset. Subsequent costs are included in the asset’s carrying amount or recognized as a separate asset, as |
| | | appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item wil flow to the Company |
| | | and the cost can be measured reliably. The carrying amount of a replaced asset is derecognized when replaced. |
| | | Repairs and maintenance costs are charged to the statement of income and loss during the period in which they |
| | | are incurred. |
| | | |
| | | Depreciation is calculated on a straight line or unit of production basis as appropriate. Where a straight line |
| | | methodology is used, the assets are depreciated to their estimated residual value over an estimated useful life |
| | | which ranges from three to twenty years depending upon the asset type. Where a unit of production methodology |
| | | is used, the assets are depreciated to their estimated residual value over the useful life defined by management’s |
| | | best estimate of recoverable reserves and resources in the current estimated mine plan. When assets are retired |
| | | or sold, the resulting gains or losses are reflected in the statement of income or loss as a component of other |
| | | income or expense. The Company allocates the amount initially recognized in respect of an item of plant and |
| | | equipment to its significant parts and depreciates separately each such part over its useful life. Residual values, |
| | | methods of depreciation and useful lives of the assets are reviewed at least annual y and adjusted if appropriate. |
| | | |
| | | Where straight-line depreciation is utilized, the range of useful lives for various asset classes is generally as follows: |
| | | |
| | | | Buildings | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 15 - 20 years; |
| | | | Production machinery and equipment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5 - 7 years; |
| | | | Other | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3 – 5 years. |
| | | |
| | | Mineral property acquisition, exploration, evaluation and development costs |
| | | |
| | | Costs relating to mineral and / or exploration rights acquired through a business combination or asset acquisition |
| | | are capitalized and reported as part of “Property, plant and equipment”. |
| | | |
| | | Exploration expenditures are expensed as incurred. |
| | | |
| | | Evaluation expenditures are expensed as incurred, until an area of interest is considered by management to be |
| | | sufficiently advanced. Once this determination is made, the area of interest is classified as an “Advanced |
| | | Evaluation Stage” mineral property, a component of the Company’s mineral properties, and al further non- |
| | | exploration expenditures for the current and subsequent periods are capitalized. These expenses can include |
| | 10 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | further evaluation expenditures such as mining method selection and optimization, metallurgical sampling test work |
| | | and costs to further delineate the ore body to a higher confidence level. |
| | | |
| | | Once commercial viability and technical feasibility has been established for a property, the property is classified |
| | | as a “Development Stage” mineral property, an impairment test is performed on transition, and all further |
| | | development costs are capitalized to the asset. Further development costs include costs related to constructing a |
| | | mine, such as shaft sinking and access, lateral development, drift development, engineering studies and |
| | | environmental permit ing, infrastructure development and the costs of maintaining the site until commercial |
| | | production. |
| | | |
| | | Such capital costs represent the net expenditures incurred and capitalized as at the balance sheet date and do |
| | | not necessarily reflect present or future values. |
| | | |
| | | Once a development stage mineral property goes into commercial production, the property is classified as |
| | | “Producing” and the accumulated costs are amortized over the estimated recoverable reserves and resources in |
| | | the current mine plan using a unit of production basis. Commercial production occurs when a property is |
| | | substantially complete and ready for its intended use. |
| | | |
| | | Proceeds received from the sale of an interest in a property are credited against the carrying value of the property, |
| | | with any difference recorded in the statement of income or loss as a gain or loss on sale within other income and |
| | | expense. |
| | | |
| | | Lease assets (and lease obligations) |
| | | |
| | | At the inception of a contract, the Company assesses whether a contract is, or contains, a lease. A contract is, or |
| | | contains, a lease, if the contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in |
| | | exchange for consideration. To assess whether a contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified |
| | | asset, the Company assesses whether: |
| | | • | the contract involves the use of an identified asset – this may be specified explicitly or implicitly and should be |
| | | | physically distinct or represent substantially all of the capacity of a physically distinct asset. If the supplier has |
| | | | a substantive substitution right, then the asset is not identified; |
| | | • | the Company has the right to obtain substantially all of the economic benefits from the use of the asset |
| | | | throughout the period of use; and |
| | | • | the Company has the right to direct the use of the asset. The Company has this right when it has the decision- |
| | | | making rights that are most relevant to changing how and for what purpose the asset is used. In rare cases |
| | | | where the decision about how and for what purpose the asset is used is predetermined, the Company has the |
| | | | right to direct the use of the asset if either (a) the Company has the right to operate the asset; or (b) the |
| | | | Company designed the asset in a way that predetermines how and for what purpose it wil be used. |
| | | |
| | | If the contract contains a lease, the Company accounts for the lease and non-lease components separately. For |
| | | the lease component, a right-of-use asset and a corresponding lease liability are set-up at the date at which the |
| | | leased asset is available for use by the Company. The right-of-use asset is depreciated over the shorter of the |
| | | asset’s useful life and the lease term on a straight-line basis. |
| | | |
| | | The lease payments associated with the lease liability are discounted using either the interest rate implicit in the |
| | | lease, if available, or the Company’s incremental borrowing rate. Each lease payment is al ocated between the |
| | | liability and the finance cost (i.e. accretion) so as to produce a constant rate of interest on the remaining lease |
| | | liability balance. |
| | | |
| | | H. Impairment of non-financial assets |
| | | |
| | | Property, plant and equipment assets are assessed at the end of each reporting period to determine if there is any |
| | | indication that the asset may be impaired. If any such indication exists, an estimate of the recoverable amount of |
| | | the asset is made. For the purpose of measuring recoverable amounts, assets are grouped at the lowest level, or |
| | | cash generating unit (“CGU”), for which there are separately identifiable cash inflows. The recoverable amount is |
| | | the higher of an asset’s fair value less costs of disposal and value in use (being the present value of the expected |
| | | future cash flows of the relevant asset or CGU, as determined by management). An impairment loss is recognized |
| | | for the amount by which the CGU’s carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. |
| | | | |
| | | Mineral property assets are tested for impairment using the impairment indicators under IFRS 6 “Exploration for |
| | | and Evaluation of Mineral Resources” up until the commercial and technical feasibility for the property is |
| | | established. From that point onwards, mineral property assets are tested for impairment using the impairment |
| | | indicators of IAS 36 “Impairment of Assets”. |
| | 11 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | I. Employee benefits |
| | | |
| | | Post-employment benefit obligations |
| | | |
| | | The Company assumed the obligation of a predecessor company to provide life insurance, supplemental health |
| | | care and dental benefits, excluding pensions, to its former Canadian employees who retired from active service |
| | | prior to 1997. The estimated cost of providing these benefits is actuarially determined using the projected benefits |
| | | method and is recorded on the balance sheet at its estimated present value. The interest cost on this unfunded |
| | | liability is being accreted over the remaining lives of this retiree group. Experience gains and losses are being |
| | | deferred as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss and are adjusted, as required, on |
| | | the obligations re-measurement date. |
| | | |
| | | Stock-based compensation |
| | | |
| | | The Company uses a fair value-based method of accounting for stock options to employees and to non-employees. |
| | | The fair value is determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model on the date of the grant. The cost is |
| | | recognized on a graded method basis, adjusted for expected forfeitures, over the applicable vesting period as an |
| | | increase in stock-based compensation expense and the contributed surplus account. When such stock options are |
| | | exercised, the proceeds received by the Company, together with the respective amount from contributed surplus, |
| | | are credited to share capital. |
| | | | |
| | | The Company also has a share unit plan pursuant to which it may grant share units to employees – the share units |
| | | are equity-settled awards. The Company determines the fair value of the awards on the date of grant. The cost is |
| | | recognized on a graded method basis, adjusted for expected forfeitures, over the applicable vesting period, as an |
| | | increase in share-based compensation expense and the contributed surplus account. When such share units are |
| | | settled for common shares, the applicable amounts of contributed surplus are credited to share capital. |
| | | |
| | | Termination benefits |
| | | |
| | | The Company recognizes termination benefits when it is demonstrably committed to either terminating the |
| | | employment of current employees according to a detailed formal plan without possibility of withdrawal, or providing |
| | | benefits as a result of an offer made to encourage voluntary termination. Benefits falling due more than twelve |
| | | months after the end of the reporting period are discounted to their present value. |
| | | |
| | | J. Reclamation provisions |
| | | | | |
| | | Reclamation provisions, which are legal and constructive obligations related to the retirement of tangible long-lived |
| | | assets, are recognized when such obligations are incurred and a reasonable estimate of the value can be |
| | | determined. These obligations are measured initially at the present value of expected cash flows using a pre-tax |
| | | discount rate reflecting risks specific to the liability and the resulting costs are capitalized and added to the carrying |
| | | value of the related assets. In subsequent periods, the liability is adjusted for the accretion of the discount and the |
| | | expense is recorded in the statement of income or loss. Changes in the amount or timing of the underlying future |
| | | cash flows or changes in the discount rate are immediately recognized as an increase or decrease in the carrying |
| | | amounts of the related asset, if one exists, and liability. These costs are amortized to the results of operations over |
| | | the life of the asset. Reductions in the amount of the liability are first applied against the amount of the net |
| | | reclamation asset with any excess value being recorded in the statement of income or loss. |
| | | | | |
| | | The Company’s activities are subject to numerous governmental laws and regulations. Estimates of future |
| | | reclamation liabilities for asset decommissioning and site restoration are recognized in the period when such |
| | | liabilities are incurred. These estimates are updated on a periodic basis and are subject to changing laws, |
| | | regulatory requirements, changing technology and other factors which wil be recognized when appropriate. |
| | | Liabilities related to site restoration include long-term treatment and monitoring costs and incorporate total |
| | | expected costs net of recoveries. Expenditures incurred to dismantle facilities, restore and monitor closed resource |
| | | properties are charged against the related reclamation liability. | |
| | | |
| | | K. Provisions |
| | | |
| | | Provisions for restructuring costs and legal claims, where applicable, are recognized in liabilities when the |
| | | Company has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events, it is probable that an outflow of |
| | | resources wil be required to settle the obligation, and the amount can be reliably estimated. Provisions are |
| | | measured at management’s best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the obligation at the end of the |
| | | reporting period, and are discounted to present value where the impact of the discount is material. The Company |
| | | performs evaluations to identify onerous contracts and, where applicable, records provisions for such contracts. |
| | 12 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | L. Current and deferred Income tax |
| | | |
| | | Current income tax payable is based on taxable income for the period. Taxable income differs from income as |
| | | reported in the statement of income or loss because it excludes items of income or expense that are taxable or |
| | | deductible in other periods and it further excludes items that are never taxable or deductible. The Company’s |
| | | liability for current tax is calculated using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance |
| | | sheet date. |
| | | | |
| | | Deferred income taxes are accounted for using the balance sheet liability method. Deferred income tax assets and |
| | | liabilities are computed based on temporary differences between the financial statement carrying values of the |
| | | existing assets and liabilities and their respective income tax bases used in the computation of taxable income. |
| | | Computed deferred tax liabilities are generally recognized for all taxable temporary differences and deferred tax |
| | | assets are recognized to the extent that it is probable that taxable income wil be available against which deductible |
| | | temporary differences can be utilized. Such assets and liabilities are not recognized if the temporary difference |
| | | arises from goodwil or from the initial recognition (other than in a business combination) of other assets and |
| | | liabilities in a transaction that affects neither the taxable income nor the accounting income. Deferred tax liabilities |
| | | are recognized for taxable temporary differences arising on investments in subsidiaries and investments, and |
| | | interests in joint ventures, except where the Company is able to control the reversal of the temporary differences |
| | | and it is probable that the temporary dif erences wil not reverse in the foreseeable future. The carrying amount of |
| | | deferred tax assets is reviewed at each balance sheet date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable |
| | | that sufficient taxable earnings wil be available to allow all or part of the asset to be recovered. |
| | | | |
| | | Deferred tax is calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the period when the liability is settled or the |
| | | asset realized, based on tax rates and tax laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance |
| | | sheet date. Deferred tax is charged or credited to the statement of income or loss (or comprehensive income or |
| | | loss in some specific cases), except when it relates to items charged or credited directly to equity, in which case |
| | | the deferred tax is also recorded within equity. |
| | | | |
| | | Income tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to offset the assets and liabilities |
| | | and when they relate to income taxes levied by the same tax authority on either the same taxable entity or different |
| | | taxable entities where there is an intention to settle the balance on a net basis. |
| | | |
| | | M. Flow-through common shares |
| | | | |
| | | The Company’s Canadian exploration activities have been financed in part through the issuance of flow-through |
| | | common shares, whereby the Canadian income tax deductions relating to these expenditures are claimable by the |
