AYO TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS LIMITED
 (Incorporated in the Republic of South Africa)
 Registration number: 1996/014461/06
 Share Code: AYO
 ISIN ZAE000252441
 (“AYO” or “the Company”)


 COMPETITION TRIBUNAL UPDATE - CLARIFICATION


Shareholders are referred to the announcement released on SENS on 3 August 2023 by AYO titled
“Competition Tribunal Update” (and using the terms defined therein unless otherwise stated) wherein
shareholders were advised that:
o   AYO, together with 35 others, including Sekunjalo (“Applicants”), filed a complaint on
    15 December 2021 with the Competition Commission for investigation on the conduct by certain
    banks in relation to possible contraventions of sections 4, 5 and 8 of the Competition Act.
    Additionally, on 22 December 2021, the Applicants submitted an application in terms of section
    49C of the Competition Act requesting the Competition Tribunal to provide interim relief pending
    the investigation of the aforementioned complaint with the Competition Commission.
o   On 16 September 2022, interim relief was granted by the Competition Tribunal in favour of the
    Applicants (“Interim Order”). The Interim Order was granted for the earlier of a six month period
    from such date or the finalisation of the investigation by the Competition Commission, with an
    extension having been granted by the Competition Tribunal to the Applicants for a further period
    of six months to mid-September 2023.
o   Following the granting of the Interim Order, three banks, namely: Standard Bank of South Africa
    Limited (“Standard Bank”), Access Bank Limited and Mercantile Bank, a division of Capitec Bank
    Limited, filed an appeal to the Competition Appeal Court to set aside the Interim Order, as it
    pertained to them. The matter was heard on 31 March 2023 and judgement was reserved
    (“Judgement”).
o   During July 2023, the Competition Appeal Court ruled in favour of the aforementioned banks,
    setting aside the Competition Tribunal’s Interim Order. The Judgement reflects that the Applicants
    had not made out a case that the refusals to provide banking and payment services to the
    Applicants were anticompetitive. Therefore, no prima facie case was made out in the Applicants’
    case in terms of a prohibited practice by the banks, either in terms of section 4(1)(a) or sections
    8(1)(c) or 8(1)(d)(ii) of the Competition Act.
o   Additionally, shareholders were advised that the impact of the Judgement on AYO and its
    subsidiaries was immaterial as alternative banking facilities and third-party solutions had already
    been put in place to ensure continuity of these businesses.

After careful consultation with the JSE, the Company felt it prudent to clarify that the Company does
not currently bank with abovementioned banks which are party to the Interim Order and that AYO
and its subsidiaries, notwithstanding that certain subsidiaries bank with Standard Bank, all have
operating bank accounts at present.
The Company refers to the aforementioned third-party solutions to provide assurance to shareholders
that contingency plans are in place, in the event the Company and/or its subsidiaries become
unbanked. At present, the Interim Order is immaterial to the operations of the Company.

The investigation in relation to the complaint with the Competition Commission is still pending and
shareholders will be provided with an update thereto in due course.

Cape Town
1 September 2023

Joint Sponsor
Vunani Sponsors

Joint Sponsor
Merchantec Capital