Dear Stockholders:

You are cordially invited to attend the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Ingersoll Rand Inc. (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held on Thursday, June 16, 2022 at 10:30 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time. The Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual meeting format only and will be conducted via live audio webcast. You will be able to attend the Annual Meeting, vote your shares electronically and submit your questions during the meeting via live audio webcast by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/IR2022. To participate in the meeting, you must have your sixteen-digit control number that is shown on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or on your proxy card if you elected to receive proxy materials by mail. You will not be able to attend the Annual Meeting in person.

Please submit your proxy to have your shares voted promptly, whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. You may submit your proxy over the Internet, as well as by telephone or by mail. Please review the instructions on the proxy or voting instruction card regarding each of these voting options.

As permitted by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we are also pleased to be furnishing our proxy materials to stockholders primarily over the Internet. We believe this process expedites stockholders’ receipt of the materials, lowers the costs of the Annual Meeting and conserves natural resources. We sent a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials on or about April 29, 2022 to our stockholders of record at the close of business on April 20, 2022. The notice contains instructions on how to access our Proxy Statement and 2021 Annual Report and vote online. If you would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials from us instead of downloading a printable version from the Internet, please follow the instructions for requesting such materials included in the notice.

Thank you for your continued support of Ingersoll Rand Inc.

You have three options for submitting your proxy before the Annual Meeting to have your shares voted at the Annual Meeting:

Please submit your proxy as soon as possible to record your vote promptly, even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting via the Internet.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting to be Held on Thursday, June 16, 2022: The Proxy Statement and 2021 Annual Report to Stockholders, which includes the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, are available at www.proxyvote.com. In addition, a list of the stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be open for examination electronically by any stockholder for any purpose germane to the Annual Meeting electronically during the 2022 Annual Meeting, at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/IR2022 when you enter your 16-Digit Control Number.

We first sent a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and made these proxy materials available to you via the Internet on or about April 29, 2022 or, upon your request, have delivered printed versions of these proxy materials to you by mail in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors (the “Board” or “Board of Directors”) of Ingersoll Rand Inc. (the “Company”) of proxies to be voted at our Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 16, 2022 (“Annual Meeting”), and at any postponements or adjournments of the Annual Meeting. Directors, officers and other Company employees also may solicit proxies by telephone or otherwise. Brokers and other nominees will be requested to solicit proxies or authorizations from beneficial owners and will be reimbursed for their reasonable expenses. The Annual Meeting will be a virtual meeting of stockholders. You will be able to attend the Annual Meeting, vote your shares electronically and submit your questions during the meeting via live audio webcast by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/IR2022. To participate in the meeting, you must have your 16-Digit Control Number included in the Notice, or if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials, in your proxy card or the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. You will not be able to attend the Annual Meeting in person.

There are two proposals scheduled to be voted on at the Annual Meeting:

Stockholders as of the close of business on April 20, 2022 (the “Record Date”) may vote at the Annual Meeting. As of that date, there were 406,123,328 shares of common stock outstanding. You have one vote for each share of common stock held by you as of the Record Date, including shares:

The holders of record of a majority of the voting power of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting must be present in person or represented by proxy to constitute a quorum for the Annual Meeting. Abstentions are counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum. Shares represented by “broker non-votes” that are present and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting

also are counted for purposes of determining a quorum. However, as described below under “How are votes counted?”, if you hold your shares in street name and do not provide voting instructions to your broker, your shares will not be voted on any proposal on which your broker does not have discretionary authority to vote (a “broker non-vote”).

A broker non-vote occurs when shares held by a broker are not voted with respect to a proposal because (1) the broker has not received voting instructions from the stockholder who beneficially owns the shares, (2) the broker lacks the authority to vote the shares at his/her discretion and (3) there is at least one other proposal on the ballot with respect to which the broker has authority to vote the shares at his/her discretion. Under current New York Stock Exchange interpretations that govern broker non-votes, the Director Election Proposal is considered a non-discretionary matter and a broker will lack the authority to vote shares at his/her discretion on such proposal. The Ratification Proposal, however, is considered a discretionary or “routine” matter and therefore, a broker may exercise his/her discretion to vote for or against that proposal in the absence of your instructions.

With respect to the Director Election Proposal, each director nominee is elected at the Annual Meeting by a “majority vote” standard in uncontested elections, which means that for each of the director nominees, the number of shares voted “FOR” must exceed the total number of shares voted “AGAINST” such nominee for director in order to be elected (with “abstentions” and “broker non-votes” not counted as votes cast either “FOR” or “AGAINST” that director’s election). There is no cumulative voting. Any incumbent director nominee who fails to receive a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election shall offer to tender his or her resignation to the Board in accordance with the policies and procedures adopted by the Board from time to time. In accordance with such policies and procedures, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, or such other committee designated by the Board, will make a recommendation to the Board on whether to accept or reject such resignation, or whether other action should be taken, and the Board will act taking into account the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s or such other committee’s recommendation and publicly disclose its decision within ninety (90) days from the date of the certification of the election results.

With respect to the Ratification Proposal, approval requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the shares of stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal, which means that the number of shares voted “FOR” the Ratification Proposal must exceed the total number of shares voted “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” at the Annual Meeting.

With respect to the Director Election Proposal, you may vote “FOR”, “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” with respect to each nominee. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the Director Election Proposal.

With respect to the Ratification Proposal, you may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN.” Abstentions will be counted as a vote “AGAINST” the Ratification Proposal. There are no broker non-votes with respect to the Ratification Proposal as brokers are permitted to exercise discretion to vote uninstructed shares on this proposal.

If you just sign and submit your proxy card without voting instructions, your shares will be voted “FOR” each director nominee listed herein and “FOR” the Ratification Proposal as recommended by the Board and in accordance with the discretion of the holders of the proxy with respect to any other matters that may be voted upon.

Representatives of Broadridge Investor Communications Services (“Broadridge”) will tabulate the votes, and representatives of Broadridge will act as inspectors of election.

Our Board recommends that you vote your shares:

Any stockholder can attend the Annual Meeting live online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/IR2022. If you were a stockholder as of the Record Date, you can vote electronically if you attend the Annual Meeting via the Internet. A summary of the information you need to attend the Annual Meeting via the Internet is provided below:

In light of the public health concerns due to the evolving COVID-19 pandemic and to support the health and well-being of our stockholders and associates, the Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual meeting format only and will be conducted via live audio webcast. The online meeting format for the Annual Meeting will enable full and equal participation by all our stockholders from any place in the world at little to no cost.

We designed the format of the virtual Annual Meeting to ensure that our stockholders who attend our Annual Meeting will be afforded the same rights and opportunities to participate as they would at an in-person meeting and to enhance stockholder access, participation and communication through online tools. We will take the following steps to ensure such an experience:

If you are a stockholder of record, you may have your shares voted by granting a proxy. Specifically, you may submit your proxy:

If you hold your shares in street name, you may also submit voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee. In most instances, you will be able to do this over the Internet, by telephone or by mail. Please refer to information from your bank, broker, or other nominee on how to submit voting instructions.

Internet and telephone voting facilities will close at 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time on June 15, 2022 for the voting of shares held by stockholders of record or held in street name.

Mailed proxy cards with respect to shares held of record or in street name must be received no later than June 15, 2022.

How can I vote the shares I hold through an employee savings plan?