| | | subscribers and not by the Company. The proceeds from issuing flow-through shares are allocated between the |
| | | offering of shares and the sale of tax benefits. The al ocation is based on the difference (“premium”) between the |
| | | quoted price of the Company’s existing shares and the amount the investor pays for the actual flow-through shares. |
| | | A liability is recognized for the premium when the shares are issued, and is extinguished when the tax effect of the |
| | | temporary differences, resulting from the renunciation of the tax deduction to the flow-through shareholders, is |
| | | recorded - with the difference between the liability and the value of the tax assets renounced being recorded as a |
| | | deferred tax expense. The tax effect of the renunciation is recorded at the time the Company makes the |
| | | renunciation to its subscribers – which may differ from the effective date of renunciation. If the flow-through shares |
| | | are not issued at a premium, a liability is not established, and on renunciation the ful value of the tax assets |
| | | renounced is recorded as a deferred tax expense. |
| | | | |
| | | N. Revenue recognition |
| | | |
| | | Revenue from pre-sold toll milling services |
| | | |
| | | Revenue from the pre-sale of toll mil ing arrangement cash flows is recognized as the toll milling services are |
| | | provided. At contract inception, the Company estimates the expected transaction price of the toll mil ing services |
| | | being sold based on available information and calculates an average per unit transaction price that applies over |
| | | the life of the contract. This unit price is used to draw-down the deferred revenue balance as the toll mil ing services |
| | | occur. When changes occur to the expected timing, or volume of toll mil ing services, the per unit transaction price |
| | | is adjusted to reflect the change (such review to be done annually, at a minimum), and a cumulative catch up |
| | | adjustment is made to reflect the updated rate. The amount of the upfront payment received from the toll milling |
| | | pre-sale arrangements includes a significant financing component due to the longer term nature of such |
| | | agreements. As such, the Company also recognizes accretion expense on the deferred revenue balance which is |
| | | recorded in the statement of income or loss through “Finance expense, net”. |
| | | |
| | 13 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | Revenue from environmental services (i.e. Closed Mines Group) |
| | | |
| | | Environmental service contracts represent a series of distinct performance obligations that are substantially the |
| | | same and have the same pattern of transfer of control to the customer. The transaction price is estimated at |
| | | contract inception and is recognized over the life of the contract as control is transferred to the customer. Variable |
| | | consideration, where applicable, is estimated at contract inception using either the expected value method or the |
| | | most likely amount method. If it is highly probable that a subsequent reversal of revenue wil not occur when the |
| | | uncertainty has been resolved, the Company wil recognize as revenue the estimated transaction price, including |
| | | the estimate of the variable portion, upon transfer of control to the customer, otherwise the variable portion of the |
| | | transaction price wil be constrained, and wil not be recognized as revenue until the uncertainty has been resolved. |
| | | | |
| | | Revenue from management services (i.e. UPC) |
| | | |
| | | The management services arrangement with UPC represents a series of distinct performance obligations that are |
| | | substantially the same and have the same pattern of transfer of control to the customer. The transaction price for |
| | | the contract is estimated at contract inception and is recognized over the life of the contract as control is transferred |
| | | to the customer as the services are provided. The variable consideration related to the net asset value (“NAV”) |
| | | based management fee was estimated at contract inception using the expected value method. It was determined |
| | | that it is highly probable that a subsequent reversal of revenue would occur if the variable consideration was |
| | | included in the transaction price, and as such, the variable portion of the transaction price wil be measured and |
| | | recognized when the uncertainty has been resolved (i.e. when the actual NAV has been calculated). |
| | | | |
| | | Commission revenue earned on acquisition or sale of U3O8 and UF6 on behalf of UPC (or other parties where |
| | | Denison acts as an agent) is recognized when control of the related U3O8 or UF6 passes to the customer, which is |
| | | the date when title of the U3O8 and UF6 passes to the customer. |
| | | | |
| | | Revenue from spot sales of uranium |
| | | |
| | | In a uranium supply arrangement, the Company is contractually obligated to provide uranium concentrates to the |
| | | customer. Each delivery is considered a separate performance obligation under the contract – revenue is |
| | | measured based on the transaction price specified in the contract and the Company recognizes revenue when |
| | | control to the uranium has been transferred to the customer. |
| | | |
| | | Uranium can be delivered either to the customer directly (physical deliveries) or notional y under title within a |
| | | uranium storage facility (notional deliveries). For physical deliveries to customers, the terms in the supply |
| | | arrangement specify the location of delivery and revenue is recognized when control transfers to the customer |
| | | which is general y when the uranium has been delivered and accepted by the customer at that location. For notional |
| | | deliveries at a uranium storage facility, revenue is recognized on the date that the Company specifies the storage |
| | | facility to transfer title of a contractually specified quantity of uranium to a customer’s account at the storage facility. |
| | | | | |
| | | O. Earnings (loss) per share |
| | | |
| | | Basic earnings (loss) per share (“EPS”) is calculated by dividing the net income or loss for the period attributable |
| | | to equity owners of DMC by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. |
| | | |
| | | Diluted EPS is calculated by adjusting the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for dilutive |
| | | instruments. The number of shares included with respect to options, warrants and similar instruments is computed |
| | | using the treasury stock method. |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | 3. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND JUDGEMENTS |
| | | |
| | | The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS requires the use of certain critical |
| | | accounting estimates and judgements that affect the amounts reported. It also requires management to exercise |
| | | judgement in applying the Company’s accounting policies. These judgements and estimates are based on |
| | | management’s best knowledge of the relevant facts and circumstances taking into account previous experience. |
| | | Although the Company regularly reviews the estimates and judgements made that affect these financial |
| | | statements, actual results may be materially different. |
| | | |
| | 14 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | Significant estimates and judgements made by management relate to: |
| | | |
| | | A. Determination of a mineral property being sufficiently advanced |
| | | |
| | | The Company fol ows a policy of capitalizing non-exploration related expenditures on properties it considers to be |
| | | sufficiently advanced. Once a mineral property is determined to be sufficiently advanced, that determination is |
| | | irrevocable and the capitalization policy continues to apply over the life of the property. In determining whether or |
| | | not a mineral property is sufficiently advanced, management considers a number of factors, including, but not |
| | | limited to: current uranium market conditions, the quality of resources identified, access to the resource, the |
| | | suitability of the resource to current mining methods, ease of permitting, confidence in the jurisdiction in which the |
| | | resource is located and mil processing complexity. |
| | | | |
| | | Many of these factors are subject to risks and uncertainties that can support a “sufficiently advanced” determination |
| | | as at one point in time but not support it at another. The final determination requires significant judgment on the |
| | | part of the Company’s management and directly impacts the carrying value of the Company’s mineral properties. |
| | | |
| | | B. Mineral property impairment reviews and impairment adjustments |
| | | |
| | | Mineral properties are tested for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying |
| | | amount may not be recoverable. When an indicator is identified, the Company determines the recoverable amount |
| | | of the property, which is the higher of an asset’s fair value less costs of disposal or value in use. An impairment |
| | | loss is recognized if the carrying value exceeds the recoverable amount. The recoverable amount of a mineral |
| | | property may be determined by reference to estimated future operating results and discounted net cash flows, |
| | | current market valuations of similar properties or a combination of the above. In undertaking this review, |
| | | management of the Company is required to make significant estimates of, amongst other things: reserve and |
| | | resource amounts, future production and sale volumes, forecast commodity prices, future operating, capital and |
| | | reclamation costs to the end of the mine’s life and current market valuations from observable market data which |
| | | may not be directly comparable. These estimates are subject to various risks and uncertainties, which may |
| | | ultimately have an effect on the expected recoverable amount of a specific mineral property asset. Changes in |
| | | these estimates could have a material impact on the carrying value of the mineral property amounts and the |
| | | impairment losses recognized. |
| | | |
| | | C. Deferred revenue – pre-sold toll milling: classification |
| | | |
| | | In February 2017, Denison closed an arrangement with Anglo Pacific Group PLC and its subsidiaries (the “APG |
| | | Arrangement” and “APG” respectively – see note 11). Under the APG Arrangement, Denison monetized its right |
| | | to receive future toll milling cash receipts from July 1, 2016 onwards from the MLJV under the current toll mil ing |
| | | agreement with the CLJV for an upfront cash payment. The APG Arrangement consisted of a loan structure and a |
| | | stream arrangement. Significant judgement was required to determine whether the APG Arrangement should be |
| | | accounted for as a financial obligation (i.e. debt) or deferred revenue. |
| | | | |
| | | Key factors that support the deferred revenue conclusion reached by management include, but are not limited to: |
| | | a) Limited recourse loan structure – amounts due to APG are generally repayable only to the extent of Denison’s |
| | | share of the tol mil ing revenues earned by the MLJV from the processing of the first 215 mil ion pounds of U3O8 |
| | | from the Cigar Lake mine on or after July 1, 2016, under the terms of the current Cigar Lake toll mil ing agreement; |
| | | and b) No warranty of the future rate of production - no warranty is provided by Denison to APG regarding the |
| | | future rate of production at the Cigar Lake mine and / or the McClean Lake mil , or the amount and / or collectability |
| | | of cash receipts to be received by the MLJV in respect of tol mil ing of Cigar Lake ore. |
| | | | |
| | | D. Deferred revenue – pre-sold toll milling: revenue recognition |
| | | |
| | | In February 2017, Denison closed the APG Arrangement and effectively monetized its right to receive specified |
| | | future tol mil ing cash receipts from the MLJV related to the current toll mil ing agreement with the CLJV. In |
| | | exchange, Denison received a net up-front payment of $39,980,000 which has been accounted for as a deferred |
| | | revenue liability as at the transaction close date. |
| | | | |
| | | Under IFRS 15, the Company is required to recognize a revenue component and a financing component as it |
| | | draws down the deferred revenue associated with the APG Arrangement over the life of the specified toll mil ing |
| | | production included in the APG Arrangement. In estimating both of these components, the Company is required |
| | | to make assumptions relating to the future tol mil ing production volume associated with Cigar Lake Phase 1 and |
| | | 2 ore reserves and resources (to end of mine life) and estimates of the annual timing of that production. Changes |
| | | in these estimates affect the underlying production profile, which in turn affects the average toll mil ing drawdown |
| | | rate used to recognize revenue. |
| | 15 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | When the average toll mil ing drawdown rate is changed, the impact is reflected on a life-to-date production basis |
| | | with a retroactive adjustment to revenue recorded in the current period. Going forward, each time the Company |
| | | updates its estimates of the underlying production profile for the APG Arrangement (typically in the quarter that |
| | | information relating to Cigar Lake uranium resource updates and / or production schedules becomes publicly |
| | | available), retroactive adjustments to revenue wil be recorded in the period that the revised estimate is determined |
| | | – such adjustments, which are non-cash in nature, could be material. |
| | | |
| | | E. Deferred tax assets and liabilities |
| | | | |
| | | Deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed in respect of taxes that are based on taxable profit. Taxable profit |
| | | wil often differ from accounting profit and management may need to exercise judgement to determine whether |
| | | some taxes are income taxes (and subject to deferred tax accounting) or operating expenses. |
| | | | |
| | | Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted or substantively enacted tax rates expected to apply |
| | | when the temporary differences between accounting carrying values and tax basis are expected to be recovered |
| | | or settled. The determination of the ability of the Company to utilize tax loss carry forwards and other deferred tax |
| | | assets to offset deferred tax liabilities requires management to exercise judgment and make certain assumptions |
| | | about the future performance of the Company. Management is required to assess whether it is “probable” that the |
| | | Company wil benefit from these prior losses and other deferred tax assets. Changes in economic conditions, |
| | | commodity prices and other factors could result in revisions to the estimates of the benefits to be realized or the |
| | | timing of utilizing the losses. |
| | | |
| | | F. Reclamation obligations |
| | | |
| | | Asset retirement obligations are recorded as a liability when the asset is initially constructed or a constructive or |
| | | legal obligation exists. The valuation of the liability typically involves identifying costs to be incurred in the future |
| | | and discounting them to the present using an appropriate discount rate for the liability. The determination of future |
| | | costs involves a number of estimates relating to timing, type of costs, mine closure plans, and review of potential |
| | | methods and technical advancements. Furthermore, due to uncertainties concerning environmental remediation, |
| | | the ultimate cost of the Company’s decommissioning liability could differ materially from amounts provided. The |
| | | estimate of the Company’s obligation is subject to change due to amendments to applicable laws and regulations |
| | | and as new information concerning the Company’s operations becomes available. The Company is not able to |
| | | determine the impact on its financial position, if any, of environmental laws and regulations that may be enacted in |
| | | the future. |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | 4. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
| | | |
| | | The cash and cash equivalent balance consists of: |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | At December 31 At December 31 |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Cash | | | | | | $ | 12,004 $ | | 1,583 |
| | | | Cash in MLJV and MWJV | | | | | | | 540 | | 1,397 |
| | | | Cash equivalents | | | | | | | 12,448 | | 5,210 |
| | | | | | | | | | $ | 24,992 $ | | 8,190 |
| | | |
| | | Cash equivalents consist of various investment savings account instruments and money market funds, all of which |
| | | are short term in nature, highly liquid and readily convertible into cash. |
| | | |
| | | |
