NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held Thursday, August 10, 2023

To the Stockholders of CorVel Corporation:

You are cordially invited to attend the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of CorVel Corporation (the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our”) to be held on Thursday, August 10, 2023, at 1:00 p.m. Pacific Time (the “Annual Meeting”). The Annual Meeting will be held at our office at 1920 Main Street, Suite 900, Irvine, California 92614. This notice and the attached proxy statement (the “Proxy Statement”) describe the formal business to be transacted at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

We are furnishing proxy materials to our stockholders over the Internet. You may read, print, and download our proxy statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023 at https://materials.proxyvote.com/221006. On or about June 30, 2023 we mailed our stockholders a notice of internet availability of proxy materials (the “Notice”), which provides instructions regarding how to access these materials and vote their shares. The Notice also explains how to request a paper copy of these materials. If you requested to receive these proxy materials via email, you should have received an email with voting instructions and links to these materials on the internet.

The accompanying Proxy Statement provides information regarding the following matters we are asking you to consider and vote upon at the Annual Meeting:

We may also consider and vote upon any other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, we are not aware of any business to be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting other than the matters described in this Proxy Statement.

The Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) has set June 16, 2023 as the record date for the Annual Meeting. Only stockholders of record of our Common Stock as of the close of business on that date will be able to attend, vote and submit questions during the Annual Meeting.

The Board has determined that the matters to be considered at the Annual Meeting are in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. For the reasons set forth in the Proxy Statement, the Board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR ALL” of the director nominees listed in Proposal One, “FOR” Proposals Two and Three, and for every “THREE YEARS” for Proposal Four.

Your vote is very important. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to read the accompanying proxy statement and submit your proxy or voting instructions as soon as possible. For specific instructions regarding how to vote your shares, please refer to the Notice you received in the mail, and the additional information in the accompanying Proxy Statement. If you requested to receive printed proxy materials, you may also refer to the instructions on the proxy card enclosed with those materials.

On behalf of the Board, and the officers and employees of the Company, I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your continued support.

By order of the Board of Directors,

RICHARD J. SCHWEPPE

Secretary

Fort Worth, Texas

June 30, 2023

CORVEL CORPORATION

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR THE

2023 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

GENERAL INFORMATION

This proxy statement (this “Proxy Statement”) is being furnished to the stockholders of CorVel Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our”) on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) in connection with the solicitation of proxies for use at the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held on Thursday, August 10, 2023, at 1:00 p.m. Pacific Time, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. The Annual Meeting will be held at our office located at 1920 Main Street, Suite 900, Irvine, California, 92614.

Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials

Pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (the “SEC”) “notice and access” rules, which allow companies to furnish their proxy materials over the Internet, have elected to furnish our proxy materials, including this Proxy Statement, our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023 (our “2023 Annual Report”), primarily via the Internet. Accordingly, on or about June 30, 2023, we mailed to our stockholders a Notice, which provides instructions regarding how to access our proxy materials on the Internet, how to vote upon the proposals to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting, and how to request paper copies of this Proxy Statement and our 2023 Annual Report. Stockholders may request to receive all future proxy materials from us in printed form by mail or electronically by email by following the instructions contained in the Notice. We encourage stockholders to take advantage of the availability of proxy materials on the Internet to help reduce the environmental impact of our Annual Meeting.

You may read, print and download the proxy materials at https://materials.proxyvote.com/221006.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS REGARDING THE ANNUAL MEETING

Please carefully review the following, which is intended to provide general information about the Annual Meeting, including the date and time of the Annual Meeting, the quorum requirement, the proposals to be voted upon, the methods available for voting your shares, and the votes required to adopt the proposals. This information is also intended to provide you with the specific information that is required to be provided under the rules and regulations of the SEC. If you have questions about the information provided, or would like to request additional information about the Annual Meeting or the proposals to be voted upon, refer to the section entitled “Whom should I contact with other questions?” below.

Why did I receive these materials?

The Board is soliciting your proxy to vote at the Annual Meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof. You should review the proxy materials carefully as they give important information about the proposals that will be voted upon at the Annual Meeting, as well as other important information regarding the Company. You are invited to attend the Annual Meeting to vote on the proposals described in this Proxy Statement. However, you do not need to attend the Annual Meeting to vote your shares. Instead, you may vote your shares using one of the other voting methods described in this Proxy Statement.

1

What proposals am I being asked to vote upon at the Annual Meeting?

We may also consider and vote upon any other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, we are not aware of any business to be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting other than the matters described in this Proxy Statement.

If you complete and submit your proxy voting instructions, the persons named as proxies will follow your instructions. If you submit proxy voting instructions, but do not direct how your shares should be voted on each item, the persons named as proxyholders will vote your shares as recommended by our Board on all matters described in this Proxy Statement. Richard J. Schweppe and Sharon O’Connor are the designated proxyholders.

Who can vote at the Annual Meeting?

Only our stockholders at the close of business on June 16, 2023 (the “Record Date”) are entitled to attend and vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof. A list of the stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available for inspection at our principal executive office and at our Annual Meeting.

Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to read this Proxy Statement and submit your proxy or voting instructions as soon as possible to ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting.

2

What are the voting rights of the holders of our Common Stock?

As of the Record Date, we had 17,200,721 shares of Common Stock outstanding and approximately 755 holders of record according to information provided by our transfer agent. Holders of shares of our Common Stock are each entitled to one vote per share on any matter that is submitted for stockholder approval. As of the Record Date, we had no shares of preferred stock outstanding. Cumulative voting is not permitted with respect to the election of directors.

What constitutes a quorum for the Annual Meeting?

The presence at the Annual Meeting, or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock entitled to vote as of the Record Date will constitute a quorum, permitting business to be conducted at the Annual Meeting.

The inspector of election for the Annual Meeting will determine the number of shares of Common Stock represented at the Annual Meeting, the existence of a quorum and the validity and effect of proxies, and will count and tabulate ballots and votes and determine the results thereof. Properly voted proxies received but marked as abstentions, as well as shares for which authority is withheld and broker non-votes, will be included in the calculation of the number of shares considered to be present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining a quorum. For additional information regarding broker non-votes, refer to the section entitled “What is the effect of broker non-votes on the proposals?” below.

What are the voting requirements to approve each of the proposals?

The voting requirements to approve each of the proposals to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting, as well as the effects of withheld votes, votes against, abstentions and broker non-votes on each of the proposals, are as follows:

Proposal One: The election of each of our director nominees requires a plurality of the votes cast by the shares of Common Stock present or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon, which means the six director nominees receiving the highest number of votes at the Annual Meeting will be elected, even if those votes do not constitute a majority of the votes cast. Stockholders may vote “FOR ALL,” “WITHHOLD ALL,” or “FOR ALL EXCEPT” with respect to the director nominees nominated for re-election under this Proposal One. A “WITHHOLD” vote with respect to a director nominee will not count as a vote cast for that or any other nominee, and thus will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal. Broker non-votes will not count as votes cast on this proposal and will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal.

Proposal Two: The ratification of Haskell & White LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2024 (“fiscal year 2024”) requires the affirmative vote of the holders of our Common Stock representing a majority of the voting power present or represented by proxy and entitled to vote upon the proposal at the Annual Meeting. Stockholders may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST,” or “ABSTAIN” from voting on Proposal Two. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” this proposal. Because a bank, broker, dealer or other nominee may generally vote without instructions on this proposal, we do not expect any broker non-votes on this proposal.

3

Proposal Three: The affirmative vote of the holders of our Common Stock representing a majority of the voting power present or represented by proxy and entitled to vote is being sought for the non-binding advisory vote to approve our named executive officer compensation. Stockholders may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST,” or “ABSTAIN” with respect to this Proposal Three. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” this proposal. Broker non-votes will not count as votes cast on this proposal and will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal.

Proposal Four: The affirmative vote of the holder of our Common Stock representing a majority of the voting power present or represented by proxy and entitled to vote is being sought for the non-binding advisory vote to approve the frequency of the non-binding advisory vote on our named executive officer compensation. This Proposal Four includes four voting options: one year, two years, three years and abstain. For this Proposal Four, the option of every one year, two years or three years that receives the highest number of votes cast by stockholders will be considered the frequency for the advisory vote on executive compensation that is preferred by our stockholders. The Board will consider our stockholders’ preference as reflected in the vote on this Proposal Four in determining how frequently the advisory vote on executive compensation occurs in the future, but may decide that it is in our best interests and the best interests of our stockholders to hold an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers more or less frequently than the option approved by our stockholders. Stockholders may not cumulate votes in Proposal Four. Abstentions will not have the effect of a vote “AGAINST” this proposal, and thus will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal.

What are broker non-votes?

If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” and do not give the bank, broker, dealer or other nominee that holds the shares specific voting instructions, the nominee may generally vote in its discretion on “routine” matters (such as Proposal Two). However, if the nominee that holds your shares does not receive voting instructions from you on how to vote your shares on a “non-routine matter (such as Proposals One, Three and Four), it will be unable to vote your shares on that matter. When this occurs, it is generally referred to as a “broker non-vote.” Broker non-votes will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting.

How do I vote my shares?

4

Can I change my vote?

Yes, you may change your vote at any time before the polls are closed at the Annual Meeting. The giving of a proxy does not eliminate the right to vote during the Annual Meeting. Stockholders have the right to revoke their proxy at any time prior to the exercise of that proxy by following the instructions below.

Subject to any revocation, all shares represented by properly executed proxies will be voted in accordance with the instructions on the applicable proxy, or, if no instructions are given, in accordance with the recommendations of the Board as described above.

Could other matters be decided at the Annual Meeting?

As of the date of this Proxy Statement, we are not aware of any business to be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting other than the matters described in this Proxy Statement. If, however, other matters are properly presented at the Annual Meeting, the persons named as proxies will vote in accordance with their discretion with respect to those matters.

When will the voting results of the Annual Meeting be announced?

The preliminary voting results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. The final voting results will be published in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC within four business days following the Annual Meeting unless final results are not known at that time, in which case preliminary voting results will be published within four business days of the Annual Meeting and final voting results will be published once we know them.

Who pays for costs relating to the Proxy Materials and Annual Meeting?