If you participate in the Ingersoll Rand Retirement Savings Plan, you may give voting instructions to the plan trustee with respect to the shares of our common stock that are associated with your plan account by completing the voting instruction card or email notice you receive. The plan trustee will follow your voting instructions unless it determines that to do so would be contrary to law. If you do not provide voting instructions, the plan trustee will act in accordance with the employee benefit plan documents. In general, the plan documents specify that the trustee will vote the shares for which it does not receive instructions in the same proportion that it votes shares for which it received timely instructions, unless it determines that to do so would be contrary to law.

You may revoke previously given instructions by following the instructions provided by the trustee.

The deadline to submit your instructions to the trustee if you hold shares through the Ingersoll Rand Retirement Savings Plan is 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time on June 13, 2022.

It generally means you hold shares registered in more than one account. To ensure that all your shares are voted, please sign and return each proxy card or, if you vote by Internet or telephone, vote once for each Notice you receive.

You may change your vote and revoke your proxy at any time prior to the vote at the Annual Meeting. If you are the stockholder of record, you may change your vote by granting a new proxy bearing a later date (which automatically revokes the earlier proxy) using any of the methods described above (and until the applicable deadline for each method), by providing a written notice of revocation to the Company’s Corporate Secretary at Ingersoll Rand Inc., 525 Harbor Place Drive, Suite 600, Davidson, North Carolina 28036 prior to your shares being voted, or by attending the Annual Meeting via the Internet and voting. Attendance at the meeting via the Internet will not cause your previously granted proxy to be revoked unless you specifically so request. For shares you hold beneficially in street name, you may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your broker, trustee or nominee following the instructions it has provided.

At the date this Proxy Statement went to press, we did not know of any matters to be raised at the Annual Meeting other than those referred to in this Proxy Statement.

If other matters are properly presented at the Annual Meeting for consideration and you are a stockholder of record and have submitted a proxy card, the persons named in your proxy card will have the discretion to vote on those matters for you.

We will pay the cost of soliciting proxies. Proxies may be solicited on our behalf by directors, officers or employees (for no additional compensation) in person or by telephone, electronic transmission and facsimile transmission. Brokers and other nominees will be requested to solicit proxies or authorizations from beneficial owners and will be reimbursed for their reasonable expenses.

Upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the full Board of Directors has considered and nominated the following slate of nominees to stand for re-election for a one-year term expiring at the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified:

The biographies and qualifications of the eight director nominees in this Proposal No. 1 are set forth below under the heading “Director Biographies and Qualifications.”

The following information describes the offices held, other business directorships and the experiences, qualifications, attributes or skills that caused the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board to determine that the director nominee should serve as a director. Beneficial ownership of equity securities of each director nominee is shown in the section titled “Ownership of Securities.”

The Audit Committee has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2022.

Although ratification is not required by our Second Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”) or otherwise, the Board is submitting the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP to our stockholders for ratification because we value our stockholders’ views on the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. If our stockholders fail to ratify the selection, it will be considered as notice to the Board and the Audit Committee to consider the selection of a different firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders.

Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting. They also will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so, and they are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

The shares represented by your proxy will be voted for the ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP unless you specify otherwise.

In connection with the audit of the 2021 financial statements, we entered into an agreement with Deloitte & Touche LLP which set forth the terms by which Deloitte & Touche LLP would perform audit services for the Company.

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees for professional services provided by Deloitte & Touche LLP for the audit of our financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 and fees billed for other services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP for those periods, all of which were approved by the Audit Committee.

The Audit Committee pre-approved all the services included in this table. The Audit Committee of the Board considered whether providing the non-audit services included in this table was compatible with maintaining Deloitte & Touche LLP’s independence and concluded that it was.

Consistent with SEC policies regarding auditor independence and our Audit Committee’s charter, the Audit Committee has responsibility for engaging, setting compensation for and reviewing the performance of the independent registered public accounting firm. In exercising this responsibility, the Audit Committee has established procedures relating to the approval of all audit and non-audit services that are to be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm and pre-approves all audit and permitted non-audit services provided by any independent registered public accounting firm prior to each engagement.

Our Board manages or directs the business and affairs of the Company, as provided by Delaware law, and conducts its business through meetings of the Board and four standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Sustainability Committee.

Our Board evaluates the Company’s corporate governance policies on an ongoing basis with a view towards maintaining the best corporate governance practices in the context of the Company’s current business environment and aligning our governance practices closely with the interests of our stockholders.

In order to better align our corporate governance with best practices and expand the rights of our stockholders, in 2021 we implemented certain governance enhancements.

Following stockholder approval, we declassified our Board, implemented a majority voting standard in the election of directors, and replaced the supermajority voting requirements in our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws with a majority voting standard in order to give our stockholders a more meaningful vote in various corporate matters.

Additionally, the Board recently approved revisions to the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines creating a role of Lead Director of the Board. The Lead Director is elected by a plurality vote of the independent directors, or via unanimous vote of the independent directors if via written consent action, and serves until the Board meeting immediately following the third anniversary of appointment, provided, however, the Board may extend such term by any length up to the fifth anniversary of the Board meeting immediately following the appointment. The creation of the Lead Director role reflects the Company’s continued commitment to enhanced corporate governance best practices. The duties and responsibilities of the Lead Director are set forth in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines which is available on our website at www.irco.com under “Investors: Governance: Governance Documents & Charters: Corporate Governance Guidelines.”

Recognizing the importance of sustainability to our Company and to our world, we established a new Sustainability Committee of our Board in October, 2021, focused on overseeing and advising the Board on the Company’s sustainability strategies and initiatives, including reviewing the overall sustainability, corporate social responsibility, and diversity, equity and inclusion strategies, initiatives and goals. We felt that a separate committee focused on these critical topics provides greater oversight and attention than simply having these matters addressed by an existing Board committee.

Our Board and management value the perspective of our stockholders and encourage stockholders to communicate with the Board as described under “―Communications with the Board” below.

As described in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, stockholders and other interested parties who wish to communicate with a member or members of the Board, including the chairperson of the Audit, Compensation, Sustainability or Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee or the non-management or independent directors as a group, may do so by addressing such communications or concerns to the Secretary of the Company, 525 Harbor Place Drive, Suite 600, Davidson, North Carolina 28036.

Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines and New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rules, a director is not independent unless the Board affirmatively determines that he or she does not have a direct or indirect material relationship with the Company or any of its subsidiaries.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines define independence in accordance with the independence definition in the current NYSE corporate governance rules for listed companies. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require our Board of Directors to review the independence of all directors at least annually.

In the event a director has a relationship with the Company that is relevant to his or her independence and is not addressed by the objective tests set forth in the NYSE independence definition, our Board of Directors will determine, considering all relevant facts and circumstances, whether such relationship is material.

Our Board of Directors has determined that each of Kirk E. Arnold, Elizabeth Centoni, William P. Donnelly, Gary D. Forsee, John Humphrey, Marc E. Jones and Tony L. White is independent under the guidelines for director independence set forth in the Corporate Governance Guidelines and under all applicable NYSE guidelines, including with respect to committee membership.

Our Board also has determined that each of Messrs. Donnelly, Forsee and Humphrey is “independent” for purposes of Section 10A(m)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that each of Messrs. Donnelly and Jones and Ms. Arnold is “independent” for purposes of Section 10C(a)(3) of the Exchange Act.

In sum, seven out of the eight current members of our Board of Directors have been determined to be independent and includes each director other than Mr. Reynal, our Chief Executive Officer.

Each year, our Board of Directors and each of its committees conducts an assessment of its performance. This assessment is overseen and facilitated by an independent firm. This independent firm conducts the assessment through a survey process and communicates the results with our Board chair and the chair of each of the committees. The results are then discussed with the full Board of Directors and, if needed, actions are formulated and executed that address any areas of opportunity identified through the assessment.