| | 16 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | 5. TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES |
| | | |
| | | The trade and other receivables balance consists of: |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | At December 31 At December 31 |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Trade receivables | | | | | | $ | 2,644 $ | | 2,608 |
| | | | Receivables in MLJV and MWJV | | | | | | | 394 | | 1,125 |
| | | | Sales tax receivables | | | | | | | 154 | | | 92 |
| | | | Sundry receivables | | | | | | | 182 | | 198 |
| | | | | | | | | | $ | 3,374 $ | | 4,023 |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | 6. INVENTORIES |
| | | |
| | | The inventories balance consists of: |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | At December 31 At December 31 |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Uranium concentrates | | $ | | | | | | | | | - | $ | 526 |
| | | | Inventory of ore in stockpiles | | | | | | | 2,098 | | 2,098 |
| | | | Mine and mil supplies in MLJV | | | | | | | 3,015 | | 2,826 |
| | | | | | $ | | | | | 5,113 | $ | 5,450 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Inventories-by balance sheet presentation: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Current | | $ | | | | | 3,015 | $ | 3,352 |
| | | | Long term-ore in stockpiles | | | | | | | 2,098 | | 2,098 |
| | | | | | $ | | | | | 5,113 | $ | 5,450 |
| | | |
| | | In 2020, the Company sold all of its uranium concentrate inventory. |
| | | |
| | | Long-term ore in stockpile inventory represents an estimate of the amount of ore on the stockpile in excess of the |
| | | next twelve months of planned mil production. |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | 7. INVESTMENTS |
| | | |
| | | The investments balance consists of: |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | At December 31 At December 31 |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Investments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Equity instruments | | $ | | | | | 16,950 | $ | 12,104 |
| | | | | | $ | | | | | 16,950 | $ | 12,104 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Investments-by balance sheet presentation: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Current | | $ | | | | | 16,657 | $ | - |
| | | | Long-term | | | | | | | 293 | | 12,104 |
| | | | | | $ | | | | | 16,950 | $ | 12,104 |
| | | |
| | 17 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | The investments continuity summary is as fol ows: |
| | | |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Balance-January 1 | | | | | | $ | 12,104 | $ | 2,255 |
| | | | Proceeds from property disposals (note 10) | | | | | | | 270 | | | - |
| | | | Purchase of investments | | | | | | | | | | | 7 | | 511 |
| | | | Sale of investments | | | | | | | (477) | | | - |
| | | | Transfer from investment in associates at fair value (note 8) | | | | | | - | | 10,423 |
| | | | Fair value gain (loss) to profit and loss (note 20) | | | | | | | 5,046 | | (1,085) |
| | | | Balance-December 31 | | | | | | $ | 16,950 | $ | 12,104 |
| | | |
| | | At December 31, 2020, the Company holds equity instruments consisting of shares and warrants in publicly-traded |
| | | companies and no debt instruments. |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | 8. INVESTMENT IN ASSOCIATE |
| | | |
| | | In June 2016, Denison acquired a significant shareholding in GoviEx Uranium Inc (“GoviEx”). GoviEx is a mineral |
| | | resource company focused on the exploration and development of its uranium properties located in Africa. GoviEx |
| | | maintains a head office located in Canada and is a public company listed on the TSX Venture Exchange. Denison’s |
| | | ownership interest in GoviEx at December 31, 2020 is approximately 13.72%, based on publicly available |
| | | information, and it continues to have one director appointed to the GoviEx board of directors |
| | | |
| | | Through the voting power of its share ownership interest, its large warrant holdings and its seat on the board of |
| | | directors, Denison had the ability to demonstrate significant influence over GoviEx and used the equity method to |
| | | account for this investment up to September 30, 2019. On October 1, 2019 (the deconsolidation date), Denison |
| | | discontinued use of the equity method based on a determination that Denison’s influence over GoviEx was no |
| | | longer demonstrable as significant - due to the expiry of its warrant holdings and an increased ownership interest |
| | | in GoviEx’s main subsidiary by the Government of Niger during GoviEx’s third quarter of 2019. |
| | | |
| | | A continuity summary of the investment in GoviEx, using the equity method, is as fol ows: |
| | | |
| | | | (in thousands except share amounts) | | | | | | | Number of | | |
| | | | | Common Shares |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Balance-January 1, 2019 | | | | | | | 65,144,021 | | | 5,582 |
| | | | Equity share of net loss | | | | | | | | - | (678) |
| | | | Dilution gain | | | | | | | | - | 252 |
| | | | Deconsolidation of investment in GoviEx | | | | | | | | - | (5,156) |
| | | | Balance-December 31, 2019 | | | | | | | 65,144,021 $ | - |
| | | |
| | | On the deconsolidation date, Denison classified its equity investment in GoviEx as FVTPL. As a result, Denison |
| | | recognized a gain of $5,267,000 which represents the excess of the fair value of the investment on that date |
| | | ($10,423,000) as compared to the investment’s carrying value under the equity method ($5,156,000). |
| | | |
| | | In 2020, Denison’s investment in GoviEx has been classified as FVTPL and is included as a component of |
| | | Investments on the balance sheet (see note 7). |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | 18 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | 9. RESTRICTED CASH AND INVESTMENTS |
| | | |
| | | The Company has certain restricted cash and investments deposited to collateralize a portion of its reclamation |
| | | obligations. The restricted cash and investments balance consists of: |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | At December 31 At December 31 |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Cash and cash equivalents | | | | | | $ | 2,883 | $ | 2,859 |
| | | | Investments | | | | | | | 9,135 | | 9,135 |
| | | | | | | | | | $ | 12,018 | $ | 11,994 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Restricted cash and investments-by item: | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | El iot Lake reclamation trust fund | | | | | | $ | 2,883 | $ | 2,859 |
| | | | Letters of credit facility pledged assets | | | | | | | 9,000 | | 9,000 |
| | | | Letters of credit additional collateral | | | | | | | 135 | | 135 |
| | | | | | | | | | $ | 12,018 | $ | 11,994 |
| | | |
| | | At December 31, 2020 and December 21, 2019, investments consist of guaranteed investment certificates with |
| | | maturities of more than 90 days. |
| | | |
| | | Elliot Lake reclamation trust fund |
| | | |
| | | The Company has the obligation to maintain its decommissioned El iot Lake uranium mine pursuant to a |
| | | Reclamation Funding Agreement effective December 21, 1995 (“Agreement”) with the Governments of Canada |
| | | and Ontario. The Agreement, as further amended in February 1999, requires the Company to maintain funds in |
| | | the reclamation trust fund equal to estimated reclamation spending for the succeeding six calendar years, less |
| | | interest expected to accrue on the funds during the period. Withdrawals from this reclamation trust fund can only |
| | | be made with the approval of the Governments of Canada and Ontario to fund El iot Lake monitoring and site |
| | | restoration costs. |
| | | |
| | | In 2020, the Company deposited an additional $803,000 into the Elliot Lake reclamation trust fund and withdrew |
| | | $811,000. In 2019, the Company deposited an additional $477,000 into the Elliot Lake reclamation trust fund and |
| | | withdrew $797,000. |
| | | |
| | | Letters of credit facility pledged assets |
| | | |
| | | At December 31, 2020, the Company had on deposit $9,000,000 with the Bank of Nova Scotia (“BNS”) as pledged |
| | | restricted cash and investments pursuant to its obligations under an amended and extended letters of credit facility |
| | | (see notes 11, 13 and 14). The funds were initial y deposited in 2017. | |
| | | |
| | | Letters of credit additional col ateral |
| | | |
| | | At December 31, 2020, the Company had on deposit an additional $135,000 of cash collateral with BNS in respect |
| | | of the portion of its issued reclamation letters of credit in excess of the collateral available under its letters of credit |
| | | facility (see notes 13 and 14). |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | 19 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | 10. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT |
| | | |
| | | The property, plant and equipment (“PP&E”) continuity summary is as follows: |
| | | |
| | | | | | Plant and Equipment | | | | Mineral | Total |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | Owned | Right-of-Use | | | | Properties | PP&E |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Cost: | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Balance – January 1, 2019 | $ 103,430 $ | | | - $ 178,947 $ 282,377 |
| | | | Adoption of IFRS 16 | | - | | | | | | | | 944 | - | 944 |
| | | | Additions | | | | | | | | | 376 | 38 | 534 | 948 |
| | | | Disposals | | (104) | | | | | | | (76) | - | (180) |
| | | | Reclamation adjustment (note 13) | | | | | | | | | 885 | - | | | - | 885 |
| | | | Balance – December 31, 2019 | $ 104,587 $ | | | | | | | 906 $ 179,481 $ 284,974 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Additions | | | | | | | | | 16 | 26 | 262 | 304 |
| | | | Disposals | | | | | | | | | (60) | (41) | - | (101) |
| | | | Reclamation adjustment (note 13) | | 1,544 | | | - | | | - | 1,544 |
| | | | Balance – December 31, 2020 | $ 106,087 $ | | | | | | | 891 $ 179,743 $ 286,721 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Accumulated amortization, depreciation: | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Balance – January 1, 2019 | $ | (24,086) $ | | | - $ | | | - $ | (24,086) |
| | | | Amortization | | (212) | | | - | | | - | (212) |
| | | | Depreciation | | (3,527) | | | | | | | (237) | - | (3,764) |
| | | | Disposals | | | | | | | | | 95 | 40 | - | 135 |
| | | | Reclamation adjustment (note 13) | | | | | | | | | 212 | - | | | - | 212 |
| | | | Balance – December 31, 2019 | $ | (27,518) $ | | | | | | | (197) $ | - $ | (27,715) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Amortization | | (243) | | | - | | | - | (243) |
| | | | Depreciation | | (2,037) | | | | | | | (198) | - | (2,235) |
| | | | Disposals | | | | | | | | | 60 | 39 | - | 99 |
| | | | Reclamation adjustment (note 13) | | | | | | | | | 243 | - | | | - | 243 |
| | | | Balance – December 31, 2020 | $ | (29,495) $ | | | | | | | (356) $ | - $ | (29,851) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Carrying value: | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Balance – December 31, 2019 | $ | 77,069 $ | | | | | | | 709 $ 179,481 $ 257,259 |
| | | | Balance – December 31, 2020 | $ | 76,592 $ | | | | | | | 535 $ 179,743 $ 256,870 |
| | | |
| | | Plant and Equipment - Owned |
| | | |
| | | The Company has a 22.5% interest in the McClean Lake mil through its ownership interest in the MLJV. The |
| | | carrying value of the mil , comprised of various infrastructure, building and machinery assets, represents |
| | | $68,909,000, or 90.0%, of the December 2020 total carrying value amount of owned PP&E assets. |
| | | |
| | | A toll mil ing agreement amongst the participants of the MLJV and the CLJV provides for the processing of certain |
| | | future output of the Cigar Lake mine at the McClean Lake mil , for which the owners of the McClean Lake mil |
| | | receive a toll mil ing fee and other benefits (Denison further has an agreement with APG reqarding the receipt of |
| | | certain toll milling fees it receives from this tol milling agreement – see note 11). In determining the units of |
| | | production amortization rate for the McClean Lake mil , the amount of production attributable to the mil assets |
| | | includes Denison’s expected share of mil feed related to MLJV ores, MWJV ores and the CLJV toll mil ing contract. |
| | | Milling activities in 2019 and 2020 at the McClean Lake mil have been dedicated to processing and packaging ore |
| | | from the Cigar Lake mine. Mil production in 2020 has been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. |
| | | |
| | | Plant and Equipment – Right-of-Use |
| | | |
| | | In conjunction with the adoption of IFRS 16 Leases (“IFRS 16”), effective January 1, 2019, the Company has |
| | | included the cost of various right-of-use (“ROU”) assets within PP&E. ROU assets consist of building, vehicle and |
| | | office equipment leases. The majority of the value is attributable to the building lease assets for the Company’s |
| | | offices and warehousing space located in Toronto and Saskatoon. | |
| | 20 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | Mineral Properties |
| | | |
| | | The Company has various interests in development, evaluation and exploration projects located in Canada which |
| | | are held directly or through option or various contractual agreements. The fol owing projects, all located in |
| | | Saskatchewan, represent $162,641,000, or 90.5%, of the carrying value amount of mineral property assets as at |
| | | December 31, 2020: |
| | | |
| | | a) Wheeler River - the Company has a 90.0% interest in the project (includes the Phoenix and Gryphon deposits); |
| | | b) Waterbury Lake - the Company has a 66.90% interest in the project (includes the THT and Huskie deposits) |
| | | | and also has a 2.0% net smelter return royalty on the portion of the project it does not own; |
| | | c) Midwest - the Company has a 25.17% interest in the project (includes the Midwest Main and Midwest A |
| | | | deposits); |
| | | d) Mann Lake - the Company has a 30.0% interest in the project; |
| | | e) Wolly - the Company has a 21.89% interest in the project; |
| | | f) Johnston Lake - the Company has a 100% interest in the project; and |
| | | g) McClean Lake - the Company has a 22.5% interest in the project (includes the Sue D, Sue E, Caribou, |
| | | | McClean North and McClean South deposits). |
| | | |
| | | Waterbury Lake |
| | | |
| | | In 2019, the Company increased its interest in the Waterbury Lake property from 65.92% to 66.57% and further |
| | | increased it again in 2020 to 66.90% under the terms of the dilution provisions in the agreements governing the |
| | | project (see note 22). |
| | | |
| | | Hook Carter |
| | | |
| | | In November 2016, Denison completed the purchase of an 80% interest in the Hook-Carter property, located in |
| | | the southwestern portion of the Athabasca Basin region in northern Saskatchewan, from ALX Uranium Corp |
| | | (“ALX”), with ALX retaining a 20% interest. |
| | | |
| | | Under terms in the agreement, Denison agreed to fund ALX’s share of the first $12,000,000 in expenditures on the |
| | | property. As at December 31, 2020, the Company has spent $6,719,000 towards ALX’s carried interest on the |
| | | project since its acquisition in November 2016 (December 31, 2019: $6,712,000). |
| | | |
| | | Moon Lake South |
| | | |
| | | In January 2016, the Company entered into an option agreement with CanAlaska Uranium Ltd (“CanAlaska”) to |
| | | earn an interest in CanAlaska’s Moon Lake South project located in the Athabasca Basin in Saskatchewan. Under |
| | | the terms of the option, Denison would earn an initial 51% interest in the project by spending $200,000 by |
| | | December 31, 2017 and would increase its interest to 75% by spending an additional $500,000 by December 31, |
| | | 2020. |
| | | |
| | | As at December 31, 2020, the Company has spent the required $700,000 under the option and has earned a 75% |
| | | interest in the project. |
| | | |
| | | Murphy Lake |
| | | |
| | | In November 2019, Denison completed an agreement with Eros Resources Corp (“Eros”) to acquire Eros’s minority |
| | | interest in the Murphy Lake project. Denison acquired Eros’s 17.42% minority interest in Murphy Lake in exchange |
| | | for the issuance of 32,262 common shares of DMC and the granting of a 1.5% net smelter return royalty on the |
| | | project. Denison’s interest in Murphy Lake is now 100%. |
| | | |
| | | Eros’s minority interest acquired by Denison has been accounted for as an asset acquisition with share based |
| | | consideration. Denison recorded a total acquisition value of $40,000 in 2019, which included transaction costs of |
| | | $21,000 and $19,000 of share based consideration which were fair valued using Denison’s closing share price on |
| | | November 28, 2019 of $0.58 per share. In 2020, the total acquisition value was reduced to $35,000 due to the |
| | | reversal of $5,000 of estimated transaction related costs. |