The costs of preparing, assembling and mailing the proxy materials, along with the cost of posting the proxy materials on a website, are to be borne by us. In addition to the use of mail, our directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies personally and by telephone, facsimile and other electronic means. They will receive no compensation in addition to their regular salaries. We may request banks, brokers and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward copies of the proxy materials to their principals and to request authority for the execution of proxies. We may reimburse these persons for their expenses in so doing.

5

What is the deadline for submitting a stockholder proposal or director nomination for the 2024 Annual Meeting?

Stockholders wishing to make a director nomination, or bring another proposal, before the 2024 Annual Meeting (but not include it in our proxy materials for the meeting) must provide written notice of such proposal to the Secretary at our principal executive offices at 5128 Apache Plume Road, Suite 400, Fort Worth, Texas 76109, Attention: Corporate Secretary. Such proposals must be received not later than the close of business on Friday, May 13, 2024. Pursuant to Rule 14a-4(c)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), if a stockholder proposal is received after Thursday, May 16, 2024, it will be considered untimely and our proxyholders will use their discretionary voting authority to vote the shares they represent as the Board may recommend. Any stockholder proposal or director nomination must comply with the other provisions of the Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (the “Bylaws”) and be submitted in writing to the Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices.

Stockholder proposals pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-8 for inclusion in our proxy statement and form of proxy for our 2024 Annual Meeting must be received at our principal executive offices not later than the close of business on Friday, March 4, 2024.

In addition, stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees, other than the Company’s nominees, must provide notice in compliance with the universal proxy rules that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 of the Exchange Act, not later than Tuesday, June 11, 2024, assuming we do not change the date of the 2024 Annual Meeting by more than 30 days from the anniversary of the Annual Meeting. If we change the date of the meeting by more than 30 days from the anniversary of the Annual Meeting, then notice must be provided by the later of 60 calendar days prior to the date of the 2024 Annual Meeting or the tenth calendar day following the day on which we first make a public announcement of the date of such annual meeting.

Whom should I contact with other questions?

If you have additional questions about this Proxy Statement or the Annual Meeting, or if you would like additional copies of this Proxy Statement, please contact: CorVel Corporation, 5128 Apache Plume Road,

Suite 400, Fort Worth, Texas 76109, Attention: Corporate Secretary, Telephone: (817) 390-1416.

6

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Proxy Statement contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements may relate to our future financial performance, business operations, executive compensation decisions, or other future events. You can identify forward-looking statements by the use of words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “will,” or the negative of such terms, or other comparable terminology. Forward-looking statements include the assumptions underlying or relating to such statements. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The outcomes of the events described in these forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors described in the section entitled “Risk Factors,” and elsewhere, in our 2023 Annual Report. We cannot assure you that the events and circumstances reflected in the forward-looking statements will be achieved or occur, and actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements.

The forward-looking statements made in this Proxy Statement relate only to events as of the date of this Proxy Statement. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made.

7

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING

PROPOSAL ONE

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Board Structure and Membership

We currently have six directors serving on our Board and one vacancy. The Fourth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (our “Certificate of Incorporation”) provides that any additional directorships resulting from an increase in the number of directors, or the vacancy that currently exists on the Board, may be filled by a majority of the directors then in office. A director elected by the Board to fill a vacancy in a class, including vacancies created by an increase in the number of directors, shall serve for the remainder of the full term of that class and until the director’s successor is duly elected and qualified. We may reduce or increase the size of the Board by resolution adopted by the affirmative vote of a majority of the directors.

Our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws also provide that directors elected at an annual meeting of stockholders will serve for a one-year term ending on the date of the following annual meeting of stockholders or until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified. The term may be shorter if such individual resigns, becomes disqualified or disabled, or is otherwise removed.

Our Board has nominated the six individuals listed below for re-election at the Annual Meeting. If elected at the Annual Meeting, each director nominee would serve for a one-year term ending on the date of our 2024 Annual Meeting or until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified. The term may be shorter if such individual resigns, becomes disqualified or disabled, or is otherwise removed, and the Board will consist of six persons on the Board. Each nominee is currently serving as a director and has indicated his or her willingness to continue to serve as a director if re-elected. In the event that any such nominee becomes unable or declines to serve at the time of the Annual Meeting, the proxyholders may exercise discretionary authority to vote for a substitute person selected and recommended by our Nomination and Governance Committee and approved by the Board.

Recommended Vote

The election of each of our director nominees requires a plurality of the votes cast by the shares of Common Stock present or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon. This means that the nominees receiving the highest number of votes at the Annual Meeting will be elected, even if those votes do not constitute a majority of the votes cast. Stockholders may vote “FOR ALL,” “WITHHOLD ALL,” or “FOR ALL EXCEPT” with respect to the director nominees nominated for re-election under this Proposal One. A “WITHHOLD” vote with respect to a director nominee will not count as a vote cast for that or any other nominee, and thus will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal.

This proposal is considered a non-routine matter under applicable stock exchange rules. A bank, broker, dealer or other nominee may not vote without instructions on this matter, so there may be broker non-votes in connection with this proposal. Broker non-votes will not count as votes cast on this proposal, and thus will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR ALL” OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES.

8

Information Regarding Director Nominees

The following table lists the persons recommended by our Nomination and Governance Committee, and nominated by the Board, to be re-elected as directors to serve for a period of one year, including relevant information as of March 31, 2023:

V. Gordon Clemons. Mr. Clemons has served as our Chairman of the Board since April 1991. He served as our Chief Executive Officer from January 1988 until August 2007 and as our President from January 1988 until May 2006. He was reappointed as our Chief Executive Officer and President in April 2012 and served in the role of Chief Executive Officer until January 2019 and President until April 2017. Mr. Clemons was President of Caremark, Inc., a home intravenous therapy company, from May 1985 to September 1987, at which time Caremark was purchased by Baxter International, Inc. From 1981 to 1985, Mr. Clemons was President of INTRACORP, a medical management company and subsidiary of CIGNA Corporation. Mr. Clemons has over 41 years of experience in the healthcare and insurance industries. The Board believes Mr. Clemons is qualified to serve as Chairman of the Board given his extensive technology, industry, management and operational experience and his substantial understanding of the Company and its operations resulting from his various positions of leadership, including his position as Chief Executive Officer and President.

Steven J. Hamerslag. Mr. Hamerslag has served as one of our directors since May 1991. Mr. Hamerslag has been Managing Partner of TVC Capital, a venture capital firm, since April 2006, and Managing Director of Titan Investment Partners, a venture capital firm, since November 2002. Mr. Hamerslag served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of J2Global Communications, a publicly held unified communication services company, from June 1999 until January 2001. Mr. Hamerslag served as the Chief Executive Officer of MTI Technology Corporation, a publicly held manufacturer of enterprise storage solutions, from 1987 to 1996. The Board believes Mr. Hamerslag’s valuable business, leadership and executive management experience, particularly in the technology industry, qualifies him to serve as a director.

Alan R. Hoops. Mr. Hoops has served as one of our directors since May 2003. Mr. Hoops has been Executive Chairman of Health Essentials, a physician medical group specializing in hospice care, pharmacy and durable medical equipment services for medically complex and frail-elderly patients, since 2012. Mr. Hoops was Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of CareMore California Health Plan, a health maintenance organization, from March 2006 to February 2012. Mr. Hoops was Chairman of Benu, Inc., a regional benefits administration/marketing company, from 2000 to March 2006, and Chairman of Enwisen, Inc., a human resources services software company, from 2001 to March 2006. Mr. Hoops was Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Pacificare Health Systems, Inc., a national health consumer services company, from 1993 to 2000. Mr. Hoops has 46 years of experience in the healthcare and managed care industries. The Board believes Mr. Hoops’ experience as the Chief Executive Officer and Director of Pacificare Health Systems, Inc., combined with his strong operational and strategic background and extensive public company experience, qualifies him to serve as a director.

9

R. Judd Jessup. Mr. Jessup has served as one of our directors since August 1997. Mr. Jessup was Chief Executive Officer of CombiMatrix Corporation, a molecular diagnostics laboratory, from August 2010 to March 2013. Mr. Jessup was Chief Executive Officer of U.S. LABS, a national laboratory which provides cancer

diagnostic and genetic testing services, from 2002 to 2005. Mr. Jessup was President of the HMO Division of FHP International Corporation, a diversified health care services company, from 1994 to 1996. From 1987 to 1994, Mr. Jessup was President of TakeCare, Inc., a publicly held HMO operating in California, Colorado, Illinois and Ohio, until it was acquired by FHP. Mr. Jessup has 44 years of experience in the healthcare and managed care industries. Mr. Jessup was a director of CombiMatrix Corporation from August 2010 to November 2017, a director of Xifin, Inc., a laboratory billing systems company, from January 2006 to August 2013, a director of Superior Vision Services, a national managed vision care plan, from December 2007 to April 2012, and a director of Accentcare from October 2005 to February 2008. The Board believes Mr. Jessup is qualified to serve as a director because he has significant executive experience with the strategic, financial, and operational requirements of large health care services organizations, including serving as an Audit Committee chair, and brings to the Board senior leadership, health industry, and financial experience.

Jean H. Macino. Ms. Macino has served as one of our directors since February 2008. Ms. Macino has served on the Board of Governors of Chapman University for the past eleven years and currently serves as Chairman of the Governorship Committee of Chapman University. Ms. Macino was Managing Director of the Newport Beach office of Marsh, Inc. from 1995 to 2005, and Managing Director of Marsh and McLennan Companies, an insurance broker and strategic risk advisor, from 1980 to 1995. Ms. Macino has over 41 years of experience in the insurance brokerage industry. The Board believes Ms. Macino’s executive leadership experience, strong sales and marketing expertise in the insurance brokerage industry qualifies her to serve as a director.

Jeffrey J. Michael. Mr. Michael has served as one of our directors since September 1990. Mr. Michael has been President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Corstar Holdings, Inc., one of our significant stockholders and a holding company owning equity interests in CorVel since March 1996. The Board believes Mr. Michael’s experience as the President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Corstar Holdings, Inc., combined with his strong operational and strategic background and extensive public company experience, qualifies him to serve as a director.

Corporate Governance, Board Composition and Board Committees

Independent Directors

Our Common Stock is listed on The Nasdaq Global Select Market (“Nasdaq”). Under Nasdaq listing standards, independent directors must comprise a majority of a listed company’s board of directors. In addition, the listing standards require that, subject to specified exceptions, each member of a listed company’s audit, compensation, and corporate governance and nominating committees be independent. Audit committee members and compensation committee members must also satisfy the independence criteria set forth in Rule 10A-3 and Rule 10C-1, respectively, under the Exchange Act. Further, Nasdaq listing standards provide that a director only qualifies as “independent” if, in the opinion of the listed company’s board of directors, the director does not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director with that listed company.