In the case of incumbent directors whose terms of office are set to expire, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews such directors’ overall service to our Company during their respective term, including the number of meetings attended, level of participation, quality of performance and any relationships and transactions that might impair such directors’ independence. In addition, pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, no person shall be nominated by the Board to serve as a director after he or she has passed his or her 75th birthday, unless the Board has voted to waive the mandatory retirement age for such director at the time of nomination.

Our Board of Directors is led by Mr. Reynal, our Chairman, and Mr. Donnelly our Lead Director. Mr. Reynal serves in a combined role of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, which provides the significant advantages of our Chairman having extensive experience with the business and ongoing executive responsibility for the Company. We believe these advantages bolster the Company’s ability to execute on its strategic imperatives and deliver stockholder value. Consistent with best governance practices, we created the new Lead Director role to work closely with our Chairman. This role is held by Mr. Donnelly and is designed to help coordinate the efforts of the independent and non-management directors to ensure objective judgment with respect to sensitive issues involving the management of the Company and, in particular, the performance of senior management.

We believe that the combined role of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, together with our Lead Director role and the other elements of our corporate governance structure, strikes an appropriate balance between strong and consistent leadership and independent and effective oversight of our business and affairs that enables appropriate corporate governance. The Board believes that a combined Chairman and Chief Executive role allows the Company to effectively convey its business strategy and core values to shareholders, customers, colleagues, regulators and the public in a single, consistent voice. The Board also recognizes the necessity of having a strong Lead Director with a clearly defined role and set of responsibilities where the Chairman is not independent. Their leadership is supplemented by engaged and expert committee chairs along with independent-minded, skilled and committed directors.

Our Board does not currently have a policy as to whether the role of Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer should be separate and believes that the Company and its stockholders are best served by maintaining the flexibility to determine whether the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer positions should be separated or combined at a given point in time in order to provide appropriate leadership for us at that time given the then-current circumstances. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that, in order to maintain the independent integrity of our Board, if the Chairman of the Board is not an independent director, the Board may appoint an independent director as Lead Director. See “Recent Governance Enhancements” above for further discussion of the Lead Director role.

We believe that strong independent leadership is essential for our Board to effectively perform its primary oversight functions. We also believe it is critically important for our Board to retain flexibility to determine its leadership structure based on the particular composition of the Board, the individuals serving in leadership positions, the needs and opportunities of the Company as they change over time.

The following table summarizes the current membership of each of the Board’s Committees.

All directors are expected to make every effort to attend all meetings of the Board, meetings of the committees of which they are members and the annual meeting of stockholders. During 2021, the Board held eight meetings and acted seven times by unanimous written consent. No member of the Board attended fewer than 75% (which is the minimum required attendance) of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board (held during the period for which he or she was a director) and the total number of meetings held by all committees of the Board on which such director served (held during the period that such director served). All eight current directors serving at the time of last year’s annual meeting attended last year’s annual meeting of stockholders.

Our Audit Committee currently consists of Messrs. Donnelly, Forsee and Humphrey, with Mr. Donnelly serving as Chair. All members of the Audit Committee have been determined to be “independent,” consistent with our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the NYSE listing standards applicable to boards of directors in general and audit committees in particular. Our Board has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee is “financially literate” within the meaning of the listing standards of the NYSE. In addition, our Board has determined that Messrs. Donnelly, Humphrey and Forsee qualify as audit committee financial experts as defined by applicable Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regulations. The Board reached its conclusion as to Mr. Donnelly’s qualification based on, among other things, Mr. Donnelly’s experience as the Chief Financial Officer of Mettler-Toledo International Inc. and as an auditor with PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP. The Board reached its conclusion as to Mr. Humphrey’s qualification based on, among other things, Mr. Humphrey’s experience as the Chief Financial Officer of Roper Technologies. The Board reached its conclusion as to Mr. Forsee’s qualification based on, among other things, Mr. Forsee’s experience as Chief Executive Officer of Sprint Nextel Corporation.

The duties and responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set forth in its charter, which may be found at www.irco.com under Investors: Governance: Governance Documents & Charters: Audit Committee Charter, and include the following:

With respect to our reporting and disclosure matters, the responsibilities and duties of the Audit Committee include reviewing and discussing with management and the independent registered public accounting firm our annual audited financial statements and quarterly financial statements prior to inclusion in our Annual Report on Form 10-K or other public dissemination in accordance with applicable rules and regulations of the SEC. The Audit Committee also prepares the report of the committee required by the rules and regulations of the SEC to be included in our annual proxy statement.

The charter of the Audit Committee permits the committee to delegate any or all of its authority to one or more subcommittees. In addition, the Audit Committee has the authority under its charter to engage independent counsel and other advisors as it deems necessary or advisable.

On behalf of the Board, the Audit Committee plays a key role in the oversight of the Company’s risk management policies and procedures. See “Oversight of Risk Management” below.

Our Compensation Committee currently consists of Messrs. Donnelly and Jones and Ms. Arnold, with Ms. Arnold serving as chair. All members of our Compensation Committee have been determined to be “independent” as defined by our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the NYSE listing standards applicable to boards of directors in general and compensation committees in particular.

The duties and responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are set forth in its charter, which may be found at www.irco.com under Investors: Governance: Governance Documents & Charters: Compensation Committee Charter, and include the following:

With respect to our reporting and disclosure matters, the responsibilities and duties of the Compensation Committee include overseeing the preparation of and recommending the Compensation Discussion and Analysis to the Board for inclusion in our annual proxy statement or Annual Report on Form 10-K in accordance with applicable rules and regulations of the SEC.

The charter of the Compensation Committee permits the committee to delegate any or all of its authority to one or more subcommittees and to delegate to one or more officers of the Company the authority to make awards to any non-Section 16 officer of the Company under the Company’s incentive-compensation or other equity-based plan, subject to compliance with the plan and the laws of the state of the Company’s jurisdiction. In addition, the Compensation Committee has the authority under its charter to retain outside consultants or advisors, as it deems necessary or advisable.

For a description of our processes and procedures for the determination of executive and director compensation, see the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Director Compensation in Fiscal 2021―Description of Director Compensation” sections of this Proxy Statement.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee currently consists of Messrs. Humphrey and White and Ms. Centoni, with Mr. Humphrey serving as chair. All members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee have been determined to be “independent” as defined by our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the NYSE listing standards.

The duties and responsibilities of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are set forth in its charter, which may be found at www.irco.com under Investors: Governance: Governance Documents & Charters: Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee Charter, and include the following:

The charter of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee permits the committee to delegate any or all of its authority to one or more subcommittees. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has the authority under its charter to retain outside counsel or other experts as it deems necessary or advisable.

Our Sustainability Committee currently consists of Messrs. Jones and Foresee and Ms. Arnold, with Mr. Jones serving as chair. All members of our Sustainability Committee have been determined to be “independent” as defined by our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the NYSE listing standards.

The duties and responsibilities of the Sustainability Committee are set forth in its charter, which may be found at www.irco.com under Investors: Governance: Governance Documents & Charters: Sustainability Committee Charter, and include the following:

The Board has extensive involvement in the oversight of risk management related to us and our business and accomplishes this through oversight and regular reporting by the Audit Committee, the chairman and members of which have experience in overseeing risk management strategy, including risk management related to information and cyber security. The Audit Committee represents the Board in this oversight role by periodically reviewing our accounting, reporting and financial practices, including the integrity of our financial statements, surveilling our administrative and financial controls and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and reviewing and assessing overall company risk through a formalized enterprise risk management (ERM) program led by the management team.

