Stop criminalising TV licence non-payment

Published: 2024-03-27 08:36 +02:00 by Zakhele Mthembu tag: Broadcasting and Media

TV licence non-compliance a perfect example of the dangers and wasteful nature of criminalising non-harmful behaviour.

The author, the Free Market Foundation’s Zakhele Mthembu The mass non-compliance with the legal requirement to pay TV licences by the South African public is a perfect example of the dangers and wasteful nature of criminalising non-harmful behaviour. South Africans are required by law, through section 27 of the Broadcasting Act, to pay for a TV licence – a TV license being a piece of paper issued by the state, which makes it legal to use/possess your television set at home. Failure to pay money to obtain this piece of paper will result in a fine not exceeding R500 or imprisonment not exceeding six months, or both a fine and imprisonment. Now a TV licence is wholly divorced from any form of harm prevention for the rights of individuals. The requirement for a licence to operate machinery like a vehicle either on land, sea or the sky, is reasonable given that not having that licence, and the training it represents, will result in an increased likelihood of harm to the right to life of various people in society. The violation of another person’s rights should be the standard for criminal persecution or treatment

The licence for operating a car has the end of making sure that you can operate the machinery in a manner that will not cause harm. The licence for a TV is not remotely related to the operation of the television set. Possessing a TV licence does not increase the likelihood that you will safeguard the rights of others, nor does not having it increase your chances of violating said rights. TV licences are meant to be revenue-raising mechanisms for the public broadcaster, the SABC. It is a form of revenue raising for the state through the SABC that was not in a money bill when introduced as is required by section 77 of the constitution. Most importantly for the spirit of justice, not paying a TV licence should not attract any form of criminal charges because it harms no rights aside from the ones the SABC “has” due to legislation. The violation of another person’s rights should be the standard for criminal persecution or treatment. Boycott Not paying a TV licence should not see you as a citizen sharing a prison cell with a thief, murderer or rapist. The state should not be spending its limited resources in the criminal justice system arresting and/or prosecuting members of the public who did not pay money for the state’s piece of paper for their television sets. South Africa has one of the highest violent crime rates in the world, which means our police officers and general criminal justice system are finding it difficult to deal with crimes that harm other people – that is, violent crimes. Having the system deal with those actions that harm no one is counterproductive. Read: SABC TV licences to stay – for now According to the latest crime statistics released by the South African Police Service, there are over 86 murders reported in South Africa per day, with only an 8% conviction rate for reported murders. The South African state is already failing with handling violent crime; it should focus solely on it given the harm crimes like murder have contrasted with the non-payment of a TV licence. Read: SABC owed R44-billion in unpaid TV licences South Africans have been boycotting the payment of their TV licences for years, yet the state persists in mandating them. When laws are absurd, their observance becomes absurd, too. Yet when disregard for the law enters the psyche of any society, it becomes difficult to have that society respect useful laws such as those against harming persons or property. It is imperative that the lawmakers in any society make laws that seek to protect against harm to other members of the public. This creates the objective standard wherein the observance of these laws safeguards against harm to another. When laws are meant to safeguard the coffers of the SABC, for instance, it sullies all laws when people do not observe it given its absurdity. Statutory offences, like the TV licence one, should be done away with. The author, Zakhele Mthembu, BA Law LLB (Wits), is a legal researcher at the Free Market Foundation The views of this independent columnist are not necessarily shared by TechCentral Get breaking news alerts from TechCentral on WhatsApp

Enhanced Investments, Inc.
329 South Oyster Bay Road #2085
Plainview, NY 11803
team@eninvs.com

Important disclosures

Performance results were prepared by Enhanced Investments, and have not been compiled, reviewed or audited by an independent accountant. Performance estimates are subject to future adjustment and revision. Investors should be aware that a loss of investment is possible. Account holdings are for illustrative purposes only and are not investment recommendations. Additional information, including (i) the calculation methodology; and (ii) a list showing the contribution of each holding to the portfolio’s performance during the time period will be provided upon request.
All statements made via social media sites sponsored or maintained by Enhanced Investments and its affiliates are for informational purposes only and do not constitute a comprehensive description of Enhanced Investments' investment advisory services.
Certain investments are not suitable for all investors. Before investing, consider your investment objectives and applicable fees. The rate of return on investments can vary widely over time, especially for long term investments. Investment losses are possible, including the potential loss of all amounts invested. Information provided by Enhanced Investments is for informational and general educational purposes only and is not investment or financial advice.

Nothing on this website should be considered an offer, solicitation of an offer, or advice to buy or sell securities.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Any historical returns, expected returns [or probability projections] are hypothetical in nature and may not reflect actual future performance.
All the strategies assume investments in equity invstrumenta only and are more relevant for "agressive investment profile". Eastern European flagship strategy assumes using up to 20% leverage of total portfolio. GlobalCommodities and US Growth strategy currently assume no leverage.
Results for the Enhanced Investments strategies as compared to the performance of Illustrative Benchmarks is for informational purposes only. Our investment program does not mirror that of the Illustrative Benchmarks and the volatility may be materially different from the volatility of Illustrative Benchmarks. Reference or comparison to an Illustrative Benchmark does not imply that strategies of Enhanced Investments will be constructed in the same way as the Illustrative Benchmark or achieve returns, volatility, or other results similar to those of the Illustrative Benchmark. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged market capitalization-weighted index of 500 common stocks chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation to represent U.S. equity performance.
Performance results were prepared by Enhanced Investments, and have not been compiled, reviewed or audited by an independent accountant. Performance estimates are subject to future adjustment and revision. Investors should be aware that a loss of investment is possible. Account holdings are for illustrative purposes only and are not investment recommendations. Additional information, including (i) the calculation methodology; and (ii) a list showing the contribution of each holding to the portfolio’s performance during the time period will be provided upon request.
All statements made via social media sites sponsored or maintained by Enhanced Investments and its affiliates are for informational purposes only and do not constitute a comprehensive description of Enhanced Investments' investment advisory services.
Certain investments are not suitable for all investors. Before investing, consider your investment objectives and applicable fees. The rate of return on investments can vary widely over time, especially for long term investments. Investment losses are possible, including the potential loss of all amounts invested. Information provided by Enhanced Investments is for informational and general educational purposes only and is not investment or financial advice.