To be considered independent pursuant to Rule 10A-3 and Nasdaq listing standards, a member of an audit committee of a listed company may not, other than in his or her capacity as a member of the audit committee, the board of directors, or any other board committee: (a) accept, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory, or other compensatory fee from the listed company or any of its subsidiaries, or (b) be an affiliated person of the listed company or any of its subsidiaries.

To be considered independent pursuant to Rule 10C-1 and Nasdaq listing standards, the board of directors must affirmatively determine that each member of the compensation committee is independent, including a consideration of all factors specifically relevant to determining whether the director has a relationship to the

10

company which is material to that director’s ability to be independent from management in connection with the duties of a compensation committee member, including, but not limited to: (a) the source of compensation of such director, including any consulting, advisory, or other compensatory fee paid by the company to such director, and (b) whether such director is affiliated with the company, a subsidiary of the company or an affiliate of a subsidiary of the company.

The Board undertook a review of its composition, the composition of its committees, and the independence of our directors and considered whether any director has a material relationship with us that could compromise his or her ability to exercise independent judgment in carrying out his or her responsibilities. Based upon information requested from and provided by each director concerning his or her background, employment, and affiliations, including family relationships, the Board has determined that each of Ms. Macino and Messrs. Hamerslag, Hoops, Jessup, and Michael do not have relationships that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director, and that each of these directors is “independent” as that term is defined under the applicable rules of the SEC and Nasdaq listing standards. Mr. Clemons is not independent under Nasdaq’s listing standards since he is an executive officer of the Company.

In making these determinations, the Board considered the current and prior relationships that each non-employee director has with our Company and all other facts and circumstances the Board deemed relevant in determining their independence, including the beneficial ownership of our capital stock by each non-employee director, and the transactions involving them described in the section entitled “Certain Relationships and Related-Person Transactions.” There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

Board Leadership Structure and Risk Oversight

The Board does not have a policy regarding the separation of the roles of the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board as the Board believes it is in the best interest of the Company to make that determination based on the position and direction of the Company and the membership of the Board from time to time. In determining the appropriate structure, the Board considers multiple factors, including our business and strategic needs and the composition of the Board. At this time, the Board has determined that separating the roles of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chairman of the Board is an appropriate structure for our succession planning priorities. This structure allows our Chief Executive Officer to focus on the day-to-day operation and management and the Chairman to focus on leading the Board and overseeing the interests of the Company and stockholders. Over the last 30 years, our Chairman, Mr. Clemons, has been building a knowledge of the Company and its industry making him well-positioned to preside over the Board and provide constructive and informed guidance to management. Our Chief Executive Officer, Michael G. Combs, who started at the Company as a software engineer in 1991, leverages his deep understanding of the business to identify and execute key opportunities for the success of the Company. While our board structure fulfills the needs of the Company at the time, our Board regularly assesses the leadership structure and considers the advantages and disadvantages of separating the roles of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, taking into consideration the recommendations of the stockholders, as well as the Company’s needs at the time.

The Board has a policy that if the Chairman of the Board does not qualify as an independent director, the independent directors of the Board will select one of the independent directors to be the “Lead Independent Director.” Since our Chairman of the Board currently does not qualify as an independent director, the Board has designated Mr. Jessup as the Lead Independent Director. The Lead Independent Director has the following duties and responsibilities: (a) acting as Chair of the meetings of the independent directors; (b) working with the Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer to ensure the Board has adequate resources, especially by way of full, timely and relevant information to support its decision-making requirements; (c) serving as a conduit of information between the independent directors and the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer and other members of management; (d) reviewing annually the purpose of the committees of the Board and

11

through the Nomination and Governance Committee, recommending to the Board any changes deemed necessary or desirable to the purpose of the committees and whether any committees should be created or discontinued; (e) being available as a resource to consult with other Board members on corporate governance practices and policies; and (f) such other responsibilities and duties as the Board shall designate. The Board believes that this current leadership structure, in which the office of Chairman of the Board is held by one individual and an independent director acts as Lead Independent Director, provides for dynamic Board leadership and enhances our ability to execute our business and strategic plans, while maintaining strong independence for Board decisions and oversight.

The Board oversees an enterprise-wide approach to risk management that is designed to support the achievement of organizational objectives, including strategic objectives, to improve long-term organizational performance and enhance stockholder value. A fundamental part of risk management is not only understanding the risks a company faces and what steps management is taking to manage those risks, but also understanding what level of risk is appropriate for us. In setting our business strategy, the Board assesses the various risks being mitigated by management and determines what constitutes an appropriate level of risk for us.

While the Board has the ultimate oversight responsibility for the risk management process, various committees of the Board also have responsibility for risk management. In particular, the Audit Committee focuses on financial risk, including internal controls. Risks related to our compensation programs are reviewed by the Compensation

Committee and legal and regulatory compliance risks are reviewed by the Nomination and Governance Committee. The Board is advised by the committees of significant risks and management’s response through periodic updates. In addition, our Chief Executive Officer reports to the Board annually regarding cybersecurity risk.

We believe that our compensation policies and practices do not create inappropriate or unintended significant risk to the Company as a whole. We also believe that our incentive compensation arrangements provide incentives that do not encourage risk-taking beyond the organization’s ability to effectively identify and manage significant risks; are compatible with effective internal controls and the risk management practices of the Company; and are supported by the oversight and administration of our Compensation Committee with regard to executive compensation programs.

We believe that the Board as a whole should encompass a range of talent, skill, diversity and expertise enabling it to provide sound guidance with respect to our operations and interests. In addition to considering a candidate’s background and accomplishments, our Nomination and Governance Committee reviews candidates in the context of the current composition of the Board and the evolving needs of our business. The Nomination and Governance Committee considers many forms of diversity in identifying director nominees in an effort to nominate directors with a variety of complementary skills and backgrounds so that as a group, the Board will possess the appropriate talent, skills, insight and expertise to oversee our business.

Diversity, Equity and Inclusion

Diversity, equity and inclusion are core to the Company’s values and instrumental in delivering stronger business growth. We believe the more diverse our backgrounds and experiences, the more we can achieve together working side by side. We are committed to recruiting the most qualified people for the job regardless of gender, ethnicity or other protected traits and to complying fully with all domestic, foreign and local laws relating to discrimination in the workplace. Additionally, we believe in providing opportunities for career progression for our people and, as such, we strive to fill our open positions with internal talent whenever possible. Our Company’s greatest strength and resource is the talent of our employees.

To ensure that our leaders and employees model fairness and inclusivity in their behaviors, our leaders have completed diversity, equity and inclusion training and such training is mandated for all employees. We are proud of having a diverse workforce and remain committed to increasing the empowerment of women and minorities across our operations.

12

As of March 31, 2023, over a third of our employees identify as racially or ethnically diverse. Additionally, over 80% of our employees identify as women, and over 72% of the Company’s managers identify as women as of March 31, 2023.

Board Structure and Committees

The Board has a standing Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nomination and Governance Committee. The Board and its committees set schedules to meet throughout the year, and can also hold special meetings and act by written consent from time to time as appropriate. The independent directors of the Board also hold separate regularly scheduled executive session meetings at least twice a year at which only independent directors are present. The Board has delegated various responsibilities and authority to its committees as generally described below. The committees regularly report on their activities and actions to the full Board. Each member of each committee of the Board qualifies as an independent director in accordance with the Nasdaq standards described above. Each committee of the Board has a written charter approved by the Board. A copy of each charter is posted on our website at https://www.corvel.com/investors under the Governance section. The inclusion of any website address in this Proxy Statement does not include or incorporate by reference the information on that website into this Proxy Statement or our 2023 Annual Report.

Audit Committee

Our Audit Committee reviews and monitors our corporate financial statements and reporting and our internal and external audits. The committee’s purpose is to, among other things, oversee our internal controls and audit functions, the results and scope of the annual audit of our financial statements and other services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm, and our compliance with legal matters that have a significant impact on our financial statements. The committee also consults with our management and our independent registered public accounting firm prior to the presentation of financial statements and, as appropriate, initiates inquiries into aspects of our financial affairs.

Our Audit Committee has established procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, and for the confidential, anonymous submission by our employees of concerns regarding accounting or auditing matters. In addition, the committee is directly responsible for the appointment, retention, compensation and oversight of the work of our independent registered public accounting firm, including approving services and fee arrangements. In accordance with the Audit Committee’s charter and policies regarding transactions with related persons, all related-person transactions are approved or ratified by the committee. Please see the information set forth in the section entitled “Certain Relationships and Related-Person Transactions” in this Proxy Statement for additional details. The current members of our Audit Committee are Messrs. Hamerslag, Hoops and Jessup. The committee held four meetings by telephonic conference calls during our fiscal year ended March 31, 2023 (“fiscal year 2023”).

Each member of our Audit Committee meets the independence and experience standards set forth under applicable Nasdaq and SEC rules, and each member can read and understand fundamental financial statements. In addition, the Board has determined that Mr. Hamerslag qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of Item 407(d) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee of the Board reviews and approves our general compensation policies and all forms of compensation to be provided to our executive officers and directors, including, among other things, annual salaries, bonuses, and stock option and other incentive compensation arrangements. In addition, V. Gordon Clemons, the Chairman of the Board and an executive officer, reviews and approves in coordination with the committee the compensation of Michael G. Combs, our Chief Executive Officer. Further, Mr. Combs reviews and approves in coordination with the committee the compensation of our other executive officers.

13

The committee also administers the CorVel Corporation Restated 1991 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”) and the CorVel Corporation Restated Omnibus Incentive Plan (formerly the Restated 1988 Executive Stock Option Plan) (the “Omnibus Incentive Plan”), including reviewing and granting stock options. Our Compensation Committee also reviews and approves various other issues related to our compensation policies and matters. The committee may form, and delegate any of its responsibilities to, a subcommittee so long as such subcommittee consists solely of at least two independent members of the Compensation Committee. The current members of our Compensation Committee are Messrs. Hoops and Michael and Ms. Macino. The committee held one video teleconference meeting and acted by unanimous written consent on five occasions during fiscal year 2023.