Through its regular meetings with management, including the finance, legal, and internal audit functions, as part of our ERM program, the Audit Committee reviews and discusses all significant areas of risk. Such review and discussion includes a comprehensive review and assessment of cybersecurity risks, other cyber risks and potential key emerging risks. The Audit Committee also reviews and assesses management’s remediation plans with respect to such risks and other relevant mitigating factors and summarizes these discussions for the Board. As part of our ERM program, management reports to the Audit Committee quarterly with respect to all significant areas of risk (including cyber risks and emerging risks), which allows the Audit Committee to closely monitor the Company’s developing risk landscape. Our head of internal audit, who is also our Chief Risk Officer, reports directly to the Audit Committee.

In addition to the oversight with respect to overall Company risk management provided by the Audit Committee, the other committees participate in the risk management process. The Compensation Committee considers, and discusses with management, management’s assessment of certain risks, including whether any risks arising from our compensation policies and practices for our employees are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees and evaluates programs and risks associated with Board organization, membership and structure, succession planning and corporate governance. The Sustainability Committee assesses current aspects of the Company’s environmental, health and safety policies and performance and make recommendations to the Board of Directors and the management of the Company with regard to promoting and maintaining superior standards of performance, including processes to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations and programs to manage risks relating to environmental and safety matters.

Executive sessions, which are meetings of independent members of the Board, are regularly scheduled throughout the year. At each of these meetings, Mr. Donnelly, as our independent Lead Director, presides.

Sustainability constitutes a pillar of our corporate strategy and we are committed to embedding environmental, social and governance initiatives into our culture.

A key principle of the Company’s Board member selection process is to strive to have a diverse Board of Directors. A critical factor that the Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee carefully consider when assessing potential director candidates is the importance to the Company of ethnic and gender diversity in board composition. As set forth in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board are required to consider, and to request that any search firm hired by it consider, highly qualified women and diverse candidates as part of any director search process. The

Board’s commitment to this focus on Board diversity has resulted in a Board where five of eight current members (62%) are diverse, including two who are female and four who are ethnically diverse. In addition, Board members actively participate as mentors and panel speakers in quarterly events hosted by the Company’s inclusion groups.

In 2021, we continued to strengthen our commitments to diversity, equity and inclusion (“DE&I”) within our workforce. These commitments include:

We expect our employees and all individuals we associate with to uphold these aspirations with humility, integrity and respect.

In terms of diverse representation, we have two focus areas: 1) underrepresented populations in the United States and 2) women globally. Our employee base as of December 31, 2021 consisted of 16% underrepresented populations in the U.S. and our goal is to increase the percentage of underrepresented populations in our U.S. employee base to 30% by 2025. Globally, women represented as of December 31, 2021, 22.6% of our population, which exceeded our first year target of 22.25%, and keeps us on track to reach our goal to increase the percentage of women in our global employee population to 25% by 2025.

We are making strides at increasing the number of gender diverse employees in more senior roles with our promotion rate increasing to 40.9%, surpassing our goal of 40%. In addition, 43% of our extended leadership team are gender or ethnically diverse. These advances are reflected in our year-over-year improvement in the employee engagement scores in four categories that we believe are closely connected to DE&I: belonging, growth, inclusion and equal opportunity.

We have expanded our employee inclusion groups to build stronger global connections, advocate for positive change and foster an inclusive culture in the organization. We currently have nine Employee Inclusion Groups (a Black Employee Network Inclusion Group, a Veterans Inclusion Group, a Women Inclusion Group, a Hispanic/LatinX Organization of Leadership and Advancement, Four regional inclusion groups (Europe and Asia Pacific) and One DE&I council in Latin America). An executive leader sponsors each group and provides guidance to establish goals in support of our company strategies, culture and values to their global members.

In addition, we continue to set the groundwork for inclusion by training our employees on unconscious bias and how to recognize bias in the workplace and in ourselves and have deployed our unconscious bias training to more than 82% of our salaried employees and conducted personalized sessions to over 150 leaders on “DE&I Matters.” In 2021, we continued our powerful initiative called “Lean into Change” where employees from across the company participate in culturally sensitive conversations with trust and transparency.

Central to our inclusion strategy is to make all employees true owners of the Company. To that end, we also announced a process by which all new or acquired employees will receive stock in the Company after one year of employment¹. We feel that the combination of a solid strategy, strong values and clear expectations, coupled with true employee ownership, provides us strong engagement and a competitive edge.

In 2021, we established a Sustainability Committee of our Board to provide oversight and guidance to the execution of our Operate Sustainably strategic imperative. As part of implementing our sustainability strategy, we have embedded sustainability into our culture and company; driving accountability and execution of our sustainability goals and initiatives through our Ingersoll Rand Execution (IRX) process; and providing transparency to the public on our progress in achieving these goals.

In 2020, we conducted a materiality assessment that included the input of employees, customers, stockholders, suppliers and other stakeholders. This assessment identified energy use, product stewardship and innovation, and our employees as our most material topics. Since then, we have continued to structure our environmental, social and governance initiatives around these material topics and deployed IRX processes to help us achieve them.

In 2021, we announced our aggressive corporate sustainability goals designed to reduce the impact of our operations and products on the environment, and support customers and partners in doing the same. Achievement of these goals will reduce greenhouse gas emissions and save energy, create safer water for our communities and result in reduced waste to landfill, all of which directly advance progress against our material topics. Further details with respect to our sustainability goals can be found on our website, www.irco.com, under “Investors: Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG).”

In addition, we continue to focus on transparency with respect to our sustainability progress through our annual sustainability reports, including our 2020 sustainability report released in July 2021, and an investor call on August 6, 2021, where we provided a mid-year update on our sustainability initiatives.

In 2021, we also implemented an enhanced environmental policy that confirms our commitment to a clean environment and compliance with environmental laws and an active environmental management program aimed at complying with existing environmental regulations and reducing the generation of pollutants in the manufacturing processes.

All of these actions resulted in substantial progress on our sustainability initiatives in 2021. At the beginning of the year, we set a three-year goal to be recognized in the top quartile of industrial companies for sustainability. We achieved this goal in little more than one year with S&P Global and Sustainalytics both recognizing us as being in the top 15% of companies within our sector.

As mentioned above, our Board and management value the perspective of our stockholders and encourage stockholders to communicate with the Board, including with respect to our diversity and sustainability initiatives, as described under “―Communications with the Board” above.

Our commitment to good corporate governance is reflected in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which describe the Board’s views on a wide range of governance topics. These Corporate Governance Guidelines are reviewed from time to time by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and, to the extent deemed appropriate in light of emerging practices, revised accordingly, upon recommendation to and approval by the Board. For example, as mentioned above, the Board upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, recently approved revisions to the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines creating a role of Lead Director of the Board.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the charters of our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Sustainability Committee and other corporate governance information are available on the Corporate Governance page of the Investors section on our website at www.irco.com. Any stockholder also may request them in print, without charge, by contacting the Secretary of the Company, 525 Harbor Place Drive, Suite 600, Davidson, North Carolina 28036.

The Company has adopted a Code of Conduct that applies to all of the Company’s employees, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Controller and other persons performing similar functions. The Code of Conduct sets forth our policies and expectations on a number of topics, including conflicts of interest, corporate opportunities, confidentiality, compliance with laws (including insider trading laws), use of our assets and business conduct and fair dealing. This Code of Conduct also satisfies the requirements for a code of ethics, as defined by Item 406 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC. The Company will disclose within four business days any substantive changes in or waivers of the Code of Conduct granted to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, or any other executive officer or director, by posting such information on our website as set forth above rather than by filing a Form 8-K.