| | | |
| | | Talbot Lake |
| | | |
| | | In June 2020, the Company closed an agreement to sell its 100% interest in the Talbot Lake property to Argo Gold |
| | | Inc (“Argo Gold”). At closing, Denison received cash consideration of $135,000 and 1,350,000 common shares of |
| | | Argo Gold that were fair valued at $270,000. The shares were subject to a four month hold. The Company has |
| | | recognized a gain on sale of $405,000 in conjunction with the sale. |
| | 21 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | Under the terms of the agreement, Denison has also received a 2% net smelter royalty on the property and it is |
| | | entitled to receive an additional milestone payment, in cash or shares, if the property produces a resource estimate |
| | | that meets certain specified amounts in the agreement. |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | 11. DEFERRED REVENUE |
| | | |
| | | The deferred revenue balance consists of: |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | At December 31 At December 31 |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Deferred revenue – pre-sold toll milling: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | CLJV Toll Milling - APG | | | | | | $ | 36,617 $ | | 36,321 |
| | | | | | | | | | $ | 36,617 $ | | 36,321 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Deferred revenue-by balance sheet presentation: |
| | | | Current | | | | | | $ | 3,478 $ | | 4,580 |
| | | | Non-current | | | | | | | 33,139 | | 31,741 |
| | | | | | | | | | $ | 36,617 $ | | 36,321 |
| | | |
| | | The deferred revenue liability continuity summary is as fol ows: |
| | | |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Balance-January 1 | | | | | | $ | 36,321 $ | | 37,727 |
| | | | Revenue earned during the period (note 21) | | | | | | | (2,762) | | (4,609) |
| | | | Accretion | | | | | | | 3,058 | | 3,203 |
| | | | Balance-December 31 | | | | | | $ | 36,617 $ | | 36,321 |
| | | |
| | | Arrangement with Anglo Pacific Group PLC |
| | | |
| | | In February 2017, Denison closed an arrangement with APG under which Denison received an upfront payment |
| | | of $43,500,000 in exchange for its right to receive future tol mil ing cash receipts from the MLJV under the current |
| | | toll mil ing agreement with the CLJV from July 1, 2016 onwards. The up-front payment was based upon an estimate |
| | | of the gross toll mil ing cash receipts to be received by Denison discounted at a rate of 8.50%. |
| | | |
| | | The APG Arrangement represents a contractual obligation of Denison to pay onward to APG any cash proceeds |
| | | of future toll mil ing revenue earned by the Company related to the processing of the specified Cigar Lake ore |
| | | through the McClean Lake mil . At closing, the Company made payments to APG of $3,520,000, representing the |
| | | Cigar Lake toll milling cash receipts received by Denison in respect of toll milling activity for the period from July 1, |
| | | 2016 through January 31, 2017, and reflected those amounts as a reduction of the initial upfront amount received, |
| | | thereby reducing the initial deferred revenue balance to $39,980,000 at the transaction date. |
| | | |
| | | In connection with the closing of the APG Arrangement, Denison reimbursed APG for USD$100,000 in due |
| | | diligence costs and granted 1,673,077 share purchase warrants, exercisable for 3 years from the closing date at |
| | | an exercise price of $1.27 per share, to APG in satisfaction of a $435,000 arrangement fee payable (see note 17). |
| | | In addition, the terms of the BNS Letters of Credit Facility between BNS and Denison were amended to reflect |
| | | certain changes required to facilitate an Intercreditor Agreement between APG, BNS and Denison (see note 14). |
| | | |
| | | In 2019, the Company recognized $4,609,000 of toll mil ing revenue from the draw-down of deferred revenue, |
| | | based on Cigar Lake toll mil ing production of 18,012,000 pounds U3O8 (100% basis). The drawdown in 2019 |
| | | includes a cumulative increase in revenue for prior periods of $26,000 resulting from changes in estimates to the |
| | | toll mil ing drawdown rate in the first quarter of 2019. |
| | | |
| | | In 2020, the Company recognized $2,762,000 of toll mil ing revenue from the draw-down of deferred revenue, |
| | | based on Cigar Lake toll mil ing production of 10,069,000 pounds U3O8 (100% basis). The drawdown in 2020 |
| | | includes a cumulative increase in revenue for prior periods of $168,000 resulting from changes in estimates to the |
| | | toll mil ing drawdown rate during 2020. |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | 22 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | 12. POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS |
| | | |
| | | The Company provides post-employment benefits for former Canadian employees who retired on immediate |
| | | pension prior to 1997. The post-employment benefits provided include life insurance and medical and dental |
| | | benefits as set out in the applicable group policies. No post-employment benefits are provided to employees |
| | | outside the employee group referenced above. The post-employment benefit plan is not funded. |
| | | |
| | | The effective date of the most recent actuarial valuation of the accrued benefit obligation is October 1, 2020. The |
| | | amount accrued is based on estimates provided by the plan administrator which are based on past experience, |
| | | limits on coverage as set out in the applicable group policies and assumptions about future cost trends. The |
| | | significant assumptions used in the most recent valuation are listed below: |
| | | |
| | | • | Discount rate of 1.75%; |
| | | • | Medical cost increase trend rate of 4.09% in 2020, grading up to 5.30% per year by 2026, staying flat at 5.30% |
| | | | per year from 2026 to 2030 and then grading down to 4.05% per year from 2031 through to 2041; and |
| | | • | Dental cost increase trend rate of 4.50% in 2020, grading up to 5.30% per year by 2026, staying flat at 5.30% |
| | | | per year from 2026 to 2030 and then grading down to 4.05% per year from 2031 through to 2041. |
| | | |
| | | The post-employment benefits balance consists of: |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | At December 31 At December 31 |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Accrued benefit obligation | | | | | | $ | 1,361 $ | | 2,258 |
| | | | | | | | | | $ | 1,361 $ | | 2,258 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Post-employment benefits-by balance sheet presentation: | | | | |
| | | | Current | | | | | | $ | 120 $ | | 150 |
| | | | Non-current | | | | | | | 1,241 | | 2,108 |
| | | | | | | | | | $ | 1,361 $ | | 2,258 |
| | | |
| | | The post-employment benefits continuity summary is as follows: |
| | | |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Balance-January 1 | | | | | | $ | 2,258 | $ | 2,295 |
| | | | Accretion | | | | | | | 57 | | 70 |
| | | | Benefits paid | | | | | | | (90) | | (107) |
| | | | Experience gain adjustment | | | | | | | (864) | | | | - |
| | | | Balance-December 31 | | | | | | $ | 1,361 | $ | 2,258 |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | 13. RECLAMATION OBLIGATIONS |
| | | |
| | | | The reclamation obligations balance consists of: |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | At December 31 At December 31 |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Reclamation obligations-by item: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Elliot Lake | | | | | | $ | 21,523 $ | | 17,987 |
| | | | McClean and Midwest Joint Ventures | | | | | | | 16,875 | | 14,503 |
| | | | Other | | | | | | | | | | 22 | 22 |
| | | | | | | | | | $ | 38,420 $ | | 32,512 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Reclamation obligations-by balance sheet presentation: | | | | |
| | | | Current | | | | | | $ | 802 $ | | 914 |
| | | | Non-current | | | | | | | 37,618 | | 31,598 |
| | | | | | | | | | $ | 38,420 $ | | 32,512 |
| | | |
| | 23 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | | The reclamation obligations continuity summary is as follows: |
| | | |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Balance-January 1 | | | | | | $ | 32,512 $ | | 30,064 |
| | | | Accretion | | | | | | | 1,352 | | 1,361 |
| | | | Expenditures incurred | | | | | | | (826) | | (855) |
| | | | Liability adjustments-income statement (note 20) | | | | | | 3,595 | | 845 |
| | | | Liability adjustments-balance sheet (note 10) | | | | | | | 1,787 | | 1,097 |
| | | | Balance-December 31 | | | | | | $ | 38,420 $ | | 32,512 |
| | | |
| | | Site Restoration: Elliot Lake |
| | | |
| | | The Elliot Lake uranium mine was closed in 1992 and capital works to decommission this site were completed in |
| | | 1997. The remaining provision is for the estimated cost of monitoring the Tailings Management Areas at the |
| | | Denison and Stanrock sites and for treatment of water discharged from these areas. The Company conducts its |
| | | activities at both sites pursuant to licenses issued by the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (“CNSC”). The |
| | | above accrual represents the Company’s best estimate of the present value of the total future reclamation cost, |
| | | based on assumptions as to what levels of treatment wil be required in the future, discounted at 3.50% (2019: |
| | | 4.16%). As at December 31, 2020, the undiscounted amount of estimated future reclamation costs, in current year |
| | | dollars, is $32,335,000 (December 31, 2019: $31,604,000). Revisions to the reclamation liability for El iot Lake are |
| | | recognized in the income statement as the site is closed and there is no asset recognized for this site. |
| | | |
| | | Spending on restoration activities at the El iot Lake site is funded by the El iot Lake Reclamation Trust fund (see |
| | | note 9). |
| | | |
| | | Site Restoration: McClean Lake Joint Venture and Midwest Joint Venture |
| | | |
| | | The McClean Lake and Midwest operations are subject to environmental regulations as set out by the |
| | | Saskatchewan government and the CNSC. Cost estimates of the estimated future decommissioning and |
| | | reclamation activities are prepared periodically and filed with the applicable regulatory authorities for approval. The |
| | | above accrual represents the Company’s best estimate of the present value of the future reclamation cost |
| | | contemplated in these cost estimates discounted at 3.50% (2019: 4.16%). As at December 31, 2020, the |
| | | undiscounted amount of estimated future reclamation costs, in current year dollars, is $24,135,000 (December 31, |
| | | 2019: $23,685,000). The majority of the reclamation costs are expected to be incurred between 2038 and 2056. |
| | | Revisions to the reclamation liabilities for McClean Lake and Midwest are recognized on the balance sheet as |
| | | adjustments to the net reclamation assets associated with the sites. |
| | | |
| | | Under the Mineral Industry Environmental Protection Regulations (1996), the Company is required to provide its |
| | | pro-rata share of financial assurances to the province of Saskatchewan based on periodic filings of estimated |
| | | reclamation plans and the associated undiscounted future reclamation costs included therein. Accordingly, as at |
| | | December 31, 2020, the Company has in place irrevocable standby letters of credit, from a chartered bank, in |
| | | favour of the Saskatchewan Ministry of the Environment, totalling $24,135,000 which relate to the most recently |
| | | filed reclamation plan dated March 2016. An updated reclamation plan is required to be filed in 2021. |
| | | |
| | | |
| | 24 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | 14. OTHER LIABILITIES |
| | | |
| | | The other liabilities balance consists of: |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | At December 31 | At December 31 |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Debt obligations: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Lease obligations | | | | | | $ | | 582 $ | | 739 |
| | | | Loan obligations | | | | | | | | | 33 | 263 |
| | | | Flow-through share premium obligation (note 16) | | | | | | | | 22 | 902 |
| | | | | | | | | | $ | | 637 $ | | 1,904 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Other liabilities-by balance sheet presentation: | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Current | | | | | | $ | | 262 $ | | 1,372 |
| | | | Non-current | | | | | | | | 375 | | 532 |
| | | | | | | | | | $ | | 637 $ | | 1,904 |
| | | |
| | | Debt Obligations |
| | | |
| | | At December 31, 2020, the Company’s debt obligations are comprised of lease liabilities associated with the |
| | | accounting required under IFRS 16 and loan liabilities. The debt obligations continuity summary is as follows: |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Lease | | | | | | | Loan | | Total Debt |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Liabilitites | | | | | | | Liabilities | Obligations |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Balance – January 1, 2019 | | $ | | | | - $ | - $ | - |
| | | | Adoption of IFRS 16 | | | | | | 944 | - | | | 944 |
| | | | Accretion | | | | | | 76 | - | | | 76 |
| | | | Additions | | | | | | 38 | | | 632 | 670 |
| | | | Repayments | | | | | | (293) | | | (369) | (662) |
| | | | Liability adjustment gain (note 20) | | | | | | (26) | - | | | (26) |
| | | | Balance – December 31, 2019 | | $ | | | | 739 $ | | | 263 $ | 1,002 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Accretion | | | | | | 56 | - | | | 56 |
| | | | Additions | | | | | | 26 | - | | | 26 |
| | | | Repayments | | | | | | (237) | | | (230) | (467) |
| | | | Liability adjustment gain (note 20) | | | | | | (2) | - | (2) |
| | | | Balance – December 31, 2020 | | $ | | | | 582 $ | | | 33 $ | 615 |
| | | |
| | | Debt Obligations – Scheduled Maturities |
| | | |
| | | The fol owing table outlines the Company’s scheduled maturities of its debt obligations at December 31, 2020: |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Lease | | | | | | | Loan | | Total Debt |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Liabilitites | | | | | | | Liabilities | Obligations |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Maturity analysis – contractual undiscounted cash flows: | | | | | | | |
| | | | Next 12 months | | $ | | | | 231 $ | 9 $ | | | 240 |
| | | | One to five years | | | | | | 457 | | | 26 | 483 |
| | | | More than five years | | | | | | - | - | - |
| | | | Total obligation – end of period - undiscounted | | | | | 688 | | | 35 | 723 |
| | | | Present value discount adjustment | | | | | | (106) | | | (2) | (108) |
| | | | Total obligation – end of period - discounted | | $ | | | | 582 $ | | | 33 $ | 615 |
| | | |
| | | Letters of Credit Facility |
| | | |
| | | In 2020, the Company had a facility in place with BNS for credit of up to $24,000,000 with a one year term and a |
| | | maturity date of January 31, 2021 (the “2020 Facility”). Use of the 2020 Facility is restricted to non-financial letters |
| | | of credit in support of reclamation obligations. |
| | 25 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | The 2020 Facility contains a covenant to maintain a level of tangible net worth greater than or equal to the sum of |
| | | $131,000,000 and a pledge of $9,000,000 in restricted cash and investments as collateral for the facility (see note |
| | | 9). As additional security for the 2020 Facility, DMC has provided an unlimited full recourse guarantee and a pledge |
| | | of al of the shares of DMI. DMI has provided a first-priority security interest in al present and future personal |
| | | property and an assignment of its rights and interests under all material agreements relative to the McClean Lake |
| | | and Midwest projects. The 2020 Facility is subject to letter of credit fees of 2.40% (0.40% on the $9,000,000 |
| | | covered by pledged cash collateral) and standby fees of 0.75%. |
| | | |
| | | At December 31, 2020, the Company was in compliance with its 2020 Facility covenants and $24,000,000 of the |
| | | 2020 Facility was being utilized as collateral for certain letters of credit (December 31, 2019 - $24,000,000). During |
| | | 2020, the Company incurred letter of credit and standby fees of $398,000 (2019 - $397,000). |
| | | |
| | | In January 2021, the Company has entered into an agreement with BNS to amend the terms of the 2020 Facility |
| | | to extend the maturity date to January 31, 2022 (see note 26). |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | 15. INCOME TAXES |
| | | | |
| | | The income tax recovery balance from continuing operations consists of: |
| | | |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Deferred income tax: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Origination of temporary dif erences | | | | | | $ | 710 $ | | 4,940 |
| | | | Tax benefit-previously unrecognized tax assets | | | | | | 1,255 | | 1,326 |