Compensation Risk Assessment. The Compensation Committee, in collaboration with management is responsible to review the rewards that may be derived from our compensation program for all employees, including our executive officers, to assess whether the program encourages excessive or unnecessary risk-taking. We have assessed our compensation program and have concluded that our compensation policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. Management assessed the Company’s executive and broad-based compensation and benefits programs to determine if the programs’ provisions and operations create undesired or unintentional risk of a material nature. This risk assessment process included a review of program policies and practices; program analysis to identify risk and risk control related to the programs; and determinations as to the sufficiency of risk identification, the balance of potential risk to potential reward, risk control, and the support of the programs and their risks to Company strategy. Although we reviewed all compensation programs, we focused on the programs with variability of payout, with the ability of a participant to directly affect payout and the controls on participant action and payout. Our egalitarian culture supports the use of base salary, performance-based compensation, and retirement plans that are generally uniform in design and operation throughout the Company and with all levels of employees. In most cases, the compensation policies and practices are centrally designed and administered, and are substantially identical at each business unit. Field sales personnel are paid a base salary and a sales commission, but all of our executive officers are paid under the programs and plans for non-sales employees. Certain internal groups have different or supplemental compensation programs tailored to their specific operations and goals.

Based on the foregoing, we believe that our compensation policies and practices do not create inappropriate or unintended significant risk to the Company as a whole. We also believe that our incentive compensation arrangements provide incentives that do not encourage risk-taking beyond the organization’s ability to effectively identify and manage significant risks; are compatible with effective internal controls and the risk management practices of CorVel; and are supported by the oversight and administration of the compensation committee with regard to executive compensation programs.

Nomination and Governance Committee

The Nomination and Governance Committee of the Board reviews and reports to the Board on a periodic basis with regard to matters of corporate governance, and reviews, assesses and makes recommendations on the effectiveness of our corporate governance policies. In addition, the committee reviews and makes recommendations to the Board regarding the size and composition of the Board and the appropriate qualities and skills required of our directors in the context of the then-current make-up of the Board. This includes an assessment of each candidate’s independence, personal and professional integrity, diversity, financial literacy or other professional or business experience relevant to an understanding of our business, ability to think and act independently and with sound judgment, and ability to serve us and our stockholders’ long-term interests. These factors, and others as considered useful by the committee, are reviewed in the context of an assessment of the perceived needs of the Board at a particular point in time. As a result, the priorities and emphasis of the Nomination and Governance Committee and of the Board may change from time to time to take into account changes in business and other trends, as well as the portfolio of skills and experience of current and prospective directors. Although the committee does not have a formal policy with respect to diversity, it has a well-established process to identify director nominees and, as indicated above, considers diversity when evaluating candidates for director nominees.

14

The Nomination and Governance Committee leads the search for and selects, or recommends that the Board select, candidates for election to the Board (subject to legal rights, if any, of third parties to nominate or appoint directors). Consideration of new director candidates typically involves a series of committee discussions, review of information concerning candidates and interviews with selected candidates who meet the minimum qualifications approved by the Board, including: (i) high personal and professional integrity; (ii) financial literacy or other professional or business experience relevant to an understanding of the Company and its business; (iii) an ability to think and act independently and with sound judgment; and (iv) an ability to be effective, in conjunction with the other director nominees, in collectively serving the long-term interests of the Company and its stockholders.

Candidates for nomination to the Board typically have been suggested by other members of the Board or by our executive officers. From time to time, the Nomination and Governance Committee may engage the services of a third-party search firm to identify director candidates. Each of the current nominees is standing for re-election at the Annual Meeting. The Nomination and Governance Committee selected these candidates and recommended their nomination to the Board. The committee has not received any nominations from any stockholders in connection with this Annual Meeting. The current members of the committee are Messrs. Hamerslag and Michael. The committee held one meeting during fiscal year 2023.

Although the Nomination and Governance Committee does not have a formal policy on stockholder nominations, it will consider candidates proposed by stockholders of any outstanding class of our capital stock entitled to vote for the election of directors, provided such proposal is in accordance with the procedures set forth in Article II, Section 12 of our Bylaws and in the charter of the Nomination and Governance Committee. Nominations by eligible stockholders must be preceded by notification in writing addressed to the Chairman of the Nomination and Governance Committee, care of our Secretary, at 5128 Apache Plume Road, Suite 400, Fort Worth, Texas 76109, not later than (a) with respect to an election to be held at an annual meeting of stockholders, 90 days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting, or (b) with respect to the election to be held at a special meeting of stockholders for the election of directors, the close of business on the tenth day following the date on which notice of such meeting is first given to stockholders. Our Bylaws and the charter of the Nomination and Governance Committee require that such notification shall contain the written consent of each proposed nominee to serve as a director if so elected and the following information as to each proposed nominee and as to each person, acting alone or in conjunction with one or more other persons as a partnership, limited partnership, syndicate or other group, who participates or is expected to participate in making such nomination or in organizing, directing or financing such nomination or solicitation of proxies to vote for the nominee: (i) the name and address of the nominee; (ii) the name and address of the stockholder making the nomination; (iii) a representation that the nominating stockholder is a stockholder of record of our stock entitled to vote at the next annual meeting and intends to appear in person or by proxy at such meeting to nominate the person specified in the notice; (iv) the nominee’s qualifications for membership on the Board; (v) all of the information that would be required in a proxy statement soliciting proxies for the election of the nominee as a director pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC; (vi) a description of all direct or indirect arrangements or understandings between the nominating stockholder and the nominee and any other person or persons (naming such person or persons) pursuant to whose request the nomination is being made by the stockholder; (vii) all other companies to which the nominee is being recommended as a nominee for director; and (viii) a signed consent of the nominee to cooperate with reasonable background checks and personal interviews, and to serve as one of our directors, if elected.

All such recommendations will be brought to the attention of our Nomination and Governance Committee. Candidates proposed by stockholders will be evaluated by our nomination and governance committee using the same criteria as for all other candidates.

15

Board and Committee Meetings

The Board held five meetings during fiscal year 2023, two of which were video teleconference meetings and three of which were in-person meetings. The Board only acted by unanimous written consent one time during fiscal year 2023. Each director attended or participated in 100% of the aggregate of (a) the total number of meetings of the Board, and (b) the total number of meetings held by all committees of the Board on which such director served during fiscal year 2023. Although we do not have a formal policy regarding attendance by members of the Board at our annual meetings of stockholders, directors are encouraged and expected to attend each of our annual meetings of stockholders in addition to each meeting of the Board and of the committees on which he or she serves, except where the failure to attend is due to unavoidable circumstances or schedule conflicts. All of our directors attended our 2022 annual meeting of stockholders.

Code of Ethics and Business Conduct

The Board has adopted a code of ethics and business conduct that applies to all of our employees, officers and directors. The full text of our code of ethics and business conduct is posted on our website at https://www.corvel.com/investors under the Code of Ethics section. We intend to disclose future amendments to certain provisions of our code of ethics and business conduct, or waivers of such provisions, applicable to our directors and executive officers, at the same location on our web site identified above. The inclusion of any web site address in this Proxy Statement does not include or incorporate by reference the information on that web site into this Proxy Statement or our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Hedging Transactions

We have not adopted any specific policies regarding hedging transactions with respect to our employees, officers and directors, but our insider trading policy discourages hedging transactions and requires pre-clearance by our Vice President of Legal Services for any such transactions.

Communications from Stockholders to the Board

The Board has implemented a process by which stockholders may send written communications to the attention of the Board, any committee of the Board or any individual Board member, care of our Secretary at 5128 Apache Plume Road, Suite 400, Fort Worth, Texas 76109. This centralized process assists the Board in reviewing and responding to stockholder communications in an appropriate manner. The name of any specific intended Board recipient should be noted in the communication. Our Secretary, with the assistance of our Vice President of Legal Services, is primarily responsible for collecting, organizing and monitoring communications from stockholders and, where appropriate depending on the facts and circumstances outlined in the communication, providing copies of such communications to the intended recipients. Communications will be forwarded to directors if they relate to appropriate and important substantive corporate or board matters. Communications that are of a commercial or frivolous nature or otherwise inappropriate for the Board’s consideration will not be forwarded to the Board. Any communications not forwarded to the Board will be retained for a period of three months and made available to any of our independent directors upon their general request to view such communications. There were no changes in this process in fiscal year 2023.

16

PROPOSAL TWO

RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee has appointed Haskell & White LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2024, and our stockholders are being asked to ratify this appointment. Stockholder ratification of the appointment of Haskell & White LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm is not required by our Bylaws or other applicable legal requirement. However, the Board is submitting the Audit Committee’s appointment of Haskell & White LLP to the stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If our stockholders fail to ratify the appointment by an affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the Common Stock present or represented at the meeting and entitled to vote, the Audit Committee may reconsider whether to retain Haskell & White LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of a different independent accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interest of us and our stockholders.

Representatives of Haskell & White LLP attended or participated by telephone in all meetings of the Audit Committee held during fiscal year 2023. We expect that representatives of Haskell & White LLP will attend the Annual Meeting. At the Annual Meeting, the representatives of Haskell & White LLP will have the opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions posed by stockholders.

Recommended Vote

The ratification of Haskell & White LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2024 requires the affirmative vote of the holders of our Common Stock representing a majority of the voting power present or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal at the Annual Meeting. Stockholders may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST,” or “ABSTAIN” with respect to this Proposal Three. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” this proposal.

This proposal is considered a routine matter under applicable stock exchange rules. Because a bank, broker or other nominee may vote without instructions on this matter, we do not expect any broker non-votes to result for this proposal.

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF HASKELL & WHITE LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

17

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The following table sets forth approximate fees for services rendered by Haskell & White LLP for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2023 and 2022:

Determination of Independence

The Audit Committee has determined that the provision of the above non-audit services by Haskell & White LLP was compatible with their maintenance of accountant independence.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee pre-approves and reviews audit and permissible non-audit services performed by our independent registered public accounting firm as well as the fees charged by our independent registered public accounting firm for such services. In its pre-approval and review of permissible non-audit service fees, the Audit Committee considers, among other factors, the possible effect of the performance of such services on the auditors’ independence. Under certain de minimis circumstances described in the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Audit Committee may approve permissible non-audit services prior to the completion of the audit in lieu of pre-approving such services. All services rendered by Haskell & White LLP for fiscal year 2023 were pre-approved by our Audit Committee.