The Code of Conduct may be found on our website at www.irco.com under Investors: Governance: Governance Documents & Charters: Code of Conduct.

The Company’s Securities Trading Policy prohibits the Company’s directors, officers and employees from engaging in any transactions (including variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds) that are designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of the Company’s equity securities.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee weighs the characteristics, experience, independence and skills of potential candidates for election to the Board. In considering candidates for the Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also assesses the size, composition and combined expertise of the Board. As the application of these factors involves the exercise of judgment, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not have a standard set of fixed qualifications that is applicable to all director candidates, although the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does at a minimum assess each candidate’s strength of character, mature judgment, industry knowledge or experience and his or her independence of thought and ability to work collegially with the other members of the Board.

In addition, it is the Board’s policy to endeavor to have a diverse Board of Directors representing a range of experiences in areas that are relevant to the Company’s strategy and business and, as required by our Corporate Governance Guidelines, as part of any director search process, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board of Directors will, and will request that any search firm hired by it also, consider highly qualified women and diverse individuals. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board implement this policy by requiring that all director searches include qualified women and diverse candidates and requiring any search firms engaged by them to include and present such candidates to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board assess the effectiveness of this policy by evaluating the diversity of the candidates presented to them compared to the total number of candidates presented as well as whether an open Board position is in fact filled with a diverse candidate.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board believe that this policy is effective given that both of the last two Board positions filled by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board were diverse candidates and that over 60% of the Board is currently comprised of diverse directors.

In identifying prospective director candidates, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may seek referrals from its members, management, stockholders and other sources. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also may, but need not, retain a search firm in order to assist it in identifying candidates to serve as directors of the Company. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee utilizes the same criteria for evaluating candidates regardless of the source of the referral. When considering director candidates, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks individuals with backgrounds and qualities that, when combined with those of our incumbent directors, provide a blend of skills and experience to further enhance the Board’s effectiveness.

In connection with its annual nomination of a slate of nominees, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may also assess the contributions of those directors recommended for re-election in the context of the Board evaluation process and other perceived needs of the Board.

When considering whether the directors and nominees have the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, taken as a whole, to enable the Board to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively in light of the Company’s business and structure, the Board focused primarily on the information discussed in each of the board member’s biographical information set forth under “Director Biographies and Qualifications.” Each of the Company’s directors possesses high ethical standards, acts with integrity and exercises careful, mature judgment. Each is committed to employing his or her skills and abilities to aid the long-term interests of the stakeholders of the Company. In addition, our directors are knowledgeable and experienced in one or more business, governmental, or civic endeavors, which further qualifies them for service as members of the Board. A significant number of our directors possess experience in owning and managing public and privately held

enterprises and are familiar with corporate finance and strategic business planning activities that are unique to publicly traded companies like ours. See the directors’ biographical information set forth above for the important characteristics considered by our Board in determining that our directors should serve as directors of the Company.

This annual director nomination process resulted in the Board’s nomination of the eight incumbent directors named in Proposal 1 in this Proxy Statement and proposed for election by you at the upcoming Annual Meeting.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by stockholders. Any recommendation submitted to the Secretary of the Company should be in writing and should include any supporting material the stockholder considers appropriate in support of that recommendation, but must include information that would be required under the rules of the SEC to be included in a proxy statement soliciting proxies for the election of such candidate and a written consent of the candidate to serve as one of our directors if elected. Stockholders wishing to propose a candidate for consideration may do so by submitting the above information to the attention of the Secretary of the Company, Ingersoll Rand Inc., 525 Harbor Place Drive, Suite 600, Davidson, North Carolina 28036. All recommendations for nomination received by the Secretary of the Company that satisfy our Bylaw requirements relating to such director nominations will be presented to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for its consideration. Stockholders must also satisfy the notification, timeliness, consent and information requirements set forth in our Bylaws. These requirements are also described under the caption “Stockholder Proposals for the 2023 Annual Meeting.”

Set forth below is certain information regarding each of our current executive officers, other than Vicente Reynal, whose biographical information is presented under “Director Biographies and Qualifications.”

The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a charter which is reviewed annually by the Audit Committee. Additionally, a brief description of the primary responsibilities of the Audit Committee is included in this Proxy Statement under “The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters-Board Committees and Meetings-Audit Committee.” Under the Audit Committee charter, our management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of our financial statements, the application of accounting and financial reporting principles and our internal controls and procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. The independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing our financial statements and expressing an opinion as to their conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In the performance of its oversight function, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements of the Company with management and with the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee also discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). In addition, the Audit Committee received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm their independence.

Based upon the review and discussions described in the preceding paragraph, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements of the Company be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 filed with the SEC.

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the following Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on its review and discussion with management, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference into the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.

Submitted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors:

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) outlines our executive compensation philosophy and objectives, describes the elements of our executive compensation program, and explains how the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board arrived at its compensation decisions for our 2021 named executive officers (“NEOs”) listed below:

Despite the continued challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, direct material and logistics inflation and overall global supply chain disruptions, 2021 was a pivotal year for the Company. We solidified our growth story as we reshaped our portfolio to focus on mission-critical flow creation technologies and high growth sustainable end markets while establishing a new capital allocation strategy designed to enable us to consistently compound earnings over time. We continued our strong operational execution where the commercial effectiveness of our team, driven by our industry-leading Ingersoll Rand Execution Excellence (IRX) process, yielded a backlog at the end of the fourth quarter of 2021 that was our largest ever, and positioned us well for continued strong results in 2022.

In addition, we achieved significant accomplishments across each of our five strategic imperatives in 2021 including:

Deploy Talent. Our employees think and act like owners because they are! As a result of our two landmark all employee share grants at the time of our initial public offering and the Merger, all of our employees at such times became owners. Incredibly, the common stock granted to employees through those grants has appreciated from $250 million at time of grant to over $500 million in value as of March 31, 2022. Furthermore, in 2021 we announced a plan to grant shares to new employees -- both those who join us as new hires or via acquisition -- to ensure that all of our employees have the chance to become owners.¹ We strongly believe that being an owner helps motivate our engaged employee base to make decisions each day that drive stockholder value creation. We can see the results of the power of ownership as our employee engagement score is up 17% over the last three years and now ranks in the top quartile of manufacturing organizations according to our engagement survey partner.

Expand Margins. By harnessing the power of IRX, we improved the Company’s Adjusted EBITDA margin 370 basis points since 2019, including an improvement of 160 basis points in 2021 alone. This drove 2021 record Adjusted EBITDA of $1,192 million, up 28%, with a margin of 23.1%.²

Operate Sustainably. We made tremendous progress on our sustainability initiatives in 2021. At the beginning of the year, we set a three-year goal to be recognized in the top quartile of industrial companies for sustainability. We achieved this goal in little more than one year with S&P Global and Sustainalytics both recognizing us as being in the top 15% of companies within our sector. This again demonstrates how we can leverage the power of IRX to drive performance across a multitude of different initiatives.

Accelerate Growth. Our unique growth enablers, including Demand Generation, IIoT, and product and service innovation, strongly contributed to growth in the past year. Our Demand Generation engine generated 3x more marketing qualified leads compared to 2018; IIoT-enabled assets were up 250% year over year; and new product innovation increased 95% in 2021. All of this helped drive record orders of $5,765 million, up 31% over 2020, and record revenues of $5,152 million, up 19% over 2020.¹

Allocate Capital Effectively. We secured approximately $2 billion in gross proceeds from the divestitures of Club Car and High Pressure Solutions, and redeployed over $1 billion to acquisitions in 2021, which represents over 6% of 2021 sales when annualized. We also repurchased $731 million in shares as part of KKR’s final equity sale, established a new $750 million share repurchase program, and initiated a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share during the fourth quarter.