| | | | Prior year over (under) provision | | | | | | | (1,105) | | (890) |
| | | | | | | | | | | 860 | | 5,376 |
| | | | Income tax recovery | | | | | | $ | 860 $ | | 5,376 |
| | | |
| | | The Company operates in multiple industries and jurisdictions, and the related income is subject to varying rates |
| | | of taxation. The combined Canadian tax rate reflects the federal and provincial tax rates in effect in Ontario, Canada |
| | | for each applicable year. A reconciliation of the combined Canadian tax rate to the Company’s effective rate of |
| | | income tax is as follows: |
| | | |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Loss before taxes | | | | | | $ | (17,143) $ | | (23,517) |
| | | | Combined Canadian tax rate | | | | | | | 26.50% | | 26.50% |
| | | | Income tax recovery at combined rate | | | | | | | 4,543 | | 6,232 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Difference in tax rates | | | | | | | 1,746 | | 2,048 |
| | | | Non-deductible amounts | | | | | | | (2,579) | | (2,675) |
| | | | Non-taxable amounts | | | | | | | 2,535 | | 2,362 |
| | | | Previously unrecognized deferred tax assets (1) | | | | | | | 1,255 | | 1,326 |
| | | | Renunciation of tax attributes-flow through shares | | | | | | (417) | | (403) |
| | | | Change in deferred tax assets not recognized | | | | | | | (5,960) | | (2,476) |
| | | | Change in tax rates, legislation | | | | | | | (55) | | (81) |
| | | | Prior year over (under) provision | | | | | | | (1,105) | | (890) |
| | | | Other | | | | | | | 897 | | (67) |
| | | | Income tax recovery | | | | | | $ | 860 $ | | 5,376 |
| | | |
| | | (1) The Company has recognized certain previously unrecognized Canadian tax assets in 2020 and 2019 as a result of the renunciation of certain |
| | | | tax benefits to subscribers pursuant to its December 2019 $4,715,460 and November 2018 $5,000,000 flow-through share offerings. |
| | | |
| | | The deferred income tax assets (liabilities) balance reported on the balance sheet is comprised of the temporary |
| | | differences as presented below: |
| | | |
| | 26 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | | | | | | | | At December 31 At December 31 |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Deferred income tax assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Property, plant and equipment, net | | | | | | $ | 387 $ | | 387 |
| | | | Post-employment benefits | | | | | | | 355 | | 590 |
| | | | Reclamation obligations | | | | | | | 11,709 | | 9,561 |
| | | | Tax loss carry forwards | | | | | | | 16,943 | | 15,827 |
| | | | Other | | | | | | | 7,747 | | 8,537 |
| | | | Deferred income tax assets-gross | | | | | | | 37,141 | | 34,902 |
| | | | Set-off against deferred income tax liabilities | | | | | | | (37,141) | | (34,902) |
| | | | Deferred income tax assets-per balance sheet | | | | | | $ | | - $ | - |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Deferred income tax liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Inventory | | | | | | $ | (757) $ | | (742) |
| | | | Property, plant and equipment, net | | | | | | | (44,436) | | (41,949) |
| | | | Other | | | | | | | (1,140) | | (1,135) |
| | | | Deferred income tax liabilities-gross | | | | | | | (46,333) | | (43,826) |
| | | | Set-off of deferred income tax assets | | | | | | | 37,141 | | 34,902 |
| | | | Deferred income tax liabilities-per balance sheet | | | | | $ | (9,192) $ | | (8,924) |
| | | |
| | | The deferred income tax liability continuity summary is as follows: |
| | | |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Balance-January 1 | | | | | | $ | (8,924) $ | | (12,963) |
| | | | Recognized in income (loss) | | | | | | | 860 | | 5,376 |
| | | | Recognized in other liabilities (flow-through shares) | | | | | | (902) | | (1,337) |
| | | | Recognized in other comprehensive income | | | | | | | (226) | - |
| | | | Balance-December 31 | | | | | | $ | (9,192) $ | | (8,924) |
| | | | |
| | | Management believes that it is not probable that sufficient taxable profit wil be available in future years to al ow |
| | | the benefit of the following deferred tax assets to be utilized: |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | At December 31 At December 31 |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Deferred income tax assets not recognized | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Property, plant and equipment | | | | | | $ | 4,744 | $ | 7,344 |
| | | | Tax losses – capital | | | | | | | 66,873 | | 66,783 |
| | | | Tax losses – operating | | | | | | | 42,635 | | 35,904 |
| | | | Tax credits | | | | | | | 1,126 | | 1,126 |
| | | | Other deductible temporary dif erences | | | | | | | 1,441 | | 1,571 |
| | | | Deferred income tax assets not recognized | | | | | | $ | 116,819 | $ | 112,728 |
| | | |
| | | | The expiry dates of the Company’s Canadian tax losses and credits is as fol ows: |
| | | |
| | | | | | Expiry | | | | At December 31 At December 31 |
| | | | (in thousands) | | Date | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Tax losses - gross | | 2025-2040 | | | $ | 220,039 | $ | 192,197 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Tax benefit at tax rate of 26% - 27% | | | | | | | 59,578 | | 51,731 |
| | | | Set-off against deferred tax liabilities | | | | | | | (16,943) | | (15,827) |
| | | | Total tax loss assets not recognized | | | | | | $ | 42,635 | $ | 35,904 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Tax credits | | 2025-2035 | | | | 1,126 | | 1,126 |
| | | | Total tax credit assets not recognized | | | | | | $ | 1,126 | $ | 1,126 |
| | | |
| | 27 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | 16. SHARE CAPITAL |
| | | |
| | | Denison is authorized to issue an unlimited number of common shares without par value. A continuity summary of |
| | | the issued and outstanding common shares and the associated dol ar amounts is presented below: |
| | | |
| | | | | Number of | | |
| | | | | Common | | |
| | | (in thousands except share amounts) | | Shares | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | Balance-January 1, 2019 | 589,175,086 $ | | | 1,331,214 |
| | | | Issued for cash: | | | |
| | | | Share issue proceeds | 6,934,500 | | 4,715 |
| | | | Share issue costs | | - | (423) |
| | | | Share option exercises | 663,150 | | 405 |
| | | | Share option exercises-fair value adjustment | | - | 140 |
| | | | Share unit exercises-fair value adjustment | 433,333 | | 299 |
| | | | Acquisition-Murphy Lake additional interest (note 10) | 32,262 | | 19 |
| | | | Flow-through share premium liability (note 14) | | - | (902) |
| | | | Share cancellations | (46,178) | - |
| | | | | 8,017,067 | | 4,253 |
| | | | Balance-December 31, 2019 | 597,192,153 $ | | | 1,335,467 |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | Issued for cash: | | | |
| | | | Share issue proceeds | 81,179,280 | | 33,933 |
| | | | Share issue costs | | - | (3,108) |
| | | | Share option exercises | 251,500 | | 148 |
| | | | Share option exercises-fair value adjustment | | - | 50 |
| | | | Share unit exercises-fair value adjustment | 358,949 | | 242 |
| | | | Flow-through share premium liability (note 14) | | - | (22) |
| | | | | 81,789,729 | | 31,243 |
| | | | Balance-December 31, 2020 | 678,981,882 $ | | | 1,366,710 |
| | | |
| | | Share Issues |
| | | |
| | | In December 2019, Denison completed a private placement of 6,934,500 flow-through common shares at a price |
| | | of $0.68 per share for gross proceeds of $4,715,460. The income tax benefits of this issue were renounced to |
| | | subscribers with an effective date of December 31, 2019. The related flow-through share premium liabilities are |
| | | included as a component of other liabilities on the balance sheet at December 31, 2019 and were extinguished |
| | | during 2020 when the tax benefit was renounced to the shareholders (see note 14). |
| | | |
| | | In April 2020, the Company completed a public offering of 28,750,000 common shares at a price of USD$0.20 per |
| | | share for gross proceeds of $8,041,000 (USD$5,750,000). The offering included the full exercise of an over- |
| | | allotment option of 3,750,000 common shares granted to the underwriters. |
| | | |
| | | In October 2020, the Company completed a public offering of 51,347,321 common shares at a price of USD$0.37 |
| | | per share for gross proceeds of approximately $24,962,000 (USD$18,999,000), which included the partial exercise |
| | | by the underwriters of their over-allotment option. |
| | | |
| | | In December 2020, Denison completed a private placement of 1,081,959 flow-through common shares at a price |
| | | of $0.86 per share for gross proceeds of $930,485. The income tax benefits of this issue were renounced to |
| | | subscribers with an effective date of December 31, 2020. The related flow-through share premium liabilities are |
| | | included as a component of other liabilities on the balance sheet at December 31, 2020 and wil be extinguished |
| | | during 2021 when the tax benefit is renounced to the shareholders (see note 14). |
| | | |
| | | Share Cancellations |
| | | |
| | | In February 2019, 46,178 shares were cancelled in connection with the January 2013 acquisition of JNR Resources |
| | | Inc (“JNR”). JNR shareholders were entitled to exchange their JNR shares for shares of Denison in accordance |
| | | with the share exchange ratio established for the acquisition. In January 2019, this right expired and the un- |
| | | exchanged shares for which shareholders had not elected to exercise their exchange rights were subsequently |
| | | cancelled. |
| | 28 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | Flow-Through Share Issues |
| | | |
| | | The Company finances a portion of its exploration programs through the use of flow-through share issuances. |
| | | Canadian income tax deductions relating to these expenditures are claimable by the investors and not by the |
| | | Company. |
| | | |
| | | As at December 31, 2020, the Company has satisfied its obligation to spend $4,715,460 on eligible exploration |
| | | expenditures by the end of fiscal 2020 as a result of the issuance of flow-through shares in December 2019. The |
| | | Company renounced the income tax benefits of this issue in February 2020, with an effective date of renunciation |
| | | to its subscribers of December 31, 2019. In conjunction with the renunciation, the flow-through share premium |
| | | liability at December 31, 2019 was extinguished and recognized as part of the deferred tax recovery in 2020 (see |
| | | note 15). |
| | | |
| | | As at December 31, 2020, the Company estimates that it incurred $Nil of expenditures towards its obligation to |
| | | spend $930,485 on eligible exploration expenditures by the end of fiscal 2021 as a result of the issuance of flow- |
| | | through shares in December 2020. |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | 17. SHARE PURCHASE WARRANTS |
| | | |
| | | A continuity of the issued and outstanding share purchase warrants in terms of common shares of the Company |
| | | and the associated dollar amounts is presented below: |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Weighted | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Average | | Number of | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Exercise | | Common | | Fair |
| | | | | | | | | | Price Per | | Shares | | Value |
| | | | | | | | | | | (in thousands except share amounts) | | Share (CAD) | | | | | | Issuable | | Amount |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Balance-December 31, 2019 | | $ | 1.27 | | | | | | | 1,673,077 $ | | 435 |
| | | | | | | | | | | Expiries | | | 1.27 | | | | | | | (1,673,077) | | (435) |
| | | | | | | | | | | Balance-December 31, 2020 | $ | - | | | | | | | | - $ | - |
| | | |
| | | The warrants noted above, issued in February 2017 in conjunction with the APG Arrangement (see note 11), |
| | | expired on February 14, 2020. On expiry, the balance was reclassified to Contributed Surplus. |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | 18. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION |
| | | |
| | | The Company’s share based compensation arrangements include share options, restricted share units (“RSUs”) |
| | | and performance share units (“PSUs”). |
| | | |
| | | A summary of share based compensation expense recognized in the statement of income (loss) is as fol ows: |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Share based compensation expense for: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Share options | | | | | | | | $ | (559) $ | | (776) |
| | | | | | | | | | | RSUs | | | | | | | | | (1,034) | | (1,043) |
| | | | | | | | | | | PSUs | | | | | | | | | (234) | | (403) |
| | | | | | | | | | | Share based compensation expense | | | | | | | | $ | (1,827) $ | | (2,222) |
| | | |
| | | An additional $1,290,000 in share-based compensation expense remains to be recognized, up until November |
| | | 2023, on outstanding options and share units at December 31, 2020. |
| | | |
| | | Share Options |
| | | |
| | | The Company’s stock-based compensation plan (the “Plan”) provides for the granting of share options up to 10% |
| | | of the issued and outstanding common shares at the time of grant, subject to a maximum of 39,670,000 common |
| | | shares. As at December 31, 2020, an aggregate of 23,401,593 options (December 31, 2019: 21,900,093) have |
| | | been granted (less cancellations) since the Plan’s inception in 1997. |
| | | |
| | 29 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | | Under the Plan, all share options are granted at the discretion of the Company’s board of directors, including any |
| | | vesting provisions if applicable. The term of any share option granted may not exceed ten years and the exercise |
| | | price may not be lower than the closing price of the Company’s shares on the last trading day immediately |
| | | preceding the date of grant. In general, share options granted under the Plan have five year terms and vesting |
| | | periods up to 24 months. |
| | | |
| | | | A continuity summary of the share options of the Company granted under the Plan for 2020 and 2019 is presented |
| | | below: |
| | | |
| | | | | | 2020 | | | | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | Weighted | | | | | | | | | | | Weighted |
| | | | | | | | | | | Average | | | | | | | | | | | Average |
| | | | | | | | | | | Exercise | | | | | | | | | | | Exercise |
| | | | | | Number of | Price per | | | | | Number of | | | | Price per |
| | Common | | | | | | | | Share | Common | | | | Share |
| | | | | | Shares | | | | | | | | | | (CAD) | | | | Shares | | | | (CAD) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Share options outstanding – January 1 | 13,827,243 $ | | | | | | | | 0.75 13,865,193 $ | 0.83 |
| | | | Grants | | 3,671,000 | | | | | | | | 0.46 | 3,005,000 | | | | 0.67 |
| | | | Exercises (1) | | (251,500) | | | | | | | | 0.59 | (663,150) | 0.61 |
| | | | Expiries | (1,424,000) | | | | | | | | 0.97 | (866,000) | 1.81 |
| | | | Forfeitures | | (745,500) | | | | | | | | 0.67 | (1,513,800) | | | | 0.79 |
| | | | Share options outstanding – December 31 | 15,077,243 $ | | | | | | | | 0.67 13,827,243 $ | 0.75 |
| | | | Share options exercisable – December 31 | 10,289,743 $ | | | | | | | | 0.74 | 9,747,721 $ | | | | 0.80 |
| | | |
| | | | (1) The weighted average share price at the date of exercise was CAD$0.72 (2019: CAD$0.70). |
| | | |
| | | A summary of the Company’s share options outstanding at December 31, 2020 is presented below: |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Weighted | | | Weighted- |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Average | | | Average |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Remaining | | | Exercise |
| | | | Range of Exercise | | | | | | | | | | | Contractual | | | | | | | Number of | Price per |
| | | | Prices per Share | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Life | | | | Common | | | | Share |
| | | | (CAD) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (Years) | | | | Shares | | | | (CAD) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Stock options outstanding | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | $ 0.25 to $ 0.49 | | | | | | | | | | 4.21 | 3,502,000 $ | | | | 0.45 |
| | | | $ 0.50 to $ 0.74 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2.26 | 6,443,643 | | | | 0.64 |
| | | | $ 0.75 to $ 0.99 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1.19 | 5,131,600 | | | | 0.85 |
| | | | Stock options outstanding - December 31, 2020 | | | | | | | | | | 2.35 | 15,077,243 $ | | | | 0.67 |
| | | |
| | | Options outstanding at December 31, 2020 expire between March 2021 and November 2025. |
| | | |
| | | The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing |
| | | model. The following table outlines the range of assumptions used in the model to determine the fair value of |
| | | options granted: |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2020 | | | | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Risk-free interest rate | | 0.27% - 0.67% | | | | | 1.31% - 1.65% |