18

PROPOSAL THREE

NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE ON THE COMPENSATION OF

OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, or the Dodd-Frank Act, enables our stockholders to vote to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in accordance with applicable SEC rules. The Company’s stockholders have expressed a preference for holding such a vote every three years and the Company anticipates that it will continue to hold a say-on-pay vote every three years for the foreseeable future.

Our goal for our executive compensation program is to attract, motivate and retain a talented, entrepreneurial and creative team of executives who will provide leadership for our success, and thereby increase stockholder value. We believe that our executive compensation program satisfies this goal, has supported and contributed to our recent and long-term success and is strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our stockholders. We urge stockholders to read the sections titled “Executive Compensation” and “Certain Relationships and Related-Person Transactions” elsewhere in this Proxy Statement for additional details about our executive compensation programs, including information about the compensation of our named executive officers in fiscal year 2023.

We are asking our stockholders to indicate their support for our named executive officer compensation as described in this Proxy Statement. This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives our stockholders the opportunity to express their views on our named executive officers’ compensation. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this Proxy Statement. Accordingly, we will ask our stockholders to vote “FOR” the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:

“RESOLVED, that the stockholders of CorVel Corporation approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers, as disclosed in CorVel’s Proxy Statement for the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC.”

This say-on-pay vote is advisory, and therefore, is not binding on us, our compensation committee or the Board. The Board and our compensation committee value the opinions of our stockholders, and to the extent there is any significant vote against the named executive officer compensation as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, we may review and consider the results of this advisory vote in future compensation deliberations.

Under the rules of the NYSE, brokers are prohibited from giving proxies to vote on executive compensation matters unless the beneficial owner of such shares has given voting instructions on the matter. This means that if your broker is the record holder of your shares, you must give voting instructions to your broker with respect to this Proposal if you want your broker to vote your shares on this Proposal.

Vote Sought

The approval, on an advisory basis, of the holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present or represented and entitled to vote at the meeting is being sought to approve the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement.

Recommendation of the Board

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL, ON A NON-BINDING ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

19

PROPOSAL FOUR

NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF

FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

Under the Dodd-Frank Act, public companies are generally required to include in their proxy solicitations at least once every six years an advisory vote on whether an advisory vote on named executive officer compensation (such as the say-on-pay proposal that is included in this Proxy Statement) should occur every one, two or three years. It is management’s belief, and the recommendation of the Board, that this non-binding advisory vote should occur every three years.

We believe we have effective executive compensation practices, as described in more detail elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. The Board believes that providing our stockholders with an advisory vote on named executive officer compensation every three years will encourage a long-term approach to evaluating our executive compensation policies and practices, consistent with our compensation committee’s long-term philosophy on executive compensation. In contrast, focusing on executive compensation over an annual or biennial period would focus on short-term results rather than long-term value creation, which is inconsistent with our compensation philosophy, and could be detrimental to us, our employees and our financial results.

Moreover, the Board does not believe that a short review cycle will allow for a meaningful evaluation of our performance against our compensation practices, as any adjustment in pay practices would take time to implement and to be reflected in our financial performance and in the price of our Common Stock. As a result, an advisory vote on executive compensation more frequently than every three years would not, in our judgment, allow stockholders to compare executive compensation to our performance.

Lastly, we believe that conducting an advisory vote on executive compensation every three years would allow us adequate time to compile meaningful input from stockholders on our pay practices and respond appropriately. This would be more difficult to do on an annual or biennial basis, and we believe that both we and our stockholders would benefit from having more time for a thoughtful and constructive analysis and review of our compensation policies.

For the above reasons, the Board recommends that stockholders vote to hold an advisory vote on named executive officer compensation every three years.

You may cast your vote on your preferred voting frequency by choosing the option of one year, two years or three years, or you may abstain from voting when you vote in response to the resolution set forth below.

“RESOLVED, that the option of once every year, two years, or three years, that receives the highest number of votes cast for this resolution will be determined to be the stockholders’ preferred frequency with which CorVel Corporation is to hold a stockholder advisory vote regarding the executive compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the SEC’s compensation disclosure rules.”

The option of one year, two years or three years that receives the highest number of votes cast by stockholders will be the frequency for the advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers that has been selected by stockholders. However, because the vote on this Proposal is only advisory in nature and is not binding on us or the Board, the Board will review and consider the results of the vote, but may decide that it is in our best interests and the best interests of our stockholders to hold an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers more or less frequently than the option approved by our stockholders.

Under the rules of the NYSE, brokers are prohibited from giving proxies to vote on executive compensation matters unless the beneficial owner of such shares has given voting instructions on the matter. This means that if your broker is the record holder of your shares, you must give voting instructions to your broker with respect to this Proposal if you want your broker to vote your shares on this Proposal.

20

Vote Sought

The advisory vote of the holders of the shares of Common Stock present or represented and entitled to vote at the meeting is being sought on the frequency of conducting stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers. The four voting options are one year, two years, three years and abstain. The option of every 1 year, 2 years or 3 years that receives the highest number of votes cast by stockholders will be considered the frequency for the advisory vote on executive compensation that is preferred by our stockholders. The Board will consider our stockholders’ preference as reflected in the vote on this Proposal in determining how frequently the advisory vote on executive compensation occurs in the future, but may decide that it is in our best interests and the best interests of our stockholders to hold an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers more or less frequently than the option approved by our stockholders.

Recommendation of the Board

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE FOR CONDUCTING FUTURE STOCKHOLDER ADVISORY VOTES ON THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS EVERY “THREE YEARS.”

21

OTHER MATTERS

Management is not aware of any other matters to be brought before the Annual Meeting. If any other matter is properly presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting, it is intended that the proxies will be voted by the persons named therein in accordance with the Board’s recommendation. Discretionary authority with respect to such other matters is granted by the execution of the enclosed proxy.

22

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The information contained in this Audit Committee Report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” or incorporated by reference into any filings with the SEC, or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.

The Audit Committee carries out its responsibilities pursuant to its written charter, and the members of the fiscal year 2023 Audit Committee have prepared and submitted this Audit Committee report. Each Audit Committee member is considered independent because each member satisfies the independence requirements for board members prescribed by the applicable rules of Nasdaq and Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act.

Among other things, the Audit Committee oversees CorVel’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including the system of internal control over financial reporting. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management CorVel’s audited financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023, including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles; the reasonableness of significant judgments; and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements; and management’s assessment of CorVel’s internal control over financial reporting.

The Audit Committee also reviewed and discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm, who are responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles, their judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of CorVel’s accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed with audit committees by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, the Audit Committee discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm their independence from management and CorVel, and has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with the independent accountant the independent accountant’s independence. Throughout the year and prior to the performance of any such services, the Audit Committee also considered the compatibility of potential non-audit services with the independent accountant’s independence.

The Audit Committee discussed with CorVel’s independent registered public accounting firm their overall approach, scope and plans for the audit. At the conclusion of the audit, the Audit Committee met with the independent registered public accounting firm, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examination, their evaluation of CorVel’s internal control over financial reporting and the overall quality of CorVel’s financial reporting.

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board (and the Board has approved) that the audited financial statements be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Audit Committee has also recommended the selection of Haskell & White LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2024.

AUDIT COMMITTEE

R. Judd Jessup, Chair

Steven J. Hamerslag

Alan R. Hoops

23

INFORMATION ABOUT OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our executive officers as of June 16, 2023:

The following is a brief description of the capacities in which each of our executive officers who is not also a director has served, and other biographical information. The biography of Mr. Clemons appears earlier in this Proxy Statement under the section entitled “Proposal One: Election of Directors.”

Michael G. Combs. Mr. Combs was promoted to Chief Executive Officer in January 2019. Mr. Combs has also held the position of President since April 2017 and previously served as our Chief Information Officer from April 2015 to April 2017. Mr. Combs has been with the Company for 31 years, joining the Company initially as a software engineer in October 1991. His prior positions at the Company include Vice President of MedCheck Development and Deputy Chief Information Officer. Prior to joining CorVel, he was with Science Applications International Corporation, a technology company, as a Software Engineer where he developed software for the Naval Oceans System Center. Mr. Combs holds a Bachelor’s degree in Computer Science from San Diego State University.

Mark E. Bertels. Mr. Bertels was promoted to his current role of Executive Vice President, Risk Management Services in April 2022. In his current role, Mr. Bertels is responsible for claims, network solutions, and case management field operations enterprise-wide. Mark has been with CorVel since 1989. Mark has over 33 years of experience with CorVel in the risk management industry and possesses extensive knowledge of the claims and managed care services provided to claim payors and self-insured employers.

Maxim Shishin. Mr. Shishin was promoted to Chief Information Officer in 2017. He has been with CorVel since 2002, holding the positions of Vice President of Information Systems, Director of Software Engineering, Software Development Manager and Senior Software Engineer. Mr. Shishin has over 21 years of technology and systems experience. His background includes vast experience with enterprise software architecture.

Brandon T. O’Brien. Mr. O’Brien was promoted to Chief Financial Officer in October 2018. He has been with CorVel since 2003, holding the positions of Area Vice President from 2015 to 2018, Vice President of Business Operations from 2010 to 2015, Director of Finance, Enterprise Comp from 2007 to 2010, and Manager of Analytics from 2006 to 2007.

Jennifer L. Yoss. Ms. Yoss was promoted to Vice President of Accounting in October 2018. She has been with CorVel since 2003, holding the positions of Director of Accounting from 2014 to 2017 and Manager in the Accounting department from 2003 to 2014. Ms. Yoss was previously an auditor at Grant Thornton LLP.

Our executive officers are elected by the Board on an annual basis and serve at the discretion of the Board until their successors have been duly elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal.

24

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The following discussion and analysis of our compensation practices and related compensation information should be read in conjunction with the summary compensation table and other tables included in this Proxy Statement, as well as our financial statements and management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations included in our 2023 Annual Report. The following discussion includes statements of judgment and forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Please see the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” for additional information.