Our purpose-led culture, the power of execution excellence through our IRX processes and our engaged employee base drove this level of execution on each of our strategic imperatives. This in turn led to total stockholder return performance of 35.9% during 2021, which was 84.8% greater than the total return of the S&P 500 Industrials during the same time period of 19.4%.

We value our stockholders’ perspectives on our business and each year proactively interact with investors through numerous engagement activities. In 2021, these included our annual stockholder meeting, quarterly earnings calls, and various investor conferences and meetings, as well as the establishment of an investor relations newsletter distributed to stockholders on a regular basis. In addition, in August we held an investor conference call focused on ESG and our Sustainability Report, in September we held an investor conference call focused on our capital allocation strategy, and in November we held our first Investors’ Day conference since the Merger. Throughout 2021, management also proactively engaged directly with our top 40 stockholders with actively managed funds, representing approximately 80% of our stockholder base based on share ownership, through quarterly business updates, non-deal roadshows and investor conferences. This resulted in over 300 individual investor touchpoints with these stockholders where we were able to communicate Company strategy and long-term objectives.

At the Company’s annual meeting in June 2021, we received substantial support for our executive compensation program, with over 95% of the stockholders who voted on the “say on pay” proposal approving the compensation of our NEOs, consistent with the positive feedback we received in discussions with our stockholders throughout the year. Based on the positive feedback we received from our major stockholders, in addition to the vote result in 2021, we did not make substantive changes in 2021 to our compensation philosophy or the overall structure of our program. We will continue to keep an open dialogue with our stockholders to ensure that we have a regular pulse on investor perspectives. We hold advisory votes on the compensation of our NEOs every three years; we will hold our next advisory vote on the compensation of our NEOs in 2024.

Our executive compensation philosophy is centered on two key tenets and grounded in the following principles:

Our compensation philosophy is supported by the following pay elements:

The following charts illustrate that a majority of NEO annual target total direct compensation (“TDC”) is performance-based. For our CEO, 89% of total compensation is delivered in variable compensation with the vast majority delivered in long-term incentives. On average, variable compensation for our other NEOs represents 74% of total compensation.

The Committee has adopted the following practices and policies reflecting what it believes to be a best practices approach to executive compensation.

The Committee oversees the executive compensation program for our NEOs. The Committee works closely with its independent consultant and management to examine the effectiveness of the Company’s executive compensation program throughout the year. For additional information regarding the Committee, see “The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters―Board Committees and Meetings―Compensation Committee.”

The Role of the Committee. The Committee ensures that the executive compensation program supports the Company’s business goals and aligns with stockholder interests. The Committee annually reviews NEO compensation levels by considering various factors, including:

The Role of Management. Our CEO makes recommendations to the Committee regarding compensation for the executive officers other than himself. No member of management participates in discussions with the Committee regarding his or her own compensation.

The Role of the Independent Consultant. The Committee has retained Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC (“Pearl Meyer”), a compensation consulting firm, to assist it in evaluating the elements and levels of our executive compensation, including base salaries, annual cash incentive awards and equity-based incentives for our executive officers. In April 2022, the Committee determined that Pearl Meyer is independent from management and that Pearl Meyer’s work has not raised any conflicts of interest. Pearl Meyer reports directly to the Committee and the Committee has the sole authority to approve Pearl Meyer’s compensation and may terminate the relationship at any time.

During 2021, Pearl Meyer advised the Committee on a variety of topics, including competitive market assessment for executive and non-employee director compensation levels, compensation peer group review, retirement equity vesting provisions, review of governance matters pertaining to executive and employee compensation, and the structure of short- and long-term incentive programs.

Peer Group. The Committee believes it is important to understand current trends in compensation practices and pay levels for companies that are comparable to Ingersoll Rand. To assist the Committee in this analysis, the Committee, together with its independent consultant and input from management, develops a compensation Peer Group of comparable companies against which it performs benchmarking (the “Peer Group”).

Together with its independent compensation consultant and input from management, the Compensation Committee developed a compensation Peer Group of 13 companies. Companies chosen are comparable in revenue and enterprise value to the Company, as the Committee believes revenue and enterprise value are key determinants of compensation levels. Companies selected generally have revenue of 1/2x - 2x of Ingersoll Rand’s revenue and enterprise value. In addition to size, companies are in comparable industries where we source executive talent. After taking these considerations into account plus additional input from its compensation consultant, the Committee decided to use the following Peer Group to help set compensation levels for 2021:

The Committee does not rely solely on data from the Peer Group in establishing compensation levels and practices, but uses it to support the implementation of the Company’s compensation philosophy and the application of the factors described above when setting executive compensation. Given the Company’s focus on delivering long-term value creation for our stockholders, the Committee generally targets cash compensation of the NEOs at or below the median of the Peer Group and long-term equity incentive compensation greater than the 50^th percentile of the Peer Group. Additionally, the Committee may also consider survey compensation data based on companies of similar size to Ingersoll Rand.

Base salary is the only fixed component of NEO cash compensation. An NEO’s base salary is related to the individual’s level of responsibility and provides them with a level of cash income predictability and stability with respect to a portion of their total compensation. The Committee believes that base salaries for executives should reflect competitive levels of pay and factors unique to each executive such as experience and breadth of responsibilities, performance, individual skill set, time in the role and internal pay parity. Base salaries are

reviewed annually or at other times when appropriate (for example, promotions, changes in job scope and/or responsibilities, etc.) and may be increased from time to time pursuant to such review.

Consistent with our philosophy to focus on long-term variable pay versus fixed cash compensation, the Committee generally established 2021 base salary rates at or below the median of Peer Group salary levels. In light of the economic uncertainty at the time 2021 compensation decisions were made, including the impacts of the on-going COVID-19 pandemic, the Committee decided for 2021 to maintain base salaries for the majority of executive officers at 2020 rates.

Consistent with this approach, only two NEOs received base salary increases in 2021. Mr. Kini’s was a merit-based adjustment intended to recognize his strong individual performance and to improve alignment with market levels, as his 2020 base salary rate was below market at the 25^th percentile level. Mr. Miñarro Viseras’ base salary increase was intended to recognize: (i) his long-term strategic importance to the Company, and (ii) the end of a legacy tax gross-up perquisite related to the reimbursement of schooling fees for his children.

The following table reflects the base salary rates of our NEOs as of December 31, 2021:

To tie a significant portion of their annual cash compensation to actual performance, each NEO is eligible for an annual cash bonus award under our Management Incentive Plan (“MIP”), based on the achievement of our financial goals for the Company and their respective business units.

A target annual bonus opportunity, expressed as a percentage of an NEO’s unreduced base salary rate at year-end, is established annually and may be adjusted from time to time by the Committee in connection with a NEO’s promotion or performance. The table below shows the 2021 target annual cash bonus opportunities for each of the NEOs.