| | | | Expected stock price volatility | | | | | | 44.16% - 54.16% | | 43.86% - 49.46% |
| | | | Expected life | | 3.4 years | | | | | 3.4 to 3.5 years |
| | | | Estimated forfeiture rate | | 2.84% - 3.08% | | | | | 2.82% - 3.12% |
| | | | Expected dividend yield | | | | | | | | | – | | | | | – |
| | | | Fair value per option granted | CAD$0.15 - CAD$0.25 | | | CAD$0.19 - CAD$0.26 |
| | | |
| | | The fair values of share options with vesting provisions are amortized on a graded method basis as share-based |
| | | compensation expense over the applicable vesting periods. |
| | | |
| | | |
| | 30 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | Share Units |
| | | |
| | | The Company has a share unit plan which provides for the granting of share unit awards to directors, officers and |
| | | employees of the Company. The maximum number of share units that are issuable under the share unit plan is |
| | | 15,000,000. Each share unit represents the right to receive one common share from treasury, subject to the |
| | | satisfaction of various time and / or performance conditions. |
| | | |
| | | Under the plan, all share unit grants, vesting periods and performance conditions therein are approved by the |
| | | Company’s board of directors. Share unit grants are either in the form of RSUs or PSUs. RSUs granted under the |
| | | plan, to date, vest ratably over a period of three years. PSUs granted under the plan, to date, vest ratably based |
| | | upon the achievement of certain non-market performance vesting conditions. PSUs granted in 2018 vest ratably |
| | | over a period of five years, PSUs granted in 2019 vest ratably over a period of four years and PSUs granted in |
| | | 2020 vest ratably over a period of three years. |
| | | |
| | | A continuity summary of the RSUs of the Company granted under the share unit plan for 2020 and 2019 is |
| | | presented below: |
| | | |
| | | | | | 2020 | | | | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | Weighted | | | | | | | | | | | Weighted |
| | | | | | | | | | | Average | | | | | | | | | | | Average |
| | | | | | Number of | Fair Value | | | | Number of | | | | Fair Value |
| | | | | | Common | Per RSU | | | | Common | | | | Per RSU |
| | | | | | Shares | | | | | | | | | | (CAD) | | | | Shares | | | | (CAD) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | RSUs outstanding – January 1 | | 2,754,099 $ | | | | | | | | 0.70 | 1,200,432 $ | | | | 0.65 |
| | | | Grants | | 3,345,750 | | | | | | | | 0.38 | 1,927,000 | | | | 0.73 |
| | | | Exercises (1) | | (238,949) | | | | | | | | 0.69 | (373,333) | 0.70 |
| | | | Forfeitures | | (169,001) | | | | | | | | 0.59 | - | - |
| | | | RSUs outstanding – December 31 | | 5,691,899 $ | | | | | | | | 0.52 | 2,754,099 $ | | | | 0.70 |
| | | | RSUs vested – December 31 | | 970,670 $ | | | | | | | | 0.69 | 303,810 $ | 0.65 |
| | | |
| | | | (1) The weighted average share price at the date of exercise was CAD$0.56 (2019: CAD$0.67). |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | A continuity summary of the PSUs of the Company granted under the share unit plan for 2020 and 2019 is |
| | | presented below: |
| | | |
| | | | | | 2020 | | | | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | Weighted | | | | | | | | | | | Weighted |
| | | | | | | | | | | Average | | | | | | | | | | | Average |
| | | | | | Number of | Fair Value | | | | Number of | | | | Fair Value |
| | | | | | Common | Per PSU | | | | Common | | | | Per PSU |
| | | | | | Shares | | | | | | | | | | (CAD) | | | | Shares | | | | (CAD) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | PSUs outstanding – January 1 | | 2,140,000 $ | | | | | | | | 0.65 | 2,200,000 $ | | | | 0.65 |
| | | | Grants | | 180,000 | | | | | | | | 0.38 | 240,000 | 0.69 |
| | | | Exercises (1) | | (120,000) | | | | | | | | 0.65 | (60,000) | 0.65 |
| | | | Forfeitures | | (180,000) | | | | | | | | 0.65 | (240,000) | 0.65 |
| | | | PSUs outstanding – December 31 | | 2,020,000 $ | | | | | | | | 0.63 | 2,140,000 $ | | | | 0.65 |
| | | | PSUs vested – December 31 | | 700,000 $ | | | | | | | | 0.65 | 380,000 $ | 0.65 |
| | | |
| | | | (1) The weighted average share price at the date of exercise was CAD$0.67 (2019: CAD$0.67). |
| | | |
| | | The fair value of each RSU and PSU granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Company’s closing share |
| | | price on the day before the grant date. |
| | 31 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | 19. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) |
| | | |
| | | The accumulated other comprehensive income balance consists of: |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | At December 31 | At December 31 |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Cumulative foreign currency translation | | | | | | $ | | 413 $ | | 410 |
| | | | Unamortized experience gain – post employment liability | | | | | |
| | | | Gross | | | | | | | | 1,847 | | 983 |
| | | | Tax effect | | | | | | | | (485) | | (259) |
| | | | | | | | | | $ | | 1,775 $ | | 1,134 |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | 20. SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
| | | |
| | | The components of operating expenses are as fol ows: |
| | | |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2020 | | | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Cost of goods and services sold: | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Cost of goods sold – mineral concentrates | | | | | | $ | | | (526) $ | - |
| | | | Operating Overheads: | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Mining, other development expense | | | | | | | | | (1,165) $ | (2,709) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Mil ing, conversion expense | | | | | | | | | (1,769) | (3,230) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Less absorption: | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | - Mineral properties | | | | | | | | | 39 | 61 |
| | | | Cost of services | | | | | | | | | (6,852) | (8,346) |
| | | | Cost of goods and services sold | | | | | | | | | (10,273) | (14,224) |
| | | | Reclamation asset amortization | | | | | | | | | (243) | (212) |
| | | | Selling expenses | | | | | | | | | (14) | - |
| | | | Sales royalties and non-income taxes | | | | | | | | | (64) | - |
| | | | Operating expenses | | | | | | $ | | | (10,594) $ | (14,436) |
| | | |
| | | The components of other income (expense) are as follows: |
| | | |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2020 | | | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Gains (losses) on: | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Foreign exchange | | | | | | $ | | | (529) $ | 2 |
| | | | Disposal of property, plant and equipment | | | | | | | | | 405 | (37) |
| | | | Investment fair value through profit (loss) (note 7) | | | | | | | | 5,046 | | | | (1,085) |
| | | | Deconsolidation of investment in associate (note 8) | | | | | | | | - | | | | 5,267 |
| | | | Reclamation obligation adjustments (note 13) | | | | | | | | (3,595) | (845) |
| | | | Debt obligation adjustments (note 14) | | | | | | | | 2 | | | | 26 |
| | | | Legal settlement (note 24) | | | | | | | | | (850) | - |
| | | | Other | | | | | | | | | (574) | (358) |
| | | | Other income (expense) | | | | | | $ | | | (95) $ | 2,970 |
| | 32 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | The components of finance income (expense) are as follows: |
| | | |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Interest income | | | | | | | | $ | | 291 $ | | 594 |
| | | | Interest expense | | | | | | | | | | (4) | (9) |
| | | | Accretion expense: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Deferred revenue (note 11) | | | | | | | | | | (3,058) | | (3,203) |
| | | | Post-employment benefits (note 12) | | | | | | | | | | (57) | | (70) |
| | | | Reclamation obligations (note 13) | | | | | | | | | (1,352) | | (1,361) |
| | | | Debt obligations (note 14) | | | | | | | | | (56) | | (76) |
| | | | Finance expense, net | | | | | | | | $ | | (4,236) $ | | (4,125) |
| | | |
| | | A summary of depreciation expense recognized in the statement of income (loss) is as follows: |
| | | |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Mining, other development expense | | | | | | | | $ | | (3) $ | (3) |
| | | | Mil ing, conversion expense | | | | | | | | | | (1,730) | | (3,165) |
| | | | Cost of services | | | | | | | | | | (192) | | (248) |
| | | | Exploration and evaluation | | | | | | | | | | (184) | | (221) |
| | | | General and administrative | | | | | | | | | | (126) | | (127) |
| | | | Depreciation expense-gross (note 10) | | | | | | | | $ | | (2,235) $ | | (3,764) |
| | | |
| | | A summary of employee benefits expense recognized in the statement of income (loss) is as follows: |
| | | |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Salaries and short-term employee benefits | | | | | | | | $ | | (7,405) $ | | (8,407) |
| | | | Share-based compensation (note 20) | | | | | | | | | | (1,827) | | (2,222) |
| | | | Termination benefits | | | | | | | | | | (35) | | (633) |
| | | | Employee benefits expense-gross | | | | | | | | $ | | (9,267) $ | | (11,262) |
| | | |
| | | A summary of lease related amounts recognized in the statement of income (loss) is as follows: |
| | | |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Accretion expense on lease liabilities | | | | | | | | $ | | (56) $ | | (76) |
| | | | Expenses relating to short-term leases | | | | | | | | | | (2,287) | | (5,146) |
| | | | Expenses relating to non-short term low-value leases | | | | | | | | | (13) | | (19) |
| | | | Lease related expense-gross | | | | | | | | $ | | (2,356) $ | | (5,241) |
| | | |
| | | The change in non-cash working capital items in the consolidated statements of cash flows is as fol ows: |
| | | |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Change in non-cash working capital items: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Trade and other receivables | | | | | | | | | $ | 649 $ | | (201) |
| | | | Inventories | | | | | | | | | | 220 | | 232 |
| | | | Prepaid expenses and other assets | | | | | | | | | | (422) | | (160) |
| | | | Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | | | | | | | | | (754) | | 2,385 |
| | | | Change in non-cash working capital items | | | | | | | | | $ | (307) $ | | 2,256 |
| | | |
| | 33 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | The supplemental cash flow disclosure required for the consolidated statements of cash flows is as follows: |
| | | |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Supplemental cash flow disclosure: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Interest paid | | | | | | | | | $ | (4) $ | (9) |
| | | | Income taxes paid | | | | | | | | | | | - | - |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | 21. SEGMENTED INFORMATION |
| | | |
| | | Business Segments |
| | | |
| | | | The Company operates in three primary segments – the Mining segment, the Closed Mine Services segment and |
| | | the Corporate and Other segment. The Mining segment includes activities related to exploration, evaluation and |
| | | development, mining, mil ing (including tol mil ing) and the sale of mineral concentrates. The Closed Mine Services |
| | | segment includes the results of the Company’s environmental services business which provides mine |
| | | decommissioning and other services to third parties. The Corporate and Other segment includes management fee |
| | | income earned from UPC and general corporate expenses not allocated to the other segments. Management fee |
| | | income has been included in the same segment as general corporate expenses due to the shared infrastructure |
| | | between the two activities. |
| | | |
| | | For the year ended December 31, 2020, reportable segment results were as fol ows: |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Closed | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Mines | | Corporate | | |
| | | | (in thousands) | | Mining | | | | | | Services | | and Other | | Total |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Statement of Operations: | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Revenues | | | | | | 3,614 | | | | | | | 8,205 | | 2,604 | 14,423 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Operating expenses | | | | | | (3,742) | | | | | | | (6,849) | | (3) | (10,594) |
| | | | Exploration and evaluation | | | | | | (9,032) | | | | | | | - | | - | (9,032) |
| | | | General and administrative | | | | | | (19) | | | | | | | - | (7,590) | | (7,609) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | (12,793) | | | | | | | (6,849) | (7,593) | | (27,235) |
| | | | Segment income (loss) | | | | | | (9,179) | | | | | | | 1,356 | (4,989) | | (12,812) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Revenues – supplemental: | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Uranium concentrate sales | | | | | | 852 | | | | | | | - | | - | 852 |
| | | | Environmental services | | | | | | - | 8,205 | | - | 8,205 |
| | | | Management fees | | | | | | - | - | | 2,604 | 2,604 |
| | | | Toll milling services–deferred revenue (note 11) | | | 2,762 | | | | | | | - | | - | 2,762 |
| | | | | | | | | | 3,614 | | | | | | | 8,205 | | 2,604 | 14,423 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Capital additions: | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Property, plant and equipment (note 10) | | | | | | 289 | | | | | | | 15 | | - | 304 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Long-lived assets: | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Plant and equipment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Cost | | | | | | 101,540 | | | | | | | 4.546 | | 892 | 106,978 |
| | | | Accumulated depreciation | | | | | | (26,241) | | | | | | | (3,194) | | (416) | (29,851) |
| | | | Mineral properties | | | | | | 179,743 | | | | | | | - | | - | 179,743 |
| | | | | | | | | | 255,042 | | | | | | | 1,352 | | 476 | 256,870 |
| | | |
| | 34 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | For the year ended December 31, 2019, reportable segment results were as fol ows: |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Closed | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Mines | Corporate | |
| | | | (in thousands) | | Mining | | | | | | | Services | and Other | Total |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Statement of Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Revenues | | | | | | | 4,609 | | | | | | | 8,974 | 1,966 | 15,549 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Operating expenses | | | | | | | (6,090) | | | | | | | (8,346) | - | (14,436) |
| | | | Exploration and evaluation | | | | | | | (15,238) | | | | | | | | | | | - | - | (15,238) |
| | | | General and administrative | | | | | | | (17) | | | | | | | | | | | - | (7,794) | (7,811) |
| | | | | | | | (21,345) | | | | | | | (8,346) | (7,794) | (37,485) |
| | | | Segment income (loss) | | | | | | | (16,736) | | | | | | | | | | | 628 | (5,828) | (21,936) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Revenues – supplemental: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Environmental services | | | | | | | - | 8,974 | - | 8,974 |
| | | | Management fees | | | | | | | - | | | | - | 1,966 | 1,966 |
| | | | Toll milling services–deferred revenue (note 11) | | | | 4,609 | | | | | | | | | | | - | - | 4,609 |
| | | | | | | | | | | 4,609 | | | | | | | 8,974 | 1,966 | 15,549 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Capital additions: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Property, plant and equipment (note 10) | | | | | | | 637 | | | | | | | | | | | 273 | 38 | 948 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Long-lived assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Plant and equipment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Cost | | | | | | | 99,994 | | | | | | | 4,591 | 908 | 105,493 |
| | | | Accumulated depreciation | | | | | | | (24,349) | | | | | | | (3,062) | (304) | (27,715) |
| | | | Mineral properties | | | | | | | 179,481 | | | | | | | | | | | - | - | 179,481 |
| | | | | | | | | | | 255,126 | | | | | | | 1,529 | 604 | 257,259 |
| | | |
| | | Revenue Concentration |
| | | |
| | | The Company’s business is such that, at any given time, it sells its environmental and other services to a relatively |
| | | smal number of customers. During 2020, one customer from the corporate and other segment, three customers |
| | | from the Closed Mines Group segment and one customer from the mining segment accounted for approximately |
| | | 94% of total revenues consisting of 18%, 57% and 19% respectively. During 2019, one customer from the |
| | | Corporate and Other segment, three customers from the Closed Mine Services segment and one customer from |
| | | the Mining segment accounted for approximately 99% of total revenues consisting of 13%, 56% and 30% |
| | | respectively. |
| | | |
| | | Revenue Commitments |
| | | |