Introduction

It is the responsibility of the Compensation Committee of the Board to oversee our general compensation policies; to determine the base salary and bonus to be paid each year to each of our executive officers; to oversee our compensation policies and practices as they relate to our risk management; and to determine the compensation to be paid each year to our directors for service on the Board and the various committees of the Board. In addition, the Compensation Committee administers our Omnibus Incentive Plan with respect to stock option grants or other equity-based awards. The three broad components of our executive officer compensation are base salary, annual cash incentive awards, and long term equity-based incentive awards. The Compensation Committee periodically reviews total compensation levels and the allocation of compensation among these three components for each of the executive officers in the context of our overall compensation policy. Additionally, the Compensation Committee, in conjunction with the Board, reviews the relationship of executive compensation to corporate performance and relative stockholder return. The Compensation Committee believes that our current compensation plans are competitive and reasonable. Below is a description of the general policies and processes that govern the compensation paid to our executive officers, as reflected in the accompanying compensation tables.

Compensation Philosophy

We operate in the medical cost containment and managed care industry. The Compensation Committee believes that our compensation programs for executive officers should: (a) be designed to attract, motivate and retain talented executives, (b) be competitive, and (c) reward individuals based on the achievement of designated financial targets, individual contribution, and financial performance relative to that of our competitors and market indices. Our philosophy is to focus more on equity compensation (in particular, to incentivize service within a five-year timeframe for time-vesting stock options) than on annual base compensation because we believe that approach more closely aligns the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders. Within this philosophy, the Compensation Committee’s objectives are to:

Compensation Components and Process

The Compensation Committee’s conclusions on the compensation levels for our executive officers are based in large part on input from our chief executive officer, who prior to fiscal year 2023 used survey data provided by Mercer, and for fiscal year 2023 onward uses survey data provided by Alera Group, for companies in the services sector with target revenue for the upcoming fiscal year similar to CorVel. While the survey data reviewed by our chief executive officer

25

includes the market 50^th percentile targets for base salary, annual bonus and long-term incentive compensation opportunities for the covered companies, this data is not used as a strict benchmark, but rather as a market check for the recommendations made to our compensation committee. The compensation committee discusses the compensation recommendations made by our chief executive officer prior to their adoption.

The Compensation Committee considered fiscal year 2023 executive compensation on February 3, 2022, May 12, 2022, August 4, 2022, November 3, 2022 and February 1, 2023, considered fiscal year 2022 executive compensation on February 4, 2021, May 6, 2021, August 5, 2021, December 8, 2021 and February 3, 2022, and considered fiscal year 2021 executive compensation on February 4, 2020, April 30, 2020, July 31, 2020, November 5, 2020 and February 4, 2021. The material considered by the compensation committee also included the historical compensation and stock option awards made to each of our executive officers. As described in more detail below, the results of each executive’s annual management by objectives plan, including a comparison of performance and job description relative to achievement and potential, were reviewed and discussed.

The following table sets forth summary compensation information for our named executive officers for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021:

Summary Compensation Table

26

27

Principal Elements of Executive Compensation

Base Salary

In determining executive compensation, we take into account overall expense control. The Board approves initial annual base salary for newly hired executive officers based on comparable survey data as referenced above. Our compensation committee reviews all executive officer base salaries annually in connection with the compensation recommendations made by our chief executive officer, taking into account both updated peer group data in the public domain and individual performance during the previous year. We believe that adjustments should be made to base salary both to reflect market changes and to reward high performance within the confines of overall expense control. The Company provides base salaries for our executive officers on a fixed minimum level of compensation for services rendered during the year, and relies on cash incentive awards to incentivize executive officers to exceed performance objectives.

At our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders, our stockholders expressed strong support for our compensation programs and the compensation of our named executive officers, with approximately 86.2% approval rate for our executive officer Say-on-Pay resolution. In light of this support, the Company’s continued strong performance and the continuing success of our compensation programs, the compensation committee made no significant changes to the overall design of our compensation program during fiscal years 2021, 2022 or 2023. The compensation committee continuously endeavors to ensure that management’s interests are aligned with those of our stockholders and support long-term value creation.

Each of our executive officers, other than our chief executive officer, undergoes an annual performance review with our chief executive officer, and during that review develops an individual performance development plan for the upcoming year. In general, these objectives vary for each named executive officer based on his or her individual responsibilities and the business function of the group that he or she manages, and includes one or more quantitative or qualitative financial or strategic measure, including earnings per share, revenue targets, product development and implementation, customer satisfaction and acceptance, strategic planning and development, operations excellence and efficiency and productivity. In reviewing past performance, the chief executive officer and the executive officer will compare actual performance during the review year to the objectives set at the beginning of the year, taking into account other factors that may not have been anticipated when the objectives were first set. In setting objectives for the upcoming year, the chief executive officer and the executive officer will typically consider not only corporate objectives, but also the executive officer’s short and long-term career objectives. To assist our compensation committee in reviewing executive officer performance in fiscal year 2022 for fiscal year 2023 compensation purposes, in fiscal year 2021 for fiscal year 2022 compensation purposes, and in fiscal year 2020 for fiscal year 2021 compensation purposes, our chief executive officer provided the compensation committee with his analysis of the performance and potential of each executive officer ranked against each other executive officer, and made recommendations based on how well each executive officer executed on his or her individual performance development plan while also taking into account external market survey data, as discussed above. The compensation committee made the final determination of the compensation paid to executive officers.

Decisions to adjust base salaries for fiscal year 2024 were made by the Compensation Committee on February 1, 2023, decisions to adjust base salaries for fiscal year 2023 were made by the Compensation Committee on February 3, 2022, decisions to adjust fiscal year 2022 were made by the compensation committee on February 4, 2021, decisions to adjust base salaries for fiscal year 2021 were made by the Compensation Committee on February 4, 2020, and all such adjustments took effect on each executive officer’s respective compensation adjustment anniversary date. Notwithstanding volatility in the stock market, the Company experienced increased revenues and earnings per share since fiscal year 2021 ultimately leading to the decision to increase executive compensation.

As part of his continued commitment to ongoing expense control, Mr. Clemons declined salary increases for fiscal years 2021 through 2023 other than increases to cover the normal increases in cost of Company-provided

28

health and welfare benefits. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Mr. Clemons voluntarily reduced his base salary to an amount just covering the cost of Company-provided health and welfare benefits. Mr. Combs’ base salary increased between 2.5% and 4.5% during each of the 2021, 2022 and 2023 fiscal years. Mr. Shishin’s base salary increased between 3.5% and 6.2% during each of the 2021, 2022 and 2023 fiscal years. Mr. O’Brien’s base salary increased between 3.1% to 5.0% during the 2021, 2022 and 2023 fiscal years. Ms. Yoss’ base salary increased between 5.5% and 6.0% during the 2021, 2022 and 2023 fiscal years.

Annual Cash Incentive Awards Plan

To reinforce the attainment of our goals, we believe that a substantial portion of the annual compensation of each executive officer should be in the form of variable cash incentive pay. In parallel with its review of base salaries for executive officers, the compensation committee considers the design and structure of the executive officer annual incentive awards plan. We use annual performance-based cash incentive awards to motivate our executives to meet or exceed our Company-wide short-term performance objectives. Cash incentive amounts for each executive officer are determined by the compensation committee based on the recommendation of our chief executive officer. Although we have a March 31 fiscal year end, we have calendar year budgets and annual cash incentive plans which are based on the calendar year. Cash incentive awards to the Chief Executive Officer and the other named executive officers are shown in the “Non Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table above. Annual cash incentive plan awards are designed to reward personal contributions to our success and are earned under a structured formula. Each executive has some portion of his or her annual bonus measured against individual management by objective goals, or MBOs, established for that person, which, depending on the executive officer, include revenue growth, national sales and regional vice president management, implementation, planning and strategy for software development and information technology infrastructure, and adherence to company-wide internal financial reporting and controls. The maximum amount that any executive may earn based on the MBO element is variable, with full achievement of MBOs resulting in an expected 70% payout and increasing up to a 100% payout for achievement exceeding established MBOs. For executive officers with operations responsibilities, this element comprises a lesser percentage of the annual incentive award for the individual, and for executive officers with corporate staff responsibilities, it comprises a greater percentage of the annual incentive award. We expect that the MBOs for our executive officers will be difficult to achieve. Based on Mr. Clemons’ own request, there were no MBOs established for him when he served as our chief executive officer.

The calendar year 2020 MBOs for Mr. Combs included increasing revenue from CERIS group health and bill review services, helping develop the executive management and field operations team, continuing to refine the strategic and operations management of internal management, and ongoing involvement in marketplace sales efforts. Mr. Combs’ bonus opportunity was targeted at 75% of his base salary with the ability to achieve up to 100%, and was 75% dependent on achieving overall financial performance and 25% dependent on his contribution toward achieving his calendar year 2020 MBOs. Mr. Combs attained 60.3% of his calendar year 2020 bonus opportunity and hence, received a bonus of 72.1% of his base salary in an amount equal to $403,000 in fiscal year 2021, the payment of which was deferred and was paid in the first quarter of fiscal year 2022.

The calendar year 2021 MBOs for Mr. Combs included increasing revenue from CERIS group health and bill review services, executive management and field operation team development, continue refinement of the strategic and operations management of internal management, and ongoing involvement in marketplace sales efforts. Mr. Comb’s bonus opportunity was targeted at 75% of his base salary with the ability to achieve up to 100%, and was 75% dependent on achieving overall financial performance and 25% dependent on his contributions toward achieving his calendar year 2021 MBOs. Mr. Combs attained 71.0% of his calendar year 2021 bonus opportunity and hence, received a bonus of 92.6% of his base salary in an amount equal to $529,864 in fiscal year 2022.

The calendar year 2022 MBOs for Mr. Combs included expansion of CERIS sales team, products and services to diversify CERIS customer base, develop leadership and bench-strength of executive team and continue

29

involvement in the marketplace through sales visits and other market-facing activities. Mr. Comb’s bonus opportunity was targeted at 75% of his base salary with the ability to achieve up to 100%, and was 75% dependent on achieving overall financial performance and 25% dependent on his contributions towards achieving his calendar year 2022 MBOs. Mr. Combs attained 48% of his calendar year 2022 bonus opportunity and hence, received a bonus of 47.8% of his salary in an amount equal to $284,755 in fiscal year 2023.

The calendar year 2023 MBOs for Mr. Combs will include increasing sales for new and existing CERIS and carrier customers, expanding the CERIS DRG service offering, and improving margins within the claims administration business. Mr. Comb’s bonus opportunity will be targeted at 75% of his base salary with the ability to achieve up to 100%, which will be 75% dependent on achieving overall financial performance and 25% dependent on his contributions towards achieving his calendar year 2023 MBOs.