2021 Performance Measures. The MIP pays out to participants based on levels of performance against financial metrics established by the Committee. To be eligible for a payout, a participant must be employed by the Company through the payment date or have an Approved Retirement (as defined below under “Potential Payments to Named Executive Officers upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control―Treatment of Outstanding Equity Awards in the Event of Termination of Employment or Change in Control―Equity awards granted 2018-2021”) on or after the end of the year but before the payment date. To ensure the right level of accountability and line-of-sight, the performance measures vary depending upon the role and responsibility of the NEO. For 2021, annual cash bonus awards for Corporate NEOs (Messrs. Reynal, Kini, Schiesl, and Weatherred) were based on the achievement of overall corporate performance, as described below. Mr. Miñarro Viseras’

annual cash bonus award was based in part on the achievement of overall Industrial Technologies and Services (“ITS”) group performance (excluding the power tools division) and in part on the achievement of Industrials Technologies and Services EMEIA (“ITS EMEIA”) performance, as described below, to reflect his leadership of the Industrials EMEIA business unit and his ability to impact the overall Industrials Group A detailed description of the 2021 MIP design and the calculation of the actual amounts paid to each of our NEOs is provided below.

For 2021, 75% of MIP payouts were based on Adjusted EBITDA performance. The Committee determined that a plan focused on Adjusted EBITDA was appropriate because it provides a reliable indicator of both our strategic growth and the strength of our overall financial results. Adjusted EBITDA represents net income (loss) before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, as further adjusted to exclude certain non-cash, nonrecurring and other adjustment items. As a balance to our profitability metric and in support of a focus on operational efficiency, the remaining 25% of the 2021 MIP payouts were based on Net Operating Working Capital¹ as a Percentage of Revenue.

For our Corporate NEOs, Corporate performance against both financial metrics is determined based on achievement for the Company. For our NEO at the ITS group level, Mr. Miñarro Viseras, performance against both financial metrics is based 30% on the total ITS segment (excluding the power tools division), and 70% on the ITS EMEIA region business unit.

The following table details the MIP payout percentage associated with a corresponding performance level against the Adjusted EBITDA targets for our NEOs and against the Net Operating Working Capital as a Percentage of Revenue targets for our Corporate NEOs. The payout percentage for performance between such levels determined on a linear basis:

Adjusted EBITDA results are adjusted to the extent that actual foreign exchange rates by country differ by more than 5% of budgeted foreign exchange rates. In addition to setting Adjusted EBITDA targets for our business units, we set an annual corporate expense budget each year and any difference between actual and budgeted corporate expense may be allocated to the Adjusted EBITDA at our business units. While there are no individual goals for purposes of MIP award payments, the Committee, on the recommendation of Mr. Reynal, may adjust an incentive payment upward or downward for performance-related reasons for other NEOs. In addition, the Committee has discretion to adjust MIP award payments for unanticipated events. For 2021, the Committee did not adjust the calculated MIP award payments for any of our NEOs.

The following table sets forth our actual payout percentage achieved with respect to each performance metric applicable to our NEOs and illustrates the calculation of the annual cash incentive awards payable to our NEOs under the 2021 MIP in light of these performance results.

Our long-term incentive awards, established through our Ingersoll Rand Inc. Amended and Restated 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan (our “2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan”), are intended to drive executives to deliver strong stock performance, align our executives’ compensation with long-term value creation, and to attract and retain highly-qualified executives. The details of these awards are as follows:

The payout under the PSUs is capped at 100% if the Company’s TSR is negative.

TSR is calculated as the appreciation in the price per share of a company’s common stock during the Performance Period (assuming any dividends or distributions are reinvested), expressed as a percentage. Relative TSR is based on the percentile rank of the Company’s TSR against the TSRs of the companies and entities that, on January 1, 2021, comprised the S&P 500 Industrials.¹

Total target values for annual equity awards granted in 2021 for each NEO are shown below:

Target annual equity award values were determined based on our competitive market analysis and our compensation philosophy, which calibrates award levels between market median and 75^th percentile.

These grant amounts were translated into a target number of performance share units, shares of restricted stock and stock options by taking such dollar amount and dividing it by the per share or per option “fair value” that was used for reporting the compensation expense associated with the grant under applicable accounting guidance. This “fair value” was based in part on the per share closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the date of grant.

To align the interests of our management and directors with those of our stockholders, the Board of Directors concluded that certain of our executives (the “Covered Executives”) and non-employee directors should have a significant financial stake in the Company’s stock. To further that goal, we implemented market-leading stock ownership guidelines (the “Guidelines”) in 2017, the year we completed our initial public offering. The Covered Executives and non-employee directors are required to hold a specific level of equity ownership as outlined below.

Covered Executives: The Guidelines apply to the Covered Executives in three tiers. The stock ownership levels under the Guidelines, expressed as a multiple of the Covered Executive’s annual base salary rate as of January 1^st of the year, are as follows:

Retention Requirement: There is no required time period within which a Covered Executive must attain the applicable stock ownership level under the Guidelines. However, until the applicable ownership level is achieved, Covered Executives must retain 75% of net shares granted to them. Once the ownership guideline is met, Covered Executives must retain 30% of net shares granted to them. This requirement drops to 20% for a Covered Executive upon the earlier of a (1) such Covered Executive reaching the age of 55 and (2) such covered executive achieving 10 years of service with the Company. The requirement terminates upon the earlier of (1) such Covered Executive reaching the age of 60 and (2) such covered executive achieving 15 years of service with the Company.

The shares counted toward these ownership requirements include shares owned outright and vested stock options. The retention requirement applies to all prior and future grants. These ownership requirements are set at levels that the Company believes are robust given the Covered Executives’ respective salaries and responsibilities.

Non-Employee Directors: Our non-employee directors are required to hold 75% of net shares granted to them under our benefit plans until they own equity equal to five times their annual cash retainers. Once the ownership guideline is met, directors must retain 30% of the net shares granted to them under our benefit plans until their retirement.

As of January 1, 2022, all our NEOs and then serving directors who were with the Company for at least one year were in compliance with the applicable stock ownership levels under the Guidelines.

The Company’s Securities Trading Policy requires executive officers and directors to consult the Company’s General Counsel prior to engaging in transactions involving the Company’s securities. The Company’s Securities Trading Policy prohibits directors and executive officers from hedging or monetization transactions including, but not limited to, through the use of financial instruments such as exchange funds, variable forward contracts, equity swaps, puts, calls, and other derivative instruments, or through the establishment of a short position in the Company’s securities. The Company’s Securities Trading Policy limits the pledging of Company securities to those situations approved by the Company’s General Counsel.

We have adopted a clawback policy for incentive compensation. The Committee determined that it may be appropriate to recover annual and/or long-term incentive compensation in specified situations. Under the policy, if the Committee determines that incentive compensation of its current and former Section 16 officers (or any other employee designated by the Board or the Committee) was overpaid, in whole or in part, as a result of a restatement of the reported financial results of the Company or any of its segments due to material non-compliance with financial reporting requirements (unless due to a change in accounting policy or applicable law), then the Committee will determine, in its discretion, whether to seek to recover or cancel any overpayment of incentive compensation paid or awarded during the three-year period preceding the date on which the Company is required to prepare the restatement.

While our compensation philosophy is to focus on performance-based forms of compensation while providing only minimal executive benefits and perquisites, we provide to all our employees, including our NEOs, broad-based employee benefits that are intended to attract and retain employees while providing them with retirement and health and welfare security. These include:

Our U.S. eligible employees, including our NEOs other than Mr. Miñarro Viseras, participate in the Ingersoll Rand Retirement Savings Plan (the “401(k) plan”), which is a tax-qualified retirement savings plan. Eligible employees hired on and after January 1, 2014, are automatically enrolled in the 401(k) plan to make pre-tax salary contributions, unless they decline participation. Under the 401(k) plan, we match 100% of the first 6% of a participant’s eligible pre-tax and/or Roth salary contributions, subject to all IRS annual limits and plan limitations. Participants are 100% vested in employee salary contributions and Company matching contributions. 401(k) plan participants may elect to contribute up to 85% of their annual eligible compensation (either through pre-tax or Roth contributions), subject to annual IRS and plan limitations.