| | | Denison’s revenue portfolio consists of short and long-term sales commitments. The following table summarizes |
| | | the expected future revenue, by segment, based on the customer contract commitments and information that exists |
| | | as at December 31, 2020: |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There- | |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | 2021 | 2022 | | | | | | | 2023 | | | | 2024 | after | Total |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Revenues – by Segment: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Closed Mines Group | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Environmental services | | | | | | 4,751 | - | | | | - | - | | - | 4,751 |
| | | | Corporate and Other | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Management fees | | | | | | 2,186 | 2,186 2,186 | | | | | | | | 547 | | - | 7,105 |
| | | | Total Revenue Commitments | | | | | | 6,937 | 2,186 2,186 | | | | | | | | 547 | | - 11,856 |
| | | |
| | | The amounts in the table above represent the estimated consideration that Denison wil be entitled to receive when |
| | | it satisfies the remaining performance obligations in its customer contracts. Various assumptions, consistent with |
| | 35 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | past experience, have been made where the quantity of the performance obligation may vary. |
| | | |
| | | In addition to the amounts disclosed above, the Company is also contracted to pay onward to APG all toll mil ing |
| | | cash proceeds received from the MLJV related to the processing of specified Cigar Lake ore through the McClean |
| | | Lake mil (see note 11). The timing and amount of such future toll mil ing cash proceeds are outside the control of |
| | | the Company. |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | 22. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS |
| | | |
| | | | Uranium Participation Corporation |
| | | |
| | | The previous management services agreement with UPC expired on March 31, 2019. Ef ective April 1, 2019, a |
| | | new management services agreement (“MSA”) was entered into for a term of five years (the “Term”). Under the |
| | | MSA, Denison continues to receive the following management fees from UPC, unchanged from the previous |
| | | agreement: a) a base fee of $400,000 per annum, payable in equal quarterly installments; b) a variable fee equal |
| | | to (i) 0.3% per annum of UPC’s total assets in excess of $100 mil ion and up to and including $500 mil ion, and (i ) |
| | | 0.2% per annum of UPC’s total assets in excess of $500 mil ion; c) a fee, at the discretion of the Board, for on- |
| | | going monitoring or work associated with a transaction or arrangement (other than a financing, or the acquisition |
| | | of or sale of U3O8 or UF6); and d) a commission of 1.0% of the gross value of any purchases or sales of U3O8 or |
| | | UF6 or gross interest fees payable to UPC in connection with any uranium loan arrangements. |
| | | |
| | | The MSA may be terminated during the Term by Denison upon the provision of 180 days written notice. The MSA |
| | | may be terminated during the Term by UPC (i) in the event of a material breach, (i ) within 90 days of certain events |
| | | surrounding a change of both of the individuals serving as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of |
| | | UPC, and / or a change of control of Denison, or (i i) upon the provision of 30 days writ en notice and, subject to |
| | | certain exceptions, a cash payment to Denison of an amount equal to the base and variable management fees |
| | | that would otherwise be payable to Denison (calculated based on UPC’s current uranium holdings at the time of |
| | | termination) for the lesser period of a) three years, or b) the remaining term of the MSA. |
| | | |
| | | The fol owing transactions were incurred with UPC for the periods noted: |
| | | |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Management fees: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Base and variable fees | | | | | | | | $ | | 2,011 $ | | 1,822 |
| | | | Discretionary fees | | | | | | | | | | 300 | - |
| | | | Commission fees | | | | | | | | | | 293 | | 144 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | $ | | 2,604 $ | | 1,966 |
| | | |
| | | At December 31, 2020, accounts receivable includes $265,000 (December 31, 2019: $236,000) due from UPC |
| | | with respect to the fees and transactions indicated above. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Korea Electric Power Corporation (“KEPCO”) and Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power (“KHNP”) |
| | | |
| | | In connection with KEPCO’s investment in Denison in June 2009, KEPCO and Denison were parties to a strategic |
| | | relationship agreement. In December 2016, Denison was notified that KEPCO’s indirect ownership of Denison’s |
| | | shares had been transferred from an affiliate of KEPCO to an affiliate of KEPCO’s wholly-owned subsidiary, KHNP. |
| | | In September 2017, Denison and KHNP’s affiliate entered into an amended and restated strategic relationship |
| | | agreement, in large part providing KHNP’s affiliate with the same rights as those previously given to KEPCO under |
| | | the prior agreement, including entitling KHNP’s affiliate to: (a) subscribe for additional common shares in Denison’s |
| | | future public equity offerings; (b) a right of first opportunity if Denison intends to sel any of its substantial assets; |
| | | (c) a right to participate in certain purchases of substantial assets which Denison proposes to acquire; and (d) a |
| | | right to nominate one director to Denison’s board so long as its share interest in Denison is above 5.0%. |
| | | |
| | | As at December 31, 2020, KEPCO, through its subsidiaries, holds 58,284,000 shares of Denison representing a |
| | | share interest of approximately 8.58%. KHNP Canada Energy Ltd (“KHNP Canada”), a subsidiary of KHNP, is the |
| | | holder of the majority of Denison’s shares. |
| | | |
| | | KHNP Canada is also the majority member of the Korea Waterbury Uranium Limited Partnership (“KWULP”). |
| | | KWULP is a consortium of investors that holds the non-Denison owned interests in Waterbury Lake Uranium |
| | | Corporation (“WLUC”) and the WLULP, entities whose key asset is the Waterbury Lake property. At December 31, |
| | | 2020, WLUC is owned by Denison Waterbury Corp (60%) and KWULP (40%) while the WLULP is owned by |
| | 36 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | Denison Waterbuy Corp (66.89% - limited partner), KWULP (33.09% - limited partner) and WLUC (0.02% - general |
| | | partner). When a spending program is approved, each participant is required to fund these entities based upon its |
| | | respective ownership interest or be diluted accordingly. Spending program approval requires 75% of the limited |
| | | partners’ voting interest. |
| | | |
| | | In January 2014, Denison agreed to allow KWULP to defer a decision regarding its funding obligation to WLUC |
| | | and WLULP until September 30, 2015 and to not be immediately diluted as per the dilution provisions in the relevant |
| | | agreements (“Dilution Agreement”). Instead, under the Dilution Agreement, dilution would be delayed until |
| | | September 30, 2015 and then applied in each subsequent period, if applicable, in accordance with the original |
| | | agreements. In exchange, Denison received authorization to approve spending programs on the property, up to |
| | | an aggregate $10,000,000, until September 30, 2016 without obtaining approval from 75% of the voting interest. |
| | | Under subsequent amendments, Denison and KWULP have agreed to extend Denison’s authorization under the |
| | | Dilution Agreement to approve program spending up to an aggregate $15,000,000 until December 31, 2021. |
| | | |
| | | In 2019, Denison funded 100% of the approved fiscal 2019 program for Waterbury Lake and KWULP continued to |
| | | dilute its interest in the WLULP. As a result, Denison increased its interest in the WLULP from 65.92% to 66.57%, |
| | | in two steps, which has been accounted for using effective dates of May 31, 2019 and November 30, 2019. The |
| | | increased ownership interest resulted in Denison recording its increased pro-rata share of the assets and liabilities |
| | | of Waterbury Lake, the majority of which relates to an addition to mineral property assets of $448,000. |
| | | |
| | | In 2020, Denison funded 100% of the approved fiscal 2020 program for Waterbury Lake and KWULP continued to |
| | | dilute its interest in the WLULP. As a result, Denison increased its interest in the WLULP from 66.57% to 66.90%, |
| | | in two steps, which has been accounted for using effective dates of June 30, 2020 and November 30, 2020. The |
| | | increased ownership interest resulted in Denison recording its increased pro-rata share of the assets and liabilities |
| | | of Waterbury Lake, the majority of which relates to an addition to mineral property assets of $223,000. |
| | | |
| | | Other |
| | | |
| | | In December 2018, the Company lent $250,000 to GoviEx pursuant to a credit agreement between the parties. |
| | | The loan was unsecured and bore interest at 7.5% per annum. In April 2019, the loan was repaid in ful , together |
| | | with interest thereon. |
| | | |
| | | During 2020, the Company incurred investor relations, administrative service fees and certain pass-through |
| | | expenses of $206,000 (2019: $217,000) with Namdo Management Services Ltd, which shares a common director |
| | | with Denison. These services were incurred in the normal course of operating a public company. At December 31, |
| | | 2020, an amount of $nil (December 31, 2019: $nil) was due to this company. |
| | | |
| | | Compensation of Key Management Personnel |
| | | |
| | | Key management personnel are those persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and |
| | | controlling the activities of the Company, directly or indirectly. Key management personnel includes the Company’s |
| | | executive officers, vice-presidents and members of its Board of Directors. |
| | | |
| | | The fol owing compensation was awarded to key management personnel: |
| | | |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Salaries and short-term employee benefits | | | | | | | | $ | | (1,899) $ | | (2,024) |
| | | | Share-based compensation | | | | | | | | | | (1,507) | | (1,881) |
| | | | Termination benefits | | | | | | | | | | | - | (481) |
| | | | Key management personnel compensation | | | | | | | | $ | | (3,406) $ | | (4,386) |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | 23. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT AND FINANCIAL RISK |
| | | |
| | | Capital Management |
| | | |
| | | The Company’s capital includes cash, cash equivalents, investments in debt instruments, investments in equity |
| | | instruments and the current portion of debt obligations. The Company’s primary objective with respect to its capital |
| | | management is to ensure that it has sufficient capital to maintain its ongoing operations, to provide returns for |
| | | shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders and to pursue growth opportunities. |
| | | |
| | | Planning, annual budgeting and controls over major investment decisions are the primary tools used to manage |
| | 37 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | the Company’s capital. The Company’s cash is managed centrally and disbursed to the various business units |
| | | based on a system of internal controls that require review and approval of significant expenditures by the |
| | | Company’s key decision makers. For example, under the Company’s delegation of authority guidelines, significant |
| | | debt obligations require the approval of both the CEO and the CFO before they are entered into. |
| | | |
| | | The Company currently manages its capital by ongoing monitoring and review of its net cash and investment |
| | | position, as wel as its operating plans for the current and future periods. The Company’s net cash and investment |
| | | position is summarized below: |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | At December 31 At December 31 |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Net cash and investments: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Cash and cash equivalents | | | | | | $ | 24,992 $ | | 8,190 |
| | | | Investments | | | | | | | 16,950 | | 12,104 |
| | | | Debt obligations-current (note 14) | | | | | | | (240) | | (470) |
| | | | Net cash and investments | | | | | | $ | 41,702 $ | | 19,824 |
| | | |
| | | Financial Risk |
| | | |
| | | The Company examines the various financial risks to which it is exposed and assesses the impact and likelihood |
| | | of those risks. These risks may include credit risk, liquidity risk, currency risk, interest rate risk and price risk. |
| | | |
| | | (a) Credit Risk |
| | | |
| | | Credit risk is the risk of loss due to a counterparty’s inability to meet its obligations under a financial instrument |
| | | that wil result in a financial loss to the Company. The Company believes that the carrying amount of its cash and |
| | | cash equivalents, trade and other receivables and restricted cash and investments represents its maximum credit |
| | | exposure. |
| | | |
| | | The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting dates is as follows: |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | At December 31 At December 31 |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Cash and cash equivalents | | | | | | | | $ | 24,992 $ | | 8,190 |
| | | | Trade and other receivables | | | | | | | | | 3,374 | | 4,023 |
| | | | Restricted cash and investments | | | | | | | | | 12,018 | | 11,994 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 40,384 $ | | 24,207 |
| | | |
| | | The Company limits cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and investment risk by dealing with credit |
| | | worthy financial institutions. The majority of the Company’s normal course trade and other receivables balance |
| | | relates to a smal number of customers whom have established credit worthiness with the Company through past |
| | | dealings. |
| | | |
| | | (b) Liquidity Risk |
| | | |
| | | Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company wil encounter difficulties in meeting obligations associated with its |
| | | financial liabilities as they become due. The Company has in place a planning and budgeting process to help |
| | | determine the funds required to support the Company’s normal operating requirements on an ongoing basis. The |
| | | Company ensures that there is sufficient committed capital to meet its short-term business requirements, taking |
| | | into account its anticipated cash flows from operations, its holdings of cash and cash equivalents and equity |
| | | investments, its financial covenants and its access to credit and capital markets, if required. |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | 38 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | The maturities of the Company’s financial liabilities at December 31, 2020 are as follows: |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Within 1 | | 1 to 5 |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | Year | | Years |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | | $ | 7,178 | $ | - |
| | | | Debt obligations (note 14) | | | | 240 | | 375 |
| | | | | | | $ | 7,418 | $ | 375 |
| | | |
| | | (c) Currency Risk |
| | | |
| | | Foreign exchange risk is the risk that the fair value of future cash flows of a financial instrument wil fluctuate |
| | | because of changes in foreign exchange rates. The Company predominantly operates in Canada and incurs the |
| | | majority of its operating and capital costs in Canadian dollars. At December 31, 2020, the Company is exposed |
| | | to some foreign exchange risk on its net U.S dollar financial asset position, predominantly as a result of U.S dollar |
| | | financing activity completed in the fourth quarter of 2020. |
| | | |
| | | At December 31, 2020, the Company’s net U.S dollar financial assets were $10,191,000. The impact of the U.S |
| | | dollar strengthening or weakening (by 10%) on the value of the Company’s net U.S dollar financial assets is as |
| | | follows: |
| | | |
| | | | | Dec.31’2020 | Sensitivity | | | |
| | | | | | Foreign | | | | | | Foreign | | | Change in |
| | | | | | Exhange | | | | | | Exchange | | | net income |
| | | | (in thousands except foreign exchange rates) | | Rate | | | | | | Rate | | (loss) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | Currency risk |
| | | | Canadian dollar (“CAD”) weakens | | 1.2732 | | | | | | 1.4005 | | $ | 1,019 |
| | | | Canadian dollar (“CAD”) strengthens | | 1.2732 | | | | | | 1.1459 | | $ | (1,019) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | | Currently, the Company does not have any programs or instruments in place to hedge this possible currency risk. |
| | | |
| | | (d) Interest Rate Risk |
| | | |
| | | Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument wil fluctuate because of |
| | | changes in market interest rates. The Company is exposed to interest rate risk on its liabilities through its |
| | | outstanding borrowings and on its assets through its investments in debt instruments. The Company monitors its |
| | | exposure to interest rates and has not entered into any derivative contracts to manage this risk. |
| | | |
| | | (e) Price Risk |
| | | |
| | | The Company is exposed to equity price risk on its investments in equity instruments of other exploration and |
| | | mining companies. The sensitivity analysis below il ustrates the impact of equity price risk on the equity investments |
| | | held by the Company at December 31, 2020: |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Change in |
| | | | | | | | | | | | net income |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | (loss) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Equity price risk | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | 10% increase in equity prices | | | | | | | | | $ | 1,709 |
| | | | 10% decrease in equity prices | | | | | | | | | | (1,709) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | | Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
| | | |
| | | IFRS requires disclosures about the inputs to fair value measurements, including their classification within a |
| | | hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to fair value measurement. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are: |
| | | |
| | | • | Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; |
| | | • | Level 2 - Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly; |
| | | | and |
| | 39 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | • | Level 3 - Inputs that are not based on observable market data. |
| | | |
| | | The fair value of financial instruments which trade in active markets, such as share and warrant equity instruments, |
| | | is based on quoted market prices at the balance sheet date. The quoted market price used to value financial assets |
| | | held by the Company is the current closing price. Warrants that do not trade in active markets have been valued |
| | | using the Black-Scholes pricing model. Debt instruments have been valued using the effective interest rate for the |
| | | period that the Company expects to hold the instrument and not the rate to maturity. |
| | | |
| | | Except as otherwise disclosed, the fair values of cash and cash equivalents, trade and other receivables, accounts |
| | | payable and accrued liabilities, restricted cash and cash equivalents and debt obligations approximate their |
| | | carrying values as a result of the short-term nature of the instruments, the variable interest rate associated with |
| | | the instruments or the fixed interest rate of the instruments being similar to market rates. |
| | | |
| | | During 2020 and 2019, there were no transfers between levels 1, 2 and 3 and there were no changes in valuation |
| | | techniques, however, the Company did change its method of accounting for its GoviEx investment from the equity |
| | | method to FVTPL in the fourth quarter of 2019. |
| | | |
| | | The fol owing table il ustrates the classification of the Company’s financial assets within the fair value hierarchy as |
| | | at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019: |
| | | |
| | | | | | Financial | | | Fair | December 31, December 31, |
| | | | | Instrument | | | Value | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | Category(1) | Hierarchy | | | | | Fair Value | | | Fair Value |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Financial Assets: | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Cash and equivalents | Category B | | | | $ | 24,992 $ | | 8,190 |
| | | | Trade and other receivables | Category B | | | | | 3,374 | | 4,023 |
| | | | Investments | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Equity instruments-shares | Category A | | | Level 1 | | 16,657 | | 11,971 |
| | | | | | | | | | | Equity instruments-warrants | Category A | | | Level 2 | | 293 | | 133 |
| | | | Restricted cash and equivalents | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | El iot Lake reclamation trust fund | Category B | | | | | 2,883 | | 2,859 |
| | | | | | | | | | | Credit facility pledged assets | Category B | | | | | 9,000 | | 9,000 |
| | | | | | | | | | | Reclamation letter of credit collateral | Category B | | | | | 135 | | 135 |
| | | | | | | | | | | $ | 57,334 $ | | 36,311 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Financial Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Account payable and accrued liabilities | Category C | | | | | 7,178 | | 7,930 |
| | | | Debt obligations | Category C | | | | | 615 | | 1,002 |
| | | | | | | | | | | $ | 7,793 $ | | 8,932 |
| | | |
| | | (1) Financial instrument designations are as follows: Category A=Financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit and loss; Category |
| | | | B=Financial assets at amortized cost; and Category C=Financial liabilities at amortized cost. |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | 24. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
| | | |
| | | General Legal Matters |
| | | |
| | | The Company is involved, from time to time, in various legal actions and claims in the ordinary course of business. |
| | | In the opinion of management, the aggregate amount of any potential liability is not expected to have a material |
| | | adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results. |
| | | |
| | | Specific Legal Matters |
| | | |
| | | Mongolia Mining Division Sale – Arbitration Proceedings with Uranium Industry a.s |
| | | |
| | | In November 2015, the Company sold all of its mining assets and operations located in Mongolia to Uranium |
| | | Industry a.s (“UI”) pursuant to an amended and restated share purchase agreement (the “GSJV Agreement”). The |
| | | primary assets at that time were the exploration licenses for the Hairhan, Haraat, Gurvan Saihan and Ulzit projects. |
| | | As consideration for the sale per the GSJV Agreement, the Company received cash consideration of |
| | | USD$1,250,000 prior to closing and the rights to receive additional contingent consideration of up to |
| | | USD$12,000,000. |
| | | |
| | 40 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | On September 20, 2016, the Mineral Resources Authority of Mongolia (“MRAM”) formal y issued mining license |
| | | certificates for all four projects, triggering Denison’s right to receive contingent consideration of USD$10,000,000 |
| | | (collectively, the “Mining License Receivable”). The original due date for payment of the Mining License Receivable |
| | | by UI was November 16, 2016. |
| | | |
| | | Under an extension agreement between UI and the Company, the payment due date of the Mining License |
| | | Receivable was extended from November 16, 2016 to July 16, 2017 (the “Extension Agreement”). As consideration |
| | | for the extension, UI agreed to pay interest on the Mining License Receivable amount at a rate of 5% per year, |
| | | payable monthly up to July 16, 2017 and they also agreed to pay a USD$100,000 instalment amount towards the |
| | | balance of the Mining License Receivable amount. The required payments were not made. |
| | | |
| | | On February 24, 2017, the Company served notice to UI that it was in default of its obligations under the GSJV |
| | | Agreement and the Extension Agreement and on December 12, 2017, the Company filed a Request for Arbitration |
| | | between the Company and UI under the Arbitration Rules of the London Court of International Arbitration. Hearings |
| | | in front of the arbitration panel were held in December 2019. The final award was rendered by an arbitration panel |
| | | on July 27, 2020, with the panel finding in favour of Denison and ordering UI to pay the Company USD$10,000,000 |
| | | plus interest at a rate of 5% per annum from November 16, 2016, plus certain legal and arbitration costs. Denison |
| | | and UI have exchanged correspondence, and award recovery options are being considered. |
| | | |
| | | Arbitration Proceedings with Orano Canada Inc. (“Orano Canada”) and OURD (Canada) Co., Ltd. (“OURD”) |
| | | |
| | | Denison commenced arbitration with Orano Canada and OURD in October 2019, with Denison’s initial written |
| | | submission made on March 9, 2020. Denison claimed that certain payments it was required to make related to |
| | | matters outside the scope of the joint venture agreement for the MLJV. Proceedings in front of the arbitration panel |
| | | were held in October 2020 and the panel released its decision in December 2020, finding in favour of Orano |
| | | Canada and OURD on the facts. A settlement was agreed amongst the parties whereby Denison would pay |
| | | $850,000 in respect of legal fees and expenses incurred by Orano Canada and OURD. This amount has been |
| | | accrued as a payable at year end and is included in Other income (expense) in 2020. Denison paid the settlement |
| | | amount in January 2021. |
| | | |
| | | Performance Bonds and Letters of Credit |
| | | |
| | | In conjunction with various contracts, reclamation and other performance obligations, the Company may be |
| | | required to issue performance bonds and letters of credit as security to creditors to guarantee the Company’s |
| | | performance. Any potential payments which might become due under these items would be related to the |
| | | Company’s non-performance under the applicable contract. As at December 31, 2020, the Company had |
| | | outstanding letters of credit of $24,135,000 for reclamation obligations of which $24,000,000 is collateralized by |
| | | the Company’s 2020 credit facility (see note 14) and the remainder is col ateralized by cash (see note 9). |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | 25. INTEREST IN OTHER ENTITIES |
| | | |
| | | The significant subsidiaries, associates and joint operations of the Company at December 31, 2020 are listed |
| | | below. The table also includes information related to key contractual arrangements associated with the Company’s |
| | | mineral property interests that comprise 90.5% of the December 31, 2020 carrying value of its Mineral Property |
| | | assets (see note 10). The company does not have any accounting joint ventures as defined by IFRS 11. |
| | | |
| | 41 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | | | | | December December | | | | | Fiscal | |
| | | | | | Place | 31, 2020 | 31, 2019 | | | | | | 2020 | |
| | | | | | Of | Ownership Ownership Participating | | | | | | Accounting |
| | | | | | Business | Interest (1) | Interest (1) | | | | | | Interest (2) | Method |
| | | | Subsidiaries | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Denison Mines Inc. | | Canada | 100.00% | 100.00% | | | | | | N/A | Consolidation |
| | | | Denison AB Holdings Corp. | | Canada | 100.00% | 100.00% | | | | | | N/A | Consolidation |
| | | | Denison Waterbury Corp | | Canada | 100.00% | 100.00% | | | | | | N/A | Consolidation |
| | | | 9373721 Canada Inc. | | Canada | 100.00% | 100.00% | | | | | | N/A | Consolidation |
| | | | Denison Mines (Bermuda) I Ltd | | Bermuda | 100.00% | 100.00% | | | | | | N/A | Consolidation |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Joint Operations | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Waterbury Lake Uranium Corp | | Canada | | | | | 60.00% | 60.00% | | | | | | 100% | Voting Share (3) |
| | | | Waterbury Lake Uranium LP | | Canada | | | | | 66.90% | 66.57% | | | | | | 100% | Voting Share (3) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Key Contractual Arrangements | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Wheeler River Joint Venture | | Canada | | | | | 90.00% | 90.00% | | | | | | 90.00% | Denison Share (3) |
| | | | Midwest Joint Venture | | Canada | | | | | 25.17% | 25.17% | | | | | | 25.17% | Denison Share (3) |
| | | | Mann Lake Joint Venture | | Canada | | | | | 30.00% | 30.00% | | | | | | N/A (4) | Denison Share (3) |
| | | | Wolly Joint Venture | | Canada | | | | | 21.89% | 21.89% | | | | | | N/A (4) | Denison Share (3) |
| | | | McClean Lake Joint Venture | | Canada | | | | | 22.50% | 22.50% | | | | | | 22.50% | Denison Share (3) |
| | | |
| | | (1) Ownership Interest represents Denison’s percentage equity / voting interest in the entity or contractual arrangement; |
| | | (2) Participating interest represents Denison’s percentage funding contribution to the particular joint operation or contractual arrangement. This |
| | | | percentage can differ from ownership interest in instances where other parties to the arrangement have carried interests, they are earning-in |
| | | | to the arrangement, or they are diluting their interest in the arrangement (provided the arrangement has dilution provisions therein); |
| | | (3) Denison Share is where Denison accounts for its share of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses in accordance with the specific terms |
| | | | within the contractual arrangement. – this can be by using either its ownership interest (i.e. Voting Share) or its participating interest (i.e. |
| | | | Funding Share), depending on the arrangement terms. The Voting Share and Funding Share approaches produce the same accounting result |
| | | | when the Company’s ownership interest and participating interests are equal; |
| | | (4) The participating interest for 2020 for these arrangements is shown as Not Applicable as there were no approved spending programs carried |
| | | | out during fiscal 2020. |
| | | |
| | | WLUC and WLULP were acquired by Denison as part of the Fission Energy Corp acquisition in April 2013. Denison |
| | | uses its equity interest to account for its share of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses for these joint |
| | | operations. In 2020, Denison funded 100% of the activities in these joint operations pursuant to the terms of an |
| | | agreement that allows it to approve spending for the WLULP without having the required 75% of the voting interest |
| | | (see note 22). |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | 26. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS |
| | | |
| | | Bank of Nova Scotia Credit Facility Renewal |
| | | |
| | | On January 14, 2021, the Company entered into an amending agreement with BNS to extend the maturity date of |
| | | the 2020 Facility (see note 14). Under the facility amendment, the maturity date has been extended to January 31, |
| | | 2022 (the “2021 Facility”). Al other terms of the 2021 Facility (tangible net worth covenant, pledged cash, |
| | | investments amounts and security for the facility) remain unchanged from those of the 2020 Facility, and the |
| | | Company continues to have access to credit up to $24,000,000 the use of which is restricted to non-financial letters |
| | | of credit in support of reclamation obligations. |
| | | |
| | | The 2021 Facility remains subject to letter of credit and standby fees of 2.40% (0.40% on the $9,000,000 covered |
| | | by pledged cash collateral) and 0.75% respectively. |
| | | |
| | | At-the-Market (“ATM”) Share Issue Program Activity |
| | | |
| | | Subsequent to year-end, Denison, through its agents, issued 4,230,186 common shares under its ATM program |
| | | at an average price of $0.93 per share for aggregate gross proceeds of $3,914,000. The Company paid total |
| | | commissions of $78,000 resulting in net proceeds after commissions of $3,836,000. The Company has also |
| | | incurred other costs associated with the set-up of the ATM program which have been deferred on the balance |
| | | sheet at December 31, 2020 and which wil be recognized as share issue expenses in 2021. |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | 42 |
| | | |
|
| ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
| | | Public Unit Offering Issue |
| | | |
| | | On February 19, 2021, the Company completed a public offering by way of a prospectus supplement to the 2020 |
| | | Shelf Prospectus of 31,593,950 units of the Company at USD$0.91 per unit for gross proceeds of $36,266,000 |
| | | (USD$28,750,000), including the ful exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option, accounting for 4,120,950 |
| | | units. Each unit consists of one common share and one-half of one transferable common share purchase warrant |
| | | of the Company. Each ful warrant is exercisable to acquire one common share of the Company at an exercise |
| | | price of USD$2.00 for 24 months after issuance. |
| | | |
| | | Private Placement of Flow Through Shares |
| | | |
| | | On March 3, 2021, the Company completed a private placement of 5,926,000 flow-through common shares at a |
| | | price of $1.35 per share for gross proceeds of approximately $8,000,000. The income tax benefits of this issue |
| | | | |
| | | wil be renounced to subscribers with an effective date of December 31, 2021. |
| | | |
| | 43 |
| | | |