The calendar year 2022 MBOs for Mr. Bertels included right sizing the operations teams while implementing processes and procedures to maintain quality and consistent results. Mr. Bertel’s bonus opportunity was targeted at 50% of his base salary with the ability to achieve up to 75%, which was 65% dependent on achieving overall financial performance and 10% dependent on his contributions towards achieving his calendar year 2022 MBOs. Mr. Bertels attained 58% of his calendar year 2022 bonus opportunity and hence, received a bonus of 43.8% of his salary in an amount equal to $103,749 in fiscal year 2023. Mr. Bertels was promoted to Executive Vice President, Risk Management Services on April 1, 2022. Because Mr. Bertels was not a named executive officer for fiscal years 2021 and 2022, his compensation for those fiscal years is not shown.

The calendar year 2023 MBOs for Mr. Bertels will include achieving key financial, production and quality metrics across claims administration, bill review and case management service lines, improving client retention, and capturing missed opportunity revenue. Mr. Bertel’s bonus opportunity will be targeted at 50% of his base salary with the ability to achieve up to 75%, which will be 65% dependent on achieving overall financial performance and 10% dependent on his contributions towards achieving his calendar year 2023 MBOs.

The calendar year 2020 MBOs for Mr. Shishin included strategic IT projects within network solutions, enterprise compensation, case management and machine learning. Mr. Shishin’s bonus opportunity was targeted at 40% of his base salary up to a maximum of 50% of his base salary, with 30% of his bonus opportunity dependent on overall financial performance and 70% dependent on his contribution toward achieving his calendar year 2020 MBOs. Mr. Shishin attained 79.0% of his calendar year 2020 bonus opportunity and, hence, received a bonus of 39.8% of his base salary in an amount equal to $98,855 in fiscal year 2021, the payment of which was deferred and was paid in the first quarter of fiscal year 2022.

The calendar year 2021 MBOs for Mr. Shishin included strategic IT projects within network solutions, enterprise compensation, case management, machine learning and output of development. Mr. Shishin’s bonus opportunity was targeted at 50% of his base salary up to a maximum of 60% of his base salary, with 30% of his bonus opportunity dependent on overall financial performance and 67% dependent on his contribution towards achieving his calendar year 2021 MBOs. Mr. Shishin attained 19.3% of his calendar year 2021 bonus opportunity and, hence, received 56.4% of his base salary in an amount equal to $145,130 in fiscal year 2022.

The calendar year 2022 MBOs for Mr. Shishin included enhancements to network solutions, enterprise compensation, case management, cloud migration and increase in network solutions development. Mr. Shishin’s bonus opportunity was targeted at 50% of his base salary with the ability to achieve up to 60%, with 33% of his bonus opportunity dependent on achieving overall financial performance and 67% dependent on his contributions towards achieving his calendar year 2022 MBOs. Mr. Shishin attained 62% of his calendar year 2022 bonus opportunity and hence, received a bonus of 37.4% of his salary in an amount equal to $101,593 in fiscal year 2023.

The calendar year 2023 MBOs for Mr. Shishin will include enhancing network solutions and enterprise compensation, optimizing CERIS DRG program, and deploying text messaging for specific business use. Mr. Shishin’s bonus opportunity will be targeted at 50% of his base salary with the ability to achieve up to 60%,

30

with 20% of his bonus opportunity dependent on achieving overall financial performance and 40% dependent on his contributions towards achieving his calendar year 2023 MBOs.

The calendar year 2020 MBOs for Mr. O’Brien included developing financial performance measures that support the Company’s strategic direction, identifying and addressing revenue leakage and opportunities, strategic capital allocation and planning, and enhancing CERIS product and revenue. Mr. O’Brien’s bonus opportunity was targeted at 40% of his base salary up to a maximum of 50% of his base salary, with 30% of his bonus opportunity dependent on overall financial performance and 70% dependent on his contribution toward achieving his calendar year 2020 MBOs. Mr. O’Brien attained 64.8% of his calendar year 2020 bonus opportunity and, hence, received a bonus of 35.2% of his base salary in an amount equal to $84,824 in fiscal year 2021, the payment of which was deferred and was paid in the first quarter of fiscal year 2022.

The calendar year 2021 MBOs for Mr. O’Brien included developing financial performance measures that support the Company’s strategic direction through CogencyIQ, strategic capital allocation and planning, Symbeo product and revenue enhancement and invoicing initiatives. Mr. O’Brien’s bonus opportunity was targeted at 40% of his base salary up to a maximum of 50% of his base salary, with 50% of his bonus opportunity dependent on overall financial performance and 50% dependent on his contribution toward achieving his calendar year 2021 MBOs. Mr. O’Brien attained 23.9% of the calendar year 2021 opportunity and, hence, received a bonus of 40.5% of his base salary in an amount equal to $100,647 in fiscal year 2022.

The calendar year 2022 MBOs for Mr. O’Brien included macro and micro-level insight into the organization’s financial health, industry pricing expertise and invoicing/profit growth initiatives. Mr. O’Brien’s bonus opportunity was targeted at 40% of his base salary with the ability to achieve up to 50%, with 50% of his bonus opportunity dependent on achieving overall financial performance and 50% dependent on his contributions towards achieving his calendar year 2022 MBOs. Mr. O’Brien attained 66% of his calendar year 2022 opportunity and, hence, received a bonus of 33.2% of his salary in an amount equal to $85,709 in fiscal year 2023.    

The calendar year 2023 MBOs for Mr. O’Brien will include increasing insight into the organization’s financial health, automating financial processes, leveraging CogencyIQ service offerings, and identifying and addressing revenue leakage opportunities. Mr. O’Brien’s bonus opportunity will be targeted at 40% of his base salary with the ability to achieve up to 50%, with 50% of his bonus opportunity dependent on achieving overall financial performance and 50% dependent on his contributions towards achieving his calendar year 2023 MBOs.

The calendar year 2020 MBOs for Ms. Yoss included invoicing initiatives to identify and address revenue leakage and opportunities, enterprise human resource and payroll enhancements, and Company executive management personal development. Ms. Yoss’ bonus opportunity was targeted at 25% of her base salary up to a maximum of 35% of her base salary, with 5% of her bonus opportunity dependent on overall financial performance and 95% dependent on her contribution toward achieving her calendar year 2020 MBOs. Ms. Yoss attained 70.0% of her calendar year 2020 bonus opportunity and, hence, received a bonus of 24.6% of her base salary in an amount equal to $39,358 in fiscal year 2021.

The calendar year 2021 MBOs for Ms. Yoss included invoicing initiatives to identify and address revenue leakage opportunities, enterprise accounting with human resources enhancement and Company key personnel development. Ms. Yoss’ bonus opportunity was targeted at 30% of her base salary up to a maximum of 40% of her base salary, with 50% of her bonus opportunity dependent on overall financial performance and 50% dependent on her contribution toward achieving her calendar year 2021 MBOs. Ms. Yoss attained 18.9% of the calendar year bonus opportunity and, hence, received a bonus of 33.1% of her base salary in the amount of $58,070 in fiscal year 2022.

The calendar year 2022 MBOs for Ms. Yoss included invoicing profit growth initiatives to identify and address revenue leakage, enterprise accounting and HR process enhancements, and company key personnel development.

31

Ms. Yoss’ bonus opportunity was targeted at 30% of her base salary with the ability to achieve up to 40%, with 50% of her bonus opportunity dependent on achieving overall financial performance and 50% dependent on her contributions towards achieving her calendar year 2022 MBOs. Ms. Yoss attained 65% of the calendar year bonus opportunity and, hence, received a bonus of 25.9% of her salary in the amount of $48,071 in fiscal year 2023.

The calendar year 2023 MBOs for Ms. Yoss will include identifying and addressing revenue leakage opportunities, enhancing the enterprise accounting and human resources systems, and developing key personnel. Ms. Yoss’ bonus opportunity will be targeted at 30% of her base salary with the ability to achieve up to 40%, with 50% of her bonus opportunity dependent on achieving overall financial performance and 50% dependent on her contributions towards achieving her calendar year 2023 MBOs.

Long-Term Equity-Based Incentive Awards

The goal of our long-term, equity-based incentive awards is to serve as a long-term staff retention vehicle by aligning the interests of our executive officers with our stockholders and providing each executive officer with a significant incentive to manage from the perspective of an owner with an equity stake in the business. The Compensation Committee, in conjunction with recommendations from our chief executive officer, administers our equity-based incentive plans for executive officers and determines the size of long-term, equity-based incentives according to each executive’s position, and sets a level it considers appropriate to create a meaningful opportunity for stock ownership. In addition, the compensation committee takes into account an individual’s recent performance, his or her potential for future responsibility and promotion, and the number of unvested stock option shares held by each individual at the time of any new grant. However, there is no set formula for determining the size of a stock option award. Our chief executive officer historically has made recommendations to the Board and compensation committee regarding the amount of stock options and other compensation to grant to our other named executives based upon his assessment of their performance and relevant survey data, and may continue to do so in the future. The Board and compensation committee takes such recommendations into account when it approves stock option grants. Our executive officers, however, do not make any determinations as to when stock options are granted. We do not require a minimum stock ownership by our executive officers, but the Compensation Committee considers an executive officer’s existing stock holdings relative to performance in determining the size of awards.

Under our Omnibus Incentive Plan, we have the ability to grant different forms of equity compensation, including stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and restricted stock units, performance awards and other stock-based awards. We have chosen to use stock options exclusively for purposes of providing long-term incentives because we believe they best align with our objectives of providing incentives that are commensurate with total stockholder return and employee retention. Stock options provide actual economic value to the executive officer if he or she remains employed by us during the vesting period, and then only if the market price of our shares appreciates over the option term. The fair value amounts shown for stock options in the Summary Compensation Table are calculated in accordance with ASC 718 and ASU 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation, and represent the aggregate grant date fair value of option awards granted during the year for awards that are not based on performance conditions. Upon determination of probable outcome of the performance conditions, we record compensation expense for performance-based stock option awards based on the estimated fair value of the options on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Consequently, stock options motivate executive officers by providing substantial upside compensation even though the entire amount of potential compensation is at risk. In the future, we may choose to grant different forms of equity compensation particularly if the use of such different forms of compensation become more prevalent at companies with which we compete or from which we intend to recruit personnel. Other factors that may lead us to provide different forms of equity compensation include, but are not limited to, the executives’ perceived value of one form of equity compensation over another, the potential effect of stockholder dilution, and the financial statement cost of one form of equity compensation over the other.