In addition to the 401(k) plan, U.S. employees with a salary band of 8 or higher (generally senior directors and above), including the NEOs other than Mr. Miñarro Viseras, are eligible to participate in the Ingersoll Rand Supplemental Defined Contribution Plan (the “Supplemental Contribution Plan”), which is funded through a Rabbi Trust. This Supplemental Contribution Plan is intended to permit Company matching contributions on eligible participant compensation contributions to the Supplemental Contribution Plan in excess of the annual limitations imposed by the IRS on our tax-qualified 401(k) plan.

Eligible employees may contribute up to 85% of their salary and/or eligible annual bonus compensation to the Supplemental Contribution Plan. Under the Supplemental Contribution Plan, after an eligible employee exceeds the annual IRS pre-tax/Roth contribution limits and the annual catch up contribution limit for participants age 50 and older or compensation limit under the 401(k) plan, we match 100% of the first 6% of a

participant’s further eligible contributions to the Supplemental Contribution Plan. Company matching contributions under the Supplemental Contribution Plan are contributed to the Rabbi Trust in the form of cash rather than our common stock. All employee and Company matching contributions under the Supplemental Contribution Plan are fully vested immediately.

Executive perquisites are not part of our general compensation philosophy; however, we provide limited perquisites and personal benefits that are not generally available to all employees when necessary to attract top talent. For instance, beginning in 2021, certain of our senior executives, including each of the NEOs, are eligible for a tax and financial planning benefit, under which participating executives are reimbursed up to $10,000 per year for qualified services and participation in our executive physical program.

In addition, from time to time, we may set forth additional perquisites in offer letters or employment agreements we enter into with our executive officers. These arrangements are discussed under “Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2021—Summary of NEO Offer Letters and Employment Agreements.” For example, in 2021, per his employment agreement, Mr. Miñarro Viseras was entitled to international school assistance and use of a company car.

The Company believes that reasonable and appropriate severance and change in control benefits are necessary in order to be competitive in the Company’s executive attraction and retention efforts. As discussed below, the offer letters we enter into with our NEOs provide for certain payments, rights and benefits to the NEOs upon an involuntary termination of employment without “cause” or a termination by the NEO for “good reason” (as such terms are defined in “Potential Payments to Named Executive Officers Upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control-Severance Arrangements and Restrictive Covenants” below). In addition, our equity award agreements provide for accelerated vesting upon a change in control in certain circumstances and upon certain qualifying terminations of employment, as more fully described above under “―Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2021―Terms of Equity Awards.”

The Committee has reviewed our incentive compensation programs, discussed the concept of risk as it relates to our compensation program, considered various mitigating factors, and reviewed these items with its independent consultant, Pearl Meyer. In addition, our Committee asked Pearl Meyer to conduct an independent risk assessment of our executive and other compensation programs. Based on these reviews and discussions, the Committee does not believe our compensation program creates risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our business.

For the foregoing reasons, the Committee has concluded that the programs by which our executives are compensated strike an appropriate balance between short-term and long-term compensation and incentivize our executives to act in a manner that prudently manages enterprise risk.

We entered into offer letters setting forth initial compensation and benefits, as well as severance terms, with Messrs. Reynal, Schiesl and Weatherred at the time of their initial employment. In addition, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Miñarro Viseras when he joined the Company in 2016, and we entered into a new employment agreement with him in October 2018 in connection with our competitive review of executive officer compensation. Full descriptions of the material terms of the employment agreements we entered into with Mr. Miñarro Viseras and the offer letters we entered into with Messrs. Reynal, Schiesl, and Weatherred are presented below in “―Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2021.”

The following table provides summary information concerning compensation of our NEOs for services rendered to us during the years indicated.

In general, the Company does not enter into employment agreements with employees, including our executive officers, however we do enter into offer letters with many of our executive officers. In addition, we did enter into an employment agreement with Mr. Miñarro Viseras in 2016 and a new employment agreement with him in October 2018. Descriptions of the offer letters we entered into with Messrs. Reynal, Schiesl, and Weatherred, and the employment agreement we entered into with Mr. Miñarro Viseras are provided below. All current NEOs serve at the will of our board of directors.

The Company entered into an offer letter with Mr. Reynal, dated April 17, 2015, which was modified by a letter, dated November 19, 2015, we entered into with Mr. Reynal in connection with his promotion to Chief Executive Officer of the Company (the offer letter, dated April 17, 2015, as so modified, the “Reynal Offer Letter”). The Reynal Offer Letter provides that, as of January 1, 2016, Mr. Reynal is entitled to receive a base salary of $750,000, which base salary was increased to $1,000,000 in March 2020, and that Mr. Reynal is entitled to participate in our annual MIP with a target award opportunity of 100% of his annual base salary, which target was increased to 150% of salary in March 2020.

In addition, pursuant to the terms of the Reynal Offer Letter, Mr. Reynal was expected to invest a minimum of $2,000,000, and was given the opportunity to invest significantly more, into our common stock, subject to satisfaction of applicable securities law requirements.

Mr. Reynal is also eligible to participate in the Company’s 401(k), Supplemental Contribution, medical, dental, life insurance and disability plans, along with a comprehensive wellness program.

The Reynal Offer Letter also contains severance arrangements, which are discussed below under “Potential Payments to Named Executive Officers upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control.”

The Company entered into an offer letter with Mr. Schiesl, dated November 25, 2013 (the “Schiesl Offer Letter”). The Schiesl Offer Letter provides that Mr. Schiesl is entitled to receive a base salary of $450,000, which base salary was increased to $500,000 in March 2020, and is eligible to participate in the annual MIP with a target award opportunity of 75% of his base salary.

Mr. Schiesl is also eligible to participate in the Company’s 401(k), Supplemental Contribution, medical, dental, life insurance and disability plans, along with a comprehensive wellness program.

The Schiesl Offer Letter also contains severance arrangements, which are discussed below under “Potential Payments to Named Executive Officers upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control.”

The employment agreement the Company entered into with Mr. Miñarro Viseras on October 22, 2018 (the “Miñarro Viseras Employment Agreement”) provided that Mr. Miñarro Viseras was entitled to receive a base salary of €330,000, which base salary was increased to €432,125 in April 2021, was eligible to participate in the annual MIP with an award opportunity of up to 45% of his base salary, which target was increased to 85% of salary in March 2020, and was eligible to participate in our Management Equity Program.

Under the Miñarro Viseras Employment Agreement, in 2021, Mr. Miñarro Viseras was entitled to use of a company car and up to €53,061 per year of international school assistance for his children through the 2021 spring semester.

Under the Miñarro Viseras Employment Agreement, Mr. Miñarro Viseras was also covered under the standard group accident insurance of the Company.

The Company entered into an offer letter with Mr. Weatherred, dated April 30, 2018 (the “Weatherred Offer Letter”), in connection with his appointment as Vice President, Gardner Denver Operating System. The Weatherred Offer Letter provides that Mr. Weatherred is entitled to receive an annual base salary of $345,000, which base salary was increased to $415,000 in March 2020, and to participate in the Company’s Management Incentive Plan with an annual target award opportunity of 50% of his annual base salary, which target was increased to 75% of salary in March 2020.

Mr. Weatherred was eligible to participate in the Company’s long-term incentive plan with a target annual equity grant opportunity equal to $275,000, which target annual equity grant opportunity was increased to $700,000 in March 2020.

The Weatherred Offer Letter also contains severance arrangements, which are discussed below under “Potential Payments to Named Executive Officers upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control.”