32

Under our ESPP, we also provide eligible employees who work more than 25 hours per week with the ability to purchase shares of Common Stock, through payroll deduction, at a pre-determined discount to the closing price at the end of a six-month purchase period. For fiscal years 2023, 2022 and 2021, the Board set the maximum permitted payroll deduction for the purposes of the ESPP at 20% of salary, and set the pre-determined discount at 5% of the closing price at the end of the purchase period.

Stock options provided to executive officers are typically granted pursuant to action by unanimous written consent of the Compensation Committee executed by the compensation committee members in person on the same day as each regularly scheduled quarterly meeting of the Board in conjunction with ongoing review of each executive officer’s individual performance, unless the executive officer is a new hire or other individual performance considerations are brought to the attention of our Compensation Committee during the course of the year. Such meetings are usually scheduled well in advance of the meeting, without regard to earnings or other major announcements by us. We intend to continue this practice of approving stock-based awards concurrently with regularly scheduled meetings, unless earlier approval is required for new hires, new performance considerations or retention purposes, regardless of whether or not the Board or Compensation Committee knows material non-public information on such date. We have not timed, nor do we intend to time, our release of material non-public information for the purpose of affecting the value of executive compensation. The grant date of our stock options is the date the Board or compensation committee meets to approve such stock option grants, which also is the date our Compensation Committee executes its action by unanimous written consent regarding such approval. In accordance with our Omnibus Incentive Plan, the exercise price of all options is set at the closing price of our common stock as reported by the Nasdaq Global Select Market on the day of grant.

Material terms of options granted to our named executive officers in fiscal years 2023, 2022 and 2021 typically included: (a) exercise price equal to the closing market value as quoted by Nasdaq on the date of grant; (b) vesting of 25% one year from the grant date and then continued vesting in a series of 36 equal monthly installments over the remaining balance of the four-year period, contingent on the executive officer’s continued service; (c) a term no longer than five years from the date of grant; and (d) to the extent not already exercisable,

the options become exercisable in full on an accelerated basis upon (i) a sale of assets, (ii) a merger in which we do not survive or (iii) a reverse merger in which we survive but ownership of 50% or more of the voting power of our stock is transferred, unless the option is assumed or replaced with a comparable option by the successor corporation. Although stock options granted to our executive officers typically contain time-vesting provisions, on one occasion in each of the fiscal years 2023, 2022 and 2021, our compensation committee awarded stock options with performance vesting provisions to Messrs. Combs, Bertels, O’Brien, Shishin and Ms. Yoss, all of which will vest based on the achievement of certain performance criteria, approved by our Board and compensation committee, relating to earnings growth.

We do not publicly disclose the specific performance target levels and related criteria because they constitute highly confidential commercial or financial information. We believe that such target levels and related criteria are not material and that disclosing them would provide competitors with insights into our operational strategy and would therefore cause us substantial competitive harm. We believe the performance targets approved by our Board and Compensation Committee are fairly difficult to achieve. We decided to grant the performance-based stock options as part of our decision to pursue a compensation strategy of aligning equity compensation with our earnings and revenue performance. On June 6, 2018, our Compensation Committee, in exercising its discretionary authority pursuant to the terms of all of our outstanding performance stock options, including those held by our officers, amended such stock options granted since 2015 to adjust upward all of the target earnings per share amounts. Our Compensation Committee made such adjustments because it deemed them equitable to recognize the anticipated impact of the changes in tax laws under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that was signed into law on December 22, 2017. Subsequently, on August 21, 2020, our Compensation Committee, in exercising its discretionary authority pursuant to the terms of all of our outstanding performance stock options granted in 2018 and 2019, including those granted to our officers, amended such stock options to adjust downward the target earnings per share amounts for calendar year 2020. Our Compensation Committee made such adjustments because it deemed them equitable to recognize

33

the extraordinary circumstances surrounding COVID-19. The amendments to the vesting targets did not result in any change to the exercise price or any other terms of such performance stock options.

In fiscal year 2023, we granted stock options awards for 155,800 shares to all full-time employees, including 47,050 shares to executive officers, or less than 0.90% of our outstanding common stock. In fiscal year 2022, we granted stock options awards for 130,200 shares to all full-time employees, including 19,900 shares to executive officers, or less than 0.74% of our outstanding common stock. In fiscal year 2021, we granted stock options awards for 234,175 shares to all full-time employees, including 61,550 shares to executive officers, or less than 1.3% of our outstanding common stock. Options granted to our executive officers were all approved by unanimous written consent of our Compensation Committee members in person on the same day as the regularly scheduled Board meeting on such date. The stock option grants received by executive officers in each of the fiscal years 2023, 2022 and 2021 were granted for incentive purposes.

If the Board determines that an executive officer has engaged in fraudulent or intentional misconduct, and if the misconduct resulted in a significant restatement of our financial results, we expect that we would, among other disciplinary action, seek reimbursement of any portion of performance-based or incentive compensation paid or awarded to the executive that is greater than would have been paid or awarded if calculated based on the restated financial results. This remedy would be in addition to, and not in lieu of, other disciplinary actions and any actions imposed by law enforcement agencies, regulators or other authorities.

The following table provides information on equity awards granted in fiscal year 2023 to each of our named executive officers.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

34

The following table sets forth information about the outstanding equity awards held by each of our named executive officers as of March 31, 2023.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

35

36

The following table provides the number of shares of common stock acquired during fiscal year 2023 by our named executive officers upon the exercise of stock options or the vesting of stock awards. No shares of common stock were acquired during fiscal year 2023 by Messrs. Clemons, Bertels or Shishin.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

Perquisites

Our executives are entitled to the same perquisites as all employees and generally do not receive additional perquisites because they hold executive positions. All employees that participate in our 401(k) plan receive a discretionary matching contribution from us in an amount equal to a percentage of the employee’s first 8% of contribution as approved by our Board in its sole discretion on an annual basis. All full-time employees are eligible to participate in our ESPP, which in fiscal years 2023, 2022 and 2021 provided a 5% discount from market price on the last day of the purchase period. Our health and life insurance plans are the same for all employees. We typically offer reimbursement to newly hired executive officers for relocation costs.

Post-Employment Compensation

We do not provide pension arrangements, non-qualified deferred compensation, or post-retirement health coverage for our executives or employees. All full-time employees are eligible to participate in our 401(k) plan. In any plan year, the Board in its sole discretion decides whether or not to contribute to each participant’s account a matching contribution equal to a percentage of the first 8% of the participant’s compensation that has been contributed to the plan. All of our executive officers participated in the plan during fiscal years 2023, 2022 and 2021.

Employment Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change-in-Control Agreements

Employment Contracts

We do not have employment contracts with any of our named executive officers other than Mr. Clemons. On January 26, 1988, we, along with Corstar Holdings, Inc. (formerly North Star), entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Clemons. The agreement became effective on February 15, 1988 and has an indefinite term. The agreement initially provided Mr. Clemons with an annual salary of $250,000, payable in semi-monthly installments, to be reviewed by the Compensation Committee annually. Mr. Clemons may terminate the agreement at any time on four months’ notice and we may terminate the agreement at any time with or without cause. If Mr. Clemons is terminated without cause, we are required to pay Mr. Clemons his salary for one year after such termination, less any other employment compensation received by Mr. Clemons during such one-year period. The Compensation Committee approved an increase in Mr. Clemons’ annual salary to $400,000, effective May 2, 2013.

37

In the event of a corporate change in control transaction, each outstanding stock option granted under the discretionary option grant program of our Omnibus Incentive Plan will automatically become exercisable as to all of the option shares immediately prior to the effective date of the corporate change in control transaction. However, no acceleration will occur if and to the extent: (a) such option is either to be assumed by the successor corporation or parent thereof or replaced by a comparable option to purchase shares of the capital stock of the successor corporation or parent thereof, (b) such option is to be replaced with a cash incentive program of the successor corporation designed to preserve the option spread existing at the time of the corporate change in control transaction and incorporating the same vesting schedule applicable to the option or (c) acceleration of such option is subject to other applicable limitations imposed by the compensation committee at the time of grant.

The Compensation Committee, as the administrator of our Omnibus Incentive Plan, has the authority to provide for accelerated vesting of the shares of common stock subject to any outstanding stock options held by any of our named executive officers in connection with certain changes in control or the subsequent termination of the officer’s employment following a change in control.

Summary Termination Table

The following table summarizes each executive officer’s present estimated entitlement to severance and the potential value of stock option acceleration upon a termination other than for cause, a termination within 60 days after a reduction in salary and a termination following a change in control, as if such termination occurred on March 31, 2023. The potential value of accelerated stock option vesting is based on the closing price of our stock on March 31, 2023 and is in addition to the value of vested stock options shown in the “Option Exercises and Stock Vested” table above. These termination provisions were individually negotiated with Mr. Clemons for recruitment and retention purposes.

We believe that the payment of compensation and the acceleration of unvested options in these circumstances is a common practice in comparable companies, and is justifiable from both a recruitment and retention perspective. We also believe that the amount of severance is within the range typically seen in comparable companies, and that we would experience difficulties attracting and retaining executives in the absence of severance arrangements that are at least as attractive as those that we offer.

38

Chief Executive Officer Pay Ratio

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023:

Based on this information, for fiscal 2023, the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of all other employees was 36:1. We believe this ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act.

As permitted by SEC rules, to identify our median employee, we selected total direct compensation as our consistently applied compensation measure, which we calculated as actual salary paid to our employees for fiscal 2023 (including overtime for hourly employees), actual bonus or sales commission earned by our employees in fiscal 2023, and the value of equity awards granted to our employees in fiscal 2023. Further, we used March 31, 2023 to determine our employee population and used the consistently applied compensation measure as described above to determine our median employee. In determining this population, we included all worldwide full-time and part-time employees other than our CEO. We did not include any contractors or workers employed through a third-party provider in our employee population.

Based on this approach, we selected the individual who represented the median employee. We then calculated the annual total compensation for this individual using the same methodology we used for our named executive officers in our Summary Compensation Table. 

39